A neighbor of mine (cute, early '20s woman) had a well-used Puegeot 504 in the '80s. It was kinda cute in a way, a kind of olivey green with tan vinyl, had an automatic and a sunroof, IIRC. I do remember it breaking down on a fairly regular basis (though likely not any more often than my family's Fiat).
Re the Maverick/Granada discussion: wasn't the Granada just a rebodied Maverick anyway, which is to say it shouldn't have taken a whole lot of engineering prowess to put that thing on the market quickly? My aunt had one, I learned to drive on it. Hated it--it had a huge hood, a tiny back seat with non-opening windows, a really bad (seats leaned too far back, didn't adjust, no tilt wheel) seating position, a weak six-cylinder engine, typically vague (dead center) Ford steering and hers had no a/c. I never understood the point of that car on any level.
if this is true or not, but I heard a story that a lot of people bought Granadas and Monarchs only to discover that they really didn't get any better fuel economy than the big monsters they traded them for. Supposedly, Henry Ford II's home phone # got made public, and people actually called him to gripe about it!
They really were just a rebodied Maverick, riding the same 109.9 inch wheelbase as the Maverick sedan. I've driven a couple of them...had a friend years ago who had a '77 sedan with a 302, and one of the managers, from when I delivered pizzas, had a '78 or '79 sedan with the 250 six. I think Ford tried to "engineer" (a loose sense of the word) a big car ride into them, but somewhere in the translation you ended up with a small car that handled worse than your typical 50's car, and the ride was enough to make you queasy.
Now the one with the 302 wasn't too bad in acceleration, but the 250 was awful. And they were both REALLY sloppy in handling.
My grandparents had a '77 coupe when I was a kid, but I was too young to really remember it well, although I remember the transmission failed on it, but under warranty. After that they had an '81 coupe which was just a facelifted Fairmont, but a much better car in just about every respect.
One of my roommates had a '79 Granada coupe, which was his first car. He says he loved it and would love to get another one sometime. I ask him why?! But then he says the same thing about my '79 New Yorker, so touche, I guess! :P
...I learned to drive on my Dad's red and white 1978 Ford Granada coupe. I don't remember the car being too bad. The 250 inline 6-cylinder delivered decent power and good fuel economy. It was cheap and easy to service.
An old girlfriend (long time ago.. not really old) had a Mercury Monarch with the 250... Painfully slow... She would turn off the A/C when she had to climb a hill...
I guess it just depends on the vehicle..
Of course, in the late '70s, the standard for acceleration was pretty darn low... They still hadn't worked out the whole fuel management/smog thing..
...I don't remember the Granada getting the gas mileage you'd think it would get, versus a larger car. Then again, 25-30 years ago, if your car got 20mpg, you were doing well. They weren't exactly lightweights, though, IIRC, and they did handle badly. I just remember having to constantly move the wheel in order for the car to stay straight, while having to really move the wheel to get it to turn. Of course, I was fifteen or so at the time, so my driving skills weren't the best. Sadly, their other car, a Diplomat with a slant six, was a better car in most respects, though it was no great shakes, either.
Large annual car show in the area. About 300 cars with 40 Vettes from the club that helps sponsor at local Chevy dealer. Best of show car for my memory days was a 65 Bonneville with 3 two barrel carbs. A 67 Mustang coupe was close behind. A Corvair Monza ?65? in perfect blue original condition.
a Lincoln Blackwood, it was black...did it come in any other color? The very few I have seen since it came out were black. Also a fairly decent (for a Yugo) Yugo.
I saw an oddball today...it was an AMC Concord coupe that had some kind of period aftermarket convertible/targa conversion. It looked very much like a Celica Sunchaser. Anyone else ever see one of these?
Looks like they started in 1981, but I don't know when they finished. I don't think that AMC offered a 2-door version of the Concorde/Eagle for much after that timeframe...maybe 1982-83 at the latest?
I drove my MINI down south to deliver it to the family member I sold it to and on the way I saw...
Over a 100 hotrods most being driven but a few on trailers. Pre-war and post-war every different type you can think off from T-Buckets to three and five window coupes lead sleds and pick up trucks.
There were just very nice clean conservative rods all the way up to very radical probably six plus figure ones that I cannot believe were being driven in the sporadic rain. It was very cool.
I also saw a mustang from every year they were build and a camaro from every year they were built. A ton of vettes a lease a dozen porsches including I think one that looked like a 959. It could not have been a real 959 though it had to have been a clone, didn't it?
Several Ferraris of many different types.
I even followed a 190E in almost this exact color for a little while.
