Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

The Future Of The Manual Transmission

178101213205

Comments

  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    My wife and I live in DC. And I can almost beat the host. We have had nothing but manual transmissions since 1978 (my first new car) with the exception of our MDX purchased earlier this year.

    My response. City traffic sucks. Having a manual transmission doesn't make it any better or worse. The third pedal is as natural as using a turn signal. I wouldn't want to teach somebody how to drive a stick on Wisconsin Avenue in Georgetown, but once they are comfortable with it, it's really not an issue.

    My 5'1" 105# wife hauls our kids and their friends around in the MDX, with 80% of her driving inside of the DC Beltway. We had traded a 1996 Trooper 5-speed with 80,000 miles. Her one gripe about the MDX is that she misses the stick. If the BMW X5 3.0 6-speed had been a little bigger, with a third row, that's what she'd be driving.

    To each their own. But just to make sure they don't get labeled sissys, my daughters are going to learn to drive with a stick. I am also convinced it keeps kids paying more attention to "driving" than the other distractions that cause wrecks. (In my former Honda S2000, my then 5 year old mastered the 1-2 and 2-1 shift from the passenger seat, with me working the clutch.)
  • shiphroshiphro Member Posts: 62
    Just to throw two more cents on the already definitive pile...

    Driving at variable, slow speeds can be easier with a manual. Automatics don't offer much in the way of engine braking. Manuals on the other hand allow you to modulate vehicle speed with only your right foot, especially in lower gears. If traffic is slowing, but not stopping, I can decrease the amount of throttle and my vehicle will slow down without having to hit the brakes.
  • PF_FlyerPF_Flyer Member Posts: 9,372
    Not really about city driving with a manual, but the thought was triggered, so I'll let it out :P

    Another thing I find easier to deal with in a manual is cruise control. We rented a larger vehicle for vacation this summer and naturally it was an automatic.

    And the very first thing I noticed was how the car would downshift on even slight grades to maintain the set speed. This would result in some awkward situations as cars were passing me and the cruise control was making it look like I was trying to keep people from passing me :sick: as I'd get an acceleration "bump" when the car downshifted and the car would speed up. I wound up NOT using the cruise for pretty much the whole week.

    With manual, the speed is maintained by adding more gas in the gear you happen to be in. If the grade gets too steep, cruise kicks off. The speed you set is the speed you get and it's very smooth. And it's pretty much automatic for me to be ready when I start going up a grade to take over throttle control as the cruise gets ready to kick off.

    Long live the stick!
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    In city jammed traffic, you will use more neutral than in 1st or 2nd gear, once you move in 1st gear, you will shift to neutral and let it roll smoothly until you stopped. For auto transmission, it create more wear & tear in this kind of traffic. And its very natural how you coordinate your right hand with your left foot and you don't need to step on the brake pedal so frequently as in auto.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    all that crawling in traffic is hard on auto transmissions - not only does the torque converter never get to lock up, but there is less cooling going on as the car is barely moving.

    pf flyer: Yessss! Long live the manual! :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    It's hard on clutches too though, isn't it? To crawl at half a mile per hour, I'm getting on/off or halfway on the clutch a lot.

    As for what habitat1 said:

    "The third pedal is as natural as using a turn signal."

    No wonder everyone's too lazy to drive stick!
  • growwisegrowwise Member Posts: 296
    Perhaps it is hard on auto tranny... but the question really is whether it is hard on the driver? I was contemplating on manual tranny on my next car (whenever the hell that is :mad: ) but could be shot down because of the missus who is not comfortable driving a car itself in the snarling traffic leave alone one with a manual tranny in it. Ofcourse, the constant rowing of gears is another issue altogether.
  • mcdawggmcdawgg Member Posts: 1,722
    I have to ask - your wife must have to sit very close to the air bag to reach the clutch, being only 5'1"? Does she use any pedal extender? One of the problems my wife has is that she has to sit too close to reach the clutch. Same car with an automatic, no problem. I offered to rig up a pedal extender, but she still refuses to drive a stick, even though she had to drive one for a year. But my car will always be stick! Even with the traffic jams!!

