By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I have a condo in Killington, VT.
Otherwise... windshield replacement is the next option... one that I would rather not take.
Now have just under 4,000 miles on our OBXT and all around mpg is inching up to just over 20 mpg (USA) in mixed freeway and city driving. We seem to be buying gas at around 300 miles, but have a comfortable reserve.
Surprisingly, although I drive a bit harder than my wife, ... I get slightly better gas mileage than she does. I get on it a bit harder and then "coast" while she accelerates slower and longer.
So far I am very impressed with the car. For reference, our other car is a 1995 Acura Legend, and the '05 OBXT replaced a 2000 Audi A4 Turbo. Before that we had owned two Saab 9000 Turbos. Previously we owned a '82 Subaru 2 wheel drive 4-m Legacy that was "bullet proof" as far as reliability went, but the torque engine needed 4 wheel drive since it had a lot of "wheel spin" when wet outside.
One thing that really impresses me, the heating. This car heats up right now compared to the Legend and other non-turbo cars that I have owned. Seat heaters are great too, seats are very comfortable for me at 5'9" and my wife at 5' even. We have always had problems finding cars that fit us both, but the OBXT does very well.
We had one rattle, traced it to the removable retracting rear cover cross bar being a bit loose. Took it off and rattle went away.
Although I like a 6 cylinder car, I like performance even more, and it is hard to beat a Turbo. Choosing between the Turbo H-4 and the H-6 was tough, but I am very pleased with our choice.
Eric.
-B
I know what you mean about the tough choice between engines. Sometimes I miss the smoothness of a 6, but right now I'm having much too much fun with the Turbo- definitely no regrets!
tom
tom
And I Craig said, it definitely needs a bigger fuel tank! I just drove 780 Kms this weekend on a retirn trip, and I had to refuel twice. I used to make that trip on one tank in my Volvo 850.
Sly
I guess the next model Subaru which really turned my head was the Brat 4x4 with the little jump seats in the back. Very slick. Another cool example of how 4WD didn't necessarily have to come in the form of a full-sized truck.
What year/model Subaru first got your attention, and why?
Tim G.
'05 OBXTL-5MT
I was always intrigued by the number of Subarus in the ski area parking lots.
Long story short - I live on a hill. The Dart died, and I used the Mustang to go to work. It snowed, and the Mustang wouldn't make it up the hill to my house. The next day, I finally went out and bought a brand new 92 Loyale 4WD 5 speed wagon. Equipped it with a Kenwood sound system and ski racks. One of the best cars I ever owned.
Since then, I have bought a 96 Outback for my wife, replaced the Loyale with a 99 GT Sedan, replaced the 96 Outback with an 03 Outback, and am now looking to replace the 99 GT with an 05 GT.
Certainly not too far off-topic. Rob M.
Craig
A neighbor had a BRAT, and at first we'd laugh at the concept until he kept driving by dad's Buick Electra stuck in the snow. It was very humbling.
-juice
Hee hee.. still do..
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Open the windows, toughen 'em up. On the bright side, their lips will be so cold they won't be able to ask "Are we there yet?"
My parents had a 1980 Subaru GL wagon, purchased new. They owned it until summer 1987 when it was totaled in a head-on collision. I always thought it was a great car from my childhood perspective. They replaced it with an '85 Camry and I always missed the cargo space of the wagon.
Wagons are definitely a good choice for a single car family, and the Subaru is probably the best choice amongst the wagons, esp. with 6 months of winter!
You stated "I think you're mixing up the base Legacy with the Legacy GT. The base Legacy is definetly playing in the same arena as the Accord and Camry. I don't think most people who are looking at the base model are going to put as much weight on sport as those who shop for the Legacy GT.
People who are shopping for G35s, BMWs, Acuras or to upgrade their WRX are probably going to look at the Legacy GT, not the base Legacy.
It was the Legacy GT at the C&D event, not the base model. "
I know the difference between the base Legacy and the GT. I know that the C&D event had the GT. The couple of times I have driven the Legacy they were all in a GT.
