Subaru XT Turbo Forester

18990929495131

Comments

  • pon1pon1 Member Posts: 196
    Juice - any idea how much better mileage for the FXT for 05? Anywhere in the 20s (city) would be good, JP

    PS: I hardly ever see FXTs on the street....but my buddy has one (at my suggestion) and now turns out our CEO's wife also has an FXT. The envy is growing but at least ours is ordered.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    EPA ratings are up 1 mpg or so. Anyone have the details for 04 and 05?

    -juice
  • bobshere1bobshere1 Member Posts: 59
    I really couldn't agree that the '04 has "bugs", Steve. Some have found annoyance with the climate control, no lighted door switch, etc., but these are pretty minor niggles. I'd say the main "real" complaints are the mpg's and handling (not that the handling is "bad", but that FXT should have come with better tires and a better swaybar).

      Handling can be much improved with better tires and a ~ $100 swaybar mod. The mpg's is just something to factor in and live with if you want FXT Zoom Zoom. This car is a rocket. I don't mind paying a few hundred more a year at the pump for this kind of fun! With the mods my FXT handles like a good sports car. I love it!

       I wouldn't pay even $500 more for the MINOR '05 changes, let alone thousands. Go for the '04 !!!

            Cheers,

                 Bob
  • steve7steve7 Member Posts: 5
    Many thanks to all for your input!

    Yesterday, I drove an Accord V-6 (my other choice), then drove the 2004 Forester XT. The XT seems as quick or quicker than the V-6 Accord, but is an absolute rocket compared to my wife's Legacy L. The Accord's interior was "classier" and it rode well. The rear seat was also larger. The Forester rode higher, the driver's seat was more comfortable, the cabin seemed more spacious, and rear/side visibility was better than the Accord. Also, the center console of the Accord restricted moving my right knee to the side - the Forester was more accommodating.

    Bob - Your comment about the "bugs" in the 2004 being minor annoyances is reassuring. It seems that saving about $3000 over a 2005 will be well worth it. Your point about the tires is echoed by many. I asked the dealer if he could pull off the Geolanders, give me some sort of credit, then mount a set of Firestone Affinitys or ContiExtremeContacts for an additional, resonable cost. They are coming up with some numbers for me.

    Miamixt - After looking at the cloth vs leather interior, I agree with you - I can live without the leather and sunroof, and save over $1500 in the process. As for power, I'm not into racing from green lights, etc., but being able to merge into an 80 mph stream of cars and big trucks on the highway, and for the hilly terrain of NH, I need more than the 165 hp provides.

    Samiam 68 - The mpg is a concern - a 30 mile commute vs a 150 mile commute could be a big factor in the decision. As it is now, I never know where my new clients will be located. I would give up about 40% of that abundant turbo power for an extra 3 or 4 mpg, but it obviously doesn't work that way.

    BTW, there is a wide fluctuation in prices around here. Some dealers are still trying to get several hundred $$ over invoice while the 2005 models are sitting next to the 2004. The best price the dealer I went to will do is $24,300 on the XT auto with premium package, and 22,800 for the XT with auto trans.

    Thanks again to everyone.
    - Steve
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    Disregard the following if you are leasing or if you keep your vehicles for 8-10 years. If you are buying as opposed to leasing, don't forget that there is a big difference in the value of an 04 cf. 05 at resale. Unless immediate cash outlay is an issue, make sure you are getting a real discount. 3 years from now, no-one cares if you bought the car in June, the 04-05 KBB difference will probably be $2k. I've known people who bought a new, last years model to save $750, completely ignoring the fact that the net value of the older year drops more than that in one year. Both of the times that I bought end of model year, it was to get the bonus financing which saved me thousands in interest so it was worth it.
    If it's cash, or if there's no finance benefit, then spend the extra few hundred on the 05 - it's a better financial decision.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    My FXT has been virtually flawless. Well okay there's HAL to deal with but I keep the climate control strictly in the manual mode so HAL is a non-issue for me.

    Mileage for the '05 FXTs is:

    19/24 Manual
    20/23 Automatic

    Just updated my fuel chart and the mpg avg for my 04 now stands at 23.9 mpg (mostly hwy miles).

