Toyota on the mend?

1287288290292293319

Comments

  • explorerx4explorerx4 Member Posts: 20,796
    You're right, but it was corporate specs.
    2024 Ford F-150 STX, 2023 Ford Explorer ST, 91 Mustang GT vert
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Don't joke - they used American suppliers

    So Ateixeira (that handle's a mouthful buddy - just kidding!), did you prefer joyriding American luxury barges or imports more when you were valet parking? Heck, you've got to get some perks to make up for the cheap [non-permissible content removed] tippers! I had a buddy who did that at some NJ resort when he was young and he liked the land yachts.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Corporate specs that were not met.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    did you prefer joyriding American luxury barges or imports more when you were valet parking?

    I'm glad you asked!

    I actually enjoyed the job. It wasn't good money, but I like cars and I made a little on Friday nights instead of going to bars and spending a lot, so the net gain was decent. Never damaged any cars, either, though someone working with me did once.

    For sure, without a doubt, a lot of my personal biases were formed during that era, late 80s basically.

    I enjoyed parking the smaller, sportier cars, everything from a CRX to a Scirocco or GTI to an Omni GLHS. In a tight, urban environment, twisy garage with small parking spots, they were right at home.

    To this day I prefer smaller, sportier cars.

    Next came the smaller lux cars. You learned about Saabs on your first day - gotta put it in Reverse to get the key out. Those were fun, back when Saabs actually had real character, not a GM rebadge. I liked 3 series, too. Euro cars with a good manual transmission.

    I hated the big ones, though. I'm sure they'd be better suited to an autobahn at 120mph than a city at 5mph, but fintail may recall those delayed throttle pedals where you got nothing at all out of an S class for the first inch or two of pedal travel. And back then, the diesels were terrible, both slow and stinky.

    American luxury barges were far worse. More body roll than a sail boat at high tide. Town Cars and big Buicks seemed to be the worst. Stop and go enough times and it felt like the bumper would scrape the ground. I could not stand those cars. Toss in Oldsmobile while you're at it.

    Back then, the Camry/Accord were so much better than the domestic cars it was almost comical. With a few exceptions ... but not many. I honestly think today's Malibu and Fusion are so, so much more competitive.

    From a bored valet's perspective, I always preferred a stick shift, and it seemed like the imports had a far higher ratio of sticks, even European. So I would rather get a Saab 900, 3 series, Accord, or Celica over an auto-only GM10, for instance.

    Despite an apparent bias, I bought a 91 Ford Escort after that job, so I am very open-minded. It was light, DOHC, has a nice stick shift, and gave me good bang for the buck.

    My roommate had a Dodge Shadow ES (turbo) and it was marginally quicker but my Escort was better in every other way. What was GM making back then? I guess the Cavalier Z24, which simply didn't interest me at all. Later Dodge put a small V6 in the Shadow, these compacts were getting 19mpg city, who are they kidding? My Escort was rated 26mpg.

    So, there you go. What did I learn? Stick shift + light = fun. I tend to seek light, efficient models in any given class. Bang for the buck, basically.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    MB still has hard throttles...you gotta put some effort into getting the car off the line. As opposed to the 85 Olds my grandma still had when I started driving, that thing would shoot off the line with barely tapping the pedal. The illusion of power.

    There was a V6 Shadow - my brother had a Sundance Duster with a V6. I also remember a V6 Tempo...torque steer had to be an issue.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Atx (sorry buddy, I've got to shorten that handle because I'm a lousy typist!) - I'm guessing from your answer there is a 15-20 year span between ages. However, my buddy's valet tales don't differ a lot from yours despite the gap. He said he liked the Lincoln's best (sorry Lemko) because they were a good balance back then. He also liked the "real" Imperials (prior to 67's). He told me that Rolls Royce were pigs. The Jags were fun, but cramped and MB's didn't do much for him. I always enjoy listening to tales of the old days and seeing the differences as time goes by and generations change.
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,072
    There was a V6 Shadow -

    My Aunt had a 93 or 94 Shadow ES with the Mitsu 3.0, period hunter green over tan. It was a fun little car. Plenty of power, I guess 0 to 6 in 8 seconds or so. I drove it quite a few times when I first got my license. torque steer wasn't terrible, but was noticeable.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Icon I6L Golf Cart

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    MB still has hard throttles

    It was more than hard, though, they actually had an inch or so where it would not react at all. They did away with it, as I never noticed that in the 90s Benzes I sampled, nor the more recent ones.

