Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
Also, no stalling even through the Poconos with only 35 miles to go before empty. . . .
Thanks
You need to document everything so you can invoke the lemon law after several attempts to fix the problem fail.
They will take your problem seriously when you are close to triggering the law. In some states, it only takes 3 tries.
http://www.whatcar.com/News_SpecialReport.asp?NA_ID=213136
-Michael
It seems that the factory kit uses Rosen A9 which is a generation back. The A9 and A10 have the same footprint so I'd imagine that one can get A10 into the same space designed for A9.
Thanks.
I looked at the Rosen systems, dealer qouted $2600, found it for about $1600 at an auto stereo shop. The only cath was the "kit" that LR uses can only be purchased through a dealer.
So, I called the parts department at my dealer, the guy kept quoting me for the kit, Rosen unit and install. He finally said he would sell it to me. But, I chose a Clarion 7" all in one overhead.
At first the stereo shop tried to sell me a 10" LCD with a stand-alone DVD player. The DVD player would either be mounted in the top glove box, requiring some cutting, or under the seat.
Regardless, I haven't had my DVD system/XM units isntalled yet...Waiting for my replacement vehicle to do that. :-(
oops...been so long since I bought it, called it an Audiovox
I am curious about why you went for a non-Rosen product. I'd assume LR designed the LR3 kit to fit Rosen. Is the kit universal so you can use whatever aftermarket unit you like?
But, they were all concerned about the minimal amount of spcae between the front sunroof and rear alpine roof. So, the LR kit is a must from their perspective. Due to weight issues I would assume. That is why one of the shops suggested the 10" LCD with stand-alone DVD player.
On the Rosen A10... it's possible it might install like the OEM A9-like version if you can get the large plastic dome mount/replacement Land Rover uses. (I'm not sure if that's in the LR Installation Kit.) It's also unknown if would play audio through the stereo's "AUX" like the factory one will (or should) if you have the little "dummy" plug in the mini-stereo AUX jack. (When Rosen/LR issues a fix... that feature is still broken on all the DVD units last we heard. tincup47?)
also since i got car back last fri. computer shows i'm only avg. 7 mpg, that's strange??? before service for air bag sensor i was proud of my 12 mpg.
She got the HSE Bonati Grey, with 3rd row. Let me just say, ride so far is outstanding. The creature comforts are pretty nice. And, it does well in snow. We're in Southwest Ohio, and had ice and snow, though not as much as other parts of midwest. It is a joy indeed.
We chose the LR3 over a Volvo XC90 (I own a 10 year 850 sedan--which I love) and a Pacifica (yes, a Pacifica-3rd row seat and the crossover vehicle idea was the key). I had given my wife a pic of the LR3 b-4 I knew the price. She fell in love. WE drove it and we were both hooked. The LR3 won based on we really liked the idea of a truck and it just seemed to have some neat items. My wife also feels very comfortable in it.
I am mildly concerned about the stalling issue. LR has a bad rep on reliability. WE have a strong shop here in town, so that helped our decision. Also, as I've read here, Ford has a $1BN "bet" that this will make LR and the Premier Auto Group profitable. They will clearly make sure this all works out.
This is the first vehicle we bought in which there was no price haggling. Dealer was not selling at discount at this time...period. WE were able to get $2500 off with X-Plan...and no security deposit with the lease (hedging our bets in case it screws up).
Am disappointed with the DVD options so far (dealer suggested company quoting $2300 for two rear seat headrest units), No sattelite radio and the phone hook-up not available yet. What are others doing about sattelite radio? Have seen some of the chat about DVD and bluetooth on here. Any other comments?
My wife and I love the comments here and the info sharing. Keep it up. We will as well.
300 miles into day 3...no stalling yet!
I just got my car back as well. As I previously said they were checking for stalling. They claimed they took 2 long road test and did not duplicate the problem. Turns out the 2 tests totaled 14 miles! Avg MPG was 7.5 and avg speed was 6.5mph! Either they did the 14 miles in traffic (in which it would have been hard to duplicate the problem) or they had the car running while it was stationary...
~2,000 miles = zero defects or issues
Be well!
Usually there's an audible signal when you exceed the maximum angle.....from the driver's mouth! Alternatively, you can just follow a vehicle with a maximum angle of 34 degrees. :-)
Navigation is great, but I need to figure out all the voice commands. It kept "misinterpreting" me, and would show things I didn't want shown, or change the view settings. But that's my issue, I'm sure.
It is just such a solid driving vehicle, and very quiet. Certainly no stalling issues.
I am wondering if reviews are being screened? I hope that is not the case as that would be a major credibility issue, which Edmunds prides itself on.
Also, I have noticed the LR3 has won several prestigious awards over the last several months including the Motor Trend SUV of the year. But these awards have not been mentioned on the Edmunds website where awards for the car are listed. Is there any reason why?
I understand that posting some of the reviews is behind a bit due to some bugs, and the IT people have been swamped fixing site performance issues from the Inside Line roll out.
Edmunds has its own awards, so I don't know if a lot of effort is made to write about awards from other car sites/mags.
