Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Honda Civic Sedan 2006
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I have a Civic as a beater, and my head says get a new Civic, but everybody has one, and I miss the seats of the 92-95 model, and now power is down compared to the comp.
If the Si gets 210HP, a 6-speed, Auto climate and available NAV, I might have to pull the trigger!
DrFill
DrFill
And oh yeah, apparently the 1.3L hybrid version is capable of getting 30 km/L which translates to about 70 mpg. They have got to be kidding me!?
2005 Civic Hybrid - 29.5 km/l (~69 mpg) Japan 10/15 = 48/47 mpg US EPA
2006 Civic Hybrid - 30 km/l (~70 mpg) Japan 10/15 = ??/?? mpg US EPA
I have no reason to doubt that this new Si won't be even better than its '99-00 version. Seeing as how we seem to have some of the same tastes(4 runner, civic si, supra, yota FJ, ect) I think you should take a serious look at this new Civic when it comes out. For the price, reliability, HP upgrade, and build quality it should be hard to beat.
-SiK99
Not gettin' sumpin' until the End od the Year Clearance sales in Sept./Oct.
Considering anything that is cool, and around $20k, including '05 Scion tC, Corolla XRS, 05 Civic Ex, 06 Civic Si (January? Too long), Tacoma V6 6-speed, Mini Cooper S, Mazda3 s lease ($188 a month ?).....
I think the Si will be KILLER, but the chances of me lasting until next year are to slim to acknowledge. I'm also think the Saturn Sky will be a true legend :shades: (GM? Noooooooo!!!)!
DrFill
Honda Civic, automatic, 4-door sedan, non-hybred, LX and EX models.
I had read last winter that a Honda executive stated it would be significantly improved over 2005 models.
Thanks for responses.
You have to use your imagination as to what significant means.
Thanks for the reply. My #1 criteria for getting the Avalon was a kick-a** [non-permissible content removed] engine and genuine seating for three in the back seat. The TL and Accord only seat two in the back seat as do all other Japanese six-cylinder midsize sedans. I refuse to buy American or European cars for reliabilty/quality concerns, and Minivans and SUV's were out of the question for handling/economy/safety reasons, so the 05 Avalon was the ONLY choice.
By the way, all Avalons are automatics, so when you speak of TL's killing the Avalon in acceleration, I assume you mean auto-equipped TL's, in which case you must define "kill" as two or three tenths of a second to sixty because Avalons are 6.4-6.6 depending upon who you read, and TL's are in the low sixes depending upon which mags you read. Comparing an Auto tranny car to a manual is irrational.
You did not mention that the brakes on the TL are relative CRAP with a capital "C"! Avalon handily outbrakes the TL, and Accord as do most or all of the above mentioned cars. You have to spend an extra $5,000 on an A-Spec to get the Brembo brakes and itinerant braking distances befitting that TL's $36,000 pricetag. C'mon Honda! Where's the brakes!!??! For that money (if I didn't need seating for three), I'd go with a BMW three-series or an Infinity G35.
You also forgot to mention that the Avalon's MPG is 22 city/31 hwy - isn't the TL's less? I can attest to 33.5 mpg at a constant 80-85 MPH on a 120 mile stretch of I95 in Virginia, and am averaging 23mpg overall in 80% city driving/20% hwy. Avalon's greater horsepower and torque outdo the TL, and it's only because the TL is geared more for acceleration than economy that the TL is marginally quicker in acceleration. Toyota could have done the same, but would have lost its phenomenal fuel economy. I wonder if the upcoming Civic SI will have fuel economy as good.
Getting to my Maxima, its nearly a 10 year-old model, and comparing its handling to that of modern Accords is silly - it an apples-to-oranges comparison. Compare my old max's handling to mid-90's accords and you'll find it's as good or better (at least on the skidpad) and definitely outbrakes those Accords, and had 30 extra HP and better fuel economy to boot.
Today's Accord EX gets out-handled by an 04 Maxima SE, possibly by a Legacy GT, probably by an Altima SE, and certainly by an Altima SE-R or Mazda6. Even Totyota offers a Camry-SE/Solara-SE. C'mon Honda! What gives??!!? Where's the Accord Sport???!!??
Clearly Honda's decided that they'd rather let all those other automakers and aftermarket companies earn our money. The Accord does many things well, but ultimately gets "beaten up" by Subarus, Mazdas and Nissans. Yes, I know the quality/feel of the current Accord's handling is more sophisticated than some of the above because of the double wishbones, but the overly-conservate decision-makers at Honda refuse to sell us cars equipped with factory performance suspensions - it's sad. I don't want to HAVE to go to the aftermarket for suspension performance, but will do so to optimize my Avalon's otherwise decent handling because there's no other option for my needs - even an 05 maxima was too narrow in the rear seat for three.
