Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Entry Level Luxury Performance Sedans

11920222425435

Comments

  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    Sorry,I have to add

    Reliability, resale value, performance, features, gas consumption, luxury to me is considered as in quality.

    I tried to make assumptions what if G35 or ES330 or 330i was the one on the top sales chart. I wonder what is the dominant factor? I was confused myself. :-). Do you have the answer?

    Intensive marketing/advertising programs, patriotism (doesnt apply to these cars except GM, ford), fanaticism, better incentives, popularity, different market segment. I dont see any of those apply to these cars. What do you think Iwantonetoo? What is it that makes people buy the car? luck is not a smart answer.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    You've completely missed my point sales indicate only that X number felt Product A was worth their dollars. That's it. 5k people dug the TL last week. It doesn't mean it's a good car, bad car or reflect anything about the car, only that 5k people dug it.

    About torque steer, I choose a car based on my purposes only.
    How many time you plant your foot to the pedal when taking a corner? TL's cornering is not the best but one of the best IMO.
    How many time you speed your car when driving in a highway? Many times lol
    How much time do you spend inside your car?
    How many time do you risk your car in a race track?
    Do you care about resale value or not?
    Do you care about gas consumption or not?


    I can answer every question with one thing: toy. That's what my BMW is to me. It's not transportation, an investment or practical. It's a toy.

    Do you care about your family or not? (are you selfish?) etc.

    What does this have to do with buying a car?
  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    It does to me bcuz if I dont care about them, I would buy a coupe not sedan with stiff suspension, loud engine and no sound system so I could take the car to a race track. No wife and kids at last free from the jail lol.

    Fyi its not 5k people who dug TL lastweek but 6+k people.

    I respect your opinion as you refer your car as a toy. I think you must be very rich but not me. I am not rich and I earn my living by working hard.

    The reason is because product A was worth their dollars, hmmm thats a good one. It doesnt mean good or bad, agreed.:-)
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    Well, I feel that relative sales numbers to cross-shopped items do reflect something about the product (whether it be the TL, any other car, or any other product for that matter.) I guess we'll just have to disagree and leave it at that.

    In any case, I for one am glad that the TL is FWD. I definitely feel that RWD is more fun to drive and that FWD has its limits, but some people want a sporty experience in a FWD setup (for foul weather purposes), and are not willing to pay the extra $2000 or so to get AWD, and its associated decrease in gas mileage.

    It just makes more economical sense for Honda to make the TL FWD, since platform sharing with the Accord and the TSX helps keep costs down. They don't make a single RWD sedan yet. Even though Honda/Acura NA sells more cars than Nissan/Infiniti NA, Nissan is a significantly bigger company in Japan than Honda.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    I respect your opinion as you refer your car as a toy. I think you must be very rich but not me. I am not rich and I earn my living by working hard.

    Sigh...all entry lux cars are toys. The class of vehicle is by definition a luxury item. We could all get by fine with a 1995 Accord. Yet we're blowing 30-35-40k on silly cars.

    I'm not gonna get into some personal thing about working hard or not. Leave the personal stuff out of it.
  • riezriez Member Posts: 2,361
    danny1878... Why are you including the Lexus ES330 in this group? There isn't anything "performance" about it. You should be including the IS300. IS is RWD, can be had with optional LSD, and is available with a manual transmission. ES is FWD, no LSD, and no manual transmission. And the IS is clearly at the low end of the $30-40K range--great value for the money, with outstanding reliability, great dealer service, and good crash test results.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    "Sigh...all entry lux cars are toys."

    Let me get this straight so I understand the conversation. The Acura TL is a toy, but the Honda V6 full-loaded for $7K less, is plebian basic run-of-the-mill appliance transportation. The TSX, which is the same price as the Honda is a toy. Okay, now I got it.

    I'm not sure why it's important that one believes there is a line in the sand between basic run of the mill appliance transportation and toy, but I'm trying to understand the price at which toy becomes necessity. In my mind anything more than a Hyundia Excel is a toy. It's just a matter of degree.

    Then the conversation becomes, which toy is the most expensive, fun to own, most reliable, etc. So while I agree with you blueguy, nobody *needs* a car like this. It's obvious that people *want* these types of cars.
  • victord1victord1 Member Posts: 94
    It's individual priority. Do you want your "toy" to be more practical, or just insanely fun to play with???

    But then again fun varies among each of us--what kind, how much, how often.......

