Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
The Aztek is ugly/ugly/ugly
The Element and xB are boxy. Really they look more like the van (Montana) than the Aztek.
GM wants credit for something they had nothing to do with...
-juice
I am a huge fan of the xB, but there are plenty of people who say it is just as ugly as the Aztek.
What is the Aztek supposed to be?
All the ribs, gills, vents, spoilers etc...conspire in futility to hide that it's a minivan that's had the roomy rear end hacked off
That's how I feel about it. Apparently everyone else that didn't buy it also.
The xB is an Echo station wagon, with tons of added space and utility. Plus it just looks cooler.
-juice
One thing I find about the Aztek is that, except for the really ardent haters who don't know anything about the vehicle, people tend to look at it and say, "If they would just change [something] and [something else] and make it a little [less/more] [something], it would be great." I think Honda and Scion/Toyota both had this reaction to the vehicle and it did, to some extent, inspire their design philosophy for the US market.
By the way, sometime take a ride in an AMC Pacer. You'll be surprised how much that bizarre vehicle influenced the philosophy of packaging and interior space for modern cars. Same basic idea as what is happening with the Aztek.
-Andrew L
i really don't think you can compare the aztek with xB except for the fact that they are unconventional in design.
1. the 101 freeway between newbury park and camarillo.
2. the canyon roads between sherman oaks and hollywood (e.g. beverly glen and laurel canyon).
with regard to the first example, the xB definitely gets a little challenged going uphill. this is a steep hill with, i think, a 5% grade on a freeway. you're going to have to spend some time in fourth gear to stay up to freeway speed going uphill--no way around that. having said that, it's not as if the car is going to be fighting, and it's no worse than any other econobox out there. you'd have the same issue if you were driving most other cars, and even in my BMW, i have to downshift to fourth to get comfortably up the hill--of course, i'm doing 80 to 90 in the BMW compared to 60 in the xB.
with regard to the second example, the xB is just fine. again, you have to do some downshifting at certain points, but because the speed is about 35 to 40 mph as opposed to 65 or 70 mph, the car is pushed much less.
bottom line? it's not going to race up the hill, but it's not going to be any worse than any other economy car out there.
There's a big story about cool new designs for all kinds of products. Guess what's under the heading "Coolest New Car"
Hint: it starts with the letter X.
i'm amazed that people are still unaware at the price point of these cars. most people who i've talked to are SHOCKED when they find out that the xB is $14K. it's as if that's the point that kind of makes the "what the heck where you thinking about when you bought that thing?" comments go away.
the latter is the hippest new car to come along, and with a price point that quells pretty much all naysayers.
If you look at Element, it's cheaper than CR-V. The xB is even more competitively priced. Perhaps at the low end of the market people are more tolerant of an "out there" design?
The Avalanche is a hit for GM, while the Baja is a bomb for Subaru. I guess you can be ugly (or bizarre looking at least) as long as you offer some utility at a value price.
-juice
I've been letting people look at it and then they always ask how much they are.
I make them guess first. Almost all guesses are 18-21K
They all freak when I tell them 14-15K.
Half Astro van? Just curious.
This thing is seriously ugly. I was on the Toyota lot this last weekend and the guy told me they are selling like hotcakes on the left coast. Can't imagine why. I think the Chrysler K cars were much more attractive.
Enjoy your K-car.
i STILL challenge someone to find a NEW car with these features and this practicality--and this build quality/reliability--in this price range.
second, i absolutely agree with the concept of "if you need it explained to you, you don't get it." tnlandsailor...where do you live? california car culture is seldom understood by those who live outside of california.
finally, to tdubz...before you criticize the car, you really oughta at least wait until they come to texas before you speak. at this point you speak from a point of ignorance. this is the hottest-selling car in california right now, and although i'm sure you might not believe it, california IS the car capital of the world.
I also considered CR-V and Elememt. I don't like the Element's "suicide doors" and seating of 4. And, they are too expensive for me to buy it in cash, too low in mpg, and I really need the ABS and the stability control features.
They added utility and space and priced it right, it'll succeed regardless of how people react to the styling.
-juice
Do like I did, fly to CA and drive one home.
