I know I'm probably in the minority here, but I actually prefer that 1974 restyle, on both the Camaro and the Vega. I just prefer the more slicked-back look with a proper bumper to that more Ferrari-esque style. Too bad the performance got cut in those later years.
I know I'm probably in the minority here, but I actually prefer that 1974 restyle, on both the Camaro and the Vega.
Me, too. On the Vega, I think the earlier ones' bumpers and taillights are too tiny, doll-house tiny!
On the Camaro, I like the wraparound taillights on the '74 better, too. I really like the '75 when they made the rear window wrap-around. Makes you wonder why they didn't do that sooner, as it looked so natural on the car.
Bill
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Hmmm... I think maybe that's a function of age... The younger you were, the less the "big-bumper" look bothered you..
When I was in high school in the early-mid '70s, most of the desirable cars were '60s muscle.. The 5-mph crash bumpers were not popular... On top of that, they changed the horsepower calculation in '72. So, even though the engines weren't really any different, the horsepower numbers dropped by about 1/3.. Hard on a guy's masculinity...
After seeing a picture of that Z-28 above... sticking with my original statement... Quit after '72
The biggest part of that ~1/3 decline in horsepower did indeed come from the change in the way they calculated horsepower, but a significant part was due to the fact that real power actually declined. Beginning with the '68 model year, ever stricter pollution laws went into effect, Compression ratios kept getting reduced, as well as a host of other changes to meet pollution requirements that seemed to get tighter by the year. The low point may have been 1974.
For the '75 model year car makers adopted catalytic converters, with a few notable exceptions (Honda's CVCC, Volvo, BMW, Mercedes, American Motors and some Mopars) and they were able to retune the engines for more power, while reducing emissions still further. Then, in the latter '70s- around '82, horsepower generally went on a mild decline, as pollution lows took a further toll. Beginning in '83-'84, and as fuel injection and other technologies were adopted, horsepower generally started to climb, and it's been increasing ever since.
To make matters worse for performance, cars kept getting heavier, to meet new safety regulations. So, the combination of greater weight and reduced horsepower and torque, was a real performance killer.
The good news, which isn't mentioned frequently among us car enthusiasts, is the health benefits we all gained (especially those of us who live in or near cities).
Today it's virtually impossible to find an underpowered car. Some may not be especially fast, but they're no longer underpowered, as many were in the '70s and early '80s.
As someone who lived through this transition, from "muscle to mousepower", I recall quite clearly that we all regarded 1975 as the end of the world as we knew it.
It is NO co-incidence, that the entire hobby of car collecting, of auctions, classic car magazines, etc., arose and blossomed from the ashes of 1975. Prior to that, car collecting was a very small enterprise and most people didn't really care about 60s cars or preserving them.
People realized in the late 70s and 80s, quite rightly IMO, that there wasn't diddley worth collecting between 1975-1985 (more or less) and that the 50s and 60s cars might never be seen again.
As it turns out, collectors were right and wrong. We did see the return of performance cars, but man, it was a desert out there for at least a decade.
Probably the most humiliating thing to watch was the "Mustang II" and the late 70s Corvettes.
My first new car was a '77 Mustang Cobra II.. It's only saving grace was the trusty 302 V-8, though smogged and constrained by a tiny carb, and generating only 135 hp (not a typo), it was still very torquey and coupled with the 4-speed manual, pretty darn quick (through the first two and a half gears..).
But, after suffering the abuses of a young driver, it was just about shot, after only 48K miles... Though unemployed, I sold it, and gave the money to my girlfriend, so she could get another car, after her engine died..
I think this is a pretty typical story of the late '70s... I blame it all on the crappy cars.. :surprise:
After seeing a picture of that Z-28 above... sticking with my original statement... Quit after '72
Ha! Too funny. I like the first gen F-body best, but, c'mon! I still liked the '74 Z/28. And the Super Duty Firebirds, too. That collector needs to keep looking for those at least. He already has so many versions of everything else.
There was a car lot next to the store where I was working part time in the summer of 1974 and they took in a really sharp, almost-new, '74 Z with silver paint and red interior, 4-speed, etc. I think they had it priced at $3,799 or $3,999? Something like that, under $4K any way. It didn't stay on the front line for more than a couple days until it sold.