    85 Olds

    I remember that, too. It was the opposite, very non-linear. You barely touch it and you get full throttle. Hard to be smooth. Plus the soft suspensions would dive and squat like crazy, I hated that.

    The Tempo, wow. That and the Diamante we mentioned in the other thread have got to be among the quickest depreciating vehicles ever. They made some 400k of those the first year, incredible by today's standards, beats the Camry and Avalon combined.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    edited November 2011
    I was high school class of '86, put it that way. I had the valet gig in college, some in grad school, so thru early 90s.

    Lincoln ... let's see, back then it was the Town Car and the Continental, which was basically just a stretch Taurus. Big automatics, no interest to be honest. I do recall driving a rare, oddball MT5 Taurus.

    The first Lincoln that I liked (80s and beyond) was the LS manual that my wife's cousin owned.

    I parked a Roller once, and yes it was also a pig. Older, beat up, badly.

    Jags were OK, back then I thought the J-gate was neat for an automatic. What I remember most is the nice leather aroma, oddly.

    M-Bs were Ok but the owners were cheap. Tip was $1, no more. We usually got $2-5.

    What cool cars do I recall?

    I parked Wilbur Marshall's 911. He was the "6 million dollar man", i.e. a Redskins player who had just signed a $6M contract. He was huge so we were VERY careful with it. I think he would have killed me if I dinged it.

    One time a DeTomaso Pantera pulled up ... but he found street parking right in front of the restaurant. I was so heart broken!

    Met Larry King (cheap) and Paul Barry (generous) from TV.

    Odd ball cars?

    One time we got a Chrysler TC by Maserati. Gimme a break. It even looked like a LeBaron. One time I parked an 80s era Quattroporte (did they call them that back then?) and I just remember trim pieces falling off inside. Horrific quality control.

    Lots of muscle cars, but those were like the proverbial bull-in-a-china-shop in that area, so I never really liked those. Same for Corvettes, you could barely see out of them.

    I used to like the Starion turbos, those were cool. Colt turbos, too. 323GTX. GTI.

    See? I tend to remember the small/nimble cars more, since that's what I enjoyed driving.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    My first car was almost a Mitsu Starion. It was actually a trade in at the Toyota dealer that I ended up buying my Olds from instead.

    I have a friend who rebuilt (and modded) the Mitsu twin, a Dodge Conquest. The thing is insanely fast and looks like brand new after some extensive body work to repair the rot and a couple of dents.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2011
    My brother loved his Duster - IIRC it was a period dark blue-green color also with a tan interior, and gold emblems. He drove the doors off it and even tried to autocross it a bit, with limited success. Something eventually gave up in the engine, he parked it in my mother's garage, I nagged her about that as I knew it would be there forever, and off to the junkyard it went as it was going to be a pain to fix and the car was worn out otherwise.

    Those Mitsu V6s had oil burning issues, IIRC.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    I know if I drive my mom's Camry and then my car, there's a lot less effort needed to get hers going. My old W126 S-class was what you describe...I swear my foot would get sore if I had to hold a low speed.

    Remember when cars would sit really low in the back if people were in the back seat? That Olds would do that.

    The Tempo, for as horrible as it looks now, has to be looked at through the eyes of the time. Amazingly, it was pretty modern when new, and it looked modern, so they sold.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Which Duster do you mean? Is it the 1970s version that could come with a 340 V-8 or the little one from the late 1980s-early 1990s based on the Sundance? One college roommate had a gold 1972 Duster that was jacked-up in the back with air shocks.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    The Sundance Duster. His was a 93, IIRC - replaced a same year Lumina. He had a thing for just-post-malaise metal, I guess. Now he drives an 83 Toyota pickup - he's a slacker, but at least he lives within his means :shades:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Top Gear had a neat episode with an older one. Ran fine until Clarkson did some amateur mods to it, and ruined it. :sick:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Remember when cars would sit really low in the back if people were in the back seat?

    Nope, but then again I was always driving (to park 'em).
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2011
    It was another issue with those soft 80s FWD cars - with any load the rear end would drag. Looked bad.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    A bad era for cars overall, with few exceptions.

    Remember the 85mph speedos? Even a mediocre car could pin the speedo.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    Heck, my mom had a 93 Taurus that I swear had an 85 mph speedo. Our Tempo did too - but I could peg it easily.