It was a fun drive and it's really a blast to have a totally unique car that most people have never seen before.--Especially 8-9 months before anyone else wiil have one
.
Many thanks
Yee haw.
Element is a very nice car too but I do not need an SUV, especially a quasi SUV, I would better get Impreza than an Element.
as far as texas buyers versus californian buyers...my brother lives in austin and goes to school out there, so i'm hardly uninformed about the whole SUV/truck rage out there.
all i'm saying is...sit in the car and check one out in person before you pass judgment on it.
"the guy aboe me summed it up great. looks like a clown car"
"i think it will be a huge flop in the usa."
You made my point.
The reaction to the car is interesting.
This car gets comments from everybody, everywhere.
I have noticed that all "car people" love it. Most young people seem to love it too. Absolute strangers run up and make raving comments EVERY time I drive it. Generally, the less pretentious and phoney they are, the more they will like it.
The people who either hate it or are visibly displeased, are either just old, or toupee-wearing Corvette types, or big-hair Lexus women and of course, the "chrome-mud-flap-girl" crowd.
It really is interesting, I've had the Scion for a month and I am able to predict with great accuracy, ahead of time, which acquaintances will like it and which won't.
If the style of the Scion bothers these people, that only increases it's appeal to me.
This is a CAR, not a SUV that gets 10 mpg - and it really grows on you. As someone else said, it's an undiscovered gem! The xB is simply the most appealing car I've ever sat in, and that includes cars that I've checked out in Japan.
For the skeptics, I say: reserve your comments until you drive one and check out the limo-like roomy interior.
People said the same exact thing about the Element. Guess which was the best selling new import name plate last year?
-juice
it'll succeed/flop
it's attractive/ugly
you would buy one or not
To me, the bottom line is that it is a competitively priced vehicle (given the level of content and expected reliability) and is different from most anything else out there. To boot, it is affordable enough to be a realistic option to most anyone in the market for a new car.
Having different automotive choices is a GOOD thing...even if you don't like or want to buy this particular different vehicle (the xB), it hopefully will encourage other manufacturers to develop that different car which might appeal to YOU. Regardless of how you feel about the xB as a personal choice, I hope we all want it to succeed so as to validate the consumer market's desire for different CHOICES. Maybe this will serve to get more auto makers to offer small station wagons again, which is my personal desire.
Otherwise, we could just be satisfied with a generic mass market/focus-grouped/offends-no-one cars like a Malibu or Camry. That's not the automotive world I want to be in.
I mean, is it closer to a Lancer Ralliart wagon or a FWD Outlander? Tough call...
-juice
andregtr, i bought a brand new 2003 f150 stx. msrp was 23000, i got it for 17000. this is way below a loaded xb (i priced one the other day on the scion website and it came out to 18,942) i could have even got a supercrew for 18000.
anyways i have a few questions for yall who have bought a xb
1)hows driving at highway speed(75-85mph)? i know alot of compact cars dont do to well at tthese speeds so im curious to how the xb handles them.
2)can 3 adults (6ft and over) fit comfortably in the back seat?not just leg and head room but hip room too.
3)whats with the no hassle price? does this mean you cant negoitate to get the price below or close to invoice?
4)anyone have the bazooka bass tube option?this seems like a waste of money for a $430 option when you can get way better at a auto store.just wanted to know how it shounded since other bazookas ive heard havent been that great
(3) Don't you have Saturns in Texas as well? Price is fixed, MSRP is the price for everyone.
(4) It is called an "option" so you would not waste money on it.
By the way, the CD/MP3 is not bad, it even shows ID3 tags.
The base Scion xB has a lot more standard features than the F150 as it is, so why would you fully load an xB to compare it pricewise? If you read comments here or at Scionlife, most people only get 0-2 options on their xB...people who customize their vehicles would still rather do it themselves. Anyhow, for pricing you should be comparing the base to the base?
TMV price: F150=$17,071 Scion=$14,653
How much time did it take you to negotiate the $17,000 price that (according to Edmunds) is what you should have paid anyhow?
