Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Midsize Sedans Comparison Thread

1186187189191192235

Comments

  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I just read the last 8 posts... it seems the only thing talked about was Stability Control and Ford's current state of affairs in the business world. What happened to the midsize sedan COMPARISON topic? I know I'm just as guilty of getting into VSA talk... just wondering when we might get back to regularly scheduled programming here.
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    this all started with a poster that was all over Ford (I guess Mazda as well) for not offering a VSC option - which to me, obviously, is not that big a deal - and mushroomed from there. Some of these technologies in automobiles kind of a sore spot with me - sorry...
    Maybe I need to lead some sort of charge to the Fusion, very little chance that car will change very much in the forseeable future and it is the most 'challenged' vehicle in this group?
  • patpat Member Posts: 10,421
    Time to heed the calls to get back to the midsize sedans...
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    the Aura XR 3.6 that I happened to park next to, accidentally on purpose. Maroon, black leather, sunroof, what appeared to be a well thought out interior. Chiseled almost Cadillac looks, appealing. I couldn't resist but no more plastic fenders. Wonder if it drives as good as it looks?
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    the Mondeo over from Europe to replace..........?

    The pictures of it are HOT. But it is slghtly smaller than the Fusion and the Milan which is most likely would replace. Also in looking at the Ford Europe UK site and the engine specs the largest engine is a 226 hp 3.0L gasser plus 3 variations of the diesel Ford offers.

    Milan ===> Mondeo ? I actually think they should keep the name Milan. 'Mondeo' just doesn't grab my attention or connect anywhere. Ive been to Milan and I liked it. ;)
  • scape2scape2 Member Posts: 4,123
    Ford isn't going anywhere. It just kills me how folks know nothing about how the Japanese/Korean governments favor thier automakers with tax breaks and "incentives". Get out on the net do the research. Ford won't need any help from the federal government. I also find it disturbing how Americans can just push by the wayside an American icon of industry and history of this country. Honda/Toyota are not in any way shape or form American. For those that believe they are, you have successfully been brainwashed, congrats. As I have said before,
    Ford is not a "marginal" car company. The media has been beating this into your head for so long you now believe it. Go to MSN.com and look at the reliability ratings of Ford vehicles and trucks, you will be surprised I'm sure it will make you think. Fusion/Milan are great vehicles with high value/quality/fit/finish.
  • kdshapirokdshapiro Member Posts: 5,751
    "Fusion/Milan are great vehicles with high value/quality/fit/finish."

    I couldn't disagree more with your post. If the Fusion/Milan are the best of Ford, they are smack in the middle of the pack at least IMO. I would buy a Camry before a Fusion and I don't like Camrys. If you want to tow the line for Ford go right ahead, but Honda and Toyota have shown Ford what they need to do.

    There is an old saying perception is reality.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    I agree the Fusion is a great vehicle. I'd give it a B.

    But I'd give the Accord an A, even with its 5 year old design. When the 08 Accord hits the Fusion will be less attractive. So yea, Ford does an OK car in the Fusion, but OK doesn't cut it when the competition is so much better.

    I kicked Ford to the curb years ago when their cars I owned were disappointments, not because the 'media' told me to.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    The fact is, in today's world the Toyota Avalon is more "American" than a Chrysler PT Cruiser. Just because a car has a so called American nameplate on it, means very little. The money I paid for my Accord probably went to more Americans, than your Fusion. I think you are the one being duped here. Read the article below.

    http://autos.msn.com/advice/article.aspx?contentid=4021986
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    I need a new car. My old 67 Mercedes was finally sold(when selling a classic you take a good offer and don't say - oh, let me get a replacement first - can you wait two weeks...)
    :P

    So I've been looking around and last night I ended up at the local Mercedes dealer. Attrocious prices for their used stuff, but I can tell you that there's nothing Ford makes that's as nice as even a basic 5 year old E-Class.

    GM and Ford are hard-pressed to even match a C-class with 90% of their offerings. For $20K used, a 4 year old C320 just pummels most anything Ford or GM make that's new.