Still your post made me think of the styling changes GM made to the second gen F-body in the late 70s which probably boosted sales when the engine hp couldn't.
For example, remember when you first saw the "batmobile" Firebird restyle for model year 1977? It was a pretty dramatic look on the street which made earlier second gen Firebirds look instantly old. Pontiac offered a good W72 400 engine option too, but only in the F-body. Argh! (Maybe they also used the W72 for just one year in the Can Am?)
A year later, the 1978 Camaro restyle gave a smooth, popsicle shape to the front end which also dated every earlier version of that same generation Camaro.
This pic (1977 Z on top, 1978 below) may not capture the full effect of "old vs. new" look on the street back then, but it really did seem to boost sales.
I wonder if it was the "batmobile era" restyle which inspired our Florida collector to collect so many variants of those late 70s F-bodys?
Maybe he might make a good Edmunds interview/feature?
Kind of macabre, but I seem to see a lot of old 1950's hearses in rural areas. I know that hearses were popular with startup rock bands (you could put a lot of amplifiers, speakers, etc. in the back). However, they handle awfully and drink gasoline like a pig. Most were Cadillac-based, but I have seen a few based upon Buicks, Chryslers, etc.-even once (in Brazil) based on a VW minibus! Does anybody collect these things? Or are the morbid associations too great? :confuse:
Hey, this is America. I bet there's even a Hearse Owners Club somewhere.
People do collect them, sometimes as part of commercial vehicle collections, museusm, or for movie rentals (the Godfather?), but they aren't worth much on the open market given the costs of restoration.
I would imagine they stay in service a long time. After all, customer complaints are nil. :P
I know where there's a '62 Pontiac hearse and a '61 Pontiac ambulance in a junkyard. Unfortunately, they're probably too far gone to salvage. Neat looking cars, though. I thought the '61 especially would have been a cool car to try saving.
I think my dream hearse, if there ever was such a thing, would be a '61-62 Cadillac, with maybe a '57-58 coming in a close second. A '57-58 DeSoto hearse would really be cool, but they're about as common as unicorns, three-headed rattlesnakes, and rust-free '76 Volares.
As for hearse clubs, I think the biggest one is the Professional Car Society of America. They cover hearses,flower cars, ambulances, etc. Probably limos too, I'm guessing?
I know I'm probably in the minority here, but I actually prefer that 1974 restyle, on both the Camaro and the Vega.
I liked the early 70 and a half RS Camaro best. However, I think I'm probably a minority in that I liked all of these 70's Camaros better than the first gen.
A few years ago, this '57 DeSoto Firesweep ambulance showed up at the Carlisle Mopar Nats...
the owner let me sit behind the wheel. I thought it was really cool, although the driving position was really tight, due to the partition inside, right at the B-pillar.
I guess most paramedics back in the day had short legs? :P
When the '70 1/2 Camaro and Firebird came out, the car magazine critics hailed it as the best-styled car in years and highly futuristic with its lack of quarter windows and other touches. I thought it was pretty cool. What sucks is those folks who bought a "'70" Camaro in fall '69 or early calendar '70 and when it was trade-in time, it was considered a '69!
The worst feature about the second-generation Camaro, IMHO, was the ridiculous passenger space in the rear seat (no wonder it didn't need quarter windows!) and the glovebox-sized trunk! When other teens my age wanted one of those, I wanted a Chevelle or Monte Carlo instead! I was an 'old soul' even then!
Bill
2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
Today, driving on a quiet residential street, the one oncoming car was a very clean white 65 Pontiac LeMans 2 door HT...didn't look over restored, just very well cared for. No other traffic in the area, in a neighborhood of mostly 50s houses. I was in the fintail...if not for a few parked cars, it could have been a 'time warp' kind of moment.
Also saw a Model A town sedan in a weird green color, and a Ferrari 360.
What sucks is those folks who bought a "'70" Camaro in fall '69 or early calendar '70 and when it was trade-in time, it was considered a '69!
You kidding? Late 1969 Camaros sold+titled new as 1970 models? Impossible. We'll need concrete proof in the form of Camaro sellers pushing them on ebay. Link please?