    Traffic jams are a disadvantage, especially stop and go situations. But if you really like stick, you learn to live with it. Most people avoid stick if they drive daily in places like Toronto, but there will always be the few die-hards (like me and the people in this forum) that will deal with it.
  • mcdawggmcdawgg Member Posts: 1,722
    "because of the missus who is not comfortable driving a car itself in the snarling traffic" Trust me, get an automatic for her! Don't force her! Sounds like my wife. If you can, get yourself a stick!
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    "Trust me, get an automatic for her! Don't force her! Sounds like my wife. If you can, get yourself a stick!"

    Wisdom is beyond price, my son, be thankful you have it...
    -- Leo McKern, "Ladyhawke"
    ;)
  • potemkinpotemkin Member Posts: 195
    I've been driving nothing but sticks in one of America's most congested cities since '79, and by now working the clutch and shifter is just second nature.

    While I'll complain about the traffic, I don't sit in it thinking I would be better off with an automatic. I don't think about it at all.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    What's better...to slow the car using the clutch/engine in a manual in stop-in-go traffic, or just use the brake. To me, it seems like since changing brake pads is so easy as compared to a clutch, I'd rather save the clutch and use the brakes. What do you think?

    The same with downshifting versus just putting the car in neutral and using the brakes to slow down (no, not at 70mph, but at least under 30mph). Seems like that would make the clutch last longer and again, I'd rather change the brake pads then the clutch.
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    I have to ask - your wife must have to sit very close to the air bag to reach the clutch, being only 5'1"? Does she use any pedal extender?

    No, for whatever reason, that's not been an issue for my wife. She definitely has the seat moved up compared to me, but she is slender and has adequate room between her chest and the airbag. It could have been more of an issue in our 911 where the clutch is stiffer and the tendency may be to move the seat up a little bit to give the left leg more leverage. But the 911's steering wheel telescopes and we both like it all the way in to enable us to extend our arms.

    Last point on City traffic. The trade off of a little more arm and leg exercise in having a stick, is having a car that is much more responsive from a dead stop or when needing a quick burst of speed. I had a 2005 Acura RL loaner when my TL 6-speed was in the shop. Trying to jump into traffic, take a left turn across traffic, etc. was a pain. The RL - a good car mind you - was much more difficult to accelerate quickly in those situations without stomping on the gas and then having to slam on the brakes after completing the merge or turn.

    I'm no Mario Andretti, but I can zip around much more easily and safely with a 6-speed that I can directly control and modulate, than a car with a computer controlled slushbox with a mind of its own. Even SMG's such as BMW's M3 do not provide me with the same level of control and confidence.
  • mcdawggmcdawgg Member Posts: 1,722
    Must have long legs. My 5'3" 110 lb. wife could never sit more than 8" away from the air bag - the minimum is 10" to be safe.
  • habitat1habitat1 Member Posts: 4,282
    I've noticed a lot of women that drive with the seat back almost straight up and down and their arms bent at 135 degree angles practically hugging the steering wheel. There was even a spot on a local news show where cars were stopped in front of GEICO Insurance headquarters and instructors repositioned the drivers seats (and properly buckle down childrens' car seats). They showed how tilting the seat back can easily put an extra 2-4" between the chest and air bag. It doesn't need to be reclined for sleeping, just tilted back to give room for the arms to extend.

    Guys don't seem to have that problem. Guess we get enough practice at reclining to watch Sunday football.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Brakes, no question about it.

    Think about it - if you go up and down through every gear, you will cut your clutch life in half, basically. A clutch runs $400-700 plus install.

    I bought brake pads for my Miata for $16.95 and put them on myself. OK, to be fair, both axles set me back about $37. Still about 10% of the cost of a clutch.

    -juice
  • growwisegrowwise Member Posts: 296
    Most people avoid stick if they drive daily in places like Toronto

    True.. Leave it to Americans to build solid highways.. I miss driving on I85/I285/I95.. I85 had 8 lanes going one way in the heart of Atlanta. Toronto sucks that way (tried the NYC model I guess but by folks of Brit origin) It sometimes takes me 45 minutes to drive 12 miles to work..

