By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
But it is a station wagon. It is a family vehicle. I don't need to impress the neighbors with my family mover.
Sure, it won't leave tire marks when I'm ripping out of Dairy Queen after getting my kids their douple dip.
:-)
No, it won't smoke the Mustang GT on the highway during our trip to Six Flags.
:-)
I'm tired of people trying to get everything out of one vehicle. It never happens no matter how hard you try.
Cry about gas mileage or cry about performance. Cry about better visibility or cry about handling...which is it?
:-)
As far as the CVT. I like it...but only in my family car.
If I wanted driving excitement, I'll get a car with a manual or a DSG.
Now that I've purged. I like my Freestyle. It's a fun family car to drive. Very comfortable, smooth and sure footed.
Your posts on this board have long since become both tiring and laughable. Your points (if indeed you really have any) were made a long time ago. Give it a rest and move on with your life. We are obviously not worthy of your wisdom and knowledge anyway.
Why aren't they selling?
tidester, host
Page 84 starts the Info center listing of errors displayed. I don't see "Engine in Fail-Safe Mode" listed.
Are you saying that your 2005 owner's manual lists "Engine in Fail-Safe Mode" as an error? If so, could you please post what the manual says this error means?
My pg. 84 (at the bottom of the page) states:
"ETC-Engine Failsafe Mode. Displayed when engine has defaulted to a "limp-home" operation."
I believe that "limp-home" operation means that the engine is trying to protect itself by shutting down half (in this case three) of it's cylinders. I suspect that the vehicle in question may have had a seriously overheated engine.
By the way, I once owned a '00 Focus with the Zetec engine. It had this same protective feature.
"ETC-Engine Failsafe Mode. Displayed when engine has defaulted to a "limp-home" operation." "
I downloaded the 3rd printing of the 2005 ownwers manual and saw what you are referring to. However, this text is only listed in the 2005 model owners manual, but is not listed in the 2006 owner's manual. Makes me wonder if they took out the feature for the 2006 MY.
As if things aren't confusing enough, now we see differences in the engineering features of the FS from 2005 to 2006???!! :confuse:
They sure look like close relations, if not fraternal twins, to me.
I can't remember the last time I heard someone complaining about the style (or lack thereof) of the Escape.
Steve, Host
"We had seven or so inches of snow in St. Paul this morning. I saw a number of Freestyles on the road driving as poised a ever. Snow? No problem. They seem to have an affinity for it."
I also live in the Twin Cities and enjoyed an 1:20 in the Freestyle to work this morning on a commute that normally takes about 25 minutes. I agree that our AWD Freebie does great in the snow. Just push the gas pedal and it goes. I only saw the traction control engage a couple of times.
I do however want to comment on the Conti Touring Contact (or whatever the stock tires are called) on the Freestyle. Although it was easy to go due to the Haldex AWD system, turning and stopping were another matter. AWD doesn't help in these areas and this is where your tire choice really helps. These Contis are terrible as I slid each time I tried to stop or turn. It is a dangerous situation since with AWD the vehicle goes so well that one is lulled into a false sense of confidence which can easily come back to bite when you need to stop or turn.
Personally, I can't wait to get these tires off of the vehicle. I think Ford can and should do better in their stock tire choice. Ford also cheeped out in a couple of other areas that are annoying. No gas door release, and no hood struts to hold the hood up. I think it was the 1970s the last time I had a vehicle that I had to use a manual hood support.
Lastly, I wanted to comment on the recent discussions of the Freestyle's looks. There is nothing wrong with the looks, in fact almost everyone who has seen our new Freestyle has commented on how nice it looks. The REAL problem is very few people know these vehicles exist. Not one of the 12 people that work in my office had ever heard of a Freestyle before we bought one, and some thought I was talking about the Freestar. Ford's BIG mistake is lack of marketing AND using a name so similar to the minivan. Don't get me wrong, Freestyle is a great name, but they should have left the minivan called the Windstar. Did they really think by changing the minivan's name people were going to thing it was completely different?
- Chad
Regarding awareness of the Freestyle, a guy down the hall from me at work just bought a Black Limited. He also did not know they existed until he saw one at a dealer. He filled out a short survey after his purchase and told Ford what he thought of the lack of marketing. He only has 600 miles on it so far, but loves it. We will begin sharing experiences about the Freebie once the weather clears. :shades:
I agree! I think Ford is stuck with their "F"s and "E"s to the point that people can't even remember the name of the vehicle that they own. Took me a while to get it straight that I was looking at a FreeSTYLE and not a FreeSTAR. Not to mention their line up of Expeditions, Explorers, Escapes, ETC (Focus, Five hundred). I would think that people can remember that they bought a Ford without having to keep all the names so close to each other. All the other car manufacturers have new names for each vehicle, rather than altering (playing off of) a name of an existing one in their lineup. Pet peeve of mine, others may like the way Ford names their vehicles, but it reminds me of a family I know where all 8 kids name's started with an L.