    Then there's "just-got-to-have-it" factor. My sister, who drives at or under the speed limit and changes lane blocks or even miles before making a turn, just has to have the TL-S. She doesn't drive on the beltways and interstates (and I mean absolutely never) and never ventures into an unfamiliar area (not without me as the driver), but she wanted that navigation system.

    And I guess it's epidemic because now I just got to have a 330i :-)
  • hoyahenryhoyahenry Member Posts: 399
    How much time do you spend inside your car?

    At least now I can't get enough.

    According to the MID the car and I were together for 10 hours on the first tank of gas. Such is life here in DC when the Avg mph is in the low 20s in 60% 'highway' driving.
  • eaton53eaton53 Member Posts: 356
    The TL A-Spec is getting dangerously close to the price to the out-the-door price of a CTS-V. One of the folks on the CTS board said he bought a V for $45K.

    If that's true, forget the A-Spec... it's not even close.
  • eaton53eaton53 Member Posts: 356
    The message editor isn't working today. Keeps getting a pathname error.

    Guess I'd better proofread before I post!
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    My view of all new cars is that they're luxury items. We could all pick up a solid 6-7 year old Accord/Camry/Altima for very little dough and it'd serve the purpose. A 99 Civic DX would satsify most "needs." Room for the dog, AWD, AC, leather, etc are luxuries.

    I have no delusions about my cars. They're not need based items. They don't approach food or shelter on the scale of things one must have to survive. I know very well that I can get by fine on an old Nissan sedan as I did through college and many, many years after it.

    And 40k for a TL is outrageous. The A-spec package should be at most 3k over a standard TL.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    still nothing i can find on the acura website. I'd be really surprised if its almost $10K more unless it involves engine mods, which i seriously doubt. if anyone can find proof of pricing and post the link, I'd appreciate it. But, for now, I'm not believing the pricing until I hear it right from the manufacturer.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • riezriez Member Posts: 2,361
    qbrozen... Just read the plethora of magazine articles that have appeared recently on the A-specs. These type mods normally cost upwards of $5,000. New tires, wheels, exterior trim pieces, etc. Not to mention suspension pieces. Lexus tried something similar a couple years ago with the IS and GS, the L-tuned. Spec I was about $3-4K and Spec II was around $5-6K. It bombed in marketplace. Tuner types would rather do it themselves, often for less or to be wilder. Nissan is trying same with Nismo for Sentra SE-R Spec V and 350Z. Not cheap. Nissan has S-tuned for street and R-tuned for racing.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Come on. BMW offers the ZHP package for 4k more than a base 330i.

    With it you get:

    M3 front end/aero package, 18 inch wheels/rims, different suspension, short-shift 6 speed, new cams, new headers, new ECU, new exhaust, new differential/gearing, alcantara interior trim, anthracite headliner, new steering wheel, new tach, power memory seats, tilt down mirror, aluminum cube trim.

    4k. There's no reason an A-spec TL should be 10k more.
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    "Come on. BMW offers the ZHP package for 4k more than a base 330i.

    With it you get:

    M3 front end/aero package, 18 inch wheels/rims, different suspension, short-shift 6 speed, new cams, new headers, new ECU, new exhaust, new differential/gearing, alcantara interior trim, anthracite headliner, new steering wheel, new tach, power memory seats, tilt down mirror, aluminum cube trim.

    4k. There's no reason an A-spec TL should be 10k more."

    By the same reasoning, there is no reason why the 330i should cost $8000 more than a comparably equipped TL. An A-spec TL still costs less than a comparably equipped ZHP 330i.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    jrock

    What are the exact upgrades of the A-spec on the TL...

    What the BMW costs is not relevant either. We're talking about a 32k car with X options. Tell us what those options are.
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    You decided to bring the BMW ZHP package into the equation by comparing the relative value of the A-spec package vs. the ZHP package. Basically your point is that the A-spec is overpriced.

    My point is that if you're going to compare it in that way, i.e. compare it feature for feature, the 330i is overpriced. It may not be relevant to you, but it is relevant to me and others.

    Frankly, I agree with you, I also think the A-spec package is overpriced. I'm not really interested in it, but I'm sure that there is some site on the internet that lists what you get with the A-spec package.
  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    The price of A-Spec is $5,2k plus installation $700.

    It is overpriced. With standard options of TL is more than enough. MSRP of TL $33,2k w/o Navi. or $35,3k with Navi.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    jrock,

    You decided to bring the BMW ZHP package into the equation by comparing the relative value of the A-spec package vs. the ZHP package. Basically your point is that the A-spec is overpriced.

    No, I was not comparing the values of the two. I merely pointed out to riez that a major manufacturer can cheaply add many, many elements to a performance package at a price that isn't a 33% jump over the base.

