By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
http://www.autospies.com/article/index.asp?articleId=3790
If they just came out with the 3.0L with respectable specs then it would suffice maybe. However if they came out with the 3.0L for the true loyalists and preorders and in a year upgraded the engine to 3.5Ls then they would smell like crap. Folks would not soon forget.
Because of the 3.5L Acura, Mercedes and BMW, Lexus has nowhere to go but 3.5L in March the way I see it. We are all concerned/suspect because of the actual cars with GS300 tags showing up though at shows and a dealership in CA. I just cannot see such a thoughtful company disappointing with a 3.0L in March.
So, if the car does show up here in the states as GS300, which I believe it will, it will be competitive power wise with 530i, A6 3.2, and STS, but down on power compared to E350, M35, and RL. Traditionally, competitive but not class leading power has been good enough for Lexus, the company has never felt they need to get into a war with Nissan and Honda. I think Lexus should go straight to GS350 in ALL parts of the world, but that may not be what their plans are.
Lexusguy, the 530 situation is somewhat similar but this is the second year for that same engine in the redesigned model, so buyers haven't gotten the feeling that the current engine was just a temporary plug. And that engine was standard on the previous model for years. Also they are giving advance warning about the new replacement engine.
On a side note, I sat in a base (v8) LWB Phaeton today. What a car ! That it is a VW is probably the single biggest reason why it is a sales disappointment! Put an Audi or a Bentley on that car, and up the price to 100K+, and you'll get the traffic and the buyers in a NY minute ! The sales guy told me unfortunately, the Phaeton is on its way out due to lack of interest from the public
Back to the GS. I finally saw the '06 in person. Let me put it this way, it is not bad looking, but did not move me to get behind the wheel. It is like a typical Lexus - not too flashy, not too daring, just a solid car. Period. Would I buy one. Nope. But I am not a GS customer anyway. My sight is on the LS, and surprise surprise, no info on the '07 LS from the Lexus folks at the auto show. Bloody waste of my time talking to these people since I know a lot more about their cars than they do.
So, the long and short of my post is that I am NOW leaning towards a GS300/GS430 in the March 2005 debut. Not the most competitive, solid step Lexus should be taking, but then, with so much money in the kitty, they may not care much. Maybe their primary concern is the splash earmarked for the MY2007 LS to re-define Lexus once again. We'll see, but I am not a happy Lexus camper right about now !
Happy New Year everyone.
Recently, I asked two Lexus salesmen about the possible 3.5L for the new GS.
Their answers, "Not at this time."
So I asked, "If not at this time, then will there be one in the future?"
Their answers, "I do not know."
Geez.
I have seen the car at the NYIAS and I don't like it, but I also like the current GS better, and the new M45 and A6 also leave me cold. The RL looks like a really good $40k car. And I sat in the RL at the Orlando Car Show. The dash is pretty sweet, the back seat is straight out of an Accord.
The Germans are prettier to my eyes, but according to the mags, have sold some soul for some more hi-tech acrynoms. I'd avoid this market class all together and git a 2-year old A6 2.7T 6-speed, but that's just me.
I think Lexus is very confident in the new GS with the LS on it's last (EXTREMELY strong) legs, and the IS still almost a year away. So the IS will have the 3 and 3.5 at launch? 245Hp and 2--HP? Will it have more than the Avalon? More than the G35? would expect a BMW 3.5 to be around 300HP. I haven't heard any quotes on that.
I'm guesing the LS 2007 will base around $60k, and will totally rock, so the V8 GS better have a pretty strong stake in the ground if it wants any play. A Hybrid option for '07 (before the LS launch) would help.
I'm disappointed by the styling,and people will probably step right over it to get to the new LS, so I don't see GS fortunes turning after it's first 2 years.
DrFill
My guess is that Lexus already built quite a few of the 3 liter V6 engines, and are going to put em in the US Lexus GS versions to use them up. Then they'll go to the 3.5 next year.
Can't think of any other reason. Maybe some cost savings too.
No reason to waste money on two completely different 3.5L engines.
I'd expect this to happen before the '07 LS is introduced, adding feul to the GS fire before the revolutionary LS takes over, again. Timing here will be crucial.
DrFill
That's it ! Now I remember that quote exactly. It will then make sense out of this sheer senseless of the 3L and 3.5L motors..... You and DrFill have put it right. The 3L will run aprox 18 months, the AWD comes in, and then mild refresh with the 3.5L engine upgrade. In the meantime, the 3.5L would have been released in Japan (needed a BIG release to launch lexus in the home market), with the NA market receiving this engine later. Darn Lexus to trick us out like this ! Why their BIGGEST market gets treated like second class beats me. That 3.5L should debut in the US since this is the biggest competitive field with the Germans.
A hybrid with more power will definitely raise some eyebrows though.