    You just have to get beyond the interior bling and trickery. Look under the hood, check the tolerances, and drive it agressively/give it a good work-out in traffic. Body flex and how it handles quick throttle and input - whether it's tight or mushy and vague are the two easiest to tell.

    Of course, the imports aren't immune, either. Far too much plastic as well. Though they have good mechanicals and fit/finish as a rule - 2 out of 3 isn't bad. (the luxury lines are 3 out of 3, though, as expected). And the E-Class isn't really special, either - just average. The big 3 have some serious problems if they can't match the "average" offerings of the imports.
  • meateatermeateater Member Posts: 123
    For $20K used, a 4 year old C320 just pummels most anything Ford or GM make that's new.

    Wow - you think so? Pummels?

    For the next 4 years, get ready for the Mercedes to pummel you with maintenance costs. So you add that cluster funk to the equation and instead buy a loaded Aura XR with a 100,000 mile warranty, multiple safety features, better performance, better eye candy, better fuel economy, nicer electronics and so on.

    C'mon Plek
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    I am seeing lots of ads in my local paper touting the 2007 Fusions and Milans (also the MKZs) with AWD. This is one advantage they have over almost all cars in this class, so I'm not surprised Ford is emphasizing this feature--especially in an area like Minnesota. I am wondering what percentage of these cars are being made with AWD. It could be a big plus for Ford, ala "I'd like AWD but need something roomier than the Legacy."
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Very true. I wouldn't be emphasizing a whopping 31 MPG highway on its 4-cylinders (that's not really too great), but pushing AWD more would be smart, especially this time of year. Just like other companies should be pushing their VSA this time of year.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    Very few cars in this class have VSC/ESC standard across the model line; Sonata is one of the few, and Hyundai touts the standard safety features of the Sonata including ESC at every opportunity. So not much additional marketing opportunity there.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    A new Aura XR for $20K? No way. Maybe with 20,000 miles on it.

    But what a beautiful interior with the Moroccan Brown leather. 18" wheels standard. 252hp V6 with 21/30 mpgs. Way to go GM. If it holds up like an Accord they've got a winner there.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    The interior at the Auto Show felt less solid than my 1996 after ten years of use (it still clicks and snicks very precisely)... auto show examples endure LOTS of abuse though, so I'm not gonna make a judgement on interior quality until I see one at a dealer.

    I did happen to think that the Aura was the best vehicle GM has put out into the mainstream market in who-knows-how-long.

    I'll give it a solid B until I get more time in one.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    "The media has been beating this into your head for so long you now believe it"

    600 or so posts later you're still on this media brain washing nonsense. Like it or not you drive a Japanese designed, Mexican built car so please give me a break from your buy American tirade.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    "The media has been beating this into your head for so long you now believe it"

    600 or so posts later you're still on this media brain washing nonsense. Like it or not you drive a Japanese designed, Mexican built car so please give me a break from your buy American tirade.

    Post Number 3,862

    I think he's trying to brainwash us about being brainwashed. 6,000 posts later, and nothing has changed. Whos beating stuff into our heads NOW? If the words "media bias" were two-by-fours, we'd all have concussions.
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    regardless of what the US government might do, and despite the fact that they have produced NOTHING even noteworthy in 15 years (I'll give the Taurus DT/SHO of the early 90s credit for being something that somebody might conceivably want at that time), Ford will never have any impact in this category until it learns how to build an engine. Heck, they don't even have the money to simply put this much ballyhooed 3.5 in the Fusion and even that engine reviews as much rougher than any of the V6s in this class (can you say a bored out DT 3.0). Sad to say the only thing it has going for it is price. Definitely more like a D, the Milan a C only because it is not nearly so cheap looking inside. That Aura looks positively opulent by comparison.
    For a Mexican car, it has, at least temporarily proven to be assembled well.
    It'll be another few years two before I buy another car in this class and there is less chance of me sending my money to Mexico, then there is of a snowstorm hitting Ford's plant down there. Buying a Fusion HURTS this country, allowing Fotd to buy out more employees, close more plants, and inject some more money down south (or up north).
    Ford really needs to get out of the car business pretty much altogether, produce the things they know how to do like trucks, SUVs and maybe the Mustang - that would be the 'intelligent' way to stop the 'bleeding', instead of trying to convince folks that they still make cars. A really sad, sad, situation for all us 'brainwashed' sheep (less viable choices) and those poor employess being paid not to work (listless 40 year olds living on some sort of fixed income does not do us any good at all!)
    I don't understand why Ford didn't do what the 'Japanese' did, establish non-union plants in the American South, unless, of course, the UAW wouldn't allow it?
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    Wow, wow! Chill out guys! We are discussing cars. Mexican workers do not deserve all this harsh criticism. They actually make better product and work harder than their Michigan brethren. Fusion had proven to be problem free high quality product so far. To make far going conclusions what it will be after several years is not fair. So cool down and check reality meantime.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    Well, 600 or so was the number of posts since I last posted.

