Options

Chevrolet Cobalt

1246742

Comments

  • odmanodman Member Posts: 309
    Some people are taking an obtuse angle on the subject.
  • Kirstie_HKirstie_H Administrator Posts: 11,242
    Yup, let's steer back on track!

    MODERATOR /ADMINISTRATOR
    Find me at kirstie_h@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.
    2015 Kia Soul, 2021 Subaru Forester (kirstie_h), 2024 GMC Sierra 1500 (mr. kirstie_h)
    Review your vehicle

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I wonder if it'll come only in Cobalt Blue.

    -juice
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I'm pretty sure they will have other colors.

    ;-)

    We should know lots more in about a month. I really hope they do a good job on this car, the ION just isn't quite there and I know GM can make a good car.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Red Line models look interesting, but even those some reviewers can't get over the cheap interior.

    -juice
  • fdannafdanna Member Posts: 263
    The very fact that this board is so dead is tell tale evidence that GM doesn't have a prayer with the Cobalt. No one takes American small cars seriously... they're strictly rental fleet vehicles.

    According to an article in the Detroit Free press (I'd post the link but the board [non-permissible content removed] will get upset).... GM is considering this a critical project to get back into the small car market.

    They actually think they can compete with the Civic Carolla and now Mazda3 crowd! I'll bet my next paycheck that the best this car will get from the reviewers is a big yawn. The last good small car GM built was the Saturn when it was introduced. Now look at it! It's a pathetic failure that won't sell without incentives and it's ALL GM's fault for cutting the funds in favor crappy SUV development (which, ironically, are lousy compared to the competition).

    Cobalt: Number one small car in America?

    WILL NEVER HAPPEN.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    An Edmunds' chat board is a scientific marketing measure.

    Quick Edmunds! Rush to patent this unique invention!
  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    Great point, Logic. You beat me to the punch.

    You seem to be up on all things GM, when do you think we will get a good look at pre-production versions of the Cobalt/Pursuit? Is there any chance that these will come with a 2.4 liter version of the Ecotec?
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Your comments are out of wack.

    The reason things have died off here might be because there has been no further info since the initial releases a couple of months ago. Car won't be seen for a few week, things will pick up when there is more to talk about.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    I think the Cobalt will be introduced at New York, or possibly Toronto.

    GM has been saving at least one introduction for Canada and New York, as these shows become increasingly important.

    For better or worse, once an actual model has been put out for the public to see, there will be a flurry of posts here. They still will not have much to do with predicting sales, however.
  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    Small cars with big four cylinders are my cup of tea. I would love to have a new Corolla with the Camry's 2.4 liter four, but Toyota won't make it.

    I guess my options will be limited to the Cobalt, Mitsu Ralliart and the Mazda 3/Ford Focus, although that isn't a bad group of cars. The 2.5 liter Sentra, for some reason, does nothing for me.
  • speeds2muchspeeds2much Member Posts: 164
    Ditto on the small cars with powerful engines. What I like about this configuration is the way the car seems to be wrapped around me. I also like the proportions for aesthetics, fuel efficiency and ease of parking.

    Right now, I'm driving a Jag X-Type, but the hood is too long and the track too narrow in proportion, so it feels like steering a barge. The car has a weird combination of harsh suspension but a sensation of not being planted firmly on the road.

    The Cobalt is on my radar as a possible company car. Could be perfect for high, daily usage, freeing up my capital for weekend toys. ;o)
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Scion tC will be that car, a 2.4l coupe intro'd at Detroit.

    Economy cars are by default less exciting. The Malibu has had good reviews, so Cobalt might surprise some.

    -juice
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Yea! What ateixiera said. The Scion tC looks like a very good new offering. Will have the looks of a coupe but will actually be hatchback design, with a good features portfolio, and a re-tuned version of the Camry 2.4L VVTi.

    And heck, whats wrong with the Sentra 2.5S? Its one of the few small cars that comes with side airbags protection for both head AND chest (Elantra and Accent are the only others that come to mind.. does the Mazda 3 have a chest side airbag in addition to the curtain... thats ideal, IMO). Anyway, my 2.5L Sentra has been flawless over its first 18,000 miles, and not many compact econocars with autos can hit 60 in under 8 seconds....