Personally, I can't wait to get these tires off of the vehicle. I think Ford can and should do better in their stock tire choice. Ford also cheeped out in a couple of other areas that are annoying. No gas door release, and no hood struts to hold the hood up. I think it was the 1970s the last time I had a vehicle that I had to use a manual hood support.
Totally agree. Quite disappointed that there is a very small selection for replacement tires and would have been happier to have had good tires on the Freestyle that I would have been content to leave on for a good long time. Does anyone know how many miles these Conti's are rated for?
I live in Virginia, but travel to Canada every winter for a couple of weeks. Need to have good tires on for the trip.
Steve, Host
I agree with you there! It is just that GM and Chrysler do seem to be able to come up with either a good new name, or a re-invention of a classic car from their past and use that name. I just don't get the F and E fettish, but I'm sure for some people, they really like how Ford names their vehicles. Its much like the debate over styling. Names are very much a personal preference issue, otherwise everyone would name their children John and Jane and everyone would be happy.
But, names are better than numbers. No matter how much you may hate your own name, I think everyone would be happier being called by their name rather than a number.
How to drive for better fuel economy on a Freebie?
When driving shift/automatic I typically used several tricks, including accelerating and breaking slowly, cruising / shifting to N if I saw a red light ahead, most of the times not having to stop, and on highway driving at the lowest comfortable speed of the highest gear (lets say 60 mph, mantaining between 1.5k-2k rpm). I confirmed that driving at 60mph saves gas over driving at 70mph.
However, with the CVT, it looks like a whole new game.
Specially on that last part: If the CVT is always mantaining the same rpm (about 1.5k) once you get to a certain speed, it will mean that to obtain the best mileage you would simply have to drive as fast as possible (provided you get to that speed on an smoothly fashion).
Am I right? I haven't had the chance to drive my freebie in a highway yet, so haven't confirmed the rpms at 70mph, or further beyond legal limits.
Well, in any case, what tips can you give me for fuel efficiency on the freebie?
All season tires are going to have a harder rubber compound so they can perform well in hot temperatures where as snow tire will practically melt when the temps get above 80 degrees. (I'm exagerating here)
If you find an all-season tire that performs well in the snow and cold then you will also find that the same tire will have a lower life expectancy than a typical all -season.
Do yourself a favor...Equip your $25,000+ vehicle with $400 worth of snow tires and you will be amazed at how much more secure your car will handle the snow. Better yet, buy a spare set of rims and you'll save yourself an extra ~$80 per year for the changeover that a typical garage charges.
Now if they could only make a snow tire that fits the Freestyle.
LOL
I'm betting that we'll be able to get snow tires for next winter.
is pretty amazing--our town snow plowers were weak--they must be running out of energy, salt and money--but the freestyle did well in unplowed conditions--there is that very stable non jittery feeling--my jeep liberty did well in snow but always felt jittery
the tires--I agree completely--given the quality of the rest of the vehicle they cut corners and it shows--high quality michelin or goodyears would have made a difference
By the way 21, 000 miles, never in shop except oil change and no I have not received a recall notice (was an early one)
This is my first winter with the FS and when I planned trips skiiing this winter I always checked the conditions and then decide whether to take the AWD FS with the P6 tires or our 7 yr old FWD Volvo with snow tires. The Volvo is by far better handling and sure footed with the snow tires - just lower clearances.
By the way, there do seem to be a number of Twin Citians on this Forum. It would have been nice to see some mention of the Freestyle in the ads for the Auto Show. It seem like there is a good market for the Freebie here. :shades:
If you want to see how your driving is affecting the MPG, RESET the MPG display in the info center after the car is up to speed. Then the MPG will directly reflect your driving. Try and maximize the MPG display, resetting occasionally. This provides an "instantaneous MPG" - the current MPG the engine is getting. You'd be surprised how it looks when reset on a highway down hill - over 40 MPG. Exact opposite when climbing the hills.
The CVT does not always maintain the same RPM. Mine settles into about 1250 RPM at 35 MPH, and goes up to about 2100 at 80 MPH. The CVT will sometimes surge at any speed, but this is generally because there is a subtle incline or dip to the road that you don't notice. But in any case, don't switch into neutral with the CVT. At highway speeds, the CVT will rev up on the downhill slope, but if you check the instant MPG in the info center, you will see that the engine is getting great mileage none the less.
