By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Best Regards,
Shipo
I would like to second that. There are two main problems I see with the RFTs (ignoring the noise issue with the Turenza's): (1) No spare, which is a real concern on long trips to remote places. (2) The tires are often not repairable and have to be replaced instead, which can get extremely expensive.
BMW could have at least offered #1 (a spare) as an option. That would have addressed most of my concerns, although I am still really worried about getting a flat since a nail can cost me $300+.
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
There ended up being a class action from Toyota Sienna owners against Toyota and Goodyear. There ended up being a settlement http://www.rftprogram.com . Recently, there was another class action lawsuit filed against another car manufacturer - http://www.nytimes.com/2007/03/11/automobiles/11FLATS.html?em&ex=1190433600&en=4- 497fc78a38f28bd&ei=5087%0A
I believe there is a class action lawsuit against BMW on RTFs - is anyone aware of that? Funny thing about the other lawsuits - they involve the same issues that we are talking about in regards to RFTs.
As far as I am concerned, BMW should go back to regular tires until the RF durability problem is solved.
Even if rapid uneven tire wear was not problem, it doesn't make much sense to use a $400 tire that according to BMW should be discarded after a simple flat.
Regards,
OW
So really it's as much a consumer-awareness + a training problem for BMW as it is a product problem.
My two cents is that they launched a new technology without any foresight about how to deal with it. It's the equivalent of Apple shipping the new iPhone without any instructions whatsoever on how to operate it, install peripherals, etc. You get a box with a product in it and nothing else. Can you imagine the problems that would have caused? "Oh, you don't plug it into the wall? Ohhhhhh...."
Regards,
OW
Keep us posted.
Best Regards,
Shipo
Twitter: @Edmunds_Test
Regards,
OW
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
"I had the bad luck to get a blowout at 80 mph..."
Been there, done that, got the tee-shirt. That said, tire technology has come a loooong way in the last couple of decades, and blow-outs without some external help (i.e. a road hazard of some sort) are all but non-existent these days. That said, if you do hit a piece of road junk that destroys your tire, it is highly unlikely that RFTs will help you all that much, if at all.
"Run flat tires allow you to maintain control with a total loss of air pressure..they allow the Directional Stability Control to operate,"
Stability control and ABS on a late model BMW work just fine even of one or more tires have zero pressure and are of the GFT variety.
"With a total loss of air, you can travel up to 150 miles to get a repair."
Ummm, no. The recommendation is no more than 50 miles.
"With a slow leak, you can travel up to 600 miles to get a repair."
That's a bizarre statement if I've ever seen one. Geez, I've driven thousands of miles with a slow leak on GFTs. Stop, fill'er up every so often and continue on your way.
"If the puncture is more than 3/4" from the sidewall, you can get it plugged for a few bucks."
Only if you can find someone willing to do it. FWIW, most (if not all) BMW dealerships will refuse to do this kind of repair.
"Keep your spare tire, keep your jack, keep your lug nut wrench..I'll keep the Run Flats and keep on driving."
Keep your RFTs with their clumsy handling, bone jarring ride and short tread life. I'll gladly take a spare and a jack with me any day.
Best Regards,
Shipo
+1.
Don't forget that it also costs about twice as much to have a RFT mounted.
Hopefully RFT or the new Michelin tireless technology will obviate this roadside practice off the face of the earth!
Regards,
OW
I think a better solution is to look for a better place to pull off the road. If there isn't one, I'd rather destroy the rim by riding on it for a while, as opposed to destroying my driving enjoyment by riding on RFTs all the time.
Alternately, you just stop! Probably, you will get hit.
Some people stop on the bridge and the maniacs passing by threaten them just for causing traffic delays.
At the end of the day, the technology needs to improve so you don't need to stop and change a tire. You can't set an appointment for a flat tire.
Regards,
OW
Agreed, but as previously pointed out, if in the highly unlikely event that you get a sudden flat (as opposed to a slow leak that usually allows a number of miles once the TPMS has been triggered), some of us would rather drive until we can safely stop. If the destruction of the wheel is the end result, I just don't see that as a big deal compared with the trade offs of RFTs. The truth of the matter is that RFTs are more expensive than GFTs, often cost more to install, and have generally inferior driving characteristics.
In case of my wife and me, we have over seventy years of combined driving experience covering some one and a half million miles in the process. Through it all, the only sudden pressure loss event that either of us has had while we were behind the wheel was when I was driving a 1968 Chrysler Town & Country station wagon. While that event was nervous as I was moving at nearly 80 mph when the right front tire let go, it could have been avoided. The car was my (then) new girlfriend's father's car and I found out right after the event that he didn't believe in changing tires until the tread was fully bald (three out of four tires in this case), and even then all he would buy was retreaded tires.