    ~alpha
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    2.2L standard and 2.4L will be an option on a GT / LS / Z24 type model.
  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    "And heck, whats wrong with the Sentra 2.5S?"

    Nothing in particular. I just don't care much for the styling (inside and out), plus the 2.5 Nissan isn't quite as quite, smooth and economical as the Toyota four.

    Don't get me wrong, I would take a Sentra 2.5 if someone handed me the keys, but it would not be my first or even second choice.

    How do does everybody feel the Cobalt will stack up against the foreign competition. Will it be able to overcome the Cavalier stigma?
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    What's wrong is the torsion beam non-indy rear suspension. Besides that the styling is dull at best.

    Slap a rear multilink and make it look more interesting and then there would be nothing wrong.

    -juice
  • tomcat630tomcat630 Member Posts: 854
    Saturn is a brand name for a line of cars, not just "a small car". Also, the Cobalt will have some European designed componentry, so it's not a typical "American small car meant for rentals".

    BTW: Look in most rental fleets these days and more and more Corollas, Sentras, and Proteges are ready to jump into.

    Yeah, activity from one message board is not an indicator. I remember how some "automobile purists were predicting the Caddy CTS to be a "big flop" and "another Cimmarron", just from their "feelings", not reality.
  • muffin_manmuffin_man Member Posts: 865
    Personally, I can't wait to see the new Cobalt. If the Cobalt overcomes the Cavalier stigma, it will probably be the top compact. The Cavalier is panned by absolutely everyone, and it still sells big numbers.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Keep in mind even the Cavalier did pretty well in the last Edmunds comparo it competed in. At least when value is factored in.

    -juice
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    I might just consider getting one rather than paying a premium for something like the Saab 9-3 Hatch as my primary car. Then I could put the extra scratch either in a completely loaded next generation Miata or the Solstice.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Edmunds.com does some things great. Like TMV, these discussion boards, True Cost to Own. Other things, they do far less well. I would say their comparisons truly suck, and put no credence in them whatsoever. In their standard Road Tests, half of them are called "full tests", but then you click on the links to performance and specifications, and theres no instrumented data. Um, how can it be a full test if theres no data. In any given review, I'll bet theres a higher percentage of factual errors compared to the leading auto publications.

    The Cavalier is the lowest rated small car by CR, and I cant understand why people choose it over much better, similarly priced entries such as the Elantra. From all that I've read and seen so far, the Cobalt SHOULD BE a good enough vehicle to buck the Cavalier's horrid image, and kudos to GM for being smart enough to change the name.

    Now, with respect to the Sentra, as long as it handles well, I dont really care about the rear suspension bits. Similar to how I dont really care about the Malibu's pushrods, as long as it delivers the performance expected of a V6 in terms of power and smoothness. Yes, IMO, DOHC is better, but in the Malibu, the pushrod unit gets the job done, and is ultra efficient to boot.
    The lines on the Sentra are boring, as the car is in its twilight years, but the interior is actually pretty nice, enhanced a bit for the 04 model year. The 2.5L is NOT as refined as the 2.4L units from Honda and Toyota, but its close. IMO, its bigger downfall is in fuel economy- I average about 26 MPG in my Sentra auto, and my parents about 27 or 28 in their Camry LE 4. That said, the Sentra sold me on its combination of features, safety (the side chest/head airbags as I mentioned before.. and std. ABS), and power. I felt very good driving it, much more so than other small cars I drove. No its not for everyone, but especially now towards the end of its cycle with the big rebate- $2500, its worth a look. You can easily get a 2.5S loaded for about 14K ish.

    I'm looking forward to the redesign.

    ~alpha
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Cavalier has 2 things going for it.

    1) Gobs of power with the Ecotec
    2) Rock bottom price after rebates

    We had a leased 99 and it was ok, but very unrefined. Wouldn't go back. Looking forward to Cobalt.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    I do hope GM does a good job on this car- The Focus is getting better and better.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    You are always at the cutting edge I tell ya!!