Yours truly, 1964.5 Mustang
PS-Just kidding. No offense about the Camaro thing. I'm a Mustang fan who accepts that the original pony car was a 1965 thing.
A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
Fintail, you may like (or cringe) this story I have - last night, I decided to order a pizza from Domino's and have it delivered. When it arrived at my home, I was waiting at the front door, and to my surprise, the delivery man's car was a Mercedes W123 300TD! I've seen a lot of pizza delivery cars used in my day, but never a Mercedes, let alone a diesel wagon.
It was obvious that this particular car was not well-cared for, as it was blowing black smoke out of the exhaust, had dirty rims, and had pizza boxes all over the back seat. I paid for my dinner, and also asked the pizza guy (a younger gentleman) what year the 300TD was. He said it was an '84. I asked him, "How do you manage to get from place to place driving that old car?" His reply: "I try my best." :P
Yeah, I like it more than cringe. It's a heading for 30 year old workhorse likely with a vinyl interior and a clattery engine, and probably has 300K+ miles on it. It will soldier on for a while before it finally checks out. Those cars were engineered for that exact fate.
I haven't read past your post, so I'm probably slow on the uptake here, but isn't this the Claire-mobile from 'Six Feet Under'?
I LOVED that show. I remember Claire driving through the funeral home parking lot (or maybe her HS parking lot?) people standing around in the way of pictured hearse, and her bellowing out the window, "OTHER PEOPLE EXIST!!". Classic.
...i the lot a VERY nice-condition '90-ish Audi 100 Quattro, in the cool-new-for-that-year Pearl White, with the lovely factory lace alloys. Also saw a really horrible late-70s Nova coupe.
I stumbled on a factory original 300 SL Gullwing Workshop Manual--the one shipped to dealers, and I snagged it. I wonder what it's worth? Very good shape! :shades:
Well, the supply of Gullwing shop manuals is small, but, then, so is the demand. That tells us nothing, of course, but is there any way of finding out the price(s) on previous sales of these manuals?
Gullwing material is sought after even by those who don't own the cars. Could be worth in the low four figures, if it's that huge book...several hundred at the least, no doubt.
...sporting more bondo and primer than sheetmetal and paint - a 1976 Datsun B210 wagon on Tabor and Levick in NE Philly that looks like it may have once been dark blue. Most of these were eaten away by rust 25 years ago around here.
Also spotted was a silver 1976 Cadillac Coupe DeVille for sale on Longshore Street in the same neighborhood which piqued my interest until I saw it too was infested with the dreaded tinworm. Sad. It was the same silver as my 1975 Cadillac Sedan DeVille and had the same hubcaps too! These cars tended to rust below the trim for the vinyl top and along the side trim on the rear quarters. The leading edge of the hood is also susceptible for some reason.
I suppose the cost of replicating this manual would be one parameter on the value of Shifty's manual, although there's probably a value associated with authenticity.
Yeah I saw that. I've seen Gullwing manuals but they are factory or club reprints. This is an original.
Maybe what I should do is go on eBay with a high reserve and see how much it bids up to. If they don't bid the reserve I can always contact the highest bidder and make a deal. It seems like a good way to test the market, don't you think.
I also have an engine assembly manual for the Porsche 356 Carrera engine---the twin cam motor. There are very few....*very* few....technicians left who can build this motor competently. It's a roller-bearing crank.
Also a Gullwing Parts Manual. It's in good shape but some pages are loose. Seems to me it could easily be re-glued.
Also a good idea. Really I don't have to get top top dollar, since I got them cheap so I'm not greedy. I'd like a fair price, and also to see them go to a good use. I'd rather not see them in some locked glass case in Geneva, but rather in a restoration shop.
Comments
Nah, his only problem right now is locating a 1974 Z/28 for his collection. And maybe a SD 455 Firebird too-unless I missed seeing one there already.
There's more 70's Detroit iron in that guy's garage than is left in all of Ypsilanti.
Me, too. On the Vega, I think the earlier ones' bumpers and taillights are too tiny, doll-house tiny!