    The Fusion is a solid car but it's obscene to say one should get one because it's the "American" thing to do. Truth be told, the Mexicans probably do a better job of assembling a car than the UAW.
  • comp386comp386 Member Posts: 56
    Yeah I second that comment. You can probably write a PhD thesis on which car is best for America. In the mean time, why not discuss the vehicles themselves.
  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,723
    think of the name, 'DURA'tec. that was the main focus of design, not 'QUIET'tec or 'ECO'tec. over time, it has proved to be a low maintenance engine. i'm not a 'princess and the pea' type, so some engine noise is fine with me.
    for me, the 3.0 in a fusion is more than enough power.
    the 2.3 I4 duratec in my focus is very smooth, quiet and powerful. it is a more recent design than the 3.0 v6.
    i'm pretty sure our reps and senators voted FOR nafta. I vote and encourage everyone to do the same, even if we don't agree on the selections.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • bhmr59bhmr59 Member Posts: 1,602
    I don't understand why Ford didn't do what the 'Japanese' did, establish non-union plants in the American South, unless, of course, the UAW wouldn't allow it?

    You answered your own question. The UAW became more powerful that the "Big 3" and eventually drove the big business "Big 3" into a noncompetitive situation. Remember the old wisdom to not buy a car built on Monday or Friday? That was because the car manufacturers could not enforce discipline on their employees.

    IIRC, some UAW contract called for full pay even when the employees were on strike. (Maybe I'm wrong.) Wasn't there a time back in the 1980's when UAW went on strike in the winter and many of the Michigan based employees escaped the cold by driving to Florida while receiving full pay and benefits?
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    Wow - you think so? Pummels?

    For the next 4 years, get ready for the Mercedes to pummel you with maintenance costs. So you add that cluster funk to the equation and instead buy a loaded Aura XR with a 100,000 mile warranty, multiple safety features, better performance, better eye candy, better fuel economy, nicer electronics and so on.


    Note that I did say that the luxury imports(Japan) are 3/3 as well - top notch examples used that also pummel the domestics. As for preference, it's a matter of choice and such.

    My point was that even a fairly non-special/average C class whomps on the domestics. Then you get into a high-end Accura or Infinity or simmilar and it's not even a fair fight. Like comparing a mule to a thoroughbred. Yes, they both have some horse in them, but it's almost impossible to compare them side-by-side anymore.
  • ontopontop Member Posts: 279
    Note that I did say that the luxury imports(Japan) are 3/3 as well - top notch examples used that also pummel the domestics. As for preference, it's a matter of choice and such.

    My point was that even a fairly non-special/average C class whomps on the domestics. Then you get into a high-end Accura or Infinity or simmilar and it's not even a fair fight. Like comparing a mule to a thoroughbred. Yes, they both have some horse in them, but it's almost impossible to compare them side-by-side anymore.


    Huh? Totally incomprehensible.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Ok, now I'm confused. One guy says buy Ford because they are an American company. The another guy says it's better that Fusions are made in Mexico, because they have better workers. What are Ford people anyway? Pro-American, or Anti-American. You like American companies, but not their workers. Sounds like you will agree with whatever Ford does to save money.
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    Mules are made bty crossbreeding horses and donkeys. You get a very sturdy but slow animal that's also sterile. Kind of like GM, in a way - lol.