3.0 and V8. Then 3.0, Hybrid, V8. The 3.5, Hybrid, V8.
Then Hybrid V8?
It looks as if Lexus is doing so many other thngs right, what happens to this model is just gravy. It's look still disappoints.
Releasing the 3.5 and Hybrid engine in the same year makes no sense. So either one will be available at launch, or they will be introduced in stages.
DrFill
Lexus already suggested releasing a hybrid-V8 with "a v12 performance and a v6 fuel economy". So this may not support your point here, unless such a v8-hybrid engine will be in a *new* UL (super)-Lexus trim above the LS500 in a future release ??? Of course, that would then mean 3 hybrid engines - 400h (RX), 4.5h (GS) and ??? (LS). Make any sense ??? Not to me .... So I am going to speculate that the 4.5h will be the v8-hybrid motor with the ~500bhp (330hp from the gas-engine v8 + ~170bhp from the battery) That is my speculation !
You guys may be wondering why would they use the GS350 for their GT car instead of the GS450? Well there maybe some evidence in the market to support this. The Subaru Liberty (or Legacy in other parts of the world) has their most powerful car as the Liberty GT with 190kw from a 2.0L, while they also have a 3.0L 6cylinder in the lineup, but that only produces 180kw. Thus the GT is more for spirited driving, while the 3.0L is for comfort. Which brings me back to the point that the GS450h may be the comfort car while the GS350GT will be the top sports vehicle.
The way I see it, the 3.0 will lead off followed by the Hybrid 3.0/Intro 3.5 around this time next year, then the 4.6 for 2007 with 340-350HP (to stay AHEAD of 545/A6), then a 450HP Hybrid V8 for 2008.
The only thing is Lexus will NOT have FIVE engine variations in the GS (3, 3.5, Hybrid V6, V8, Hybrid V8). So I would guess by 2008 the 3.0 will be dropped, and the 3.5 will be the base engine.
BUT, Lexus made this all-new 3.0 for a reason. It HAS to be in the IS or GS long-term to make any sense economically. The only reason it can work is that it will be the basis for all future Lexus Hybrid V6 models, and the 3.3 will be phased out.
My understanding is the 3. is a super modern plant, that is lighter and more efficient than the 3.3, which I believe is a bored and warmed-over last-gen 3.0 that has been in the Toyota family for many years. And is too close to the 3.5 anyway!
Consider the fact that the 3.3 Hybrid in the RX400 only makes 25HP more than a unfitted GS300 (245HP).
Toyota made this 3.0 for major work in the future.
It wouldn't make it here as an LS, it is 3" shorter thasn the current LS.
The real car would be taller than 54".
Why does the concept sport a V8?
DrFill
2006 GS: 3.0 and 4.3 engines (245/300)
2006 IS: 2.5 and 3.0 (200/245)
2006 RX: new 3.0 along with hybrid 3.3 (245/270)
2007 ES: new 3.0 (245)
2007 GS: new 3.5 and 4.6 engines (280/350)
2007 LS: new 4.6 (350)
2007/2008 IS: upgrade 2.5, new 3.5 (220/280)
2006 Avalon: 3.5 (280)
2006 Highlander: new 3.0 along with hybrid 3.3 (245/270)
2007 Camry: 2.5 and 3.0 engines (180/245)
2007 Solara: 2.5 and 3.0 engines (180/245)
2007 Sienna: new 3.5 (280)
This is pure speculation.
I think the 3.5L is going to find its way into the RX and HL, if not the Sienna. The Ody has 255 hp, so why is a 3.5L in the Sienna out of the question?
~alpha
http://www.autoweek.com/news.cms?newsId=101546
I'm thinking if GS3.5L 280hp from new Avalon plus hybrid of 170hp well then this GS GT will be 450hp isn't bad after all. There also a confirmation from Lexus that 3.5L will be in fall 2006. Lexus is smart first they release 3.0L and 4.3L then when 3.5L come they will move to a bigger V8. Then there will be 4 engine just like BMW having 2 V6, V8 and M.
Does any one known if there will be any use of alluminum on GS?
I will be, no, the LS WILL DEFINITELY have a hybrid V8 engine by 2009. Period. That's done.
EVERY Lexus (or 'Yota) will go Hybrid within 5 years.
The LS will extend it's leadership as the most efficient gas V8 luxury car in America, if not the world. I predict Corolla economy (32-35MPG) from a 400HP V8 hybrid, selling for around $85k in 2009!
It seems Lexus plan is to introduce something new to the GS every 18 months, a sound scheme. New design, then new hybrid model, then new V8, then V8 hybrid.
The looks disappoint, but should carry it until the hybrid forces renewed interest.
And I vote detuned 3.5 in Sienna over a full-bore 280HP. AND a hybrid 3.0 by '07.
DrFill