    -Frank

    P.S. Over 12k on the odo and still nary a rattle to be heard.

    P.P.S. Having driven an XT for 6 months, there's no way I could now go back to driving an XS.
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    Bugs: Steering Linkage makes Noise, Air conditioning is fair to good, HAL the Climate Control sometimes turns himself on when off, Engine Surge with A/T(possible Transmission issues). Then of course, no Power Seats, Memory Side Mirror's, lack of lit Switches, strange switch placement, no inside Temp Gage, no Turbo Boost Gage,6 Disc CD Changer that WILL jam someday instead of a 1 disc MP3 Unit, VERY marginal Emergency handling( great in a straight line!), Geolanders small & horrible Tires.
    RATTLES: Everywhere, no question about it! Road Noise, way more than the CRV.
    Overall the Subaru Forester XT is a great Budget Buy Turbo SUV.
  • distancedriverdistancedriver Member Posts: 7
    I just bought an XT today! Silver, premium package. Great price. Very happy. But, in terms of anticipating the future, should I buy the added security plan, the gold or the classic? Does anyone have any view or experience?

    Also do I need a guard for the hood scoop? Just curious?

    Appreciate any replies.
  • deadeye5deadeye5 Member Posts: 93
    Distancedriver...Have read a lot of comments on here about the various plans..most are NEGATIVE...I have an XT (Gold) w/prem pkg..Love it=at 8,200 miles...One item used under warranty a front shock.._No chg and/or hassle from the dealer...

                     Enjoy your XT !! Deadeye
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    No issues, rattles, etc., with my '04 XT at 13k nor any problems - same with my son's XT at about 10k. The only other new vehicle I owned that comes close to being repair & rattle free reliability was my '71 Datsun 510 2dr sedan that I very competitively autox'd & took off-road.
    No complaints either on the XT's handling capabilities which I find nimble & predictable. Sure, I've owned sports cars & sports sedans that could post a little better score on lateral acceleration but they would beat me to death on anything but a glass smooth surface. I like the XT's long travel suspension.
    The XT's advantage is in the sum of its parts that work well together in a variety of situations & on diverse roads / terrain rather effortlessly...if only the straight line acceleration wasn't so linear... :)
  • ohtomaohtoma Member Posts: 28
    Do you mind telling us about the pricing, options, and location of your purchase?
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    my Friend has a 2003 Forester. He told me Rattles, nope none on his. I visited my Friend in the Land of Subarus, New Jersey last Year, drove all over the East Coast. Heard all sorts of Vibrations/Rattles/Noises, and when I pointed these out, he said,"ah I dont hear anything"? Everything from the Rear Metal License Plate, to the back Seatbelt holder, located in the Roof, to the In Dashboard Storage area that snaps,crackles & pops, you would think it's Plastic, oh it is Plastic. Even some have reported the CD's in the Changer Rattle, and have you put any Spare Change in the Fuse box/Coin holder, it Rattles, the Coins Rattle, and the 2 overhead Bins for Glasses etc, yes they Rattle. And the Giant Moonroof is one gigantic Rattle~

