By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I still find the Merkur experiment to be a little hokey, marketing them somewhat as BMW competitors - when in Europe, they were just Fords - ones that could be optioned up nicely, but not prestige cars.
I had a radio controlled XR4Ti back in the day, I liked those too.
And about service - probably gotta find an experienced indy, or do it yourself. Doesn't sound fun. A car like that needs to remain as a sunny Sunday driver, not be pressed into regular service, where it would no doubt become a painful experience.
Speaking of those big Birds, there's a nice one in my town, I see it now and then on nice days (maybe isellhondas has seen it too). It's a 72, dark green with a white top, I want to say it has a small hood scoop, vintage style wheels, and it sounds mean - maybe it's a 429. It looks to be in excellent condition, cool car for what it is.
http://lansing.craigslist.org/cto/3803141937.html
though this is not usually a big selling point: "But the raccoon's got inside and rearranged a few things."
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1987-Bertone-X-1-9-Base-Coupe-2-Door-1-5L-/261219- 163030?ViewItem=&item=261219163030&forcev4exp=true
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1989-MERKUR-SCORPIO-WITH-FACTORY-5-SPEED-AND-66K-- MILES-/230988044268?ViewItem=&item=230988044268&forcev4exp=true
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/1982-MERCEDES-BENZ-TURBODIESEL-CLASSIC-DIESEL-/18- 1150910671?pt=US_Cars_Trucks&hash=item2a2d6f88cf
Since the X1/9 is from the last year of production (1987), I assume all the bugs were worked out by that time, and that it won't rust into oblivion like earlier Fiats did. I've always thought of the Merkur as silly and eccentric.
Fintail - didn't you own a W123 300D at one point, or did you have another M-B I'm thinking of? Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe 1982 was the first year for the turbodiesel engine, which is what this one has. My dentist is the original owner of an '82 300D that has 270k miles on it, and is currently sitting with a bad transmission.
1982 was the first year for the turbodiesel in the W123. It had been available is the W116 since, I believe, 1979.
2009 BMW 335i, 2003 Corvette cnv. (RIP 2001 Jaguar XK8 cnv and 1985 MB 380SE [the best of the lot])
I've never owned a W123, but I wouldn't kick one out of my garage, especially a turbo model in mint condition and good colors. Seems all the nice survivors are brown or tan. I can deal with a brown W126...I'd like a W123 with the interior color you posted, but a light blue/silver blue exterior. I tried to find one years ago before I bought a W126, couldn't find one to meet my color and condition demands. Shame about the transmission failure, not a common fault - those cars are pretty rugged.
Still, this one did look pretty nice. Most old turbo diesels are clapped out piles of junk by this time, or restored beauties with a premium price that doesn't justify their drawbacks IMO. (exception---a turbo diesel wagon makes up for in utility what it lacks in performance).
But really, when an old Benz diesel that's been restored approaches the price of a new Passat diesel wagon, common sense prevails.
His personalized tags were "TH BEAZT". He traded in a pagoda-era SL to get it.
All kinds of disco era style, still low values
Definitely a boss's car for the high rolling 80s, I don't know what compares now, relatively, as the market is more diverse.
I'm putting on my flame retardant suit before going on.
The closest entry from Detroit is the CTS Coupe, but I see that as being closer to the A5/S5, and, therefore, no cigar. Thinking outside the box, if it weren't for the prestige factor I'd say a properly optioned (more luxury, less muscle-car) 2013 Challenger wouldn't be that far off, since it's been described as a good cruiser. I recognize that the Challenger, any Challenger, can't be really be compared with the 560 SEL was heavy on prestige. But, from a product standpoint, the new RWD Mopars do incorporate a lot of MB engineering.
I can't think of one current Asian model that would be anywhere near qualifying as spiritual counterparts to the 560 SELs.
As for a current high end luxury coupe, I'm stumped - aside from the SL and the 6, you'd have to move up to the Bentley/Jaguar/Aston Martin level. For under $100k, the S5 would fit, as would the CTS-V coupe.
I'm thinking of an modern top of the line powerful sedan that is head and shoulders above the competition, is both imposing and elegant (and maybe even a little muscular), and will age well. In 1986, neither the Japanese nor Audi had anything in the same universe, the 7er was smaller and all 6 cylinder, the Americans were still pretty old and baroque, and the British even more so. The 560SEL was in its own world. Cost about 65K then, which meant more when money was worth something.
The current big barges from all makers come close in some ways, but the current S might be the closest - 2013 model is quite old design wise (production started late 2005) but has aged well and continues to sell. I don't see any current American cars fitting the bill, mid lux and luxobarge are different.
I know someone that lives not far from me who's owned a black 560 for many years. I've chatted with him a few times, but not recently, because he also owned a E30, similar to the one I had. I've seem him driving his MB within the past month. He takes extremely good car of it. It's always spotless.
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Limited Velvet Red over Wicker Beige
2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha
I see neglected examples of those now and then too.
I'm seeing pretty darn decent 450SLs for $5,000 and up right now.
The most valuable V-8 SLs are the very last 560SLs, and the very first chrome-bumper 350SLs.
Anything else is going nowhere in the "collectible" arena.
To drive a 450SL is to learn to dislike it. :P
Last of the 560s drive pretty nice, though. They're faster (much), handle better, get way better MPG---better in every single way.
I wouldn't let a friend buy a 560SEL unless it had a maintenance record the size of a Manhattan phone book and fewer miles than calories in a couple dozen Big Macs. (okay, with fries and a shake).
2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Limited Velvet Red over Wicker Beige
2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha
"A 1992 comparison test of the Northstar-powered Allanté by Car and Driver placed it above the Jaguar XJS V12 convertible and the Mercedes-Benz 300SL in North America. Although the Cadillac roadster got big points for its new engine, Allanté was criticized for its handling, which was an inherent result of the front wheel drive layout. Ultimately, it was the rapid rise in the retail price of its competitors due to changes in exchange rates that won the test for Cadillac. At that time, the Allanté's price seemed a bargain compared with the $71,888 Jaguar and $90,335 Mercedes-Benz."
I was SURE that was a misprint, then I looked it up...WOW. Go forward 16 years, to 2008, and the base price on an SL550 was only $95,300, LESS than the base price on the '92 500SL ($97,500).
What's up with that?
Speaking of old cars from earlier, I have a lot more respect and give more notice to an immaculate 20-25 year old car than a new one. And a dirty neglected abused late model car is worst of all.
I suspect the Car and Driver comparo was "price dependent". Having driven an Allante, I can see that it might compare favorably to the Jaguar but between the handling and the quality control issues, I never regarded it as a worthy competitor to the SLs.
Apparently lots of people found that out the hard way.
http://losangeles.craigslist.org/sgv/cto/3862942679.html