Dodge Dakota Crew Cab
Has anyone been able to find out the cost of the
new Dakota Crew Cab ???
new Dakota Crew Cab ???
Tagged:
0
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
and now the exhaust manifold bolt broke off for no reason. The engine pings and knocks like crazy and sounds like a fricken diesel. The truck has never seen the woods and has never been beat on. Its a shame because its a beautyful truck with a lot of problems. Im probably going to trade it in. (not for another Chrysler product)
Baker
Quad Cab yet? Did they have pricing information?
I understand your feelings on this issue, but let me explain why I like them, and you may understand a little better (even if you still disagree.) I go to school in Atlanta, and park in a parking deck; ergo I need to be able to maneuver well in urban areas and small, tight parking spaces, sometimes parallel parking when driving around campus. I want to have a truck for versatility, but I don't want to sacrifice interior space and people-hauling capacity (3:00am food runs just happen a lot...) I can't buy a full-size truck, ext. cab or quad cab, because I'd never be able to park it, I have no real need for that much bed space or that kind of towing capacity, and I can't afford it anyway..
So, my only logical choice is to get the Quad Cab Dakota. Also, the Dakota is lighter, so it will have a little bit more zip to it than a Ram or F150 would. Gotta have at least a little of the fun-to-drive factor in there.
A Dakota Club cab has a 6 1/2' bed, the Quad cab has a 5 1/4' bed. Now I have bought club, but it strikes me that for most people there is little difference between short and very short bed. The difference with an 8' is obvious - sheets fit in an 8'.
My guess is that most people who buy compact trucks will appreciate the cab space more than the lack of bed space, 5'+ is still enough for weekend haulers.
interested in big cab w/ short bed than you think.
I'm interested in the Dakota Quad cab 'cause
although I like 'em, SUV's are too darned pretty
to mess up and too darned expensive... I want
something where I can haul people around
comfortably, yet have a place to throw my nasty
cargo! 5-1/4' vs 6-1/2' makes no difference to
me.
manual should get 15/20, the automatic might be
slightly less (don't know.)
1. Seat 4 comfortably, 5 semi-comfortable
2. Four Wheel drive
3. Exterior hauling space for Gas can, compost, Junk, etc.
4. Smaller than full size pickup
Dakota Quad seems to meet all requirements. I am trading my '89 Mustang Convertible and '83 CJ-7 Jeep for this Truck. I am not trying to convince anyone else, but it is the right vehicle for me.
Called 800-4-A-DODGE, they said availability in late November (which jibes with the 6-8 weeks that they tell you it takes to get one.)
So, I'd say you could very well have it by Christmas. I plan to.
The official rear leg room for the club cab is 36.1". The crew cab though is 32".
In order to keep the same wheelbase and length for both the Club Cab and the Quad Cab, the Club Cab has a shorter bed. The Club Cab bed is a standard 6'6" while the Quad Cab has a smaller 5'3" bed. Whether this matters to you depends on how you'll use the truck.
The Dakota R/T stands for the Road and Track version. It's a package that's available on the regular and Club Cab 4x2 Dakotas. The R/T package adds a 5.9L V8 engine, 17" wheels, a lowered suspension, and several other accessories. This package is supposed to turn the Dakota into a performance racing truck.
The F150 has a similar option called the Ford Lightning. I'll let other people debate the relative merits of the Dakota R/T vs. the F150 Lightning. In fact, I believe there's already a topic about that.
The V6 mileage (from the sticker) with manual tranny and the anemic differential was 22 and 17. With auto and lower gears those numbers will be lower by two or three, at least.
Dodge now offers a new 4.7 V8 which has 235 HP and gets reasonably good mileage, close to the V6. Considering resale value and the small mileage difference I would get the 4.7 V8, if I were in your shoes.
Your trailer is 3000 pounds, plus passengers, plus fluids, plus who knows what else. You could be close 4000 pounds by the time you leave your driveway.
Good luck,
Robert
Robert
good luck,
robert
After you choose the truck and model, you can spec it out with point&click option lists. It gives a running total both for the MSRP and the dealer's cost. Very nice to use.
?? can 2 adults regular size ride in the back seat for say several hours ??
and trying to find out about pricing
If i get to buy one at dealer cost
invoice are they still making $$$
ANy help is appreciated
L. Kendall
you can respond to me privately @ Kendall1@ix.netcom.com
Reasons for wanting it is simple. I want a truck that can hual small things and large things short distances but also be able to carry passengers. Kids especially (sp). I have seen the quad up close and sat in it and it is great. The back seat is comparable to the durango. The price was around 26,500 here in denver. But watch out they have attached a market adjustment here of $5,000. That is right five thousand. That is crazy do not pay it!!!!! As for the Nissan forget it, it is too tight for rear passengers and the bed is really to short. YOu can get by with a 5'3" bed but nothing shorter than that. And ford like many have said will not be out until later in 2000. But Ford has not set prices yet so do not listen to anyone on that just talked to ford yesterday. You can order one and it might get here in February but they do not have a price.
To me the dakota quad is perfect. It has a big enought engine and yes it will tow that 3,000 lbs trailer great but make sure you get a low enough rear end. Also the comfort is great. You can find the msrp and the invoice price on Kelly blue book www.kbb.com