    Added Security Prices are posted at most Dealer Websites, also posted here by me (please go back 1000 posts or so to 9/03). How could I quote the Prices, because they are all the Same, an Insurance Product regulated by your State, issued mostly by Minnehoma Insurance Company for Subaru, and in a few States under the Subaru Name. I went with the Gold Plus plan with a Zero Deductible, and now am in the process of Cancelling my Warranty. It's great full Coverage for those who know they will have the Car for 6 to 8 Years. Do not buy any Policy online! And while the Forester is fast, and the AWD is awesome, it is a very light SUV, and is prone to sliding which can cause problems, especially with the small Geolanders.
  • distancedriverdistancedriver Member Posts: 7
    Needed to clarify: Premium package, leather, moonroof, cold weather pack, cargo tray, $3MM of MSRP plus a trade-in, also the car was a demo with some mileage.
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Hey gang! Ive been on the road for six straight weeks, since we got our FXT PP. Before we got the XT, we were thinking the big decision was between a FXT versus Legacy GT for me and my wife was going to trade in her A6 on a Highlander, convinced that we needed a bigger vehicle. Six weeks later, I cant keep my wife out of the FXT and she is encouraging me to get that Legacy GT wagon for myself!
      The FXT has been perfect so far, not a hiccup, a rattle or a squeak. Getting about 23.5 mpg, mostly highway at 75-80 with the AC running and a full load of four folks and their luggage. The kids have no complaints about the back seat after several 6-8 hour trips. The front passenger seat is a little hard after that long, which is part of my wife's desire to get behind the wheel! I dont understand the complaints about HAL 6000...I guess I'm used to the similar operations of the Audi automatic climate control...you just gotta push the buttons in the right order.
        I am a big believer that the most important safety features are those that help you AVOID accidents, and so far the FXT has given us outstanding acceleration to get around big tractor-trailer rigs, outstanding braking to avoid gawkers not paying attention in construction-related traffic jams and the great "greenhouse" visibility has enabled me to see and avoid running over a pedestrian who came from behind me along the passenger side and ran across in front of me at a stoplight after the light had already turned green.
        I changed the oil and filter at 3700 miles and went with Mobil 1 synthetic. The oil filter wrench is a tight fit on the OEM filter, but I'm hoping it will expand a tad. Its great to have enough clearance to change the oil and filter without jacking up the car! I am going to make a bug screen for my intercooler ...already sucked in a few butterflies that break up and have to be vacuumed out of the heat exchanger fins.
        Has anybody come up with a front armrest extension that comes up high enough and far enough forward to actually function as an armrest? Thats one thing I miss on those long trips.

    Mark
  • bsumpterbsumpter Member Posts: 35
    With almost 30,000 miles on my XT in just under a year, I've got zero regrets.

    Yeah, the auto climate control is pretty bizarre at times but that wasn't even an option I cared about having in the first place.

    And I'm no fan of the OEM Geolander tires, but they'll do until the tread is gone (looks like around 45,000 miles for me) - it's certainly not dangerous driving it spiritedly on them, assuming both driver competance & reasonable air pressure (I run 35-36 psi for a decent balance between ride quality & handling). When I buy tires the Geolanders will most definitely *not* be something I consider :)

    There seems to be a rather large variation between individual XT's in terms of reported fuel economy, whether it's the car or driver I can't say - mine is on the higher end, but my driving is also rather more highway than most. Drove 1500 miles between Tuesday & Thursday of this week, averaged 26 mpg (high tank was 27, low was 25.5) - 99% highway, cruising at 70-75 with the a/c running. Nothing to complain about there...
    My average during my normal 76 mile daily round trip commute is 22-23 mpg, closer to 23 these days as it seemed to improve a bit once I passed the 15,000 mile mark. That's also when I switched to synthetic oil, don't know if it was a coincidence or not though.

    I've also had the first thing break this last week - strangely enough, the cruise control will randomly disconnect at speeds over about 73 mph. Anything under that is fine - will be talking to the dealer about it this week. Not a big deal...
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    the first Service (Oil change) was required at 3000 Miles or 90 days. It's great that you used Synthetic Oil, highly suggested in an Aluminum Engine, however doing this Service yourself, and at a time of your choosing might bite you in the Butt~
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Scott, I was en route between NC and MI when 3000 rolled over. I actually bought the filter , crush washer and oil , intending to change it before we got on the road, around 2800, but couldnt find a filter wrench that fit.Changed it as soon as I got to Michigan. I'll just smudge my entry in my service record.

    mark
  • ohtomaohtoma Member Posts: 28
    Any other comments on the sliding issues, and is this just related to the Geo's? We managed to fishtail (accidentally) an XT on a test drive this weekend, perfectly dry day. With the kind of weather we get, this may be a dealbreaker.

    Good lord this is a fun car to drive!
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Bugs: ... no Power Seats, Memory Side Mirror's, lack of lit Switches, strange switch placement, no inside Temp Gage, no Turbo Boost Gage

    Huh? You call those Bugs? Sounds more like a wish list to me. And you knew the FXT was missing them yet you bought it anyway.