So any idea what was going on some where in PA around the I-81 and I-84 corridors?
You can build/buy some fiberglass rods for very cheap and they aren't worth much when you're done, so the rain isn't raining on anything special in many cases. The best rods of course are metal bodied using the top of the line components. To bust over $35,000--$40,000 in value, you pretty much have to have a name builder or truly amazing design, high-tech, and workmanship involved. It's a really fun way to lose money.
My favorite rods are '32 Ford classic roadsters, all metal, with the seats molded into the rear deck, no supes or electronic gizmos, just a nice Chevy small block and a 4-speed and clean, clean lines stem to stern.
I googled the AMC...it was called the "Sundancer". So it doesn't just look like a "Sunchaser".... I wonder how many could have survived...or even produced.
I bet the 959 was a fake...I've never seen a real one on the road anyway. Was the 190E a 2.3-16? Those have a small following.
Yeah it was a 2.3-16. I followed it from behind for a couple of miles then blew past it once I had someone in front to draw radar gun fire.
I am sure the 959 was fake just cause there are no real road legal versions US. Almost all of the rods I saw were going the opposite direction as me but a few were going my way and I got a close look. I am sure some were steel bodied as there were just too many too all be fiberglass. I am sure there were some real expensive ones too.
Saw an old MG replica today, not my favorite kit car. This one was particularly bizarre as it had Isuzu Impulse wheels. They were the very early wheels that had a pattern of squares across them - very space age, but not so perfect for an MG replica.
This past weekend the National Hot Rod Association held its big eastern show in York, Pa. (just off of I-83, about 30 miles from the Mason-Dixon line). It's one of the biggest events in the world of hot rodding.
The All-Ford Nationals were also held in Carlisle, Pa., which is located where the Pennsylvania Turnpike and I-81 converge. Andre and I were at the Ford Nationals on Saturday.
I'm going to be there, Friday-Sunday, with my LeMans. It's still not too late to register. Here's link for it. If you want your car judged, pick the "Original/Unrestored Classes" choice, the $35 one. I always just pick the fun field $25 registration.
Go do it now! :P That show needs more non Chevy cars!
Thanx! I just filled out the registration for the Original/Unrestored Class for my Brougham. I will have it there provided the weather is good. If not, you will get to see my 1988 Buick Park Ave. Grbeck saw it at the very wet Carlisle Spring Meet.
I saw a goodie today...I'm sitting in the gym in my apt building, which looks out at an angle onto a fairly busy street. About 3 blocks down I spot something old and a little swoopy and dashing...I could only see it from the beltline up as traffic was thick. E-Type? Old Italian? Pre-68 Vette? As it got closer I caught a glimpse of the front quarter panel, and then of the whole car, so I easily knew what it was - a ca. 1960 300SL roadster. Silver on red, and beautiful. I'll take one.
I will probably sell tickets on Friday and Sunday, but I have a wedding to attend on Saturday, so I don't believe that I will make it to the show on that day.
It shouldn't be too late to register. The GM show hasn't been as popular as the Mopar and Ford shows.
...you've got to get the new issue of Collectible Automobile currently at Barnes & Noble and Borders. It has a great article on the 1974-78 full-size Chryslers. When I was a kid, I had a neighbor who owned a travel agency who would buy a new Chrysler or Imperial every two or three years. This guy had two of the cars I saw in the article. His last big Chrysler was a white 1978 New Yorker Brougham. After that, he switched to Cadillacs and stayed with them. Unfortunately, he picked the worst year to switch to Cadillac and ended up with a 1981 V-8-6-4 DeVille. Maybe he should've got one of the last R-Bodies instead?
...sent in my registration yesterday. Hope the weather holds! I imagine the registration is good for all three days. Is it too late to find a hotel room? I was just planning to go out Saturday.
Yeah, I got that issue Lemko. I like that style of car, especially the 4-door hardtops and the 2-door hardtops that didn't get the landau roof/opera window treatment. I actually prefer the Furys and Monacos with the quad headlight setup, which I think was only offered in '74-75. I think in '75 the cheap Fury and Monaco still had quad headlights, but the Gran Fury went to that goofy single headlight look, while the Royal Monaco got hidden headlights. And then for '76-77, I think those upper-crust styles permeated to the cheaper models.
I have a friend who used to have a 1978 Newport 4-door hardtop. It got totaled when he t-boned a '90-93 Accord that cut him off. I didn't know him at the time, but he lived in the area where I delivered pizzas, so I used to see that car around all the time, and even saw the scene of the accident.