As to the Tranny problem in 04 and earlier models, thanks for the info - I didn't know. Regarding the next Civic SI (the whole point of this forum), I sincerely hope the dunderheads at Honda let the designers have their way and build the car we want, and deserve, and not the pretender (but still a decent car) that is the current SI.
I understand the next SI will have every reasonable modern safety feature (short of all-wheel drive), but I am concerned it'll fold up like a tin can as did most other samll cars in side-impact tests as reported by Consumer Reports. I'm a family man now (two kids) and safety is first. If the SI doesn't bode well in crash tests, I may consider spending $5K to $9K more to move up to a Mazdaspeed6 or Legacy GT as the car to replace my aging Max. The Mazdaspeed6 is a car Honda shoulda built years ago (no, let's let Mazda, Subaru and Nissan secure that market says Honda).
One final thought about Honda handling: Brakes ultimately are slightly more important than the suspension when it comes to stopping a car and/or avoiding most common accidents, and while Hondas have sophisticated suspensions, their brakes seem underspec'd, almost as if Civic brakes are on Accords, and Accord brakes are on TL's.
Welcoming all responses,
Deanie
You know the last Accord I liked was the Ex 4-cylinder from the last generation.
Or the 1991 Accord SE Coupe, with moonroof and dual exhaust.
Most of those small cars rate pretty good on crash test, when outfitted with side curtain airbags. I didn't see them as necessary (as an unencumbered man who likes small, agile, fun-to-drive cars), but these recent tests show that samll cars MUST have them if the BECOMING inevitable happens, a SUV or P/U decides to run a red light and T-Bone you!
'Yota's have great brakes, Hon-duhs have better personalities, but not as refined.
The SI will rock, but I'm not waiting 'til January! The Mazda3 and tC are fighting for my wallet right now. Maybe a 160HP Civic EX in Oct. can be the dark horse :confuse: ?
DrFill
I will admit that Honda does lack in braking department. The first upgrade on the Si was the Brembo rotors and EBC Green stuff pads. For under $120 it is hardly breaking the bank. To make the Avalon handle like TL will definatley take more than $120 in suspension parts, and still no manual. But you can get the TL to brake like the Avalon for under $150.
Honda does have something in braking department that others don't: No fade braking. Your first brake application is equal to your 20th brake application, however bad it was.
My personal favorite from Honda is the TSX. But that is another forum.
I really thought Accord styling was going in the right direction with the last Accord, but Honda once again fumbled short of the goal line and created the kinda fugly current Accord. The last Honda I liked (and would have bough had I the money at the time) were the last CRX Si and the late 80's Preludes (great styling that was lost on later generations).
Drive the Mazda3 back to back with the other cars you're considering and you'll find it hard not to go with the 3. 2nd in my opinion is the TC with the Si a close third, but you can't go wrong with any one of these three.
Regards,
Deanie
Thanks for your reply/comments, but I think you misread my post. My primary criteria for chosing the Avalon: great engine and genuine seating for three in the back. I neither said nor implied that the Avalon's handling was sporty - I merely said it was "decent". I know the TL slightly outhandles the 05 Avalon - from experience, as I drove them both back to back from an Acura dealer over to the Toyota dealer.
Because of my manually transmission-challenged wife, I had to buy an auto tranny. Of course the Avalon doesn't have a manual option. There's no business case for one, as the upcoming Lexus IS350 will fill that niche for only a few thousand more than the priciest 05 Avalons cost now. And when that car comes out, The TL had better be ready for an update.
Even if Acura dropped a V8 or a turbo six in the TL, it still couldn't seat three in the rear, so it wasn't an option for me. See what I mean about there being no other choice for me? I love driving a manual tranny, but can't get one till my old Maxima dies, and when it does (if it does) I hope the Civic Si will be there to exceed my expectations.
Better pads would surely help the TL's braking, but a similar swap would do the same for the Avalon as well. Regarding brake fade, I'll let the car mags do their tests to answer that question - not gonna check that out on my own car. Unless the Avalon's brakes are extremely prone to fade (unlikley), the braking advantage still goes to the Avalon.
Upgrading the Avalon suspension, including labor will probably cost $1-2K, but there's no amount of money you can spend on the TL to get it to seat three in the back. Bone stock, my Avalon XLS does .80 G's on the skidpad according to one of the car mags (forgot which), with the Touring model maybe .81 or .82 (a guess). I couldn't buy the Touring b/c it doesn't offer stability control which is the best safety feature on cars today other than the seatbelt. I don't recall the TL's skidpad numbers, but they can't be much better than .80, can they (anyone care to check on that?)?
