By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
http://www.usautonews.com/
http://www.detnews.com/autosinsider/
http://www.gmcanada.com/ssi/english/vehicles/isuzu/isuzu.html
Bob
It's a version of the Isuzu Trooper. Honda had their own Isuzu too, the old Honda Passport was the Isuzu Rodeo. And Isuzu used the old Honda Odyssey as their Isuzu Oasis.
-Brian
Cheers Pat.
-Brian
Cheers Pat.
I like the 300. It has a very forward, aggressive look to it. It's not "good" looking but it is "strong" looking.
The styling is inspired by Chrysler-Ghia concept cars from the 1950s, so there is a Chrysler historical link here.
Bob
http://www.imperialclub.com/Articles/53GhiaSpecial/
http://www.team.net/www/ktud/ghia/k310.html
http://www.imperialclub.com/Articles/GhiaStory/Page01.htm
http://www.conceptcarz.com/folder/vehicle.asp?car_id=1861
Bob
AWD is better in wet and poor weather. otherwise, give me RWD any day. I'd like to Subaru's sporty offerings move towards more static RWD bias (like the STi's 35/65 selection).
~Colin
I see the 300C as the next MIB movie vehicle for T.L.J. to drive.
Even though I rank FWD second, it is a VERY distant second, and really (for me) not even a consideration. Been there. Done that.
Bob
Apparently MY2002 was the last year for the Isuzu Trooper in the US.
DaveM
What do you think about AWD systems like in the G35 that are RWD until needed? Is that the best of both worlds?
Ken
http://www.cnn.com/2004/WORLD/europe/04/22/amorous.rhino.reut/ind- ex.html
-Brian
no because it's carrying around a lot of extra weight for no good reason and who knows how fast it actually reacts. the 911 AWD biases have it about right, if you're going to bother with AWD... 30-35% up front.
bob,
basically we agree on nothing.
~c
Ken, my only problem with the Infiniti set up is it is RWD until the wheels slip. I prefer (at least in theory, until it's been tested in real life) the new Acura SH-AWD. It's RWD biased (good) and always AWD (also good).
Bob
Bob
the 911 AWD biases have it about right, if you're going to bother with AWD... 30-35% up front.
Bob
~c
I said, " Would you mind being careful please?"
"What are you talking about?' is the reply.
'You just swung your door into the side of my car.'
"No I didn't!"
'I saw you do it' I am standing between the cars now, 'you can see the line you left in my passenger door.'
"Well I was here first, you probably hit my door when you got out!"
'I don't get out of the passenger side usually. There's a door on the driver's side.'
She just pulls out and says "go to Hell."
It was surreal. Luckily only small scratches and no dent or I'm not sure what I'd have done. I hadn't raised my voice or sworn at her believe it or not. I made a point of controlling myself and being non-threatening. When I got in my car, I was physically tense and just seething. My immediate thought had been that I wished she been a man instead so I didn't have to be non-threatening. Call it road rage or whatever, but I have no tolerance for people who show complete lack of consideration for others. It's not even like I parked close to her. There was easily 2.5 feet between the cars. Enough that I was able to squat between them to look for damage without touching either car. Most parking lots require a little caution when getting in or out, and I am always very careful even when someone has sardined me. I don't understand the arrogance of people like that.
I'm sure everyone has similar experiences, but I really needed to vent or it would have festered in my head all day, and I'm working.
Nicholas
Sorry, I do feel for you.
CUSAFR
Craig
-Frank P
P.S. Pat, I know you read Nicholas' post and I'm imagining what your reaction is so I want you to take several deep breaths and go lie down in a dark room with soothing music playing ;-)
Nicholas
~c
actually, it would've been tempting to kick a dent in her car as she was driving off.
Cheers Pat.
Mitsu is in real trouble. They should go indy or they'll be the next Isuzu. We all know what happens when you starve a brand of cash.
300C is controversial but I give them credit for a bold design. I prefer the Magnum wagon, by far.
Renault Laguna: some where there is a joke about this being a sexy car, but I just couldn't fine-tune the punch line enough to mention it.
-juice
The S40? To be honest I was a little disappointed. There is plenty of good stuff, like a strut for the hood, multi-link hinges for the wide-opening trunk, door sill protectors, and obedient Geartronic trannies.
But then there were just as many let downs. The carpet in the trunk is unfinished, they just cut the edges off like the Ford Escape's cargo area. The A-pillar is wrapped in fabric but it's not padded, so why bother? Plastics on the lower half of the dash and console felt cheap and hollow. The seat fabric looked cheap also, perhaps durable, but shouldn't it feel nice?
The rear seat is tight, my head rubs towards the back just sitting there. I would hurt to go over a speed bump too fast. Leg room was adequate, about what my Forester has. Even front head room is limited. It's not wide enough for 3 across in the back, plus the hump is pronounced (with FWD, why?).
They drove only a little better. The base 2.4i understeered like crazy, and leaned a bit much also. The tires were loud and squeeled a lot. Steering was a little too light, clutch take-up was a bit abrupt, though these were worn cars from an 8 city tour.
The automatic would hold a gear if you used Geartronic, at least. But they sapped a lot of the power from the base engine.
The T5 was a lot better, but still had more throttle lag than I'm used to. Much more lag than the Subaru 2.5T, maybe about the same as the WRX 2.0l turbo.
The Geartronic spoils the fun, it would not stay on boost. The track was also too short for this model.
The 6 speed T5 was nice, but again, this track was way too tight so you could not open it up. Half the time you'd be waiting for the turbo to kick on, and by then you'd be on the brakes.
The T5 didn't understeer nearly as much, thankfully, but the ABS and traction control kept interfering on the course and spoiling the fun. Still, handling was tight.
This may sound hilarious, but the best model for that track was the base 2.4i, in a "more fun to drive a slow car fast" way.
They had one V50 parked, and head room was better in that model. The back seat is still tight, though. The Legacy has more room and far, far better interior materials, IMO.
I sat in an S60 with leather, and that felt like a luxury brand's car. The V40 doesn't. It would probably make a better Mazda3 or Focus because expectations are lower.
Ken: IMHO you'd be crazy to pick one of these over a Legacy. Even over a Forester XT. Heck, perhaps even a WRX wagon!
-juice
learn left-foot braking.
~c
-juice
In full auto mode, the tranny was very, very slow to respond. By the time it downshifted for power I was turning or braking.
-juice
Sounds like you had some fun there. I also did notice that the 2.4i leaned A LOT more through the turns. The T5 was tons more fun to drive.
I almost lost it taking a T5 6-speed through the slalom. Luckily, we were out by the Bay with a stiff sea breeze so the ground crew didn't really her the tires squeal.
Rest east: The test drive event put the V50 out of my consideration. I think I was a lot more V50-crazy from NAIAS. Part of it was due to the very cold reception from Subaru in contrast to the excellent showcasing by Volvo.
Ken
I imagine some of them may be named Twingo, Scénic, Espace, Kangoo, Clio, Mégane, Laguna and Vel Satis? ;-P
Ed
-mike
Maybe some special STi models to demand attention?
Ed: Nissan can come out with all the new models it wants, if it doesn't address the issues it has with its current trucks it's not going to improve at all. Armadas still have resonance and overall truck sales are below projections.
-juice
Ed
~c
But it was a blast and I'm hooked on Porsches now!
-mike