On the Camaro, I like the wraparound taillights on the '74 better, too. I really like the '75 when they made the rear window wrap-around. Makes you wonder why they didn't do that sooner, as it looked so natural on the car.
Bill
When I was in high school in the early-mid '70s, most of the desirable cars were '60s muscle.. The 5-mph crash bumpers were not popular... On top of that, they changed the horsepower calculation in '72. So, even though the engines weren't really any different, the horsepower numbers dropped by about 1/3.. Hard on a guy's masculinity...
After seeing a picture of that Z-28 above... sticking with my original statement... Quit after '72
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
For the '75 model year car makers adopted catalytic converters, with a few notable exceptions (Honda's CVCC, Volvo, BMW, Mercedes, American Motors and some Mopars) and they were able to retune the engines for more power, while reducing emissions still further. Then, in the latter '70s- around '82, horsepower generally went on a mild decline, as pollution lows took a further toll. Beginning in '83-'84, and as fuel injection and other technologies were adopted, horsepower generally started to climb, and it's been increasing ever since.
To make matters worse for performance, cars kept getting heavier, to meet new safety regulations. So, the combination of greater weight and reduced horsepower and torque, was a real performance killer.
The good news, which isn't mentioned frequently among us car enthusiasts, is the health benefits we all gained (especially those of us who live in or near cities).
Today it's virtually impossible to find an underpowered car. Some may not be especially fast, but they're no longer underpowered, as many were in the '70s and early '80s.
It is NO co-incidence, that the entire hobby of car collecting, of auctions, classic car magazines, etc., arose and blossomed from the ashes of 1975. Prior to that, car collecting was a very small enterprise and most people didn't really care about 60s cars or preserving them.
People realized in the late 70s and 80s, quite rightly IMO, that there wasn't diddley worth collecting between 1975-1985 (more or less) and that the 50s and 60s cars might never be seen again.
As it turns out, collectors were right and wrong. We did see the return of performance cars, but man, it was a desert out there for at least a decade.
Probably the most humiliating thing to watch was the "Mustang II" and the late 70s Corvettes.
My first new car was a '77 Mustang Cobra II.. It's only saving grace was the trusty 302 V-8, though smogged and constrained by a tiny carb, and generating only 135 hp (not a typo), it was still very torquey and coupled with the 4-speed manual, pretty darn quick (through the first two and a half gears..).
But, after suffering the abuses of a young driver, it was just about shot, after only 48K miles... Though unemployed, I sold it, and gave the money to my girlfriend, so she could get another car, after her engine died..
I think this is a pretty typical story of the late '70s... I blame it all on the crappy cars.. :surprise:
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Ha! Too funny. I like the first gen F-body best, but, c'mon! I still liked the '74 Z/28. And the Super Duty Firebirds, too. That collector needs to keep looking for those at least. He already has so many versions of everything else.
There was a car lot next to the store where I was working part time in the summer of 1974 and they took in a really sharp, almost-new, '74 Z with silver paint and red interior, 4-speed, etc. I think they had it priced at $3,799 or $3,999? Something like that, under $4K any way. It didn't stay on the front line for more than a couple days until it sold.
Still your post made me think of the styling changes GM made to the second gen F-body in the late 70s which probably boosted sales when the engine hp couldn't.
For example, remember when you first saw the "batmobile" Firebird restyle for model year 1977? It was a pretty dramatic look on the street which made earlier second gen Firebirds look instantly old. Pontiac offered a good W72 400 engine option too, but only in the F-body. Argh! (Maybe they also used the W72 for just one year in the Can Am?)
A year later, the 1978 Camaro restyle gave a smooth, popsicle shape to the front end which also dated every earlier version of that same generation Camaro.
This pic (1977 Z on top, 1978 below) may not capture the full effect of "old vs. new" look on the street back then, but it really did seem to boost sales.
I wonder if it was the "batmobile era" restyle which inspired our Florida collector to collect so many variants of those late 70s F-bodys?
Maybe he might make a good Edmunds interview/feature?
<img src="http://i10.photobucket.com/albums/a123/hoyvin/77_78Z28.jpg" border="0" alt="Photobucket"
However, they handle awfully and drink gasoline like a pig.
