Hybrid Honda Accord

1181921232466

Comments

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    has features that are still better than most new cars and it is a '93

    And the early 90s Lexus were much better looking than the new. They followed the trends and that was toward ugly cars... With a few exceptions.
  • michael2003michael2003 Member Posts: 144
    I believe the tax break for FY 2004 is only $1,000, which drops to $500 in FY '05.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The tax break was renewed recently. It is back to $2000 deduction off income for 2004. What I am not sure of is whether the HAH qualifies for that deduction. There has to be a certification from the government. Since the car isn't for sale yet, that may not have happened. Anyone know?
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    from a news report:

    "As part of that measure, Congress restored the alternative-fuel and hybrid vehicle federal income tax deduction to $2,000 for vehicles purchased in calendar years 2004 and 2005. (Under current law, the value of the deduction was to have been reduced by 25 percent, to $1,500 this year, and reduced by an additional 25 percent in 2005.) The value of the deduction in 2006 remains at only $500, as under current law, and the deduction continues to sunset entirely at the end of 2006"
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    Assume a HAH buyer is in tax break of 33%, tax deductible on $2,000 is equivalent to $660 that person can get back. Whatever we get back from Uncle Sam is good. I am ready to file federal tax deductible $2,000 on my HAH at end of this year 2004 and also try to claim tax deductible on my state tax too before the deductible amounts come down to zero. California has not been specifically authorized for tax deductible on Hybrid vehicles even though it has OKed small hybrid vehicles such as Honda Civic hybrid and Prius to run on the carpool lanes.
  • railroadjamesrailroadjames Member Posts: 560
    Whoa there, with that line about Toyota like a dinosaur & Honda like the sports car,oh so nimble.
    Honda hit the market with what seemed like a 2/seater skateboard with hard seats. Not a bad start but by most folks opinion not at all a practical family car. After Toyota did their homework they delivered with the 1st generation Prius that turned some serious heads with little ones. The 04' Prius, which I presently own, gets my gold star. I would like to say that I have fond respect for Honda and their R&D. They many times led the way with countless inovations be it motorcycles or autos. I owned one of Honda's first 2 cyl. Coupes back in 72' and I've owned better than a dozen of their bikes (some good & some bad). Toyota has an outstanding reputation for their leadership in an ever changeing and competitive market. I just hope the Hybrid trend proves itself worthy. Time will tell as well as word of mouth (the best advertisement of all).
    Culliganman (hiball!)
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Has more to do with Toyota marketing. Honda, OTOH, is doing its usual thing.
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    I used to own 2-cycle 50cc Honda motorcycles back in 1966, 1967...1975 and they were all leading and superior motorcyles compared to other competitors' motorcyles. Honda motorcyles at that time were the best in term of power, riders' comfort, engines'responsiveness, smart design, smoothness, durability and style. I just fell in love with Honda motorcyles since 1966 and later on Honda automobiles since 1976.
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    Sorry, I just recalled that back in 1966 while Suziki, Yamaha, Kawasaki, Ducati...mostly built 2-cycle motorcycles Honda built 4-stroke Honda motorcyles and obviously they were more power and faster than motorcycles by other manufacturers.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Honda built 4-stroke Honda motorcycles and obviously they were more power and faster than motorcycles by other manufacturers.

    Hold on there. In the late 1960s, I raced desert & motoX on a Honda 125 two stroke and got beat by Huskies, CZ, Kawasaki, Maico and a lot of others. Honda built a decent bike. Not the fastest or best handling. It was the cheapest to buy of the race bikes. To be real competitive in the world of racing you needed sponsors and Honda was real cheap in my area of CA & later Alaska. Of the Japanese racing bikes Yamaha and Kawasaki were the tops.
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    In the late 1960s in my big home town, Honda (50cc, 90cc, 125cc) was the best compared to Kawasaki, Yamaha, Suziki...in terms of value, resale value, great number of buyers/ users, Honda bikes' easy to use, style, power, product solidity, popularity, durability, etc. It seemed everybody bought Honda bikes at that time. And now after over 4 decades (40 years+) I still love and buy Honda automobile. Honda has never failed me on one single product. And this time I will have to pay big bucks to buy a HAH with NAVI with lot of exciting features (Trying to to stick to our HAH discussion subject).
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Trying to to stick to our HAH discussion subject

