Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
What is the magic cutoff date of posts that we should not reply to?
I find older posts interesting to reply to a few years later as we all can see how history has either supported or nullified our views and comments.
Some posts end up being timeless.
The only GM total development concept that keeps evolving....
Regards,
OW
Our politicans have spend most of their waking hours on a "mission" to destroy our auto industry under the guise of "protecting us." Live in Florida where we have the mandated seat belt law, never really used the belt, and I was ticketed lately, $116 for endangering my life..and I was also smoking at the time and I asked the officer if that was a ticketable offense at this time..nope, however flipping a butt out the window is a $500 tab..Luckily I had a cup of Starbucks coffee in the car with some liquid remaining and the butt was doused..I could do with a little less personal protection from the government and at the age of 77 it really is annoying..
My 2 cars, the Mustang GT and the Pontiac GPGT are somehow targets for the ticket-writers, and I behave in town, not a hot-rodder, however the interstate is another story and I-75 in my area, north or south is a roadway to really rock and roll..average speed is around 80 with triple digits probably 20% of the time..The cars love it, and it's a stress reliever..
I believe China will set the auto rules and styling in the future for they are the market leader in this day and age..Too bad you youngsters on this forum missed the "glory days" of the Big3, and yes, the Detroit guys did offer some pieces of junk, however, I did avoid every one of them..however I did supply parts for some of the junkers..
God help you if you were injured or killed in the mine. The company would just dump your carcass in the front door of the company house and toss your family and all your stuff on the street at the end of the month.
"Sir, there was a terrible explosion in the mine! Ten men and four mules were killed!"
"FOUR MULES?!?!? Heads will roll!"
Why???...why did you HAVE to buy stuff from them???...can't you just go to the next town and buy stuff where you want to???...kinda makes you wish walMart came to town...
I don't see this stopping until we're close to bankrupt. Congress passes consumer financial protection legislation but its implementation is dragged out and delayed (of course, it was probably watered down to begin with). Commodities are turned into a speculative fervor screwing over consumers so the Wall Street insiders can make even more millions; $5 gas only means more money in their pockets. Face it, Wall Street is a huge political contribution player to BOTH parties. America doesn't usually change course very quickly either. We're still emphasizing things like history in high school while we fall further behind in math and science. And don't even think about teaching business related topics - let kids graduate without even a basic understanding of finance and commerce and then wonder why they jump into these dumb, greedy investments that later burn them.
It's all a great transfer of wealth - trickle up economics. As you say, the same special interests control both parties, elections are more of an entertaining spectacle than anything meaningful.
I've long believed it is no coincidence that few kids receive any kind of financial education through high school and even many in college. I wonder who benefits from that.
Similarly, I always get a chuckle when what is happening in today's U.S. manufacturing base is compared to the shrinking of America's agricultural base all those many years ago. The huge difference is, the many new jobs, good-paying ones at that, back then were still in this country. When manufacturing jobs leave the country today, those people often turn to jobs like WalMart because there is no other decent-paying blue-collar working situation in this country. And I'm speaking as a college-educated white-collar guy my whole life, and the son of a postal manager, so I have no union-factory mentality in me whatsoever.
At the end of the day, it's about taking care of our own house first.
And again...not all foreign nameplates are built here, and not all domestic nameplates are built in Canada or Mexico. It's easy to figure out. I often see the cop-out statement online "Most American brands are built in Canada or Mexico anyway". Where does that information come from? It's to make the import-buying poster feel good, that is all.
And the reason domestics build outside the U.S. is solely due to foreign competition--particularly building in Mexico which I find appalling...it is basically a third-world country with wages as such. I have to believe that without the wide-open door available to import manufacturers all these years, and the imports not having legacy costs, the need to outsource domestic production wouldn't have occurred.
Someone posted earlier about how WWII shouldn't be a factor in a car purchase. I can only speak personally here...for me the worst war events in the history of the world, only ended 65 years ago...not nearly long enough to forget. The car companies coveted today assisted in the war effort, widely, against our own soldiers. I know the arguments, so no need to rehash...'I know a Medal of Honor winner who drives an Audi/Lexus/fill in the blank'. That's OK of course. 'GM owned Opel and they were complicit'. I don't think anyone can logically compare Roosevelt to Hitler and Hirohito. I'm from a military family and I am also aware of the pain that war brought to 35 families in my small, close-knit hometown. While there are thousands alive on both sides who participated, I'm sure there are one-generation-removed from those fighters, citizens who dislike or detest the U.S. still from their countries losing the war, same as some people here think about them. The difference is, those people there are probably laughing at the way we practically worship their products.