My point is that the GT suspension has been detuned slightly. You yourself admitted to this on 9/4/04:
"The Legacy not suprisingly took top honors in the power department. Where it lost points was in the suspension and handling area. I suspect that the GT is tuned a bit softer than some of the other models and combined with Subaru's long travel suspension and the RE92s, it would diminish any hard-core driving. "
ateixeira, "Legacy GT Limited vs. Acura TSX and TL" #161, 30 Aug 2004 10:24 am
So it is not just my opinion or the opinion of others, but even some of the positive reviews that the GT has gotten have also mentioned an over boosted steering, and body roll. e.g. Motor trend and R&T.
Motor Trend said "But its [GT] steering feels darty and overboosted, with more quickness than feel and feedback, making us tentative in fast sweepers on the outside lane of the mountain road. We had no such complaints with Japanese-spec 2.0-liter turbo Legacy GTs last year at the Fuji racetrack ("First Drive," October 2003).
I am not bashing the Legacy. There is a very high probability that I will buy it. I mean, what other car gets you so much performance for 24-28K? Its suspension and steering are not that bad but I did notice that the GT had a slightly more slushy suspension and an overboosted steering compared to the 325i. I have also noted these minor quips when comparing it to my brothers WRX. These things are not a deal breaker for me, but they did cause some slight dissapointment. That's all.
Nelson
BTW, the suspension is easily fixed with a set of coilovers, which would give you much better handling than a BMW, G35, or TSX/TL and still have paid less! (I'm considering changing out my springs and maybe the struts myself)
tom
Okay, got your points. I wasn't sure if you realized that the base model and GT had different tuning based on your message.
Yeah, the GT probably isn't tuned hard enough for people who really want very cutting edge handling. Our own Colin also mentioned that he would have seriously considered the GT over the Evo had it come with a sport suspension option.
But the GT is probably far more "sport" for 80% of the owners out there including myself that use it as a daily driver and family vehicle. While I would love sharper handling and less body roll too, I don't think I would want it at the cost of a bone-jarring ride. The base Legacy is tuned right there around the CamCord marketspace and the GT probably a few notches above in the A4/TSX area.
Over at Legacygt.com (have you been there?) there are lots of folks with concerns similar to yours that have taken on to a few simple modifications to improve handling. The most popular one seems to be swapping out the rear sway bar for the JDM version. The sky's the limit on how much of a track car you want to make it, but from what I've gleaned from Paul Hansen's review, the USDM Legacy GT isn't too far away from the Spec B JDM version.
I wouldn't be surprised if Subaru did offer an STi-like package for the GT in a few years. It all depends on demand and the competition. Are you planning on buying soon?
Ken
Rick
Here is my review of the Legacy GT. I had the privilege of taking a 5MT and 5EAT sedan out on the Las Vegas Motor Speedway infield track. The car was beyond my limited capabilities, but I still hit 100+ mph on the short straight.
It had enough torque to power slide out of the last corner before the straight.
ateixeira, "Town Hall Test Drive Team" #109, 20 May 2004 9:42 pm
The GT has a quicker steering ratio than the 2.5i, and lower profile tires on 1" bigger rims. Probably slightly stiffer springs.
Did they leave room for an STi above the Legacy GT? Sure, I think so, but the GT is the gentleman's sports sedan, still livable on days when you're not at the track.
-juice
Is 35 psi too high? Tires seemed soft, so I put that much in thinking it would help the low mpg... but it didn't seem to help according to trip computer.
Chuck
Bryan
Anyway, my thinking is that if you slow down the engine to much, it might drop out of an efficient power band and burn more fuel.
A bit of drag reduction might be more helpful. In case you are wondering, .... I have no ideas on how to do that.
I like the bigger tank idea, wonder if one could be made to fit. Wonder what it would cost!
Still, given a choice, I would not want to give up any performance for another couple of miles per gallon. The added cost factor is not that great, at least not at this time.
Probably the best "cheap" solution is to get a turbo gage and learn how to drive efficiently using it.
My old turbo Saab(s) could go about 400 miles between fill ups, and that was great!