    No fire, no soul - just not capable of running with the real horses as it were.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    The beauty of America is that people do not care where stuff is made – we just want to buy the best product available in the world for the lowest possible price. We call it capitalism.

    If big 3 cannot enforce discipline why I have to care as a customer? I will not buy their product and that’s all about it. Let Mexico develop middle class – they deserve it more than Michigan. Only fittest survive. America is not Europe – if you cannot compete you die and another business takes your place and nobody feels sorry for you – you are a loser, you deserved it. If you don’t like it – go to Europe, yeah move your headquaters to Europe – the government will take care of you. CEOs get such a huge compensation and they cannot figure out how to establish the discipline in the company? New companies do not have this kind of problems and if old ones cannot do it then let’em go.
  • dmjoachidmjoachi Member Posts: 5
    I recently sat in the back seat of the Aura. The car itself was impressive. But the back seat looked and felt too upright.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    What are Ford people anyway?

    I would say they're people who like Fords.

    I guess a certain percentage of that group would be anti-foreign and pro UAW. I would say for that subset group the Fusion would be a dilemma since this car is based upon the Mazda 6, has a Japanese built transmission and is assembled in Mexico.

    You can't say with a straight face to someone to buy a Fusion over an Accord or Camry because it's an American car. A car such as an Impala would be a better choice for those who want USA designed, USA made, and USA high content.

    I personally like Honda and Audi/Volkswagen vehicles. I guess in some people's eyes that makes me a bad American.
  • meateatermeateater Member Posts: 123
    I personally like Honda and Audi/Volkswagen vehicles.

    Interesting choice since these 2 companies will lead the way (in this segment) in the next couple of years with the introduction of clean, new generation diesel vehicles that have excellent torque, good mileage, much quieter than older gen. diesels, for about the same $ as their gas counterparts.

    Diesels will allow the US to get away from its insane dependence on the Arabs in the Middle East for the bulk of our energy needs, moreso than hybrids. 50% of the new vehicles sold in Europe are diesels. They've already moved in that direction for many years.

    The US needs to too. Honda knows that. The 08 Accord will surely adopt diesel. And everybody else will scramble to do the same.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    The 08 Accord will surely adopt diesel. And everybody else will scramble to do the same.

    Yup. The shape of things to come. Diesel has so many advantages over hybrid technology, especially this new generation of diesels.

    Anything to wean us off Arab oil is a big plus. Honda and VW will be so far ahead of everybody in diesel cars. I'll seriously consider a diesel Accord in 09.

    Why doesn't Ford go down this road? What an opportuntiy.
  • kdhspyderkdhspyder Member Posts: 7,160
    I too look for a good diesel alternative primarily so that I can use locally-made biodiesel instead of dino fuel.

    Question for the audience..
    How far out of the way would you go to fill up on biodiesel?
    How much would you be willing to pay/Gal to use biodiesel?

    Anything to wean us off Arab oil is a big plus. Honda and VW will be so far ahead of everybody in diesel cars. I'll seriously consider a diesel Accord in 09.

    While Honda has great engines and bleeding edge technology it hasn't translated yet into being a significant presence in the world's diesel market place. It's only in the US that Honda is considered to ba a 'premium' mid-maket brand. In Europe both they and Toyota are relatively small players but Toyota's diesel technology there is far more advanced than Honda's in terms of market acceptance. GM/F/VW/Renault all are much bigger players than either T/H. In Asia it's T/N/F who dominate the diesel truck market. [ Aside: The new Ford Ranger (diesel) has been out now for over a year in Thailand. Ford has not updated the old Ranger here. The Ranger plant here being considered for closure in these new round of cuts which would allow the new more modern diesel's to come in from Thailand prolly in 2008. ]

    In 2008-09 we should see a flood of more efficient offerings here. The first will be from Honda !! in the Ody, MDX, Ridgeline and possibly the Accord/Pilot.

    Now here is a question I've asked several relatives, mostly women, who are not very aware of new automotive trends. Try it.