Oddly enough, my ex-wife's LeBaron got stolen and impounded that same weekend, and ended up at the same towing company/junkyard as the Accord and Newport. I remember talking to the owner about that accident when I saw the crumpled Accord up on the flatbed. He said "yeah, we have the Newport around in back". He let me look at it. Considering that it punched in the Accord about two feet, between the wheels on the passenger side, the Newport wasn't that bad. All the plastic stuff up front was broken and smashed, and the driver's side fender crumpled just enough into the tire to make it un-driveable. And it bent one of the rear axles when it hopped a curb after whacking the Accord.
I actually met the guy who owned the Newport about a year later. I was still delivering, and had a '79 Newport by that time. One friday night during a slow stretch I was standing out in front of the store, and some of the kids who worked there were out in front smoking. This guy comes walking up and I hear him say "Is that a Newport?" Well, I didn't say anything to him because I thought he was asking the kids about their cigarettes and was just trying to bum one off of them!
He started to turn and walk away, when it hit me that he was talking to me. D'oh!
As for an '81 New Yorker versus a DeVille, I don't know which one really would be better? Or worse? There wasn't anything really horrible about the '80-81 R-body, except for the strangulated engines. The '79's were more prone to rusting, and had aluminum bumpers that would corrode and let the chrome peel off.
MT or C&D compared a 1980 Seville with the 368 to a 1980 New Yorker with a 318, and I think the Seville did 0-60 in about 10.6 seconds, while the New Yorker was about 14. That New Yorker had 120 hp and a 2.45:1 rear end, while the Seville had 150 hp and a lot more torque, but a similarly low rear end.
For 1981 the NYer was bumped up slightly to 130 hp. I've seen a 4-bbl 165 hp version listed, but I think it was only a copcar engine. And supposedly, if you knew the right strings to pull, you could still get a 360-4bbl which put out around 185-190 hp. But while the engine was boosted a bit in hp, they went to a taller rear end, 2.26:1 versus 2.45:1. They did change first and second gear in the transmission though, to compensate. So I dunno if an '81 would be better or worse than the 80 in acceleration.
The Caddy 368 was down to 140 hp that year, I think , but still pretty torquey. I'd imagine that as long as it was running right, with no V-8-6-4 problems, it wouldn't have been too bad of a performer? I heard the V-6 version that came out that year did 0-60 in about 21 seconds though!
Lemko, I know hotels fill up pretty quickly for the Mopar show, but it's about twice the size of the GM show, if not more. It probably wouldn't be too hard to find a hotel room, although you might have to go out a few miles.
late-60's Ambassador 4 door sedan. Green. Looked fairly original, in decent shape. I think it is some kids daily driver, and for sure not something you see too often.
Yeah that was a good haul...I surfed ebay for like 15 minutes and I was finding interesting suff everywhere. That Caddy is something...is that the original interior?
I haven't seen X-Men...I'll have to keep an eye on IMCDB for any screen caps.
Today I saw something unusual...it was a 72 T-Bird, the kind with the fake landau bars instead of the opera windows. It was a dark grey-green with a white top, and it was sitting on old style mags and it had a hood scoop. It looked immaculate, and in a strange way quite sinister.
I saw a ton of Porsches all years and types and all conditions. Saw a nearly perfect late 60s 911 in a dark tan/brown color.
A little while later I about killed a guy in a white 944 turbo. I was in the left hand lane of a 40 mph zone four line street. I was just about to move over into the right hand lane and had started signaling and was checking my mirrors. I didn't see anyone in the side mirrors didn't see anyone in the rearview mirror so I glanced at my blind spot and then started to move over. That is when I saw a flash of white and felt more then heard the fart can exhaust. I got passed by the 944 at at least 90 mph. I didn't see him because he came up on me so fast he wasn't there when I looked before.
If I had moved over a few seconds earlier he would have just run right under the side of me. I was in my disco and the 944 looked lowered so his roof was probably about even with the bottom of my passenger side door. I hate to think what the boxed frame rail of a 4,400 lbs Disco would do to the roof of a 944.
It was a beautiful day here today...although pics never show it, the fintail really needs some finish renovation. I didn't see many other old cars - a shame on a day like this.
I did see a blue Ferrari 328 - that has to be odd. And a Plymouth GTX like in 'Tommy Boy', but it was a coupe.
Comments
Re the Maverick/Granada discussion: wasn't the Granada just a rebodied Maverick anyway, which is to say it shouldn't have taken a whole lot of engineering prowess to put that thing on the market quickly? My aunt had one, I learned to drive on it. Hated it--it had a huge hood, a tiny back seat with non-opening windows, a really bad (seats leaned too far back, didn't adjust, no tilt wheel) seating position, a weak six-cylinder engine, typically vague (dead center) Ford steering and hers had no a/c. I never understood the point of that car on any level.