    I had a real bad experience with a 1978 Honda Accord. I would be willing to give them another chance with the HAH or the Accord Diesel. I think Honda has come a long way since their failed attempt in the 1978 Accord.
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    As far as I know Honda built its first Civic in 1976. I used to be so concerned about accidents and wanted a car with strong body so I bought GM cars and stayed away from Japanese cars until 1986. And then I got so tired with GM cars's low quality so I bought a Civic. My first Civic 86 was a great one. At 6 1/2 years old, 120K miles, it ran on the highway like new except I had to replace the ball joints and the starter, etc. Otherwise, the engine was so fine. When I bought the Accord EX I4 95 I also test drove an entry level Acura 95 but the Acura was lighter and less roomy than the Accord so I decided to buy the Accord. I rather buy the Accord hybrid 2005 than the Acura TL or other entry-level Acuras 2005. I totally go for the new advanced technology in the HAH. For a few thousand more we get them all. It is really worth it. Some Honda dealerships "begged" to sell me a regular AV6 EX 2005 at cost but I do not want it.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    The Civic debuted in 1973...
    http://www.edmunds.com/reviews/generations/articles/68272/article- .html

    Remember when the CVCC engine on the early Hondas was "advanced technology"? Now some of us think nothing of paying thousands of dollars for the latest powertrain technology, as on the HAH or other hybrids. Well, that's more practical than spending thousands of dollars on fancy alloy wheels, as some folks do.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Well, that's more practical than spending thousands of dollars on fancy alloy wheels, as some folks do.

    Excellent point. I wish magazines who keep talking about "hybrid premium" say as much about these cosmetic accessories.
  • dogface5dogface5 Member Posts: 87
    I don't want to disappoint anyone but be aware of the following:

    "The battery pack is designed to last ten years under normal driving conditions."

    Source: hondacars.com

    "Its[HAH} battery pack comes with an 8-year/80,000-mile warranty"

    Source: hondacars.com

    Honda is admitting that the average life of the battery is 10 years. Since it is only covered for 8 years, consumers will have to shell out thousands of dollars to replace the battery out of warranty.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    If battery pack costs thousands of dollars, how much does the hybrid system (minus battery pack cost)?

    Nobody has a clue right now about how much those batteries will cost in ten years from now. And if history repeats itself, and competition is bound to appear, it should be cheaper than whatever it does now.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    "Its[HAH} battery pack comes with an 8-year/80,000-mile warranty"

    Doesn't California mandate a 10 year 150k mile warranty on the battery pack for the Prius? I would think that would be for all hybrids.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Prius is AT-PZEV, which requires a 10 year, 150,000 mile warranty on some components (like the battery) in states that recognize the AT-PZEV emissions rating. I don't think the HAH will be AT-PZEV, will it?
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    My 18 year old son with his brand new Accord 2003 V6 Coupe, that I just bought for him, wants to install the "$4,000 Honda factory performance kit" which contains new lower suspensions/ shocks, spoiler, etc. Kids do love alloy wheels and fancy stuff. He makes me crazy.
  • dogface5dogface5 Member Posts: 87
    "Nobody has a clue right now about how much those batteries will cost in ten years from now."

    Once you own the car they can charge whatever they want for the battery (as they do for just about everything else).
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    I heard the Civic/Accord hybrid's battery is made of technology which is somewhat similar to 9-volt battery technology and it is not too hard to build it in mass production later on.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I could not find an EPA rating on the Honda website. It did mention that the 8 yr 80,000 mile was for certain areas.

    http://automobiles.honda.com/info/news/article.asp?ArticleID=2004- 091746959&Category=Accord+Hybrid
  • vietviet Member Posts: 847
    Remember that Honda timing belt and some non-critical parts can be manufactured by other companies at lower cost. Honda automobiles are very reliable but Honda parts and services are so much expensive. That's why I have to hire my own mechanic to maintain all my Hondas (of course except for the coming HAH and major services). I buy most parts at Honda dealership. But for my old Hondas, I buy timing belts and spark plugs (Bosch preferred), coolant... at Kragen. Recently, Honda sent out surveys asking customers how much they pay for oil change, maintenance service, parts, etc. Now Honda starts to realize how customers (bitterly) feel about their high charge for parts and services. Anyway, it is very hard to resist buying a new Honda. "Honda's manual transmission shifts like...butter". It is so true. I have to add "Honda manual transmission shifts like... Heaven". I drove my manual 86 Civic so I can confirm that folks.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Civic Hybrid is, so it has the 10 yr/150K mile warranty (as does the Accord PZEV). But I thought the AT-PZEV related warranty applied to only emissions.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    This may help explain why an emissions warranty includes the battery:

    However, CARB isn't necessarily making it easy for hybrids to qualify for the AT PZEV certification. As proposed, they must test to zero evaporative emissions and provide a 15-year, 150,000-mile warranty of "tailpipe" emissions performance. In effect, this means that if the battery (or any other part of the powertrain) doesn't last for that period of time or mileage, the manufacturer must eat the cost.

    http://www.thecarconnection.com/index.asp?article=5892&pf=1
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
    from honda web site
    Torrance, Calif. October 5, 2003 --
    Make/Model = Honda/Civic Hybrid*, Insight

    Bumper-To-Bumper Warranty (Years/miles)= 3years, 36,000 miles
    Powertrain Warranty = 3years, 36,000 miles
    IMA Battery Warranty (Years/miles)= 8 /80,000, AT-PZEV*(CA, NY, ME, VT, MA): 10/150,000
    Corrosion Warranty (Years/miles)= 5 years, unlimited miles
    Emissions Warranty (years/miles) = Federal: 3 years/36,000, California: 3 years/50,000, AT-PZEV*(CA, NY, ME, VT, MA): 15/150,000
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    As proposed, they must test to zero evaporative emissions and provide a 15-year, 150,000-mile warranty of "tailpipe" emissions performance.