    However, I heard that Southeast is getting worse now in areas like Atlanta, Miami etc..
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    How much do you think an auto transmission cost, is it cheaper than a clutch? If not, I think wearing a clutch out is still better than a sucked auto transmission.
    Moreover, usually a stick enthusiast will utilize the neutral most of the time and to shift smoothly to minimize the clutch wear and the clutch can still last for at least 130,000 miles.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    most auto transmissions need replacement by about the 150K mark, to the tune of $2-3K oftentimes, while you might replace the clutch once in the same time frame to the tune of $500-1000.

    Compression braking in the gear you are already in is fine. I wouldn't do too much downshifting to brake - once I get down to lug speed in the gear I was already in, I just shift to neutral and use the brakes the rest of the way to 0 mph. Downshifting to brake is hard on EVERYTHING.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    This is nice. A whole bunch-o-people feeling like I am. I've been mad enough to pull my teeth out the past couple years with lack of manual trannies. Anyone here tried to get a VW in a manual package? You know, the VW, the fun little driver's cars? I almost wigged out when I went to the dealer a couple years ago and saw only automatic GTI's. Talk about fear of the second coming on its way. We needed a new pickup last spring and had to drive 3oo miles to Galviston to pick up a used Dodge Ram with a 5 speed manual. That was the ONLY one we could find. The dealers wouldn't even think of ordering a manual, since nobody asks for them anymore.
    My last 3 VW's were automatics. The 97 Jetta GLX was okay with an automatic. The VR6 can come anyway it wants and I'll be happy, but the last 2 1.8T's were as much fun as "boiled turnip night at Nickerson's Farms in Hays, Kansas." Now, I'm circling around the Passat 2.0T, with great hope and expectations, but lo and behold: "No sunroof with the manual. No fog lights with the manual. No 3.6 V-6 with the manual." The positive side? Well, with such a lack of options for the manual, it is bound to be feather-light. The Jetta GLI is looking rather good to me now. My Theory? VW is not at fault here. Right now as we speak, there are more than a handful of the Passat 3.6's busting down the left lane on Autobahn A3 in 6th gear (manual transmission of course). It isn't VWAG. It's VW of America. They are the ones dictating what we really want.

    I guess what we need to do, is everyone on this forum, collectively write a letter to your car manufacturer and tactfully, but forcefully, ask, "What are you trying to do to us?" And then they will come around and have pity and come back to their senses and ...... Yeah, right...

    Can I buy you a turnip tonight? :sick:
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    I just took a peek at the Jetta GLI and had to scratch my noggin a few times. I'm really having a difficult time understanding what on earth those (theoretically) intelligent folks at VWoA are thinking.

    For my purposes, I want a powerful car with a manual transmission, leather interior, a high end audio system WITHOUT a satellite system, dual zone climate control, a power adjustable driver's seat, Xenon headlights, Homelink, Rain sensing wipers, and an auto dimming mirror. Of that list, the Jetta GLI will provide everything I want (and more) if, and ONLY if I opt for the automatic transmission. :P If I opt for the manual transmission, then no high end audio system with or without satellite, no climate control, no power adjustable driver's seat, no Xenon headlights, no Homelink, no Rain sensing wipers, and no auto dimming mirror.

    VW lost my business once before by pulling a stunt like this, and I guess they are determined to keep me gone.

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    Shipo! Fancy seeing you here. Check out VW's web page ond look at the GLI. I think the dealer was pulling your leg. Yes, I know it is hard to believe a VW dealer would give you the run-around, but look at VW's page and you'll see the automatic is a stand alone option. But, then again, that is only the web page. They still don't let you build one and price it yet.
  • shiposhipo Member Posts: 9,148
    Ummm, VW's web page is where I got the data for my post. The only way to get all of the goodies that I demand on my cars is to order "Package #3", which unfortunately includes the two pedal DSG (which in my mind is simply a manual in automatic's clothing). :-(

    Best Regards,
    Shipo
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    will GTO provide most of what you want? I am not sure.

    I am encouraged that Honda continues to offer the TL and TSX with manuals, despite what I hear is (not that surprisingly) a low take rate for that transmission. And now it has added a V-6 MT Accord sedan.

    I believe the Acuras offer most of the stuff on your list.

    My fear is that when Acura goes all AWD in the future, it will eliminate the manual. Note that the RL is auto-only.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • rwatsonrwatson Member Posts: 144
    Are you looking at the GLI or the 2.0T? Be aware that the ydon't give the "build it" option on this car yet. I just have to look at the specs and still see the DSG as a stand alone.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    There's no doubt that over the lifetime of the car, a manual will cost you less overall for transmissions repair/maintenance. In fact a failed auto tranny is probably the final straw for a lot of cars, i.e. what essentially kills it.