They really were just a rebodied Maverick, riding the same 109.9 inch wheelbase as the Maverick sedan. I've driven a couple of them...had a friend years ago who had a '77 sedan with a 302, and one of the managers, from when I delivered pizzas, had a '78 or '79 sedan with the 250 six. I think Ford tried to "engineer" (a loose sense of the word) a big car ride into them, but somewhere in the translation you ended up with a small car that handled worse than your typical 50's car, and the ride was enough to make you queasy.
Now the one with the 302 wasn't too bad in acceleration, but the 250 was awful. And they were both REALLY sloppy in handling.
My grandparents had a '77 coupe when I was a kid, but I was too young to really remember it well, although I remember the transmission failed on it, but under warranty. After that they had an '81 coupe which was just a facelifted Fairmont, but a much better car in just about every respect.
One of my roommates had a '79 Granada coupe, which was his first car. He says he loved it and would love to get another one sometime. I ask him why?! But then he says the same thing about my '79 New Yorker, so touche, I guess! :P
I guess it just depends on the vehicle..
Of course, in the late '70s, the standard for acceleration was pretty darn low... They still hadn't worked out the whole fuel management/smog thing..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Not really 'THE HOLY GRAIL OF TATRAS' (that would be a 77 IMO), but cool to look at, huge price
Shifty-mobile
Buick wasn't the first to call a car "Lucerne" (but it is more appropriate for that market, unlike "LaCrosse")
I always kind of liked these. Seller has some freakshows hanging around
Someone bothered to bring this over
They all end up on ebay - big money
Long story
Someone apparently went to some trouble for this
Now this is a Buick...what a cool elegant car
Same as above
Max Wedge
Claimed to be a Hitler car...I bet it's just a taxi
Not many survived like this I suppose
These 2 doors seem a lot less common than the 4 doors
This looks pretty nice
<a href=
<a href=
Thanks for the posts. There are some unique cars there
It was stunning!
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Also a fairly decent (for a Yugo) Yugo.
Looks like they started in 1981, but I don't know when they finished. I don't think that AMC offered a 2-door version of the Concorde/Eagle for much after that timeframe...maybe 1982-83 at the latest?
I should have known you'd be the one to know what I was thinking about!
Actually it's kind of scary I can remember that and not some of the important things in my life. LOL I guess that makes me a TRUE cat nut huh?
Over a 100 hotrods most being driven but a few on trailers. Pre-war and post-war every different type you can think off from T-Buckets to three and five window coupes lead sleds and pick up trucks.
There were just very nice clean conservative rods all the way up to very radical probably six plus figure ones that I cannot believe were being driven in the sporadic rain. It was very cool.
I also saw a mustang from every year they were build and a camaro from every year they were built. A ton of vettes a lease a dozen porsches including I think one that looked like a 959. It could not have been a real 959 though it had to have been a clone, didn't it?
Several Ferraris of many different types.
I even followed a 190E in almost this exact color for a little while.
So any idea what was going on some where in PA around the I-81 and I-84 corridors?
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
My favorite rods are '32 Ford classic roadsters, all metal, with the seats molded into the rear deck, no supes or electronic gizmos, just a nice Chevy small block and a 4-speed and clean, clean lines stem to stern.
I bet the 959 was a fake...I've never seen a real one on the road anyway. Was the 190E a 2.3-16? Those have a small following.
I am sure the 959 was fake just cause there are no real road legal versions US. Almost all of the rods I saw were going the opposite direction as me but a few were going my way and I got a close look. I am sure some were steel bodied as there were just too many too all be fiberglass. I am sure there were some real expensive ones too.
The All-Ford Nationals were also held in Carlisle, Pa., which is located where the Pennsylvania Turnpike and I-81 converge. Andre and I were at the Ford Nationals on Saturday.
Both shows are quite large.
Go do it now! :P That show needs more non Chevy cars!
It shouldn't be too late to register. The GM show hasn't been as popular as the Mopar and Ford shows.
I have a friend who used to have a 1978 Newport 4-door hardtop. It got totaled when he t-boned a '90-93 Accord that cut him off. I didn't know him at the time, but he lived in the area where I delivered pizzas, so I used to see that car around all the time, and even saw the scene of the accident.
