Subaru Crew Cafe

1277278280282283343

Comments

  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Cool pic. With that, Bugs would have made it to the Le Brea tar-pits instead of winding up in Scotland!
    Some like the Highlander Hybrid keep the CD player hidden behind the nav screen which tilts away. That's nice.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah - and careful with the AVIC models, the early ones had ONE single CD/DVD slot, so if you had the Nav DVD in there you could not listen to music on CDs at all. You had to pre-load the route and then insert the CD to hear music.

    To me that was a deal killer.

    Later AVIC models were better, but I still didn't like the interface.

    Just read one of Bob's old e-mails and the 2010 Forester with Nav actually has Bluetooth integrated.

    I'd still like to see a bigger screen (it's 6.5", isn't it?) and especially a backup cam.
  • tsytsy Member Posts: 1,551
    What's a CD? ;)

    I think CD's are headed the way of 8 track tape!

    As long as a stereo has an iPod or aux input, it's all I need.

    I think the newer AVIC models are much better than the old ones.

    If you need a bigger screen just have an aftermarket 20" installed! :D

    tom
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Very true, so many today only keep the CDs at home if at all. Much like the old days when you bought the vinyl and then taped it to play in the car.

    I had an 8-track in the 77 Mustang Ghia back in high school. Decent selection of tunes took up the whole back seat!

    Edit: the upside was that they were dirt cheap in the bargain bins.
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
  • xwesxxwesx Member Posts: 17,777
    Wow.... that was darned near a human shish-kabob, right there!
    2018 Subaru Crosstrek, 2014 Audi Q7 TDI, 2013 Subaru Forester, 2013 Ford F250 Lariat D, 1976 Ford F250, 1969 Chevrolet C20, 1969 Ford Econoline 100
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Aux input is OK, but let's take that a step further and ask for a USB input.

    The USB input can even charger your iPod, or you can just plug in a plain old $5 flash drive and put music on there.

    With that, the CD drive becomes obsolete.

    2010 Outbacks - higher end models only of course - will get that.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    and that's just dumb. A $15k Honda Fit and Nissan Cube have that. $16K Kias have USB integration. Subaru needs it badly, on ALL models.
  • grahampetersgrahampeters Member Posts: 1,786
    G'day

    I read an interesting interview with product planners for a couple of major motor manufacturers.

    We are just seeing the switch on of digital radio in Australia, covering the major population centres. The radios out now are pretty straightforward but will have ability to store and playback and will get fancier over time. They can display album covers, frame ads and similar. There is also an increasing demand for remote audio inputs and USB connections, so drivers can select their own music.

    The product planners talked of a shift as definite as the demise of tape players or cartridges (never big in Australia). They forecast that 6 stack CD players will disappear very rapidly and in a year or so, there will not even be a single CD player in cars. Reliance will, instead, be on flash memory, USB or similar.

    That is quite a shift. A couple of years ago, I queried a retailer as to how to play MP3s assuming that there was connection for mass storage device. He was as mystified as me, assuring me that they would only ever play off burnt CD's and there was no way to connect through USB on any players. Given that USB at 64GB is now easily available and lower capacity devices are cheaper than a pre recorded CD, we must have moved along a bit!

    I am old enough to recall 78 records still being around. LP records played at 33rpm seemed pretty nifty At that time, owning a car radio seemed incredibly exotic. . I wonder where we go next?

    Cheers

    Graham
  • ladywclassladywclass Member Posts: 1,713
    Well, speaking of "obsolete" ways to play music (although not necessarily in cars!) -

    In my house -

    an antique player piano
    a Victrola which plays those 78's just fine thanks
    (the kids used to play with these 2 things when they were young and the power would go out in the house!)
    still have a turntable from the old "Realistic" components bought at Radio Shack in the 70's (difficult but not impossible to get a new stylus for)
    numerous CD/cassette players

    but you guys know I'm not a Luddite

    we also have various MP3 players (I hate to think of how many my husband has bought on Ebay, but he DOES give them away and I think every one of our 5 kids plus all the grandchildren have had at least one!)

    I have an iPhone, he has an iTouch (and a Zune, and .....)

    and then there are all the computers!

    We were counting up the other night ... there are 3 desktops, 3 laptops, 2 netbooks, and, of course, the iPhone and iTouch have online capabilities also!