The stereotype of the previous Avalon (2004 and earlier) as an overly soft suspended, couch-like-riding old man's car is valid, but such is not the case with the 05. Check the Forums for proof that 2005 Avalons are being bought by and is very popular with the 30-something set (I'm 36 and a dedicated car guy), and that there are many 05 owners who are in their 20's with one as young as 20. In fact, many previous generation Avalon owners (mostly 50-60+, and the very tall-over 6'5") lament the improvements in styling, power and handling made to the 05. Toyota had to up production from 85K units to 125K units to satisfy the strong demand for the car. I'll bet you haven't seen an advertisement for one have you? They don't have to - that's how well received the car is across most demographic borders.
But this is the Civic Si thread, so lets talk. I read an earlier post re: the Si getting the RSX 210 hp engine - no chance. Honda's too paranoid about protecting their own. That's why we didn't get the 200hp engine in the first place in the current Si. 200hp is the max we'll see, though I hope I'm wrong. There has to be a better reason than the Acura name, warranty and leather seats to justify the price difference between the upcoming SI and the current RSX's (and maybe some TSX's) that'll rot on their lots if the Si has more than 200hp. Why does 197hp stick in my head?
Regards to all,
Deanie
I agree with you about honda nopt always marketing the right products in the USA at the right time. I did have a 85 CRX si and a 95 GSR that were great though!. By the way my wife likes Avalon is on her second and the new 2005 is pretty awesome; not ready to replace her current one though. Honda finally met my needs with a 6-speed 2005 Accord Coupe. I think the 2006 Civv SI is going to be a winner too!.
Good Luck,
MidCow - the manual shift man
P.S.- enjoy your Avalon
doesn't the element already offer iPod integration? iPod integration + steering wheel controls + navi display shows iPod info = very cool Civic.
However, even that is good since 99% of cars do not offer even an AUX input jack and the AUX does not restrict you to any specific brand or model of MP3 player. You could even connect a laptop and play music off your hard drive once you have set up all your play lists.
With some BMWs, you can get both an AUX input plus iPod integration (which has limited functionality since you have to create specially-named playlists for them to work with the car integration .)
And My Civic is the VP model- Air Conditioning, CD Player, Power Locks, Remote Keyless Entry, Manual Windows, and no Cruise Control.
I like my Civic- it's basic transportation with a few frills that gets me where I need to go cheaply, reliably, and efficiently. Sure, sometimes it doesn't have enough space, but hey, it only cost me $11,000 new.
The original question was about Civic. Also, Element only has AUX, iPOD integration allows you to control the iPOD from the stereo or steering wheel controls if equipped, as well as provides tag readouts on the radio screen.
Even the BMW factory iPod integration is like that.
So the car is designed to better deal with collisions with pickup trucks and SUVs. Honda has even made the bold claim that the new civic will be the safest car in its class.
With regards to Honda and its braking, I believe that tires are playing more of a culprit than you guys may believe. It is known that Honda generally undertires their cars. Simply replacing the oem tires with a high performance 3 season tire will dramatically improve braking distance as well as vehicle handling.
This isn't a Civic discussion, but specifically a 2006 Civic/Si discussion, and we've ran out of info. Rehashing what we already know and have already said about the 06 is beating a dead horse, so until we get more info from this month's car mags or new info from other sources, a few diversions aren't hurting anyone - in fact they're helping considering that those posts specifically addressed the upcoming 06 Si as well as Hondas in general.
Regards,
Deanie
Even the BMW factory iPod integration is like that.
That sucks!
Also keep in mind this is the Canadian west coast market. US models and colors will probably vary.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
It's in the article that compares the Corolla XRS and Mazda3 s.
DrFill
Surprisingly there's an EX model available. In 2001 there were only 3 models at first the DX, DX-G, and LX.
No info yet on what features each models will have.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
now, i do understand what a lot of people love about the civic (affordability, reliability, etc) - but would that be something they would integrate into an "EX Special Edition"? (beyond the current leather wrapped steering wheel and upgraded audio).
i love the way these little cars drive, but i'm just looking for a tiny bit more luxury - and with the possibility of the death of the rsx, i'm feeling a bit stuck!
Complete brochure!!
In regards to seeing a civic with leather, US might get one, but in Canada we also have the Acura 1.7EL, which is basically a 4 door Civic with different front and rear styling, the 127HP Vtec engine, and leather interior, so I don't see us getting a leather Civic as it would competer head on with the EL.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX
Plus you will be able to choose better quality leather than Honda would ever factory install.
Marc :mad:
Marc
For the price that they will add to the LX to get Alloys you can simply go to http://www.tirerack.com and get whatever wheels you like, for much less than Honda would charge you. Heck, you can buy used EX or Si alloys on ebay. Just make sure you get the ones that fit the LX, some of the Si wheels are 5 bolt.
The dealer will simply sell you a 15 inch alloy (same as the current size on the LX) and then give you your same (read not that good) stock tires back to you on the new alloys. Oh, and then charge you $1,200 for the pleasure. No thanks.
We have no specifics on the arrival dates as of yet.
2016 Audi A7 3.0T S Line, 2021 Subaru WRX