    6 Disc CD Changer that WILL jam someday instead of a 1 disc MP3 Unit

    Anecdotal perhaps but in almost 4 years of ownership mine never caused a problem.

    VERY marginal Emergency handling( great in a straight line!), Geolanders small & horrible Tires.

    As has been pointed out it ain't no sports car but I dare say it handles better than just about any other SUV/tall wagon. Two notable exceptions being the $40k BMW X3 and the even more expensive Porsche Cayenne.

    RATTLES: Everywhere, no question about it! Road Noise, way more than the CRV... Everything from the Rear Metal License Plate, to the back Seatbelt holder, located in the Roof, to the In Dashboard Storage area that snaps,crackles & pops, you would think it's Plastic, oh it is Plastic. Even some have reported the CD's in the Changer Rattle, and have you put any Spare Change in the Fuse box/Coin holder, it Rattles, the Coins Rattle, and the 2 overhead Bins for Glasses etc, yes they Rattle

    Loose change rattling? Sun glasses in the overhead bin rattling around? Metal license plate rattling? Well sure, if I take a speed bump at 30 mph! Which by the way you can in the Forester! Fairly smoothly even. My point is that these type things will rattle in just about any vehicle. When I think of annoying rattles, I think of body parts and trim pieces that aren't suppose to rattle and my Forester has zero of those. Not loose change for goodness sake! Heck, something like that would even rattle in a Lexus or Acura.

    Overall the Subaru Forester XT is a great Budget Buy Turbo SUV.

    Finally something we agree on :-)

    -Frank
  • ozman62ozman62 Member Posts: 229
    when he had the wheel turned. Surprise! It slid! The emergency was getting it straightened back up after he let off. Can you say drop-throttle oversteer? :-D
    Owen
  • edunnettedunnett Member Posts: 553
    agreed - I would not put synthetic myself until after the car had at least 10K on it. Personal opinion is that the engine is still breaking in for 10K and that the synthetic keeps that from happening normally.
    elissa
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    This shouldn't come as a surprise with a sudden throttle lift in a turn - would be expected.
  • lark6lark6 Member Posts: 2,565
    As has been pointed out it ain't no sports car but I dare say it handles better than just about any other SUV/tall wagon. Two notable exceptions being the $40k BMW X3 and the even more expensive Porsche Cayenne.

    I wouldn't even go so far as to say the X3 outhandles it, having driven both. I searched for my post in the XT v. X3 v. FX35 forum and, though ego tells me I shouldn't quote myself, I've copied what I wrote in pertinent part:

    The X3's steering was much heavier and gave more feedback than the Forester's. At highway speeds this was a plus but around town and in the parking lot the heaviness felt artificially notchy - not unlike a force feedback steering wheel used for video games. The Forester's steering felt much lighter, too light in fact.

    Handling was a surprise to me. The X3 handles better than I expected; though there's a good bit of body lean its suspension and tires kept it in its place. The sensation I got was the one I get in my current Forester running its plus-one UHP A/S wheel and tire combo. The Forester XT leans a good bit too and its OEM tires are a hindrance, but those tires also were better at letting me know when the XT was nearing its limits than those on the X3. Ultimately though the Subaru felt a lot nimbler to me than the BMW, a lot easier to toss through the twisties. The cynic might say that was due to my familiarity with the car, but I'm inclined to believe that it's a combination of lighter weight, lower center of gravity and shorter wheelbase that gives the Forester the nod.

    The Forester felt more softly sprung, which didn't harm its handling vs. the X3 as much as it improved its ride. Over rough pavement peppered with ruts and potholes the Subaru gets the nod.


