Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options
Comments
Last thing: FORD IF YOU ARE WATCHING, DON'[T THINK YOU CAN KEEP THE MANUSHIFT OUT OF THE FUSION AND PUT IT IN THE LINCOLN TO TRY TO MAKE ME PONY UP SOME EXTRA MONEY. THE ONLY THING EXTRA I'LL BE ABLE TO PONY UP IS SOME GOOD DRY LINT.
I agree it is more conservative looking...which is why I prefer it.
It figures the Milan would be cheapeer when loaded with options...since I don't want a lot of stuff added on
I don't even want the stuff they add to the base Milan over the base Fusion. The only things I would add are safety related things like abs, more air bags, and stability control (should that become available).
I probably won't be buying a new car until at least the 2007 model year, so I'll be interested in seeing what changes there are.
FREESTYLE. Ok, Jeff has asked me why I have it in for such an innocuous design? That's why I have it in for the design. Innocuous doesn't sell these days when a manufacturer needs to make inroads for market share. The Freestyle is BORING looking and hasn't gotten very good reviews from the public nor the critics. In fact, Ford is already considering abandoning the model from what I hear. Just look at the sales figures. That will tell you most of what you need to see.
Many of you have also asked me why I don't like the Corvette and why I think low lying sports cars are not cool? First, I would say the practicality issue would be a big one. Not all of these buyers are in their 30 or 40's. Many are in their advanced ages (hence they can afford them) and the ability to get in and out easily is a factor. In fact I have worked sales most of my life and when my company gave me a 2004 Honda Civic to drive.....I gave it back to them. Getting in and out was a hassle. You may think it's nuts, but it's a fact when you try it over and over. And when your buying a new car, it will run through many a mind.
But let me ask a better question about the Corvette? How many of you would prefer to see a new design more like the first or second generation of Corvette than the sixth generation? Don't get me wrong. Performance wise and price wise I don't think that it can be beat. But that's not what is putting rear-ends in the seats these days...judging by the sales numbers.
As always I am very interested in your responses to my opinions. Thanks
And about sport cars, everyone knows getting in and out is a chore. I recently sat in things like the Crossfire, Boxster, Cayman, Mustang. I'm only 5"11 and found it tough. However most enthusiasts will find the drive to be rewarding enough to make up for those contortionist moves.
About the Corvette, I like the design it has now. No need to go retro. Chevy, please save that for the Camaro when you bring it back.
It seems to work for Toyota and Honda.
But if you read back to my posting about innocuous designs, I stated that innocuous doesn't work unless you already have an advantage. Which as we all know the Americans, i.e. Ford and GM etc. don't have. Hey, unless you don't know it already, I hoping the Americans can regain market share and win one again for the Gipper.
Hey! The Freestyle is a very well executed vehicle. It is just lacking on style (hence the the name, Free(of)Style). The Pacific, its nearest competitor, clearly has more style.
But I can criticize the Freestyle as I own one. Do you, have you even drive one?
Apart from is poor lack to style, it is still a pretty good vehicle. It was also a vehicle to convince my wife to drive a Ford - my wife once vowing to never drive a Ford or GM again. So it has to be fairly decent.
Again, the Freestyle may be the best mechanical car in the world, but the design in part has led to very poor sales. But don't even listen to me. Talk to Ford, they are already considering moth-balling the design because of terrible sales.
I WANT FORD TO DO WELL, TRUST ME.
Sorry if I have offended any of you. Not my intention. And I was just kidding about the Ice cream and Sunday Football stuff. HA HA.
Ford is getting Edge, and a different people mover based on the Fairlane concept.
Ford is also getting a new mini van possibly.
You are picking on the Freestyle because it does what it was designed to do. Be the best vehicle on the market for carrying 6 people without being a van. Thats like picking on a school bus because it can haul 60 kids around. Um yeaah the aveage school bus is pretty innocuous.
You are judging this car based on its exterior. You don't drive the outside of the car. The outside is at worse unoffensive and forgetable. The interior though is the best execution yet of a crossover utility. Until you have sat in a car, maybe you should be a little less judgmental.
And before you talk about poor sales. Don't believe the media hype. Mercedes is lucky if they sell 170,000 total units in the US. Ford measures the success of its individual MODELS in the >100,000.
More Mustangs were sold in the US last year than all Mercedes models COMBINED!
One year of F-series sales counts for about FIVE years of Mercedes sales.
Mark
I also don't see anything wrong with the freestyle. I'm not interested in that vehicle myself, but us boring married guys buy vehicles too.