    Foreign cars must have been exempt, MB from that era anyway have 120+ units.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited November 2011
    Atx (sorry buddy, I've got to shorten that handle

    Just call him Juice like most everyone else does. :)

    "In a key ruling in the Toyota sudden-acceleration multidistrict litigation, a federal judge on Monday tentatively dismissed foreign consumers' claims against the automaker. The judge also tentatively dismissed racketeering claims against Toyota, as well as products liability and negligence claims."

    Judge Tentatively Dismisses Foreign Consumers' Claims Against Toyota in Sudden-Acceleration Case (Inside Line)
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 17,072
    My 93 Taurus had an 85 mph speedometer. An officer once informed me it would do over that. :P

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic / 2022 Icon I6L Golf Cart

  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    edited November 2011
    The Tempo, for as horrible as it looks now, has to be looked at through the eyes of the time. Amazingly, it was pretty modern when new, and it looked modern, so they sold.

    Kind of like ATX, I like small and nimble. My first new car was in 1985. I looked at small and nimble handlers, and ended up with an '85 Jetta which gave me 143K nearly trouble-free miles. I did look at the Tempo as it was just a bit bigger. HATED the interior - that peach fuzz headliner and the really soft cloth seats with no bolstering. Almost all of the US brands had those types of seats and that alone was pretty much a deal breaker for me.

    My girlfriend hat an '84 Toyota Camry LE. Kind of tinny and much smaller than today, but the interior was nice and the seats were firm yet comfortable, like most foreign cars of the day.
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Foreign cars must have been exempt, MB from that era anyway have 120+ units.

    85 MPH speedometers were required between 1979 and 1982 (appx) in accordance with NHTSA regulations with an emphasis the 55 mph national speed limit.

    But there were ways around it. Here is a period Ferrari speedo:

    image
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's because Japan did not threaten to close military bases that belong to any of those countries. ;)

    Call me "juice", or use my initials, AJ. :shades:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    edited November 2011
    Wasn't the Jetta made in Germany back then, and the Golf in Mexico? Something like that. I seem to recall the Jettas being better built.

    Today it's the other way around, the Jetta suffered from cost cutting, while the Golf is still a bit more upscale than mainstream competition.

    I did enjoy driving VWs. Audis back then were awful, though.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    Weren't Vegas aluminum heads? I just remember all the head gaskets.

    Yes, the '85 Jetta was German. That was the first year of the "new" style after the original boxy style of the first Jetta incarnation.

    The Camry of the day was a much smaller car than today. My girlfriend's car had really nice brownish striped velour seats that were firm, and the interior was pretty nice as well. The car wasn't powerful (102 hp as I recall) but would cruise at 65 mph under 2K rpm, getting great mileage.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Manuals were common, too. I remember ad cars for under $10k, though you wonder how many of those dealers actually stocked. Still, I drove several manuals.

    The Camry went big/soft starting around '91 or so. Ironically it worked - that generation is when they took over as best selling car.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    DENSO's old Navi system blows chunks:

    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/22/automakers-suck-at-ui/

    Mercedes and Fords, too.

    They need for Entune to be well received.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    edited November 2011
    Wow. I had never looked at those specific years, but you're right.

    A 1982 S-class:

    image

    Here's a 450SL:

    image

    Those were dark days. I remember our Ciera actually had "55" in a red outline.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    I like COMAND, it does things the German way - you gotta work for it :shades:
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Reminds me of SAP (I'm an IT guy). It will do anything you ask, you just have to learn how to ask.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Those would have looked better if they put the KM on the outside. What a dumb rule.

    Though, to be fair, I complain even more about the opposite problem, i.e. when the speedo is WAY too optimistic.

    Does my Miata really need a 150mph speedo when top speed is 130 or less?
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    It's all psychology juice.

    The 85 MPH speedos made driving at 55-60 seem downright wreckless while your 150 mph speedo in the the Miata is to make you feel optomistic.

    Another thing with the 85 MPS speedo was that the 55 had to be highlighted.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Having a builtin NAV has been a learning experience. One I don't plan to repeat. We no longer use the worthless NAV in our Toyota. We carry the Magellan which for under $200 is worlds better than the POC sold by Toyota. I did get an Upgrade notice for a new DVD. They wanted $169. When I called the Toyota dealer they informed me it would not work in my 2007. No longer supported. So I am stuck with the 2005 DVD that came with it. Probably reason enough to never look at a Toyota again. 4 years old and no longer supported. sheeeesh :sick:
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    edited November 2011
    Mercedes and Fords, too.