    Do you think we're "connected" enough?
    Particularly since neither of us has any job connection in any way to any sort of tech business !!!
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    The first record player my family ever bought was a Realistic. Early seventies, and we felt that we had "made it" to finally get one!
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 268,909
    I think Realistic was the Radio Shack house brand.. but, I could be wrong .. That was a long time ago.. :P

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Yes it was.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yes, but that's nothing new, Subaru has always lagged behind in audio/visual.

    Ford has Sync and Chrysler has that MyGig by Infinity, and even the upcoming 2010 Legacy lacks the ability to accept voice commands and store Gigabytes of music internally, years later. And this is their state-of-art, top-of-the-line system.

    Bob and I went to check out a Cube after lunch yesterday but the dealer was closed so we were only able to inspect the outside. Got a pic of one here:

    http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/sredir?uname=coachjuiceman&target=ALBUM&id=534495- 4374152051985&authkey=Gv1sRgCL-H0YqW2NHCYw&authkey=Gv1sRgCL-H0YqW2NHCYw&invite=C- LKfrpsP&feat=email

    Very space efficient design, lots of cool styling cues. Prices ranged wildly from $16k to $24k with the $2000 ADM they had on some stickers, crazy.

    The rims on the high end models look great, it'll definitely be the type of car that sees a lot of customization.

    Nit picks: drum brakes on the rear axle, plus the driver's side D-pillar has this ugly matte black plastic peice covering what probably ought to be a window.

    Didn't get to drive it.
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    Nissan cube = ugleeeee. I keep thinking of Citroen 2CV. :confuse:
    Gen Z may luv cube though.
    Interior shag rug for dash is wierd, but I can see practicality.
    Sat in one - comfort was so so.
  • saedavesaedave Member Posts: 694
    Nissan cube = ugleeeee. I keep thinking of Citroen 2CV

    But the Deux Cheveaux had its [non-permissible content removed] up in the air like no car ever before. At the time I thought it was like a snail part way out of its shell. I haven't driven one for more than fifty years, but that was a memory of things French that I'll never forget. The name which means two horses is appropriate. It had a very soft ride and the ability to go over large curbs and bumps with aplomb
  • grahampetersgrahampeters Member Posts: 1,786
    G'day

    I had entirely forgotten about the pleasures of the 2CV. The gear change looked like an umbrella handle poking out of the dashboard. You wiggled it vaguely and hoped to find a gear. The tiny engine revved freely and it was real fun. Suspension incredibly compliant over rough ground and the roof folded back to make the car wide open. I seem to remember that you could take the seats out somehow so as to have seating for a picnic. They kept making them until 1991.

    Car magazine in the UK turbocharged one and it was apparently very fast until it self ignited, terminating the experiment.

    Cheers

    Graham
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    That D pillar thing is likely because they took the time and expense to make sure the rear door opened the right way for LHD curbs. Unlike, glaringly, RAV4. It is a bit tricky since the asymmetrical design means it is more involved than just switching hinges.

    The 2CV was arguably better post-war European engineering than Beetle. But it was the look of the Beetle that won hearts, so.....the rest is history.

    The 2CV is actually easier to repair in the field, and has a suspension designed to handle comfortably what would have been bombed out country roads ripped to shreds by half tracks, Panzers, and who-knows-what. Then there is the sardine can roof and the ability to remove the rear seats. Picnics? Perhaps. Hauling the goat to the vet? More likely.

    A friend of mine is angling to have a pretty clean '74 Truckette brought over. He already had a 2Cv and and Ami 8. The guy helping him has a Pallas and a DS, both from the 60's
  • Karen_SKaren_S Member Posts: 5,092
    Join Consumer Advice Editor, Phil Reed, and other Edmunds staff for an auto industry chat Wednesday night, 9:00 -10:00 pm/et (6:00 -7:00 pm/pt). To enter the chat, click on the green banner at the top of the page. See you there!
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    ...but we drove a Fit Sport tonight, and it's all over. better built, better functionality and versatility, and a driving experience that is a genuine pleasure. And better mileage to boot. We'll drive a Clubbie again most likely; it is nicer, with higher quality interior materials, more power, and more poise....., but I'm not sure it does enough things better to justify the $6000+ premium.
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    ...oh, anyone driven the new OB yet? I figure that's next on the list in, say, three years or so, which is about how long I expect to get out of our '99. I hope the 2010 is still somewhat fun to drive.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Outbacks won't be out until July sometime Loosh. I have driven 2 new Legacy 2.5i Limiteds (yesterday and today), and they're quite nice.