    My point is that if you're going to compare it in that way, i.e. compare it feature for feature, the 330i is overpriced. It may not be relevant to you, but it is relevant to me and others.

    I was talking about what's added equipment wise. X base, what's added to it to get to Z total. The TL stickers for like 32-33k. Loaded. Whatever they're adding, from what i've seen it's an aero kit, some suspension/tire mods and a tweaked exhaust it's not nearly worth 10k. We're talking parts...not the value of the car. Even if the TL stickered at 25k as is and the a-spec raised the price to 35k I'd be annoyed as the parts could be added aftermarket for that price.

    And value is subjective. At 25k I probably would have bought a TL. 33k? Nope. That's why they make different cars - because not everybody wants to drive one type of vehicle.
  • kahunahkahunah Member Posts: 448
    ...is not worth the money. But, TLs are well worth sticker, any day. BMWs on the other hand...
  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    Value is really subjective. But usually overpriced item like the A-spec will not sell well.

    I myself will not buy an overpriced A-spec, and I think majority of people will not buy an overpriced item. Will you buy an overpriced item?
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    Overpriced is entirely subjective. In October 2000, the Sony PS2 came out. I bought up several and resold them in online auctions for 200-300% over MSRP. The people buying them obviously felt the toy was worth $800-900 because they bid up to that point. I'm not going to tell them they're wrong but what i valued and what they valued were different.

    To somebody out there, the A-spec may be worth 40k. Hard to imagine but it's possible. Just as it's hard for some to imagine blowing 40k on a 3 Series. To each his own.

    In the end shouldn't we buy that vehicle we feel most comfortable driving?
  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    "In the end shouldn't we buy that vehicle we feel most comfortable driving?"

    I was NOT saying about a car or 330i as an overpriced item. Unless you feel it that way of course. And again A-spec is not worth my dollars and you seemed to agree to it too.

    I like Jrock's objective opinions eventho sometimes we disagree.

    If it is about a car then actually for 4 months I had been researching and comparing 330i, gs300, es330, G35 and 325i (No acura in my top list) before I even knew about TL.

    Choosing car is a complicated issue, you cant compare one's driving experience with the other. You cant value TL for just $25k bcuz 6k people/month would disagree while maybe only 467 people would agree to it.

    You like the car the way you like it, why we should care about others.

    After market gadget is different than the original. You can install them but you might destroy the car's harmony. That is just my opinion.

    I like 330i too. peace :-)
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    "No, I was not comparing the values of the two. I merely pointed out to riez that a major manufacturer can cheaply add many, many elements to a performance package at a price that isn't a 33% jump over the base."

    Aight, my bad if that was your point.
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    "objective opinions"... haha, I didn't know that opinions could be objective, but thanks for the support.

    I've learned a great deal from these forums and threads like these, and all the regulars that post here, even though we've had our share of disagreements. It rarely gets too personal here, and I've seen many threads at other forums basically deteriorate into name calling. Part of it is the "hard-line" police work of the moderators. =)

    When I was a teenager, I used to think that only Lexus made nice cars, and everything else was junk. I've evolved somewhat since then.
  • eaton53eaton53 Member Posts: 356
    Said that the TL A-Spec they drove had an MSRP of $41,893, so there's no question as to what it costs. Whether or not it's worth it compared to the 330i... ???

    But at $42K it's getting within a few grand of the CTS-V, a car that stomps a mud hole in it (and the 330i, for that matter).
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    danny reported a few posts back the A-spec is $5900 installed. A far cry from the $10K originally quoted that started this current discussion. And if that autoweek number is correct, that's a Navi equipped unit, correct? I think that adds up. $35K+ for the car and $5900 for the package = over $41K. So can we now stop saying things like "$45K for a TL", "33% more", "$10K more", etc? At least until Acura makes the numbers public or we have a more reliable source.

    I see that motortrend has reported testing the A-spec and they support the $5200+install number. According to them, you get the following:

    an aero kit that incorporates a front air dam, small chin spoiler, body side skirts, and a choice of two different rear spoilers--a small trunklid spoiler or a larger (yet still tasteful) rear wing. The aero kit was wind-tunnel tested and produces more downforce while generating a slightly improved overall Cd.

    A-SPEC badging flanks the body panels, and the TL's well-trimmed interior is left alone save for a recontoured, slightly thicker racing-style steering wheel.

    more aggressive suspension tuning

    Most visible are the 18x8.5-inch alloy wheels and grippy 235/40VR18 Yokohama AVS ES100 tires.