Most were Cadillac-based, but I have seen a few based upon Buicks, Chryslers, etc.-even once (in Brazil) based on a VW minibus!
Does anybody collect these things? Or are the morbid associations too great? :confuse:
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
People do collect them, sometimes as part of commercial vehicle collections, museusm, or for movie rentals (the Godfather?), but they aren't worth much on the open market given the costs of restoration.
I would imagine they stay in service a long time. After all, customer complaints are nil. :P
If I had a big collection, a fintail hearse wouldn't be out of place
This one has better fins:
I think my dream hearse, if there ever was such a thing, would be a '61-62 Cadillac, with maybe a '57-58 coming in a close second. A '57-58 DeSoto hearse would really be cool, but they're about as common as unicorns, three-headed rattlesnakes, and rust-free '76 Volares.
As for hearse clubs, I think the biggest one is the Professional Car Society of America. They cover hearses,flower cars, ambulances, etc. Probably limos too, I'm guessing?
I liked the early 70 and a half RS Camaro best. However, I think I'm probably a minority in that I liked all of these 70's Camaros better than the first gen.
the owner let me sit behind the wheel. I thought it was really cool, although the driving position was really tight, due to the partition inside, right at the B-pillar.
I guess most paramedics back in the day had short legs? :P
The worst feature about the second-generation Camaro, IMHO, was the ridiculous passenger space in the rear seat (no wonder it didn't need quarter windows!) and the glovebox-sized trunk! When other teens my age wanted one of those, I wanted a Chevelle or Monte Carlo instead! I was an 'old soul' even then!
Bill
Also saw a Model A town sedan in a weird green color, and a Ferrari 360.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
You kidding? Late 1969 Camaros sold+titled new as 1970 models? Impossible. We'll need concrete proof in the form of Camaro sellers pushing them on ebay. Link please?
Yours truly,
1964.5 Mustang
PS-Just kidding. No offense about the Camaro thing. I'm a Mustang fan who accepts that the original pony car was a 1965 thing.
It was obvious that this particular car was not well-cared for, as it was blowing black smoke out of the exhaust, had dirty rims, and had pizza boxes all over the back seat. I paid for my dinner, and also asked the pizza guy (a younger gentleman) what year the 300TD was. He said it was an '84. I asked him, "How do you manage to get from place to place driving that old car?" His reply: "I try my best." :P
"formerly expensive cars that have depreciated to affordability by pizza delivery persons, will die a horrible death".
As for my final ride... I'd prefer a Lincoln.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
Here you go!
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
I LOVED that show. I remember Claire driving through the funeral home parking lot (or maybe her HS parking lot?) people standing around in the way of pictured hearse, and her bellowing out the window, "OTHER PEOPLE EXIST!!". Classic.
Yeah me too. When the hearse subject came up I figured I would post a pic.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Gullwing material is sought after even by those who don't own the cars. Could be worth in the low four figures, if it's that huge book...several hundred at the least, no doubt.
Here is just a factory parts manaul on Ebay $295.00
I searched completed listings but didn't see any repair manuals.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
Also spotted was a silver 1976 Cadillac Coupe DeVille for sale on Longshore Street in the same neighborhood which piqued my interest until I saw it too was infested with the dreaded tinworm. Sad. It was the same silver as my 1975 Cadillac Sedan DeVille and had the same hubcaps too! These cars tended to rust below the trim for the vinyl top and along the side trim on the rear quarters. The leading edge of the hood is also susceptible for some reason.
I suppose the cost of replicating this manual would be one parameter on the value of Shifty's manual, although there's probably a value associated with authenticity.
Maybe what I should do is go on eBay with a high reserve and see how much it bids up to. If they don't bid the reserve I can always contact the highest bidder and make a deal. It seems like a good way to test the market, don't you think.
I also have an engine assembly manual for the Porsche 356 Carrera engine---the twin cam motor. There are very few....*very* few....technicians left who can build this motor competently. It's a roller-bearing crank.
Also a Gullwing Parts Manual. It's in good shape but some pages are loose. Seems to me it could easily be re-glued.
I can't think of a better way to do it with a single ad.
How about also putting an ad in Hemmings after you've tested the market on Ebay?