    Bob
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    yea I know, I figured one of you special types had already had a shot at it :P I hope it still drives like a subaru, you know what I mean? I hope it isn't too....Camry.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Well, I haven't driven a Camry, but check out this report:

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1786584

    His comments almost mirror mine—and he has driven a Camry, and others too, and has made references to those cars.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Good call about the hinge, and that's something that I even made a point to show Bob. Nice to see a Japanese auto maker make that slip (Toyota still doesn't and Honda moved to liftgates after never fixing that).
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    SOA is planning on setting a world record for the most Subies in a parade. Check it out.

    http://forums.nasioc.com/forums/showthread.php?p=27140354#post27140354

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    If it snows, more people show up vs. no snow. ;)
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    This is next month and in Illinois, so I doubt it will snow. :)

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Yeah, I just remembered that gathering paisan shared pics from, with a pair of XTs and an SVX. The snow seemed to bring more people out than normal.
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    Why the heck doesn't Subaru NW try these kinds of things?

    We have a ton of Subarus up here in Portland OR and I suspect our local area could easily make a huge parade of Subarus.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Maybe the city isn't big enough for all the Subies in the NW. :D
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    cars101.com posted this info (edited for main Subaru info):

    6/22 JD Power 90 day new car problem survey for 2009...... Overall, the industry average for initial quality is 108 problems per 100 (new) vehicles (PP100) in 2009, down from 118 PP100 in 2008...

    Subaru is #28 on the 2009 list with app 130 PP100 cars sold. At the bottom is Hummer, Jeep, Saab, Smart, Land Rover, and Mini.


    So Subaru is now well below Industry average? What happened?
    And will this get worse when the new '10 Legacy and Outback hit the streets?
  • snowbeltersnowbelter Member Posts: 288
    Subaru has been below the median for the past two or three years (at least since I've been following the JD Powers 90 day new car ratings.) My 07 Outback arrived with rattles, misaligned headlights, etc. The odd thing is that Subarus tend to do betterin ratings as they age. My wife's 09 Forester was delivered with a defective clock, but hasn't had any other problems, so it seems to have come off the line in decent shape.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Actually, it's been longer than 3 years, I recall way back in 1998 Subaru was slightly below average in this survey.

    Doesn't matter - what matters is long-term reliability. IMHO their 5 year Durability study is far more important, and Subaru does better in that study.

    Think about it - this is just 90 days, and you're not only under warranty, but even within the adjustment period, so you'll get even new windshield wipers replaced for free if they're streaking too much.

    Point is - who cares? Those problems won't cost you anything.

    We're discussing this at length in the thread called "Is there room for Hyundai in the Luxury Segment" (something like that).

    Jesse Snyder from Automotive News wrote:

    The difference between fifth place (Honda) and 24th place (Saturn) is one-fifth of a flaw per vehicle

    Then joked:

    Gee, guess I'll use that as my No. 26 tie-breaker in my decision [of which car to buy].

    With AWD on every car, there is an extra drive shafts, two extra half shafts, an extra rear diff, plus most of them have extra features like heated seats, mirrors, wiper de-icers, etc. The H-4 engines have twice the number of camshafts, valve covers, and head gaskets. More potential defects, basically.

    I think the IQS issues are more likely little things like rattles or paint chips, though. Long-term Subaru beats the industry average by quite a bit.
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    They are trying to have the largest parade of Subarus ever in a small town just outside of Chicago.
    Why the heck they are not doing this in the NW puzzles me...

    On other hand, is anyone from the NW USA considering going to this?

    There are a couple people I could visit on the trip, but it would add 6000 miles to my 'Bu.
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    Was a CVT model. From side and front it looks a lot like the '09/10 Forester, but with more slope to hatch. Interior arm rests reminded me of Saturn Aura; upper door trim was very dark. Lots of shiny aluminum trim on the console.
    Car was still wrapped in plastic and tape from shipping so will have to wait until dealer puts it on display to see what interior is really like.
  • kurtamaxxxguykurtamaxxxguy Member Posts: 1,798
    autonetwork.com has the '10 Subaru Legacy Technical and Marketing presentation of June 23, 2009. Lasts an hour - goes into extensive detail.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Bob said people on NASIOC are reporting it cruises at 80mph at just 2000 rpm. That sounds GREAT. I think that beats my ultra-high-geared Sienna, and by quite a bit.

    My Miata is the opposite, and I think revs would be near double that Outback CVT.