    The rest of the underpinning mods include a track-tuned shock and coil-spring combo that lowers ride height by one inch. Special attention was paid to spring rate and shock valving to ensure sportier handling without the tradeoff of a harsh on-highway ride.

    and some more tidbits from their article:

    In A-SPEC form, both torque steer and understeer are dramatically reduced--we even experienced an occasional hint of oversteer on aggressive corner turn-in. Braking performance from the factory-installed Brembo four-piston disc brakes improves, too, thanks to reduced nosedive during hard stops and the stickier rubber.

    The A-SPEC package was not only developed under Acura's umbrella, but the added cost ($5200 plus installation) can be rolled directly into the purchase or lease price. Finally, the factory warranty remains unviolated.

    and the numbers? Stock vs. A-spec
    Braking, 60-0, ft 141 119
    Slalom, mph 62.5 66.1
    Skidpad, g 0.77 0.83

    now, question, does anyone have published numbers for a non-ZHP 330 vs. a ZHP 330 and the total price difference? Now, we're not talking the Peformance Pack, right? No engine mods. Unless the engine mods and suspension mods come in around $6K. Do they? No more time for me to search today, so maybe someone can do that for me.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • chrisbothchrisboth Member Posts: 493
    Those numbers are atrocious.... .77 skidpad.? 141 feet braking from 60. Now wonder these things are 31 loaded.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    a CTS-V is $50 large, so its still more than a few grand from the $42K A-spec TL. And I know someone "claims" to have bought a CTSV for $45K, but prove it. Not to mention that comparing street prices on one vehicle against sticker on another is certainly unfair.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    just remember that is only one source. Interestingly enough, C&D got very close to those Motortrend A-spec numbers with their STOCK TL. So, interpret that how you will. I'm willing to bet that Motortrends stock numbers are a bit conservative and make that A-spec package look way better than it is in real life. A .06 improvement in skidpad is pretty incredible. A .02 (C&Ds stock number vs. motortrends a-spec number) seems much more realistic to me.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • eaton53eaton53 Member Posts: 356
    I'm going to "prove" someone paid $45K for a V... get real.

    I can see how it could be done... GM card, various other certificates that are available, if you can find a dealer that will accept them. Looks like the guy that paid $45K may have done just that.

    I also don't think Autoweek makes up MSRP's. The A-Spec is overpriced at the price point where Autoweek tested it.
  • chrisbothchrisboth Member Posts: 493
    I would expect much better numbers as the tsx and the rsx are capable of those numbers. Hell the old integra could skidpad .77. Imagine 265/18/45's on a G! .9 skidpad would become .95-.98 or even 1.0! That's just tires. Put a $5100 package on the G coupe and run with the 911- put it on the G sedan and run with M class
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    now, question, does anyone have published numbers for a non-ZHP 330 vs. a ZHP 330 and the total price difference?

    $3900...that's the price difference. BMW claimed the ZHP dropped the zero to 60 numbers to 5.9 (tests by mags get it lower) v. the official 6.5 of the 330i (check bmwusa.com for that). I'll have to do some digging for the numbers. I know the slalom numbers were different too.
  • eaton53eaton53 Member Posts: 356
    "Put a $5100 package on the G coupe and run with the 911- put it on the G sedan and run with M class"

    That is a pipe dream... you'd better find another 100 or so hp for a G to run with any of the really serious factory sports sedans.
  • chrisbothchrisboth Member Posts: 493
    I think a G could run with an M3 without the extra hundred HP...how about 50. Point is spending 5100 bucks is doing little for the aspec TL to get it up to mid lux sedan expectations.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    so the $3900 ZHP package includes the engine mods?

    of course, you need those engine mods just to compete in straight lines with the stock TL. But do those necessarily come with the improved suspension? Or can you get the suspension upgrades without the engine mods?

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    Exactly my point. We can't prove what that guy paid, so the CTSV is $50K for points of this discussion. And the A-spec TL, as far as we know, is about $40K without Navigation. So that's $10K more for the CTSV.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    read up on C&Ds numbers - hell, go back and read this discussion. You'll find several people have shown several times over that the stock TL numbers compare very favorably with the other cars we talk about here and it doesn't need the A-spec package to do so.

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • speedracer3speedracer3 Member Posts: 650
    According to a Car and Driver article I've read.It seems that NISMO (Nissan's motorsports arm) products might not offered for Infiniti vehicles because of fears of tarnishing the luxury persona of the brand. On the other hand NISMO products will be avaible for popular Nissan cars (like the 350Z). It is a shame, since the NISMO tuned JDM Skylines (G35) are hellish machines. Hopefully, Nissan will see the light and allow car enthusiasts to purchase performance parts for their Infinitis.
  • jrock65jrock65 Member Posts: 1,371
    How do you italicize quoted sections of other posts?