Oddly enough, my ex-wife's LeBaron got stolen and impounded that same weekend, and ended up at the same towing company/junkyard as the Accord and Newport. I remember talking to the owner about that accident when I saw the crumpled Accord up on the flatbed. He said "yeah, we have the Newport around in back". He let me look at it. Considering that it punched in the Accord about two feet, between the wheels on the passenger side, the Newport wasn't that bad. All the plastic stuff up front was broken and smashed, and the driver's side fender crumpled just enough into the tire to make it un-driveable. And it bent one of the rear axles when it hopped a curb after whacking the Accord.
I actually met the guy who owned the Newport about a year later. I was still delivering, and had a '79 Newport by that time. One friday night during a slow stretch I was standing out in front of the store, and some of the kids who worked there were out in front smoking. This guy comes walking up and I hear him say "Is that a Newport?" Well, I didn't say anything to him because I thought he was asking the kids about their cigarettes and was just trying to bum one off of them!
He started to turn and walk away, when it hit me that he was talking to me. D'oh!
As for an '81 New Yorker versus a DeVille, I don't know which one really would be better? Or worse? There wasn't anything really horrible about the '80-81 R-body, except for the strangulated engines. The '79's were more prone to rusting, and had aluminum bumpers that would corrode and let the chrome peel off.
MT or C&D compared a 1980 Seville with the 368 to a 1980 New Yorker with a 318, and I think the Seville did 0-60 in about 10.6 seconds, while the New Yorker was about 14. That New Yorker had 120 hp and a 2.45:1 rear end, while the Seville had 150 hp and a lot more torque, but a similarly low rear end.
For 1981 the NYer was bumped up slightly to 130 hp. I've seen a 4-bbl 165 hp version listed, but I think it was only a copcar engine. And supposedly, if you knew the right strings to pull, you could still get a 360-4bbl which put out around 185-190 hp. But while the engine was boosted a bit in hp, they went to a taller rear end, 2.26:1 versus 2.45:1. They did change first and second gear in the transmission though, to compensate. So I dunno if an '81 would be better or worse than the 80 in acceleration.
The Caddy 368 was down to 140 hp that year, I think , but still pretty torquey. I'd imagine that as long as it was running right, with no V-8-6-4 problems, it wouldn't have been too bad of a performer? I heard the V-6 version that came out that year did 0-60 in about 21 seconds though!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Another neat old heap
I don't think I would use the term "invested"...
I think this is pretty cool in its own way
You'd have to be brave
Fell on hard times in the 70s, apparently
Roller skate
Right before the fun ended
This is really something
Ummm...no
Pretty, but whats it worth
Cool Italian luxobarge
Strange lights...some kind of stupid DOT thing I am sure
Classy
This is some design
I've never seen one of those thermometers before
This is an odd spec...kind of sport-pimp
Only so many cars can get away with pink
Perhaps the strangest fins
If anything, special because of the rare and well preserved velour
Neat highline fintail, but I don't know about that upholstery
XS
Canadian Nova
Uncommon tank
Tremendous to see that car again. Haven't seen
one in those colors in a long time!
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
Captain Picard is driving a late-'60s, early-'70s monster Mercedes sedan in a flashback.... then, later... I think they are in the new S550...
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
I haven't seen X-Men...I'll have to keep an eye on IMCDB for any screen caps.
Here's a C43 in an almost unknown color
Today I saw something unusual...it was a 72 T-Bird, the kind with the fake landau bars instead of the opera windows. It was a dark grey-green with a white top, and it was sitting on old style mags and it had a hood scoop. It looked immaculate, and in a strange way quite sinister.
Stupid having to buy a house.
A little while later I about killed a guy in a white 944 turbo. I was in the left hand lane of a 40 mph zone four line street. I was just about to move over into the right hand lane and had started signaling and was checking my mirrors. I didn't see anyone in the side mirrors didn't see anyone in the rearview mirror so I glanced at my blind spot and then started to move over. That is when I saw a flash of white and felt more then heard the fart can exhaust. I got passed by the 944 at at least 90 mph. I didn't see him because he came up on me so fast he wasn't there when I looked before.
If I had moved over a few seconds earlier he would have just run right under the side of me. I was in my disco and the 944 looked lowered so his roof was probably about even with the bottom of my passenger side door. I hate to think what the boxed frame rail of a 4,400 lbs Disco would do to the roof of a 944.
Excuse the photo...the dumb phone makes things a few car lengths away look very small
I saw a 968 today too.
"Stupid having to buy a house."
Hey...you didn't have to. Cars are more fun.
ANd remember, you can live in your car, but you can't drive your house!
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
I did see a blue Ferrari 328 - that has to be odd. And a Plymouth GTX like in 'Tommy Boy', but it was a coupe.