    Ed
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    First, mine is an 04 XT, with Premium pack. After 13500 and 11 months of ownership I can make the following observations:
    1) The turbo is still a blast. It's great to not have to worry about merging, changing lanes, or when the need arises, passing.
    2) Subaru AWD - I'll never have another car in the NE that's not AWD, be it a Subaru or something else
    3) Fit and Finish - my wife's 03 OBW is way better put together. Period. Quieter, less road noise, more upscale feeling inside.
    4) Around town mileage - in pure stop and go - and mine is stop and go - 100ft, stop, go 200 ft, stop, go 50 feet stop ..... you get the idea - not quite 17 mpg. Less than my 6 banger 200hp Sable got.
    5) Highway mileage with "summer" gas is about 24 and for someone who maintains a steady 75-80 mph with HAL in auto mode I can't complain.
    6) Stereo - on the high end of good, not great, but very decent for an OEM system. It is starting to sound like I'm losing a channel or speaker. Given my dealer's lack of hearing, I'll wait until its totally dead, or I can't stand it anymore - whichever comes first.
    7) Dash crackle - and I bet it doesn't get cold enough for Frank to hear this. I say that because when the outside air is above 50 my dash totally ceases to make the snap-crackle-pop sound that I was blessed with for every mile of every day of the entire winter. Annoying enough that my wife refuses to ride in the car during those times and insists we take the OBW for around town. We still take the XT for longer trips however because we both feel its extra power adds a significant safety margin.
    8) Rattles overall - passenger door, under dash, in engine compartment.
    9) Tires - with 8500 on the Geolanders (I had snows on for 5 of the 13.5K miles) they're already starting to get "squeally" <- new word? around corners. And yes, the inflation is correct. And no, I don't take my corners on 2 wheels :<).
    9) HAL - much easier to live with in the summer vs the winter. The AC has no trouble keeping up with the 80 degree and one 90 degree day we've had so far this year.
    10)Auto tranny - another gear would be great.
    11)Ease of DIY maintenance - very easy.

    So far the only issues mechanically I've had with mine were a misaligned steering column when I got the car, and now an issue with an antifreeze reservoir that slowly drops. Not terribly bad, but I've added a pint in the last month. The car goes in for a pressure check this week.

    On a scale of 10 - I'd give it an 8.5. I'd give the 03 OBW with 19k on it a 9.

    As regards the new Legacy/OBW with turbo's, Subaru is starting to move out of my price point.

    Like I said, my 0.02.
  • bsumpterbsumpter Member Posts: 35
    Sounds like most of the handling "issues" are really driver issues to me - all wheel drive doesn't mean you can ignore basic driving techniques. Overall this is one of the most forgiving vehicles I've ever been in when pushed hard. Sure, it'll drop-throttle oversteer - as will most other AWD/FWD cars. Power-on it'll tend to understeer & perhaps spin the inside front tire; if you really abuse it & throw it harshly into a corner under a ton of power, then you can get the back end coming around - shouldn't be a suprise at that point.
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    i will tack on my summary after 9k+ and 11 months on my '04 fxt 4eat PP

