By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-juice
-juice
DVD player
running boards$429
remote start$150
splash guards $50
various roof and hitch carriers
SE package $2156
supercharger$2995
bug deflector$100
black chrome lens covers f&r $600
tubular grill guard $550
17" chrome factory wheels $1200
The survey was on Gongos and is meant to find what the consumer wants as accessories for the nox.
Do any of you think the pricing packages for the nox will follow the vue? not in price but in content? anyone have the prices for the nox? options and base?
this looks like a very nice machine and we are very interested in purchasing one. i also wish it had the honda engine but that's ok for now.
I live about 90 miles from the nearest saturn,honda,toyota,hyundai etc dealer. i have a chevy,chysler,dodge,jeep dealer in may town so distance is a consideration.
Happy New Year to all
http://www.chevylaunch.com/pdfs/equinox_ordwkbk.pdf
If Chevy can make this Equinox fairly reliable...then there will be no reason to buy a CRV or RAV4 with their awful bumpers and spares sticking out...that you have to worry about backing into someone's hood parking in the city.
I test drove the CRV 2X. The 2nd time I drove it I realized the seat didn't go back far enough...I could not reach the stereo...I heard pebbles hitting the underside of the car...I was able to leave permanent scratches on the interior trim with my fingernails.. oh and the color choices stink! Otherwise...it was nice :>) As for the RAV4..I think it is nicer than the CRV but you have to get a loaded model to get side bags and the door arm rests are useless.
So all I'm saying is... Chevy.. make this reliable and get decent gas mileage and it will sell like crazy!
I don't need one, but my father-in-law was looking at a Dodge minivan replacement vehicle, and this was as close as he came to something he would consider.
We'll see how it all plays out.
It would be great to see them pull out of this spin cycle and be ready to produce what buyers really want, not what they are willing to accept.
It would be great to see them pull out of this spin cycle and be ready to produce what buyers really want, not what they are willing to accept.
Chinese V6 has more to do with politics than it does with technology.
I do wish the NOX had a better motor but I'll wait to test it before I w/o the whole thing.
Well, maybe not. To be honest the Nox disappointed me a little. I didn't like the Vue, and the same things I didn't like about that apply here - splongy seats and plasticky trim.
Also, though it's longer in wheelbase, it just doean't translate into more usable space. The shape is more stylish and raked, not as square, but the result is similar interior room in a bigger car.
To me that was a waste. The seats are too soft, spongy, not supportive enough for hard driving.
The rear has that clever shelf you can put at several heights, neat idea but the shelf itself is a cheap feeling plastic. Finish isn't all that great either.
This is pre-production, so maybe they'll fine tune it more. The Malibu got better by the time it was produced.
Styling is good. It looks big in photos, up close it's not, though. They had it next to a TrailBlazer and the Nox looked small next to it. I guess it's not as long nor is it as tall.
It was getting some attention, but nothing compared to GMs 3 small cars, the production Solstice, the Saturn (forget name), and the super-cool Nomad. Those drew the crowds, plus the Vette.
Overall the GM booth did well, though.
-juice
I too loved the exterior in person. I was hoping for a little more room inside but I guess they larger size didn't yield it. Do you have any comparative numbers vs the VUE? Sometimes things are bigger than they seem.
As for the seats, it's not a performance car so comfort over support I guess.
I hope they use different seats, more firmly padded. I was bummed when I went to Saturn and they told me the Vue Redline has the same seats as the other Vues. Those are also too soft and spongy.
I guess normal drivers might like it, but not me. I need more side bolstering. At least firm them up, like Volvo's excellent seats.
-juice
Actually, my Forester's seats are very firm, which is good on trips. Our Legacy's seats are on the soft side, I'd trade them out for harder seats in a heart beat.
-juice
Politics aside, it was a very bad move on GMs part, IMO. The 3.5 is now also going into the G6 and the updated minivans and should have gone into the Nox.
We bought the buick for the wife.
Now we are looking for another car.
We like the space of SUVs, but we hate the truck drive. We like vehicles that have room like SUVs, drive like cars and would be nice if they had features like minivans where seats can be moved around.
Anyway, the point is what type of car will this one be. Will it be truck-like similar to the trailblazer or will it be like a car similar to the Rendouvous or Highlander.
I am trying to find out if I want to wait for this vehicle or not. Appreciate any help.
If I remember correctly, the VUE was based on a modified Saturn L-Series chassis.
hoyahenry: GO PATS indeed!
Don't expect rebates over $1,000 for at least 6 mos. after intro, unfortunately. Probably will have $1,000 at intro, however. That's what Chevy did with the Malibu, Colorado and Aveo. Yes, $1,000 on the tiny Aveo gets me even madder!
Nox's might be at dealers before the I get to the NY Auto show.
5.7 used in corvette and others
3800 used in full size GM of most all divisions
366 & 427 cid used in medium duty trucks
just because gm doesnt use dual overhead cam/five valve/all aluminium/supercharged/intercooled in every vehicle it produces is not a sign the current engines are not worthy of being used. I have a 1977 caprice that i ordered from the dealer in fall of 1976 with a 305 in it. i still have the car and after 125,000 of family use and 125,000 miles of 2 teenage sons it still runs great and uses about 1/2 quart of oil in 2000 miles. the original trans has never had anything done to it except fluid and filter changes.
all of the problems i have read here and on other sites about people having tramatic problems with autos must be abusive,not properly servicing, or just think that their auto(or anything for that matter) should run forever with no care or maintainance.
remember these are machines built and designed by people and people are not perfect.
Plus the fact that it IS noisy when accelerating.
Assume both problems are fixed with the 3500.
joey : Toronto show is about a month away. I will take some digital pictures for ya. I took some of the exterior last year. I won't likely be shopping till the summer / fall so.. I will wait for the new adaptors to go first.
Hey rhouser: If I could get the Nox for the same price you paid for the '77 Caprice I wouldn't complian since it's the same technology from '77.
I've had a '92 3.1L and my '97 3800, just like Chevyguy: both had oil leaks in intake manifold gasket within the first 1000 miles. Hmmmm, how long does it take for GM to fix something. Plus the 305 was a sweet engine. The V8's were another story, you don't hear me complaining about them.
Toronto will be my last look before a test! I remember seeing it last year and the rep telling me it was a year till it's released. Hard to believe it almost for sale.
My wife loves the look of the nox. Saw one at the Indianapolis Auto Show in December in Salsa Red Metallic and it was beautiful. Unfortunately, they had it locked and would not let you get in it. From everything I have read, I like everything about it other than the engine. I have put up with the 3.1 in my 'bu for 5 years, so I guess I could put up with a 3.4 just as long. Sure wish they would have put the 3.5 from the new 'bu in it though. At least they put the 5-speed auto in it that they forgot to put in the new 'bu.
I've heard of folks spending anywhere from $500-$800 for the repair, depending on how long it takes. I'm no mechanic, but I think roughly the top half of the engine needs to be disassembled to get to the gaskets.
Really bad gaskets would lead to coolant in the oil. You don't want to go there.