    16.9 gallons and 31mpg highway should mean excellent range.
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    31mpg highway sounds pretty awesome... and yeah, I bet your Miata is turning over 4k at 80mph. Actually I'm a bit surprised you still have it! :D
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Hey Colin... It's been a while—too long.! How's life treating you? Bring us up to date.

    BTW, juice has a new Miata now ('08 leftover model).

    Bob
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Sweet! I remember a while back he was debating replacing the '93 (I think) Miata with a motorcycle... I wouldn't do that in NoVA, and I love bikes-- but I like living even more. ;)

    Thanks for the warm welcome.

    I'm working on getting my CarSpace profile setup. Really short, short update:

    - Son is now 2.5 -- Evan may not have even been born when I was posting last!
    - Shared custody of kiddo and a second mortgage payment, I mean, totally fair child support
    - Still have my '03 Evo, 77k miles. It's been paid off a while now and I dread ever having a car payment again.
    - Still work for the largest US-based privately held company
    - Still love cars :D
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I think you were expecting a child, or it had just been born when we last heard from you. Glad things are working out for you.

    BTW, I've now got a '09 WRX 5-door Premium. My '06 WRX was totaled (I got rear-ended) last September in a nasty 5-car accident on the Capital Beltway. :(

    Bob
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    I was well-impressed with the CVT. Can't think of it as an automatic. There's Auto, there's Manual, and there's CVT. I had a little epiphany out there in that 2010 OB. Autos blow because they aren't as good at knowing what gear you really want, when (or before) you want it, as you do. Hence MT>AT. But the CVT is ALWAYS in the sweet spot, and gets great mileage. It's just different. A third way of driving. Certainly not appropriate yet for performance cars, but I haven't been to the track in 5 years now, so who cares?
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    One of the posters on the Venza board posted that they didn't like the CVT in the Outback. I remember reading many posts in the CUV board knocking the CVT in the old Freestyle. I don't get it really. Why wouldn't you like a tranny which never hesitates to shift and can be geared for both optimum acceleration and FE? I honestly thought the CVT in the Freestyle was great. Know a couple of people with FS who really like it too. My only concern with that tranny was the issue of long term service given that Ford abandoned it. One of the bonuses often cited is that when you floor it, it just goes, whereas an auto always has that downshift hesitation. I always thought that a high torque capable CVT would be killer in the WRX if it was programmed to always bump the engine to the turbo sweetspot when you floored it.
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    Wow! Sorry to hear about the death of your WRX, Bob. I hope you weren't injured, but you seem ok now. :)

    I see Lucien, Juice, and a number of other folks all from 3-5+ years ago. I'm glad to be back, but I don't have a lot to say about Subaru these days. I'll probably be limiting myself to the Cafe and Problems & Solutions.

    I do like some of the stuff that is new (to me) on Carspace. I'm going nuts over in the Answers area. :D
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Colin, here's a blog I did on Straightline last Nov., that includes a link to the original blog describing the accident.

    http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightline/2008/11/the-wrx-is-dead-long-live-the-wrx.- html

    Bob
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    so what's your next car gonna be? :shades:
  • colin_lcolin_l Member Posts: 591
    I'm so relieved not to have a car payment right now, so I'm definitely not in the market for a new car, or a lightly used car.

    But, for fun, let's say my Evo got squashed on the highway today. What would I buy to replace it? I really haven't thought about this much, or followed new cars closely.. but I'll take a stab at it. Money would matter a lot. I'd want to get the best bang for my buck, instead of justifying the best car I can afford. What I mean is that even if my total budget was $30k, if I could be happy with a $20k car, I'd buy it.

    Not an EvoX. They grew fat and soft, losing the things I cared about. There are many performance sedans and I don’t feel the EvoX is one of the best ones.

    I’m not sure how much I really care about performance any more. I’m definitely not buying a hybrid, but I might buy a diesel. I might buy a performance sedan or wagon/5-door hatch. No 2-3 doors for sure.

    Does Juice still do the 'What's in your 100,000 garage' question once a year? :D
  • lilbluewgn02lilbluewgn02 Member Posts: 1,089
    Welcome back to the fold...sort of. You need to show off your son...post some photos; you know how we all like kids, cars, and pet photos. I'm glad you are doing fine; we hope to see you here more often.
    Serge
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Colin, not sure if you were aware, but Edmunds had an EVO as a long-term tester (had it for a year). Here's their wrap-up report, as they're getting ready to sell it.

    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/Drives/LongTerm/articleId=129981/pageId=173- - 842

    They also still have another EVO (5-speed) in which they've modded somewhat.

    Bob
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.