    Thanks for the picture. Can't see much but it's better than nothing. Looks fine so far.
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    dull. but dull sells....missing the 'killer guppy' aesthetic of the malibu.
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    Thanks, theo.

    I don't really see pre 2004 Civic, but I do see 2000- current Ford Taurus. Could be worse....

    ~alpha
  • theo2709theo2709 Member Posts: 476
    You don't think this is similar?

    image
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    alpha: have not driven that Sentra, so I'll take your word for it. The old Maxima, which had a similar torsion beam in the rear, had some axle hop in bumps along a turn. It performed well up to that point, so that really stood out in my mind.

    I think it looks more like the 2004 Civic. The headlights are pulled back a bit more.

    Either way, it looks far better than the 'bu to my eyes.

    -juice
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    Malibu with pulled back headlamps.
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    as long as it doesn't have the annoying 'swooshes' the malibu has.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    as long as it can beat the Honda Civic/Toyota Corolla AND underprice them, then GM will have a winner.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    Can hardly see the "swooshes" on the car in person. I suppose they are ok on other cars like Subarus and Toyotas though right?
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    It will be priced a snick under the Civic I'm sure.
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    ugly on the subaru too.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Toyota uses them on the Highlander, Subaru on the Forester. I think the creases are not just an appearance thing, they add structural strength, too.

    Flat sheet metal dings easily.

    -juice
  • corsicachevycorsicachevy Member Posts: 316
    "Flat sheet metal dings easily"

    And flexes. The early 1990s Chevrolet/GMC pickup trucks had creaseless sides that not only looked bad, but provided little in terms of rigidity.
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I think the new Pathfinder has them also.

    Not a big deal. You see it more in pictures than in real life.
  • jchan2jchan2 Member Posts: 4,956
    will Chevrolet really gain any new customers to the Cobalt from Honda or Toyota? A Corolla LE can be bought for just under $16K, nearly loaded.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, let's see the final product before we give it a verdict.

    Incentives have made it pretty cut throat. It would have to be a innovative knock-out to charge a premium (think Sienna). Most cars in this class will have to compete based on price.

    -juice
  • regfootballregfootball Member Posts: 2,166
    pretty darn nice picture, actually. might have to put off that focus SVT purchase. good job, assuming the car is a mirror image of the picture.

    thankfully, no swooshes.

    I just wish they'd put pushrods in it. I really want all that torque and 'launch feel'.
  • vcjumpervcjumper Member Posts: 1,110
    definitely confirms the shots a few months ago of the rear end of the car behind some woman were of the Cobalt. Not thrilled with the front grille as it could be more modern looking but the rest looks good. Makes the Ion look like dirt.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    have a normally aspirated 2.4, the turbo 2.0 in the ION Redline, or something else?
  • alpha01alpha01 Member Posts: 4,747
    You crack me up.

    It should be interesting to see how the non-SS Cobalt coupe stacks up to the recently announced Scion tC. Heck, throw in the Saturn ION Coupe and Civic EX, and it sounds like the makings of a fun 2005 small coupe comparo.

    ~alpha

    PS- For kicks, I just went to carsdirect.com and priced a fully loaded Cavalier 2Door LS SPORT auto. MSRP would be $20,770... ARE THEY KIDDING? Prices have got to be more realistic next time around, or else they are going to need incentives of at least $2500 out of the gates. (FWIW, carsdirect.com price is $15,958 and invoice, $19,658). This is for a car w/o leather, w/o NAV, w/o side curtains, w/o stability control....
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    I like it. It has an evolutionary rather than revolutionary look to it vs. the Cavalier. Rear tail lights have the Impala SS look to them. Hope it has an interior to match those looks!
  • bigdaddycoatsbigdaddycoats Member Posts: 1,058
    I believe the Cobalt SS will have the supercharged 2.0 that will be in the ION Red Line.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Isn't that a turbo? I'm not sure...

    -juice
  • dindakdindak Member Posts: 6,632
    SS gets a 2.4L 170hp vvt Ecotec. Turbo is only Saturn.
  • bigdaddycoatsbigdaddycoats Member Posts: 1,058
    where did you get that info?
Sign In or Register to comment.