Steve, Host
See About Consumer Ratings and Review for conditions regarding the factors considered in posting a review.
Drop a note to me or my cohost, Steve, if your review doesn't show up in the next few days.
tidester, host
tidester, host
Steve, Host
Regars, Todd
toddwilfong @earthlink.net
I while let you know if my review is not up in the next few days.
Sontob
My dealer is telling me that they think was an option and my car does not have it...
Website and sticker indicate Peremiter alarm included.
Feedback please?
Out of respect for the dealership (and for the fact that we haven't taken delivery yet) I can't tell you the exact details...yet. My advice, when dealing on an SE that's either on the lot or en route, is to aim for the sweet spot right between invoice and sticker.
Mine does that too. I have heard this reported by rather a lot of users, too.
sort of ridiculous for a vehicle over 50k
I feel for those that have had problems, but I would hope there is not an impression out there that the LR3 has inherent design or production problems that affect each vehicle.
1) they are enthusiasts who look at LR3 ownership as much as a club/hobby as they do owning an SUV
------or
2) they have a problem and are looking for others with the same issue to search for help.
If there are 4,000 LR3s on the road (a guess, I have no clue) I'd bet maybe 400 owners ever make it to this site. And maybe only 80 every bother logging in. If 20 people have had a certain problem, it then seems like a 25% have issues and scare others away from a great vehicle when in reality, the real number would be .5%. For a brand new machine, a number like that seems reasonable.
Our LR3 is currently in the shop. We did get a loaner. The vehicle has stalled 7 times - all at the same stop sign. Perhaps we sould drive a different route to get home.
Other than the stalling, I really do like the LR3. It is very solid and stable. The ride is great and the interior configuration is the best.
Now if they can stop the stalling, we'll have a great SUV!
Anyone who is considering between the LR3 and any of the other options (GX,XC,X5,MDX) this vehicle is the best all round driving SUV out there...it's solid as a rock!
The purpose--the only valid purpose, IMHO--of buying a LR is full-time reliability. That is what the plethora of special features is for: absolute reliability of safe mobility in all situations and terrains. It either fulfills this mission or it doesn't, and it does it CONSISTENTLY across the vehicle line or it doesn't. Nice ride, good looks, uniqueness in the neighborhood,etc., are beside the point. The LR3 held such promise, but is a failure (at this point) and must be avoided for those for whom reliability of safe mobility in all conditions is the issue. IMHO, Teldoc, the number of problems is neither reasonable nor acceptable. I'm waiting til next year (there are still no other competitive options--that's not in question), and hoping LR realizes what people need from it, and starts to put that first. If everyone buys now and plays the stalling lottery, neither LR nor its dealers will get the message. Right now, they certainly don't get it, and they appear in no hurry to start to.
1) objects in the mirror are larger than they appear (this forum will make issues seem more frequent than they actually are)
----and
2) anytime you screw together 50,000 parts there is going to be a learning curve.
See the Airbus A320, Space Shuttle, GX470 or anything for more details.
Time to change my user ID...
Tom
Vancouver, BC
However, human error is inevitable even with a billion dollar state of the art platform and decades of experience building a particular machine. Therefore, there is an unfortunate learning curve involved in any human process, which is at the expense of the customer in this case.
With that said, in order to illicit a well-informed decision one must involve critical thinking to help make the best decison possible for that person - that is, analyzing the risk versus reward, which I believe Edmunds forums does assist with even with the small sample size-one defective LR3 is still one defective LR3 and questions must be asked and answered.
For those more riskier people the reward of a new state of the art SUV outweighs the apparent risk of purchasing a potentially defective automobile. This is a brand new, top to bottom inside and out vehicle-there will be more reliability problems based on that fact alone-there is no way around it.
I have about 2000 miles on my fully loaded SE7 and only have great things to say about it- not one problem at all (knock on wood). It is an amazing piece of machinery!
However, when I purchased it I knew I was taking a risk. If the tax incentive of accelerated tax depreciation did not end in 2004 I would of waited until next year for the kinks to be worked out.
At this time it looks like lady luck was on my side.
And you are basing this on what? A few posts in this forum? We've had zero problems, but I'm not going to rant about that. This forum is not an effective sample size. We really won't know about initial quality until, well, next year after all the evil researchers are done.
My only complaints so far have to do with product management decisions (missing features, etc.) and Land Rover's amazing miscommunication skills.
Yes, there is an excellent chance I'll have greater than average issues that will need to worked with my service department... but such is life with a brand new first year vehicle. So far, I haven't seen it.
That's an absurd blanket generalization that is IMPOSSIBLE to attain. "Full-time reliability" -- there is no such thing in a mechanical vehicle. And quite frankly, people buy Land Rovers for MANY MANY different reasons, and most of us would appreciate not having those reasons lumped into "valid" and "non-valid".
I obvioulsy called the dealer to complain. They said bring in back in an they will fill the tank (or send them a receipt and they will cut a check).
What I dislike is the fact that we have to do anything at all to fix something that never should have happened in the first place!
Anybody know what the dollar limit is on theft before it's considered a felony?