    1) The turbo is still a blast. It's great to not have to worry about merging, changing lanes, or when the need arises, passing. concur
    2) Subaru AWD - I'll never have another car in the NE that's not AWD, be it a Subaru or something else concur
    3) Fit and Finish - my wife's 03 OBW is way better put together. Period. Quieter, less road noise, more upscale feeling inside. my honday odyssey has less road noise, not upscale, a small bit quieter, less fun to drive, great for home depot and always the car used when i drive with the family. subaru needs to compete in larger car segment also before i would shop them for the family hauler.
    4) Around town mileage - in pure stop and go - and mine is stop and go - 100ft, stop, go 200 ft, stop, go 50 feet stop ..... you get the idea - not quite 17 mpg. Less than my 6 banger 200hp Sable got. my drive is more rural, lots of hills, curves with speeds usually in the low range ( 15-40 ) and getting around 15mpg.
    5) Highway mileage with "summer" gas is about 24 and for someone who maintains a steady 75-80 mph with HAL in auto mode I can't complain. the one time i did take it on a family trip ( it was snowing so the odyssey stayed home, got 24mpg in the snow, outstanding ).
    6) Stereo - on the high end of good, not great, but very decent for an OEM system. It is starting to sound like I'm losing a channel or speaker. Given my dealer's lack of hearing, I'll wait until its totally dead, or I can't stand it anymore - whichever comes first. i concur on the decent OEM system. no problems.
    7) Dash crackle - and I bet it doesn't get cold enough for Frank to hear this. I say that because when the outside air is above 50 my dash totally ceases to make the snap-crackle-pop sound that I was blessed with for every mile of every day of the entire winter. Annoying enough that my wife refuses to ride in the car during those times and insists we take the OBW for around town. We still take the XT for longer trips however because we both feel its extra power adds a significant safety margin. no dash crackle here. i feel the odyssey and its safety scores, plus it weight to match the other monsters and its cant beat room is my family hauler
    8) Rattles overall - passenger door, under dash, in engine compartment. mine is rattle free
    9) Tires - with 8500 on the Geolanders (I had snows on for 5 of the 13.5K miles) they're already starting to get "squeally" <- new word? around corners. And yes, the inflation is correct. And no, I don't take my corners on 2 wheels :<). gotta talk to mike about getting the fxt to be a better handling vehicle but the fxt rocks compared to the odyssey
    9) HAL - much easier to live with in the summer vs the winter. The AC has no trouble keeping up with the 80 degree and one 90 degree day we've had so far this year. concur
    10)Auto tranny - another gear would be great. agree
    11)Ease of DIY maintenance - very easy. concur
  • miamixtmiamixt Member Posts: 600
    OK the XT has very few Bugs. Also I am not the Oil Police, and do not fault anyone for being a little late with a change, however you know Service Departments, and willingness to do Warranty Work. Yes I screwed up and smoked all 4 Tires making a Left Turn, I was the Idiot, but it CAN happen to you , and the XT does Slide, no question. If you have NO Rattles that's unbelievable, in fact I don't believe it. Yes Coins will rattle, but why the Coin Holder itself? Yes the overhead bins will Rattle, but why would it do so when empty? The Snap, Crackle and Pop Dash Storage area makes all sorts of sounds, again when empty. The Tweeter Rattles, and the Driver Door Panel rattles. My XT initialy came with a Mind numbing Dash Rattle/Buzz that was from a Wiring Harness. And the rear seatbelt holder, of course it vibrates and Rattles, how could it not?. I think the XT is a great Mini SUV, and really enjoy it. Is it my favorite vehicle I've owned, no. Is it the fastest Car off the line I have ever owned, yes, is that a good thing, not necessarily. And as far as Synthetic Oil, if your Service Department suggests it, use it, if not you will save some Money. I live in the worst Climate in the U.S., some would say this area is not even part of the U.S., I mean have you ever seen a large Roach with a Face fly by and hiss at you in the Process?
  • grove4grove4 Member Posts: 95
    The rear seat belt does rattle.I coiled it up in itself and stuffed it back in the slot.All the other stuff you talk about I did not experience.If you live in miami there are better fwd cars for the money or rwd.Those of us that deal with snow can accept a higher price for the awd car.In my no b.s. opinion I think the xt is a little "raw" for the price it is.I think after seeing how nice the Legacy can be the Forester is overpriced.I may get nailed on this forum for saying that but there is alot that could be improved.Mostly in the areas of refinement.Suspension noise,power seats,soundproofing etc...It is still a nice car but depending on what car you came from the XT may dissapoint in some areas.I E Honda or Toyota.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Fit and Finish - my wife's 03 OBW is way better put together. Period. Quieter, less road noise, more upscale feeling inside.

    I think that's really not a better put together issue, but just the fact that the Legacy/OB gets more soundproofing in general compared to the Forester and Impreza lines.

    Ken
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    "the Forester is overpriced"

    Okay I'll bite... I disagree. The FXT is a steal considering what you get for your money. Yes there's certainly always room for improvement but you have to remember that this is only a mid $20k vehicle. In fact, the Forester is actually below the new car avg selling price yet the FXT is faster than 99% of the cars on the road today.

    The new Legacy is a very nice ride and certainly more refined than the Forester but then $4k buys a lot of sound proofing!

    So yes there are plenty of more refined cars out there but IMO none that come close to offering the FXT's combination of utility, safety, handling, power and price.

    -Frank
  • pon1pon1 Member Posts: 196
    Definitely not overpriced if you understand and value what you are getting, and compare it appropriately.