    So that is interesting. 15 year and 150k miles on antthing that can screw up the emissions. I wonder if a guy will have a problem with Toyota or Honda getting his car repaired 14 years down the road.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    So, it does apply to all AT-PZEV vehicles (Civic Hybrid and Prius at the moment). And if Honda offers AT-PZEV HAH in CA (like HCH), it would apply to it as well.

    From the same article…

    That's because no one knows how long any of this hardware will last

    Eight years ago, the same question prevailed when Honda EV-Plus was became the first EV to have NiMH battery pack.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
    Kind of a moot point since the Honda EV-Plus isn't around anymore :)

    Plug It in ! Plug It in!

    YMMV,
    MidCow
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    But the battery technology is (NiMH). :-)

    That said, EV-plus has not taken the form of FCX and still uses the same electric motor (albeit with more power now, up from 68 HP to 80 HP). Energy storage has moved from NiMH battery pack to ultra capacitors.
  • midnightcowboymidnightcowboy Member Posts: 1,978
    I thought Ultra Capacitors were still in the early alpha stages of research. There has to still be a charge leakage problem to overcome to keep to charge from dissipating. While capacitors have proven themselves in car bass amplification, the chare doesn't have to be reatined very long. I will be intrested when the cahge can be hled overnight, much less when the car sits for several weeks.

    And by the way all NiMH batteries are not the same. There have been significan improvments in the hydride alloys as well as the charge density in recent years, such a prismatic.

    YAMV, A=amperage

    MidCow
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    I thought Ultra Capacitors were still in the early alpha stages of research.

    I guess it will be some time then before the HAH employs Ultra Capacitors?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Ultra Capacitor has found its way into production vehicle anyway. Honda had been using its UC pack in FCX prototypes (V3 and V4) before launching the production FCX. It is 430V system via UC pack with 160 ultra capacitors (package size and weight is said to be about the same as 144V/120 NiMH battery pack used in Honda’s hybrids). Maxwell technologies has received a contract to supply UC packs for gasoline-electric hybrid buses in Long Beach, CA.

    IMO, it is a matter of time before UC replaces batteries in hybrid vehicles especially those that work in “burst mode” (mild hybrids for that matter). The energy density is getting up there (in some cases exceeding that of NiMH batteries), with very high charge/discharge rate compared to chemical batteries. And they are lighter and more compact too! Cost may be an issue, but according to an article I read, the manufacturing cost has come down by as much as one-twentieth of what it was in the mid-80s (from about $2 to $0.10 for each farad of capacitance). There is an anticipation that it might go down to half of the current cost soon. It is also expected that UC will find its way into accessories like PDAs and cell phones.

    As for charge leak, electrostatic storage is still (considerably) below electrochemical storage when it comes to “charge life”. A typical alkaline battery is said to retain 75% of its charge after five years on shelf, compared to 50% for a UC in 45 days. But, who would buy a car to put it “on shelf” for 45 days (much less, five years)? That being said, UC by characteristics have a very quick recharge rate too and are better than batteries to gain charge during regenerative braking.
  • rfruthrfruth Member Posts: 630
    Look out here comes the HAH - snip - The Toyota Prius has gotten all the attention. Each time the price of a barrel of crude pushes up the price of a gallon of gas, folks line up outside their Toyota store to bid on a Prius.

    http://motortrend.com/features/news/112_news21/
  • frank49gfrank49g Member Posts: 6
    I had a chance to drive the Accord Hybrid yesterday and posted a review. Since 99% of the people on this forum have more technical knowledge than I do, corrections are welcome. Please remember this is written for a lay audience, though.

    http://www.aiada.org/article.asp?id=26012
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    "The plans aren't firm yet, but we have more hybrids coming. The system in Accord can go into any of our vehicles."

    Sometimes I feel Honda Odyssey Touring should have been just that, a hybrid.
  • frank49gfrank49g Member Posts: 6
    I had a chance to drive the Accord Hybrid yesterday and posted a review. Since 99% of the people on this forum have more technical knowledge than I do, corrections are welcome. Please remember this is written for a lay audience, though.

    http://www.aiada.org/article.asp?id=26012
  • 307web307web Member Posts: 1,033
    Maybe in a year or two. Releasing a hybrid Odyssey at the outset might have been a bit much.
    Plus they probably don't have enough of the engines to go around anyway.
  • jrct9454jrct9454 Member Posts: 2,363
    Yeah, well for about the umpteenth time, the federal tax thingee is a DEDUCTION, not a CREDIT. This means that if you're in the 15% bracket, the actual dollar value [assuming you itemize deductions at all, or is it deductible as a separate item?] could be as little as $300 - hardly a reason to buy or not to buy, either way.