    We have MyTouch in our new Explorer. As I have used it more, I will admit it's a bit frustrating. She likes precision. The voice commands require that you first say the street address with the city last. But if you don't know st. or ave., she isn't happy. I wish it would accept input of the city first then ask for the street name. Even doing it on the screen follows the same schema. One time though, she did say "Let's try this a different way, what city?" and then "what address?" so she is able to do that. I just need to find out how. I'm sure it's somewhere in that 400 page book I have.

    I recently had to go to 161 Emerald in Wrentham, MA The nav came back with a few streets names Emerald in other towns. I then tried Sirius Travelink included with MyTouch and it was able to give me directions to the same place without an issue - with voice commands.

    BTW - Ford is sending MyTouch owners the 2013 update via USB stick early next year and for those of us with nav, we will get a new SD card with updated Navtech maps. It's all at no charge.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Don't even get me started on SAP!!! It's needlessly complex for the sake of complexity. I hate it with intense and extreme passion!
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    Don't even get me started on SAP!!! It's needlessly complex for the sake of complexity. I hate it with intense and extreme passion!

    What would you expect from a German software company?? It's complicated for the sake of elegance.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    What I hate is that in my daily drive I'm only using about 1/3rd of the speedo. The labels are 20mph apart so you can't see your speed at a glance.

    My GPS addresses that.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I think you'll find similar issues with other OEM Nav units, FWIW.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    CNET reviewers loved Sync but not MyFord Touch. So there's potential there, for sure.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    It's complicated for the sake of elegance.

    I love that some of the menus have seemingly 87 options.

    What do they say, the human brain can memorize 5-7 options? Keep it simple, guys.

    Our SAP programmers are the best paid.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    http://www.autoblog.com/2011/11/23/2013-lexus-gs-350-first-drive-review/

    Generally positive. They like the steering, which is a surprise from a Toy/Lex product.

    I wonder if a 6 speed auto is behind the times nowadays?

    Nice 12.3" LCD screen, matches the XTS' huge screen. I wonder if they used the same supplier?
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,510
    It's just so boring. And to unveil it at a major classic car show. I know some classics, and that's no classic.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    BMW, Toyota announce diesel, green technology tie-up

    joint development of lithium-ion batteries. BMW will also supply diesel engines to Toyota in Europe as part of the tie-up.

    Read more: http://www.autonews.com/article/20111201/COPY01/312019939<meta name=#ixzz1fIN5kVuM

    Could actually help BMW meet CAFE and benefit Toyota in Europe.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    link title

    My favorite line:

    but we can&#146;t help think that enthusiasts and tuners around the world will want more power &#150;- and very soon -- leading to bolted-on turbos. Why? Because the chassis can take more power. A lot more power.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm sure we'll see a forced induction model in a year or two.

    You don't need a lot of power to pull just under 2700 lbs. People are used to ton-and-a-half or more cars, this is a light weight.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I agree, the 240hp in my S2k is plenty quick and I actually enjoy working for it. :D

    200hp in the '86 will be equally as fun as my Honda and probably be even better in the corners due to it being a HT and about 250lbs lighter. Heck, the Lotus Elise is 2700lbs and that thing is very highly regarded on the track IIRC.

    This looks to be similar specs except it will just have an actual interior to go with it, lol
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    edited December 2011
    As far as car sales go...

    Top 20 best-selling cars of November 2011 sales charts

    Also to note, the Civic is picking up pace and has captured the top spot in its class as well.

    Now, where are the naysayers who claimed that nobody was buying Civics and Camrys because they were no longer desirable and had handed over the market to Chevy rental cars (Cruze/Malibu) never to look back?

    Oops... :blush:

    Amazing how the Escape keeps humming along for a 10 year old design. My guess is people are scooping up the last of the truck like ones before it changes over to the new "Kia" inspired theme :P
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Are we seeing a new era in Toyota offerings?

    MR2 lives on with Toyota GRMN Sports Hybrid Concept II

    The standard 2ZZ four-cylinder (or lesser 1ZZ in the States) has been swapped out for a 3.5-liter V6 mounted amidships and outputting 247 horsepower. While that's not much juice from a big V6, the addition of an electric motor powering the front wheels brings overall output up to just under 300 hp, allowing the 3,300-pound roadster to run to 60 mph in the mid-five-second range.

    It's only a concept but still... :shades:
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.