    If you want a proven (Sti-derived) turbo powertrain in a compact AWD wagon that has acceptable on road handling, some genuine off-road ability and bags of "character", it's a steal.

    It is overpriced and has high running costs if you dont need/want the turbo and all you need/want is an upscale Forester, CRV, Jetta or other small SUV/wagon. My wife thinks it's overpriced but at least we could afford it, so she gave in to my begging.

    Everything else with comparable utility and performance is out of my price range (and likely auto-only), hence it is a screaming bargain to me.

    Subaru should be congratulated that it exists at all, most cars are boring or impractical, the FXT is neither.

    JP

    (still waiting for the Canadian 05s to show up)
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760

    Subaru should be congratulated that it exists at all, most cars are boring or impractical, the FXT is neither


    a very efficent sentence that says it all.
  • njswamplandsnjswamplands Member Posts: 1,760
    drive the car really hard and crank up the radio you will spend so much time concentrating on the road you will forget the noise.
  • lfdallfdal Member Posts: 679
    Along with the sound proofing the car has not one rattle and the dash is immune to the outside air temp i.e. quiet all winter.

    I have a suspicion that my XT certainly is in the minority re: the dash snap-crackle-pop issue. My belief is that the bar that goes from one side of the car to the other and that the dash attaches to is not properly mfg (remember, I had to shim one side of my steering column to get it properly aligned) and the dash has a torsional load on it that will never go away.

    I've seen a guy selling an 03 dash on e-bay for $174 and I'm thinking of buying it just so a can figure out how to change the bar, and/or unload the twist. There's no way I'd ever let the dealer touch that kind of job. Sad to say.

    Larry
  • grove4grove4 Member Posts: 95
    When the xt came out it was 28k for the premium package.You may get some more deals now then when I bought one.Dont get me wrong it is fun and practical to a certain degree.Hey I bought one myself so give me a break I know what attracted me to the car.But after the first couple weeks or so stuff started to bug me for a car costing 28k.For one it is practical but only for 2 or 3 people.If you get 4 adults in the car it better be a short trip.The auto is only a 4sp and no pwr seats.I feel that the XT should be a premium upgrade from the XS.Dual pwr seats and all the goodies for the price it is.And yes it is only 1,200 more than the XS but that price could be a little lower for what it is.The power is great on the XT but the refinement is on a korean economy car level.I had the car a year and IM still a fan of it but I hope they start going a little more upscale but try to keep the car close in price to now.
  • volkovvolkov Member Posts: 1,306
    It's true, I did also think the Forester XT premium was a little steep relative to the pimped out CR-V. But even the V-tec doesn't come close to the 2.5T, and $1200 for that engine upgrade is a screaming deal. Can't think of any other car where such a significant engine option is cheaper. For comparison, the upgrade in the VW from the 2.0 to the 1.8T is $2k.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    So tell me what vehicle offers a sophisticated and capable AWD system, excellent all-weather capability, lots of utility, exhilarating acceleration, huge moonroof, leather seating, balanced ride and handling dynamics, solid all-terrain capability, and best in class safety ratings for $28k? How&#146;d that old ad line go... if you can find a better vehicle, buy it.

    Now you want to add a 5sp auto, dual power seats, dual-zone AC, a quieter ride, a luxury interior and even more bells and whistles but keep the price the same? Well you can get all those things in the top-of-the-line Legacy but it'll cost you another $4k.

    The current Forester is certainly more refined than the previous generations and no doubt Subaru will continue to make improvements but the Legacy model will always be a step higher on the luxury scale. Otherwise there would be too much overlap between models.