    Yours is the third article on hybrids I've read in just the last 24 hours that calls the federal deduction a "credit" - the difference is pretty important.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Engines won’t be a problem since Odyssey’s power train is “ready” for IMA. However, given the history, Honda doesn’t usually go for all trims right away anyway. So, hybrid may come out in a year or three.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    It does not sound like Honda wants to build a lot of hybrids. Enough to justify the R&D. If they are real popular they will build more as Toyota is doing with Prius. I still think if the hybrid is going to be popular, the Insight should have sold better than it has. It is by far the most practical of the ones on the market for commuting with one or two people.
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    We could say that Miata should have sold better than it does, but that would be without putting things into perspective. A 2-seat coupe/hb like Insight isn’t designed to have a mass appeal, and more so if it comes with a price tag of $20K.

    Honda is a cautious automaker, and it isn’t pushing hybrid technology as much as Toyota (at the moment). And if I understand correctly, the point may have to do with letting the technology develop while people take their time to perceive hybrids differently than they do now, and are more accepting to it.

    I don’t doubt that Honda could potentially launch a powerful hybrid vehicle sometime soon (compared to the small IMA set up Honda is currently using) but having a few mainstream offerings will help in its own ways. As with any evolving technology, there has to be a need for refinement, improving the little things before you attack the more pronounced pieces. Even as it can be seen, the evolutionary changes from Insight to HCH to HAH have been focused more on the little things, getting more out of less, and making the system more efficient before designing more powerful ones.

    The Acura SUV (RDX?) could be a representative of IMA’s high power potential, and may go head on against Toyota’s RX400h. We may have to wait for at least a year or so to hear more about that vehicle. Honda is a tight lipped company after all.
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "Hi Dennis,

    Few weeks ago, I checked oil on my Accord EX 95 I4 it did burn some oil after 350 miles high speed highway drive. Today, I checked oil again after about 400+ miles it has not burned any oil. It is really misterious."


    viet,

    The oil pressure level changes when you drive. If you check the level right after you drove, it may seem different than a cold engine. It's great that you are having a great experience with you Honda. Any transmission or other problem?

    Dennis
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "(Prius success) has more to do with Toyota marketing."

    When the product is superior, it is easier to market.

    Dennis
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "Nobody has a clue right now about how much those batteries will cost in ten years from now"

    I have some clue. :-D The battery pack would cost less in ten years from now on. For example, the panasonic battery pack used in 04' Prius costs 30% less than 03' Prius.

    Due to the success of hybrids, greater mass production output can be realized. The price will keep going down, not up. Competition will also drive the cost further down. Sanyo is supplying NiMH packs for HAH and Escape Hybrid. It won't take long until American manufacturers such as Ovonic join the race.

    Dennis
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "I heard the Civic/Accord hybrid's battery is made of technology which is somewhat similar to 9-volt battery technology and it is not too hard to build it in mass production later on."

    I don't think what you heard is accurate. HCH and Insight uses D cylindrial shape NiMH cells. The same shape for the flash lights therefore, it might be possible to replace them. Maybe that's the origin of the myth.

    NiMH cells in HV are not the same as consumer electronic rechargable batteries. HV cells can discharge more power, have higher energy density, and lower internal resistance.

    Dennis
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Thanks for the review! Did you get a chance to look at the mpg readout during your drive? How did it do in the city, highway, and when you were going 80? How about trunk space--I read it was reduced due to the battery pack. How roomy is it, and is the shape conducive to holding stuff?
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "I will be intrested when the cahge can be hled overnight, much less when the car sits for several weeks."

    Capacitors loose charge quickly. Supercapacitors and Ultracapacitors hold their charge well. They are already in use in cars today. They can be found in smart box backup devices and door latches.

    Dennis
  • usbseawolf2000usbseawolf2000 Member Posts: 759
    "It does so by combining the technology of the electric motor technology so few people understand, on top of the six-cylinder gas engine we’re all familiar with."

    Frank,

    I find that sentence confusing due to multiple use of "technology". Accord Hybrid use IMA which stands for Integrated Motor Assist. It would be more accurate if you say the 16hp electric motor assists the six-cylinder 240hp gas engine.

    Never mind, I read further into the review and found assisting explanation but I did not see IMA mentioned anywhere.

    "When the motor is in recharge mode, a bar of green lights indicates ths function."

    I found a typo. :-D

    Dennis
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.