Negotiation time: F150=30minutes(est.) Scion=0minutes
Standard Warranty: F150=3/36,000 Scion=3/36,000
Drivetrain Warranty: F150=3/36,000 Scion=5/60,000
Roadside Assist: F150=3/36,000 Scion=NA
Rust: F150=5/unlimited Scion=5/unlimited
Recalls: F150=2 Scion=0
TSBs: F150=1 Scion=0
Manufacturer Suggested Maintenance in the first 25,000 miles: F150=11 Scion=4
Power to Curb Weight ratio: F150=.051 Scion=.048
Power to Gross Weight ratio: F150=.033 Scion=.033
Payload: F150=2060lbs. Scion=925lbs.
Gas Mileage: F150=17/20 Scion=30/33
Drive: F150=RWD Scion=FWD
Suspension: F150=IFS Scion=IFS
Stabilizer bars: F150=front Scion=front&rear
Safety: F150=4wheelABS Scion=4wheelABS, emergency brake assist, traction control, stability control
Seating Capacity: F150=3 Scion=5
Tilt steering? F150=no Scion=yes
Stereo: F150=24W AM/FM/cassette w/ mast antenna and 4 speakers Scion=160W AM/FM/CD w/ element antenna and 6 speakers
Front Head Room: F150=40.8" Scion=46.1"
Front shoulder room: F150=63.8" Scion=48.7"
Front hip room: F150=61" Scion=50.7"
Front leg room: F150=40.9" Scion=44"
Rear Head Room: F150=N/A Scion=46.6"
Rear shoulder room: F150=N/A Scion=50"
Rear hip room: F150=N/A Scion=50.6"
Rear leg room: F150=N/A Scion=31.6"
(although I included hip and shoulder room to make this a fairer comparison...the factors that matter most to me 6'0" and some of my close friends 6'3", 6'5" and 6'1" are head room and leg room which the Scion excels in!)
Was anyone keeping score? F150/ties/Scion=5/3/19
The Scion wins the fairer comparison! Amazing!
What does any of that have to do with anything related to this discussion?
Like I said, if my Scion confuses the "chrome mudflap girl" bunch hanging out at Sonic, that makes me like it even more.
as far as your questions:
1. it's fine at highway speed. it drives like an economy car, because that's what its platform is based on (the toyota echo). a good proxy is the echo.
2. you can easily fit three 6+ foot adults in the xB. it is cavernous.
3. the "no hassle" price means that there is a fixed price at the dealer. given that anyone can go online and price out the car, it's essentially whatever you price the car out at online. you can go to any dealer and get the same price, but not necessarily the same service. one dealer might charge you a little less for add-ons, and another might throw in floor mats for free, though.
4. i don't have the bazooka tube. the thing has more than enough bass on its own, unless you want to go bumping obnoxiously down the sunset strip.
Forget the Scion. We should all buy 1972 Buick Le Sabres.
The Buick is superior in all ways. Here is PROOF:
Engine: Lesabre, 455 cubic inches. Scion 1.5L
Size: Lesabre, 21 feet. Scion, Half of that.
Sound System: Lesabre 8-Track. Scion:8-track not available.
Insurance: Lesabre $92 yr. Scion: 645 yr.
Weight: Lesabre, 5625. Scion, 2250
Purchase Cost: Lesabre $475. Scion 14,475
Price per pound: Buick buick 8.3 cents. Scion: $6.43
Value of Lesabre ownership: Priceless
These are the undisputed facts.
You all must agree. No one should buy a Scion.
not sure if i like that no hassle price. most of the new cars i have bought i have got below invoice, where the dealer hardly makes any money. but i guess with scion they plan to make most of there money on options( im guessing) so they probably have the price as low as it will go anyways.
scootertrash, i never was comparing the f150 to a scion, i was just comparing the prices
;-)
-juice
still, you got a great deal on your truck--no doubt about that. you just can't compare the F-150 to the xB because they are two totally different vehicles. if you want to compare only PRICE, then we can also make a case to compare the xB to any econobox out there--and the xB on features and roominess alone would pretty much nuke the competition.
about the no-haggle pricing...i like the fact that the price is the price. i don't care about how much or how little the dealer makes; i only care about how much is left in my bank account after i buy the car. besides, "invoice" is a lousy way to ascertain how well you are doing. embedded in the invoice price is a ton of kickback/incentive money to the dealer for selling the car.