    Without any preface..
    "Would you trade your Odyssey for a diesel Odyssey?"

    Huh?
    You mean like a schoolbus?
    Never.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Question for the audience..
    How far out of the way would you go to fill up on biodiesel?
    How much would you be willing to pay/Gal to use biodiesel?


    The real question on biodiesel is if the diesel engine you are buying is compatible with biodiesel. Many are not because biodiesel eats the seals, and will void the warranty. If the car can actually run biodiesel or regular diesel, that would be a plus also.
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    no reason to be confused - you can certainly check out the US content percentages on the window stickers of all Ford/GM/DMC products as well as Toyota/Honda/Nissan. The fact is that all the automakers are international companies - but the fact remains, if supporting our own economies is a motivation, don't buy anything from the 'Detroit 3'. And yes there may indeed be a better work ethic in Mexico than there is in Dearborn, and maybe this supposed quality in the Fusion is some evidence of this. I don't have any problem with Mexicans (or Canadians, for that matter), but it does bother me when folks advocate buying 'American' when exactly the opposite is a lot closer to the truth.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    My point was that Ford expects you to buy their cars because they are "American", yet they build them in Mexico. And Ford fans not only don't question this, but seem to agree with it.

    US content percentages on the window stickers of all Ford/GM/DMC products as well as Toyota/Honda/Nissan.

    The only part that can be misleading about the content percentages is, they count Canada as US content. :confuse:
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    they've forgotten all about the 'tec' suffix - if you really want something durable (and simple) buy the GM 3.8, dates all the way back to the Buick 231 of the 50s - and sounds and feels like it. The 4s have historically been Mazda engines, the 6s, of course a DT/Vulcan variant, and a Ford engine. The Probe/MX6, back in the eighties, were the first I can remember sharing this power afflication, and even then, the 4s were the engines of preference.
  • captain2captain2 Member Posts: 3,971
    probably something that the 'Detroit 3' arranged to be able to hide the facts. Many of the 'foreign' manufacturers use 100% American labor and continue to invest billions in places like Alabama, Texas etc..
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Many of the 'foreign' manufacturers use 100% American labor and continue to invest billions in places like Alabama, Texas etc..

    And as an Alabama resident, I can tell you our economy couldn't be happier to have Mercedes, Honda, and Hyundai! Our state's economy is really booming relative to how it was a decade or two ago. The extra employment is great too.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    "I too look for a good diesel alternative primarily so that I can use locally-made biodiesel instead of dino fuel"

    Be prepared to be disappointed with the new Honda diesel engine then. The big news isn't that Honda is coming out with a diesel in our market but with a clean burning diesel. One that will meet the emission standards in all 50 states. One that will use clean diesel fuel.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    Biodiesel is clean.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    Yeah, Right.
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    Even if the diesel engine can't use biodiesel, it will still be more fuel efficient than a comparable gas engine. Then it comes down to how much more a diesel car will cost. From what I've read it will be more cost effective than Hybrid cars are. Only time will tell.
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    "From what I've read it will be more cost effective than Hybrid cars are."

    Agreed. My knock on diesels has been with emissions but it looks like some manufacturers have cleared that hurdle.
  • goodegggoodegg Member Posts: 905
    My knock on diesels has been with emissions but it looks like some manufacturers have cleared that hurdle.

    One manufacturer (Honda) will be putting their exhaust scrubbing technology in Accords very soon. I think VW does it different (urea additives), but diesel is still proven technology that will outdo hybrids in the Mid Size sedan sector very soon. Toyota seems to favor hybrids in the US.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    "Yeah, Right."

    Maybe you could elaborate if you disagree! ;)
  • venus537venus537 Member Posts: 1,443
    Elaborate!

    You're not going to be able burn it in the upcoming Honda diesel engine. And it stinks!
  • elroy5elroy5 Member Posts: 3,735
    The word CLEAN, in "clean diesel engine" means CLEAN as in EMISSIONS, not clean diesel.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    The biodiesel produces no more "dirty" emisions than dino diesel.

    Besides biodiesel does not have to be b100.
This discussion has been closed.