The above isn't to say that we've never had a flat, we've had lots, however, in every other case the flat happened so slowly that we either saw it before getting in for a drive, or were alerted to the fact by the sloppy handling of the car. Obviously the first case is simply annoying, and the second case we've always been afforded enough time to get to a safe place to change it or get it changed.
All of this is to say that if I had instead spent the extra money on RFTs (assuming they were available) for those 1.5 million miles, I'm sure we would have spent several thousand dollars more for our tires than we have at this point, more than enough to pay for a few damaged wheels should it ever come to that. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
Guys in the UK have had 'total' sidewall failures on RFT's within 20 miles of running low pressure. All depends on the load being carried and for how long the pressure was dropping, before the warning is thrown up.
HighlandPete
Guys in the UK have had 'total' sidewall failures on RFT's within 20 miles of running low pressure. All depends on the load being carried and for how long the pressure was dropping, before the warning is thrown up.
Here is what my 3-series manual says. Do people disagree with this? The manuals in general tend to be conservative about this stuff, right?
"In the event of complete tire pressure loss, 0 psi/kPa, you can estimate the possible distance for continued driving on the basis of the following guidelines:
- With a light load: 1 to 2 persons without luggage: approx. 155 miles/250 km.
- With a medium load: 2 persons, cargo bay full, or 4 persons without luggage: 90 miles/150 km
- With a full load or when towing a trailer: 4 or more persons, cargo bay full: approx. 30 miles/50 km"
Regards,
OW
Regards,
OW
Best Regards,
Shipo
"So I am driving along the M11, everything seems fine, beautiful sunny day in fact. All of a sudden I get the DING! warning from I-drive that one of the tyres has a puncture. No problem I thought - still got another 90 miles or so on them, albeit at a snail pace 50 mph.
A couple of miles later, I arrive at my destination. I go for a quick inspection, and all the tyres look perfect, no problems so far. Fifteen minutes later, I'm back on the M11, heading back to London, and the car is horrendously unstable. The steering is completely off-centre, vibration through the body/seats/s.wheel is very bad, and the car is weaving all over the place - this is at LESS THAN 50 mph. I decide to call BMW Assist, who just tell me what I already know, "They're good for another 90 miles at 50mph". However, I refused to take their advice - I just pulled up on the hard shoulder, called BMW Mobile Service, and was towed home an hour later.
Yesterday I had it towed from my house to the local dealers. I just thought of it as a straightforward simple job - change the tyre, Bob is your uncle. How wrong I was...
The (not-very)run-flat tyre was completely disintegrated on the inside. The tyre's beading had become so hot, it welded itself onto the rim. BMW Service said they would try and get it off, so long as I accepted liability should they bust the rim. Thankfully the very able technician was able to get it off without damaging the rims.
However, the tyre, in its last moments, must have rubbed against the suspension dust cover, leaving a big gash in this flimsy plastic part. And now, the dealers want 3 hours labour to remove the suspension shock, and put a new plastic cover.
Moral of the story......You cannot drive 90 miles at 50mph on these things - NO WAY. From no more than 20 miles on flat, the tyre not only scorched itself, but tried taking my shock away with it....
Even with RFT's, I WANT A SPARE WHEEL.
HighlandPete
Brothers and sisters, gimme an Amen and a Halleluia.
Right on Pete. ;-)
Best Regards,
Shipo
Having said that, I would have PAID EXTRA to have my 3-series come with a spare. I have read that bmw decided to ditch the spare in order to have better fuel economy numbers. I think they could have still done that if they had offered the spare as an option. My only complaint then would be that a simple flat can cost me $300. But at least I wouldn't have to be paranoid on long trips about getting stranded.
Oh, well. The car still rocks.
Dan
BTW, my Conti's are performing/wearing perfectly at 13K miles, rotated at 5K intervals.
Pretty impressive even with the extra weight of the xi.
Would I take the spare and trade in the RFT's? In a heart beat! I'll even throw in the $50 for a dip stick!
Regards,
OW
I have a 2006 325xi with sport pkg staggered setup. My Bridgestone RE050aII's have been a pain with the noise, but more costly have been the 4, yes 4, nails that I have had in them in the last year.....I want Continental non-RFT's.....
In a word, yes. Be sure to order one of these kits before you venture out on a long trip with no spare tire:
http://www.tirerack.com/accessories/conticomfortkit/index.jsp
Best Regards,
Shipo
I'm sure the 20% reduction in tire and wheel costs per vehicle have something to do with it as well.
I'm sure you're right. Even with the RFT's, I would be willing to pay for the extra wheel and tire to have a spare in the trunk, just in case. I know the X5 comes with a spare if you don't opt for the 3rd row seat. I don't see why they couldn't put a spare in the sedan, at least as an option.
Hmm.. I asked my service advisor and he said that BMW no longer recommends rotating tires. He says there is no need to do it. Is he wrong? I have the non-xi SP with the staggered setup, so rotating would be more of a swap.