Incidentally we think it is much more stylish than any of the minivans out there. The FreeStyle is not going away, it is moving upmarket to Mercury and, I think ANT14 mentioned, that it may go to Lincoln as well. The thing is that the car is not bad, it is just made up of many expensive European components and so Ford needs to move it upmarket so they can charge more money for it.
The thing is Ford builds many cars more many different types of people.
This is a Fusion/Millan forum, enough talk of the Freestyle now!
I'm very interested in Ford products, namely the Fusion because I am a Ford shareholder. I have a lot of money in Ford and you all probably know the rest. I want it to do better and I hope the Fusion can jump start the company's sales.
By the way, does anyone have any figures that would tell us how the Fusion is selling? I can't get any info. I want to find out if the car is a hit yet?
Whats also strange is that I haven't seen one TV commercial for the car yet? What's going on?
First, I'm a Ford shareholder so I'm not hear to bash them.
Second, Ford is a proponent in the implementation of six sigma quality measurement standards. That's denotes a goal of 3.4 defects per million opportunties. That means no more than 54 failures of that component (16 million X 3.4). 600 complaints is more than 10 times their goal.
http://www.blueovalnews.com/2005/business/index.html
All the figures you could possibly want. And by the way rscherb, in the first 10 months of the year Ford has sold 66,355 Freestyle's and will sell well over twice as many this November as last. The Freestyle may not be selling gangbusters, but it is selling well, especially so for a vehicle that has received virtually no advertising support from Ford. I see multiple Fusion commercials on TV every day where I live. Most are network feeds. Where do you live that you're not seeing these? Ford seems to be targeting shows that appeal to those who are 25-36 yrs. of age. Virtually any Football game will have Fusion ads.
Mark
Anyway, Passat_2002, thanks for the advertising info. concerning the Fusion. I want the car to do well. Especially after they've had some bad sales in the preceding months. During the month of October or November I saw some scary sales figures for the Big 3. Ford they said had a thirty percent sales drop. I nearly fell out of my Freestyle....Whoops, that's right I don't own one.
I do love it when people state personal opinions as if they were fact. Styling is completely subjective. Or, as I've always said, beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
I'm only 30, but to my Midwestern eyes, the Freestyle is about the most attractive thing available in Housewares (yes, cooler items are available in Sporting Goods, but that's two aisles away - you've got to compare apples to apples). I personally like the inoffensive, clean European look of 'em. But I know on the coasts, bling-bling and gauche are the flavors that sell. For those folks, I can see a sparkly Pacifica or T&C with a chromed fuel filler door having a lot of appeal. Who am I to judge? To each his own...
As far as the Fusion/Milan bright chrome/satin finish debate, has anyone else considered the police laser implications? I'm thinking Ted Trooper could pull a speed off that big chrome Fusion grill from the next county. Ah, but none of us drive in excess of the speed limit now, do we? The Fusion is very attractive - I prefer it to the Merc. - but I'd hate to have to take away some of the freedoms granted to my right foot. I think the more conservative Milan is a great option - stealthy and stylish.
Given the influential buying crowd that frequents Edmunds forums, posting what you do here is sure a strange way to help Ford sell a million Fusions and enrich your brokerage account, I daresay.
As for my investment accounts, I am wise enough I don't post what I do or don't have on the Internet...nor is that a topic for this forum...
That's interesting. I am a 42 MWM, with 2 teenage boys. I live in the Washington, DC area and have only seen 1 ad and that was on the WB channel. I watch a lot of both college and pro football on network and cable TV and don't see the commercials you are talking about. This is a GREAT car. I bought a Fusion SEL on 10/4 and have over 3,000 miles on it. I want this car to do well too, but I am disappointed in the ad campaign or lack thereof. Funny though, the campaign may be geographic, because in my travels to northeast PA, I have seen many billboards for the Fusion.
But the force field did tell me something that I didn't know. The force field is what's been keeping all of those buyers out of Ford showrooms for the past 20 years.
I saw the first ad last night, her in Los Angeles, which shows people being repelled from getting a closer view of the Fusion. I was thinking to myself, "what moron thought of this one". It makes absolutely no sense! Good job Ford. You have a commercial for a car that's probably your most important product launch in 20 years and you don't want the public to get a closer look at the car. Brilliant again Ford, the idea not to let anyone see the beautiful interior that was made for the vehicle....yeah, no one got to see it, at least in the commercial. They must be smoking drugs or trying to prevent sales. The management of Ford should be spanked on national television for this campaign.