    I was only comparing stopping with brakes vs. stopping by downshifting.

    -juice
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    Sorry for misunderstand you.
    But you remind me of one major benefit of Manual over Auto, is that by manually down-shift, you can shorten your stopping distance by engine braking.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Most brakes have enough power to lock up the wheels, but engine braking is useful on long down hill stretches where the brakes might get baked.

    To be fair, some of the better auto trannys are smart enough to hold a lower gear on a down hill, too.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    but oftentimes the auto trans is slipping (ie not in lock-up) on that downhill ride, reducing by some large percentage the amount of engine braking the wheels are actually getting.

    Engine braking is one reason I had to get a manual in my truck - the descent from Yosemite and over the Tahoe grade is steep enough I want something besides the brakes slowing me down.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Don't most autos lock up in every gear except 1st and 2nd?

    I'm not exactly an auto tranny expert, given all my cars have been manuals. :D

    -juice
  • wale_bate1wale_bate1 Member Posts: 1,982
    Even a cush waste of time like my Toyota 5-manumatic can offer significant compression braking, Nippon, but I'd bet there's a range of effectiveness from model to model, mfr to mfr.
  • bobw3bobw3 Member Posts: 2,989
    My Freestyle has CVT that does a lot better job of engine braking downhill then an automatic. I think the CVT will eventually replace both manual and automatic.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    with the CVT - no torque converter.

    juice: but what if it's second gear you want to be in - steep hill, low speed road?

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • lemmerlemmer Member Posts: 2,689
    Engine braking is one of the many reasons I can't stand automatic transmissions. It doesn't do it enough when I want it to, and it does too much when I don't want it to. You just can't beat a manual for having total control.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I guess it depends on which automatic you're talking about.

    A buddy of mine owns a Boxster and we went to the beach in that, probably spent 8+ hours driving on and off. The Tiptronic in that car was brilliant. It held a gear, downshifted before a turn, even blipped the throttle to match revs. Very impressive.

    I think that tranny would be fine on a steep hill, low speed road.

    OTOH, the Tiptronic in the Passat isn't nearly as good, and very slow to shift too.

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    well, yeah, in the PORSCHE I would hope that engine control was total, even in the auto. I was talking more about "regular" cars.

    Someone I know has the same truck I do, only with auto trans. On that grade coming out of Yosemite, even 2nd gear will only hold the speed to maybe 35 mph (at which point the engine is turning at maybe 2000 rpm, making me think it must be slipping, not in lock-up), which is too fast for that road when it is snowy. If you just lock out the overdrive so that it can't shift higher than third, it will allow the speed to climb to 60+, which is pointless to even do, as that is WAY too fast for that road in any weather.

    In my truck, which is the stick shift, it will slow down in second gear even on steep grades (got the chance to head to Yosemite last week, yay!).

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'll tell my buddy his Boxster is irregular. :D

    My point was a good automatic can do it, but you're right in that most don't.

    -juice
  • bhill2bhill2 Member Posts: 2,595
    My problem with lack of engine braking with an automatic happens in traffic. With an automatic, as the speed of traffic varies, I find that I am on and off the brake constantly to maintain distance between me and the car in front of me. This is because even releasing the accelerator completely doesn't slow me down enough. With my stick, I can maintain a given distance simply by varying the pressure on the accelerator. In my experience, this more than offsets having to use the clutch.

    2009 BMW 335i, 2003 Corvette cnv. (RIP 2001 Jaguar XK8 cnv and 1985 MB 380SE [the best of the lot])

  • michaellnomichaellno Member Posts: 4,120
    Exactly! I've been driving a stick shift Focus for my daily commute for the past couple of years -- next summer, I'll probably switch back over to "my" car (Saturn L300), which has an automatic.

    On my way home from work last night, I realized that I modulate my speed in slow traffic (both on and off the highway) solely by throttle as much as possible. With a slushbox, that won't be the case and I'll be hopping from throttle to brake and back again ... potentially many, many times.