Always try and maintain a constant speed in town. Try and time the lights so that you don't have to stop - getting that 2 tons of steel (the Freestyle) up to 35 MPH takes a lot of gas, while cruising takes less gas.
You want to get the FS up to speed as quickly as possible while burning the least gas. I am thinking that the best way is to give it a fair amount of gas (around 2500 RPM), and then as you feel the CVT bite into higher gears, decrease the accelerator as the speed goes up past 20 MPH. This is the method I intend to try.
Keep the tires properly inflated, which according to the book means 32 front / 34 rear. I keep mine at about 33 / 35. In any case, put two extra pounds in the rear to be in accordance with the owners manual - the engineers must have designed the car that way.
This seems to be true of most cars. My 2002 4-cylinder Camry XLE gets 3-4 mpg better milage with the cruise control on than without it. I've averaged 30.8 mpg on the Camry over 77,000 miles.
Our 2006 Freestyle SE goes about 1900 rpm on flat freeways at 65-70 mph, and about 2050 at 70-75 mph.
It may well be that the Freebie's gas consumption goes way up at over 2000 rpm. This is worth a deliberate test.
Does Hyundai use a Volvo AWD system? A newly engineered CVT system?
Did Hyundai spend the time to engineer their car to withstand crashes as best they could?
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/cars/3341.html
http://www.nhtsa.dot.gov/ncap/cars/3089.html
I have Michelin Pilots on my RSX and if you hop on any RSX discussion boards you will find out that they are hated by most RSX owners. I guess the grass is always greener ay?
:-)
I'll take my lack of struts for the hood in my Freestyle. Seriously, whats the percentage of time that you'll be propping your hood up?
Compare that to the percentage of time that you'll be glad that you had the extra engineering that went into crash testing.
As far as warranties go. Just because a car comes with a standard 10/100 year warranty doesn't mean that it won't be in the shop any less.
And an extended warranty only costs about $1500 to get up to the 10/100 time frame as the Hyundai.
Again, most people won't keep their car that long, and for those that do....they can extend their warranties any time before the original expires.
:-)
Even though I know you can buy an extended warranty for the $2K right now, I think that if every Ford went up by $1500-2500 based on the vehicle and came with a 10y/100K warranty they'd sell more cars.
Huh? Very doubtful. Do you know what that would do to the average Joe's (or Jane's) monthly car payment? Besides.. few people buying a new car plan on keeping it anywhere near 10 years. A ten year warranty is largely a sales gimmick, one that apparently is needed to move Hyundai's off the lot.
VW had some grumpy consumers for a while because they had a 2/24 warranty on some parts.
Having to fund longer warranties supposedly makes the manufacturer pay closer attention to quality as well, which has paybacks for those who don't drive them forever.
Ford brings in more than a billion dollars a year through the sale of extended warranties, fwiw. (Warranty Week)
Steve, Host
I have yet to own a vehicle that needed a new engine or transmission (or anything else covered by a power-train warranty) in 7 yrs / 70,000 miles.
Not even in the second year of production.
Just CHEAP...??
Exactly how I feel.
I bought an extended warranty on a used 1997 Explorer (33,000 miles) and that cost about $800 to extend up to 70,000....saved me thousands because the engine blew on it at 60,000 miles.
I didn't bother with the extended on the Freestyle because my wife drives it and works about 4 miles from home.
I'll assess it's history near the end of the standard warranty term and decide then whether or not I'll fork over another $1000 for an extended.
And as far as replacement tires go, go up a size or two and your options expand as opposed to staying with the stock size. With the exception of snow conditions more quality tire on the road is a good thing for safety and control. While the Conti's may not be the best tire in the world, I do not understand the rap they get here. At 8500 miles mine do not make excessive noise, they have dealt very well with a Chicago winter that has been admittedly mild but snow did not reveal anything untoward, gripped in rain, etc., etc., I'm not sure what people expect of all season tires but these have been competent and in my estimate not deserving of the rap they are getting. If you live in snow country it's not fair to expect these to perform like dedicated snows with AWD plain and simple, buy snows for winter if snow is extensive in your area. Maybe I got the only good set they made for our FWD FS...
As for the extended warranty Geico offers on its policy and extended service contract that takes our FS to 7ys/100k miles with a $250 deduct. We pay for it with our monthly payments, it works out very well. Once we knew that we signed the papers for our FS.
The owners manual carries a warning to Limited users (18" wheels) not to put snow cables on the car. I think this has to do with wheel well clearance issues. One might also have problems with a larger tire size. I get the feeling the FS was originally designed for 16" wheels and the marketing folks decided on 17" and 18" after the vehicle was designed.