    Thanks.
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    so the $3900 ZHP package includes the engine mods?

    Everything I listed from exterior/interior mods to engine modifications to suspension changes all come with a ZHP package.

    But do those necessarily come with the improved suspension? Or can you get the suspension upgrades without the engine mods?

    It's all one package. The only optional items from the package are the trunk lip spoiler and getting leather over that stupid Alcantara garbage.
  • chrisbothchrisboth Member Posts: 493
    "It is a shame, since the NISMO tuned JDM Skylines (G35) are hellish machines. Hopefully, Nissan will see the light and allow car enthusiasts to purchase performance parts for their Infinitis. "

    If the 350Z and the G are essentially the same except body panels - why wouldn't one be "allowed" to upgrade thier G with those nismos components? Just because the Infiniti dealer wont be offering them doesn't mean they aren't available! IN fact most of my work and parts supply come from Nissan anyway.

    If there's one thing the G has got it's Z and G enthusiasts galore and many many aftermarket suppliers of performance parts and it stems from the 350Z guys who are nuts about performance. Nismo is only offering what is available elsewhere from other sometimes better suppliers.
  • qbrozenqbrozen Member Posts: 33,736
    ok. thanks for the info.

    considering all that, seems like the Performance Package is a bargain when considered by itself and compared against other similar upgrades (the JCW Mini comes to mind).

    '11 GMC Sierra 1500; '98 Alfa 156 2.0TS; '08 Maser QP; '67 Coronet R/T; '13 Fiat 500c; '20 S90 T6; '22 MB Sprinter 2500 4x4 diesel; '97 Suzuki R Wagon; '96 Opel Astra; '11 Mini Cooper S

  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Type < i > (without the spaces) to start the italics and then < / i > (again, no spaces at all) to end them. You can do the same thing with b instead of i for bold instead of italics. And they can be used together, if you want. There are many html guides all over the web that any search engine will find for you if you want to go further.

    :)
  • speedracer3speedracer3 Member Posts: 650
    It's it's not a matter of being allowed. NISMO makes performance packages tailored for specific cars like the 350Z. Not to say you can't take a part from a Nissan kit and use it on an Infiniti....what you won't be able to do is buy a NISMO kit for say a G35 coupe. Although this package IS available in Japan, you can't get it here. Again, Nissan feels that NISMO takes away from the Infiniti image. I think it's silly, and I hope Nissan reconsiders.
  • riezriez Member Posts: 2,361
    The rather high cost of the ZHP, A-spec, and L-tuned are just another factor in the value equation. None of them are really worth it. They just don't give you that much for the money. Much of the A-spec and L-tuned were for non-performance things like exterior changes.

    Guess that is why I bought an IS300 manual. Could get a reliable fun car for about $30,000. And it had HID and LSD.

    Heck, I'd rather have a $30,000 325i Sport 5-speed manual than a $40,000 330i ZHP. Then I'd use the $10,000 to buy myself a muscle car (say AMC AMX or Javelin)?
  • danny1878danny1878 Member Posts: 339
    I agree with riez on that, why we should buy a performance package for a sedan.

    If you are really into performance, go with the two seater. its better than buying performance package which doesnt perform (0-60 5.9), the A-spec which is mainly only stability & body makeup. Sedan always have the luxury part, with too much performance, nobody cant even see it, its too fast.:-)
  • blueguydotcomblueguydotcom Member Posts: 6,249
    The rather high cost of the ZHP, A-spec, and L-tuned are just another factor in the value equation. None of them are really worth it.

    Guess it's all a matter of priorities. I know for a fact I could get the engine, interior/exterior, suspension and tire mods for 4k. It's impossible. Just the differential swap would be a hassle. New cams, headers, ecu and exhaust?!

    Heck, I'd rather have a $30,000 325i Sport 5-speed manual than a $40,000 330i ZHP.

    Different worlds. That's like comparing a CTS to a CTS-V or a mustang V6 to an SVT. Yes, it's a two second difference and the entire character of the car is different.
  • 95gt95gt Member Posts: 69
    My biggest concern with the packages is that that 5k you add up front will pretty much be worth nothing when you go to sell the car. Sure some here or there will know what it means and want to pay more but most likely you will eat that cost.

    Either way would love to have the package but the cost is pretty high
Sign In or Register to comment.