    Makes me think that perhaps I should stick with a stick (ha! - pun intended).

    Now to find something with a V6 and a manual transmission, preferably under $25K....
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    to have a slushbox for city driving at all, is it? The manual tranny's are boss, aren't they?

    My next Kia will have a manual transmission and my current one has one. The Kia before the one I have now had a manual tranny as well. Starting to see a trend occurring? :D

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • durability05durability05 Member Posts: 142
    Excellent conclusion, I had a 12 year old Honda Accord with 100K miles that I retired because its automatic died and a replacement rebuilt would cost as almost as much as the car $1800. I own a manual equipped Jeep, the reason I got a manual was for longevity of the vehicle, the downside I don't think I might be able to give it to either of my daughters, unless they learn to drive a manual 10 years from now.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You can teach them - I taught my wife.

    Drink. You, I mean, not her. It takes the edge off. LOL

    -juice
  • iwantws6iwantws6 Member Posts: 26
    Manumatic, Autostick, etc (different manufactures have different names for them) but I'm talking about automatic transmissions that you can up or down shift if you choose to.. Exactly how is this different from a traditional automatic in which you can just put it in a lower gear (like driving on hilly terrain or if you're stuck in snow, etc)? I've driven both,and even if you down shift to merge into traffic or something it feels the same. So is there really a difference or is this just a marketing tool?
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    marketing tool. Except in the case of DSG, which is a real twin-clutch manual but has no clutch pedal, and will shift itself or can be shifted by the driver.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    I guess the difference is that if you put a traditional automatic in "3", it'll change freely between 1, 2, and 3 (it locks out the gears above the number you've selected - like old 'overdrive off' switches).

    A manumatic will stay in the gear you tell it to, until your rpms reach either extreme of the rpm range.

    Physically, they're the same, torque converter and all. But they're not to be confused with SMG, DSG, and the like, which are manual transmissions without clutch pedals. They do have a clutch (the DSG has two), which a computer controls when you press the flappy paddles. But since it's computer controlled, you can program the computer to choose when to shift, like an automatic.

    All flappy-paddle manual transmissions except for DSG downshift perfectly; they raise revs to where they have to be for a seamless shift. But they don't let revs drop on upshifts - they shift as fast as possible - which makes for jerky upshifts. Good for racing, but that's it.

    DSG (found in VWs and Audis) have two clutches. One of them gets used like a normal clutch, while the other one guess what gear you're going to switch into. It revs at the appropriate speed, so when you upshift or downshift, it's totally smooth. The only downside is weight and complexity, but VWs and Audis are heavy anyway.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    ....manual trannies should not only be around for a long time, but flurish such as they last longer than autos, they're less expensive to repair, more economical fuel economy wise, they deliver more power to the wheels, and they're more fun to drive. There's only one reason I can think of why the future of the manual may be in jeapordy and that's because the auto is somewhat more popular and auto makers have been moving toward the trend of taking away chioces for the buyer. Just like individual options have been done away with in favor of more expensive option packages, some day the manual tanny may become extinct in favor of nothing but auto trannies.
  • carlisimocarlisimo Member Posts: 1,280
    Well... they're either more fun or more fuel-economical, but not both at the same time. At least not in my experience...
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    will eventually kill the manual transmission. Hopefully not until I am long gone.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    Actually they're both. Saying a manual is more fun is obviously an opinion, but saying they're more economical is fact. Less power is lost through the drivetrain with a manual compared to an auto, so for any given driving style, the manual will always be more economical than an auto. If you have an aggressive driving style with a manual, you'd more than likely have the same driving style with an auto as well and you'd just end up burning more fuel.
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    How will emissions control kill the manual? That doesn't make any sense. Manuals are more fuel efficient so why wouldn't emissions control kill the auto? If anything kills the manual it'll be the auto makers with thier let's-make-every-vehicle-exactly-the-same approach to streamlining the manufacturing process and bossting profits. The more individualizing that can be done on any given vehicle, the more it slows down the production process, therefore biting into profits. In a perfect world for the automakers, everyone would want exactly the same model, with exactly the same options, in exactly the same color. This minimizes production time and maximizes profits. Hopefully, Joe public will scream loudly enough about the industry taking away our options that this never happen, but try they will.
Sign In or Register to comment.