    -Frank
  • grove4grove4 Member Posts: 95
    The Legacy Gt lmt wagon can be had w/auto for 30k.And it has all the bells and whistles inc dual climate control,which by the way I didnt mention on the prior post.That would only be 2k more than what the forester is and its on the next bigger platform than the impreza from which the forester is based.And its true that subaru has a market that is hard to compare to.And that does not mean they cant just smooth over what I consider a unrefined ride.Normally the next step up in a car line is pricier.EX camry-corrolla,accord-civic.So the 2k price difference is justified with the legacy but yet its so much more car for that 2k that the forester xt should come down.By the way I still love my xt "for the most part"but the new legacys got it all over it.
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    All the "goodies" (power seats, noise insulation, etc,) add unnecessary weight & detracts from the overall performance capability the XT exhibits. I prefer the raw character of the XT & it fits both my business & personal driving needs on most surfaces...much better than my Gen II (Yamaha V6) or Gen III (V8) SHO's.
  • grove4grove4 Member Posts: 95
    Why not get a sti then?
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    The $4k difference I used between the top-of-the-line Legacy and the top-of-the-line Forester is based on MSRP. However, you can actually get an 04 FXT auto with PP for under $26k now so the street difference is still about $4k. That figure will come down some as the newness of the Legacy wears off (just as it did for the Forester) but right now it's nowhere near $2k. And I'm not saying the Legacy isn't worth $30k, but I'm more than satisfied with the $25k I spent on my FXT.

    -Frank
  • troop2shostroop2shos Member Posts: 235
    My XT is used for business & again, its configuration is much better suited for my needs not to mention its stealth factor on the road (like the SHO's - just another Taurus that blends in). Also, the auto tranny is better suited for business use - rowed sticks for business use in the past - that & my AWA doesn't like to shift anymore in the rare event she has to drive it (her excuse but she really thinks I'll run auto-x competitively again, etc.).
  • grove4grove4 Member Posts: 95
    You can keep your xt and be happy.All I am saying is that there is much room for improvement on the inside of the car which I already pointed out.I had 2 SHO's,one 5sp and 1 auto they were the worst cars I ever owned reliability wise.And not a whole lot of performance to back it up.But in the early nineties 220hp was alot I guess even for a big sedan.Anyway,it is true that the XT has a stealth factor.Even after a year people still just think of it as a little economy wagon.I do enjoy that myself.It's funny that alot of people that I consider car guys still have no idea about the xt.
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    I agree. Nothing on the road offers the stealth/perfomance factor that the XT does. It makes it that much more fun to drive. I actually enjoy a couple of highway on-ramps in my area because there's a long turn before the straightaway and someone is inevitably tailgating me. As I enter the straightaway, the guy behind me almost always has his blinker on as he thinks he's going to shoot out in the left lane and fly by me. Only, I punch it in third gear and within a couple of seconds he's a mile behind me. Unlike the Magnum, Subaru hasn't hyped the performance aspect of this vehicle.
  • mrbentleymrbentley Member Posts: 13
    hi there,

    ok, got this info from a non-Subaru dealer...so I took it with a huge grain of salt...but wanted to double-check...

    does the XT require longer warm up time than a non-turbo Forester?? any other "quirks" about the XT I should know about??

    Thanks.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Subaru's offical line is that the XT requires no special treatment. However, as with any car, it would be prudent to drive conservatively until the engine has warmed up.

    Actually, the more commonly held belief is that due to their assumed higher operating temperatures, turbos need longer to cool down. But again, after driving any engine hard, you should spend a few minutes driving conservatively before shutting it off.

    -Frank
  • subewannabesubewannabe Member Posts: 403
    Maybe a lot of hard driving in the twisties would yield a different result, but I think the Subaru engineers were brilliant to go with the aluminum hood. I have the Sierra Gold, which doesn't absorb much heat energy from sunlight, and during several long sunny 80+ degree days on the highway at 75-80 mph with the tach always above 3K, including the hills of the West Virginia Turnpike,the engine heat was very moderate when I stopped for refueling. I assume a lot of the heat from the turbo is being radiated and dissapated by the aluminum hood.
        If I'm not running late, I pop the hood open before I start to refuel and leave it open until I'm ready to pull out (and check the oil and coolant levels in the interim). This seems to minimize heat build up during short stops.

    mark
  • dnestrdnestr Member Posts: 188
    Bently, get a turbo timer with Webasto (an auxiliary heaters)
  • corkfishcorkfish Member Posts: 537
    That's another reason I didn't go with the black. It's hot enough in there without the sun cooking your intercooler. Although I'm not a fan of the tuner segment, I'm actually thinking of getting the STI scoop which might alleviate heat soak a little.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.