Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)
This discussion has been closed.
Comments
upstate NY, a pair of old beetles. a slightly custom looking yellow job (probably late 60s) and a stock black super early one. Had to be just beyond the tiny windo (was not split) vintage, but looked decidedly older. Maybe late 50s?
A few other oddballs in passing. nice clean 70ish Nova 2 door with some hop ups. and a 70ish road runner.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Funny thing about the Daimlers, when new were a bit pricer than a nearly identical Jag, today are worth a bit less.
I think the '58 Buicks and Oldsmobiles are so over-the-top, right from the factory, that those more conservative colors, such as that nice blue, help tone the car down overall.
If anything, I think the job they did makes the cars more appealing to modern tastes. These are cars after all, not Monets. It's still a '58 Buick, it's still reflecting the history of the 50s, and it's still making people happy, so what's the harm in this case?
I'm more concerned when someone takes something beautiful and nearly perfect and really makes it ugly. Sure, if you put a truck diesel in an E-Type, or turn a rare Mopar Hemi into a 4X4 with cammo paint---then yes, IMO you're guilty of a crime.
As long as the customizer is a true artist, I can *usually* get behind it.
WOW. You really know how to hurt a guy. :sick:
It's a Buick. :shades: A Buick wouldn't have been configured in any such way even adjusting to the contemporary modifications of its day.
Now here's the kind of car that gives me a thrill to see: it's stock. It's just the way it would have been when originally on the road.
Andre should like this one too. Its style is spot on for the period. And I like them in white, which usually makes cars look bad by showing oddities in styling if there are any.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Owner claims it's 1 of 500...
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Not *everything* is worth preserving---sometimes people just gotta look at a vehicle and say "oh, nice old used car".
I guess I'd put the Shelby Turbo in the "Curiosity Department" of collector cars, so it has a place on the oddity shelf. But would I throw myself in front of the customizer's sawz-all to save it?
No.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
In contrast, I think GM did a pretty good job at making the competing Electra and 98 look like expensive cars, and Mercury did a good job giving its Marquis that "baby Lincoln" look.
With the fuselage cars, I think my favorites are the Imperials, followed by the Dodge Monaco/Polara. I thought the Dodges looked great in '69, sportier and not as fat as the other cars, and I liked when they started putting hidden headlights on the Monaco, even though it did make it look like a ripoff of the Mercury Marquis.
You are right; they look best in 4-door versions, as the greenhouse seems a bit taller. That includes the wagons. The 2-doors, while swoopy, had an unfortunate shallow greenhouse (that is back in vogue today of course) which to me never looked right.
There was a sameness to all of them, as Chrysler didn't do all that much to differentiate the Imperials from the Chryslers from the Dodges from the Plymouths. But I liked them for a bunch of reasons: the sheer audaciousness of the design, which Chrysler said was akin to a jetliner (it was the jet age, after all), the hefty loop bumpers they used on many, and (this is odd, I know) I absolutely loved the rounded top of front windshield corner garnish molding they used, which was unlike most other cars and just seemed right to me. Such a minor point, but as a 12 year old, it seemed important.
Unfortunately they seem not to be built as well as earlier models, but I still go for a nice one.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Go figure!
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
Probably a good thing! I saw one not that long ago and it certainly looked well worn.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
One of the things I don't like about the new Camaros is that they're porkers. Hopefully, that'll be addressed in the next generation.
Wow no one even notices a Toyota in print.....
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
These are pretty rare and this car for some reason didn't have the raised centers on the hubcaps that usually denote a 356B,. it wore the flatter hubcaps seen on 356C models. :confuse:
It was ivory with a black top and obviously restored. A very nice sight for a old sports car guy.
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
The notchback is the least popular and least valuable of all the 356s. It's not a very handsome car. Sometimes in Europe they get chopped and passed off as cabriolets. Not nice.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
Considering that they basically are cabrios which had the h/ts welded on, that doesn't seem so bad. :shades:
2001 BMW 330ci/E46, 2008 BMW 335i conv/E93
Regards:
Oldbearcat