Yes, I am venting about this. And I'm enjoying it. Stupid advertising like this does not help sell new American cars. Go Redskins!
Yes, I am venting about this. And I'm enjoying it. Stupid advertising like this does not help sell new American cars. Go Redskins!
Man, I'm glad I DIDN'T see that one!!! You're right, though, they need to show the roomy interior, with the charcoal leather seats and contrasting stitching. That's what I have and it's beautiful, comfortable, and functional.
Go Redskins!!! That's a good one, but we're hurting here and I could go on and on, but that's for another forum
Do you mean Snoop Dogg? That's Chrysler, not Ford. C'mon... lets not jump on Ford for Chrysler's advertising mistakes.
http://www.usatoday.com/life/people/2005-08-05-iacocca-snoop-ads_x.htm?POE=LIFISVA
What we were talking albiet venting about, was the stupid idea of introducing commercials to a new car, that stupidly doesn't allow the viewer to come close to the car. Force fields repel the gawkers who want a closer look. Can you believe this? Stupid, Stupid, Stupid. Why on earth would you want a consumer to get closer to the Fusion....that would probably cause them to buy one. WOW! What a concept Ford. A commercial that puts the couch potato into the interior. The viewers might like it. OH NO!
In case you are typically confused by commercials:
-The guys in the Guiness commercials didn't invent the little black book or the six pack holder.
-TBS doesn't really have a panel of operators waiting to tell you whether something is funny or not.
-Women will not begin attacking you just for wearing Axe body spray.
-Hordes of support personnel do not follow you around when you have a Verizon Wireless phone.
-There isn't really a "Burger King".
- The baby in the Quizno's add can't actually talk.
Hope that helps.
Yeah but Snoop Dogg really does swing like a girl and can't golf to save his life. :P
The sniping that's going on in here is doing nothing but detracting from an otherwise useful and interesting conversation.
Sorry just kidding.
It appears that Ford is holding up cars either production is behind or the cars are not being shipped immediately. Specifically the 4 cylinders.
I know when cars are being held when the vehicle locater say they are on the lot but I know they are not.
Anyone have any information on why cars are being delayed?
Oh and speaking of stupid car commercials, remember the original Infinity ads that showed green leafy trees rustling in the wind? Not a car in sight?
Its amazing that after doing such great F-150 ads and Mustang ads that Ford would do lamo Fusion ads?
Has Ford been out of the car business so long they forgot how to do a car commercial?
I mean even a Nascar tiein would have been better.
Mark.
I am wondering why there aren't many of the Fusions on the lots. Not much on the Zepher either. Both are nice looking cars and I hope they do well.
Boy, Ford does some strange things.
Rob
We do have a separate Zephyr discussion, and I'm quite sure there is a discussion somewhere on the News & View board where the decisions that Ford makes as a corporation are being discussed. (If I am wrong, anyone is free to create one - but that's the board where that conversation belongs.)
Thanks.
The AWD on the Fusion / Milan / Zephyr should also be very helpful to sales of those vehicles, probably more so than the 3.5 V6.
I4 copies with both the ATX and MTX arrived on lots near me the other day. Looks like all but one are stickered under $20k.
Sorry, but I had to answer this one.
Ford is not making as much money on the Freestyle as they wanted. plain and simple.
why, you ask?
Because it's using Volvo's AWD platform...which is not cheap. It is using a newly designed CVT tranny which has ended up costing more than they bargained for (initially that is)
That's why they couldn't even offer stability control with it. It would have cost too much to add the necessary components.
Not that it needs it. Traction control and AWD is plenty for a low slung vehicle like the Freetstyle. (relative to the bouncing wagons that is i.e SUVs)
I've heard countless stories about salespeople pushing Explorers on would-be Freestyle buyers. My dealer doesn't even have them out in the front of the lot. They're out behind the building in a fenced in area.
Now back to the Fusion. I've been seeing quite a few commercials this past weekend.
It was while I was eating ice cream and watching football.
:-)
The key question is....how fast do you need to go? If you want to do 120mph to impress, well maybe this car isn't for you. But for normal driving and passing...and doing drive bys (ha-ha)....it's fine. How many opportunities do people get to go 90 or 100 MPH? I have never understood this. Even as a young man, I didn't see the impulse. Sure we all need passing power and the ability to go 75Mph but what more do you need? Look at all the frustrated Porsche owners who try to go fast out here on the California Highways and they look like they are going to lose control at 85Mph. It's a joke!
If you want a beautiful and functional American car, then the Ford Fusion is one car to choose.