Eric.
I don't think 35 PSI is "too high" personally. And don't take your trip computer's mileage reading as "gospel"; they're not that exact. You're better off doing the old 'divide gallons used and miles driven' calculation at fill-up if you're looking for your true MPGs.
I've always run my cars' and trucks' tires a little higher than the door sticker stated, primarily because it always seemed to improve gas mileage a little, offer better handling (better hydroplaning resistance, too) not to mention better tire wear, as well.
I'd recommend trying it out. If you find your tires aren't gripping as well, for example during wet breaking, maybe let a pound or so out and see how that works for you. Besides, as long as you don't exceed the tires' maximum inflation pressure, keep in mind that more tire failures occur from under-inflation than over-inflation. This is because the heat build up on a tire increases exponentially with under-inflation and/or added load.
Hope that helps,
Tim G.
'05 OBXTL-5MT
DaveM <still needs to add his winter air>
A Toyota Corolla revs at 2650 rpm at 80 mph. No reason the Sube can't have a taller gear. The problem is that when people have to downshift they will have the perception that the car is not powerfull - that is why manufacturers tend to make their manual tranny cars rev high on the highway.
-juice
The heating system is terrible. No heat comes out the floor when you use the setting for part out the vents and part out the floor. Can't get a good temperature setting with which I am comfortable. Don't like a lot of heat but feet can really get cold. Never had a car like this. Sounds like a real common problem.
Since I replaced the fluid, it's fine at 10°F. So it was definately either the factory and/or the dealer who put in the diluted fluid. Complain to Subaru and the dealer. No excuse for this stupidity.
Prestone makes some yellow (or was it pink?) stuff that is supposed to protect to 40 below freezing, that ought to work better for those in truly frigid conditions.
To prevent interior fogging, I keep my (manual A/C) on fresh air, temp on hot, and occasionally turn on the A/C compressor to dehumidify the air. The air still comes out warm, but it works to defog.
In fact I only cycle on the A/C for 15-20 seconds every 15 minutes or so, and that's enough to keep it clear.
Try something like that.
-juice
http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/B0002JN178/103-0919- 477-4199865?v=glance
temperatures as low as -34°F
There you go. $7, so you really get what you pay for. The $1 stuff at Wal-Mart can only do so much.
-juice
The blue stuff is supposed to protect to 20 below freezing, but we get below that some times. It gets that cold in DC??
So the Prestone stuff is rated for 46 degrees cooler temps!
-juice
Don't you just hate when the wife starts pressing buttons while you are driving? My wife loves to play with all the goodies until they are screwed up. Then I'm forced to restore order to my domain. But if I ever borrow her Audi A4 and fail to return everything to its rightful place I will hear about it over the dinner table.
As to mpg. I have 5000 miles on the car which is an automatic. The trip computer seems to read about 1 mpg high. I am getting about 22.2 on it on average so 21.2 seems about what it is. This is for city driving. So I am about one mpg low. As to the highway I have seen as high as 28 so that puts me realistically about 3 mpg south of the EPA number. But I can tell you that my Subarus pick up at 10,000 and again about 20,000. In fact at 20,000 I was getting 29 highway on my 2003 WRX here in the midwest which was 2mpg+ EPA. So I am not too sorry about trading some horsepower (especially since I am really impressed as to how much power the "weak" 168 hp NA engine has.) because I am expecting to get good mileage this summer at high altitude when I go to Colorado. I should be able to break the 30 mpg barrier (my wrx averaged 30 mpg all the way back from Utah to Indiana at 70 mph. Some tanks exceeded 32 mpg and no tank was less than 29 on that 1500 mile run). (OK, it is 5000 ft. downhill!)
formerly "TWRX" now "Ag-Ltd"
I've never been troubled by the lack of range in my OBXT because I need to take a break after about 150 miles of driving anyway as my legs and hands need a break. So I get gas and resume the trip. Actually I like to use the trip timer and stop every two hours just to loosen up.
bob
i am getting quotes for 3,000 below MSRP on XT Ltd. in boston area.
anyone got better offers than this ?