I spent a weekend with several Battle of the Bulge veterans. Those guys are truly the greatest generation. I used to roll my eyes as a kid hearing guys my Dad's age tell "war stories". I have a much-greater appreciation of history now.
I think comparing my feelings about WWII, to the way I think people should stop whining about their bad cars from 20 years ago, is a very-unbalanced scale of what happened. But that's just me, and I won't bad-mouth anyone who feels differently (most people). And say what you will, because I won't post a response to anyone's response to this post.
Bottom-line for me, is I bought new domestic brands throughout the '80's and '90's. Some were better than others, but none left me stranded even once, and none were terrible. I certainly don't have the vitriol for them that I see on this board. Also, I like domestic styling better (almost always), I don't buy a car as a status symbol so I don't buy expensive cars although I could afford to buy more expensive than I do, and I wish to do the bottom-line best thing for our country in the process.
Incidentally, this is not a racist opinion as we have Chinese friends and I have known Japanese-Americans in my life and have always enjoyed them and treated them well, as they have me. And I am of German descent.
My experiences with domestic cars pretty much mirror yours. I most definitely prefer domestic styling over European or Asian makes.
I have Chinese coworkers and they drive Chevrolets. I had a boss who was Japanese and I believe he was the best guy I ever worked for.
The way I see it, nobody from the past has a right to a moral high ground. Either everyone is a criminal, or nobody is. Everyone has blood on their hands. If you don't want to buy a car connected to a place with old atrocities, you'd better start walking :shades:
Ah, the "legacy costs" - quite possibly the least convincing argument in favor of buying domestic. The D3 willingly incurred these costs at a time when they monopolized the market because they stupidly believed that this monopoly would last forever & that they could always pass these costs on to us, the car buyers. We customers never had a chance to vote on this absolutely idiotic business decision, so it's not surprising that as soon as we had a chance to avoid paying these costs, many of us did.
The legacy costs argument reminds me of the man who murders his parents & then asks the court to have mercy on him - because he's an orphan.
Of course, those European brands benefit from a fair dose of "socialism" either directly or otherwise. But, that's evil ...we can't support it, even if we buy products aided by the socialism of others.
Driving a 50s-60s Caddy convertible in Germany would probably get you more attention than a new Ferrari.
The funniest scene I know of is Switzerland, and Scandinavia, especially Sweden. Big American cars have huge followings in both places. I was amazed at the amount of both late model and older American cars in normal service in Switzerland.
The manufacturing jobs problem is a tough one. The problem is that we aren't the only country on the planet. Seems to me that either we are isolationist, which means we will pay more and likely not have the best products - something that won't keep us in the top tier of countries either, or we have today's situation. I don't particularly like it either, but it's sort of like medicine - you don't want to take it but you realize you should.
Looking at an alternate scenario where we HAD been more protectionist, I see products would have been a lot more expensive due to US labor. And so of course if the salaries of US citizens are the same, there are fewer sales, so then jobs start getting lost anyway. In thermodynamics, energy is neither created or destroyed - it is conserved. I think economics are similar. We can't borrow our way to prosperity, and we can't protect our way to prosperity, either.
This country is no more or less than the value of its goods and services and the quality of its workers' output. That isn't going to change regardless of what other countries are doing. There are lot of very smart people in the rest of the world, and we don't get a choice as to whether we put up with the effects of those people. Being (economically) on top for 50 or more years while the rest of the world is hungry for advancement means that they are more willing to work hard - they are hungrier for success than the mass of complacent U.S. citizens are. I don't see an easy way out of that. And in the protectionist scenario, I don't want the U.S. to devolve to a situation like Eastern Europe was in a while back - protected, lazy, backward. Driving Trabants around. Never having the latest technology. I don't see that as a good choice, either. I think we need to suck it up and be more innovative instead of crying about how unfair it all is. No scenario is easy, and we won't be prosperous if we don't work hard to make it so.
While I agree, we need to suck it up and be more innovative , we create an additional onus on ourselves in NA. Probably because we see ourselves as superior to the rest of the world, and in order to help justify our stance, we impose regulations (environmental for example) that within the level of those restrictions, we can use as an excuse to defend that stance if/when we fall short competitively.
"We customers never had a chance to vote on this absolutely idiotic business decision, so it's not surprising that as soon as we had a chance to avoid paying these costs, many of us did."
But we DID have a chance to vote on it, and we voted with our feet...and walked into Honda and Toyota and Nissan dealers, and bought what we believed was a better product, and it usually was...
So you CAN teach an old dog new tricks! :P :surprise: :shades:
I'll by a GM when all other car companies go bankrupt and are not rescued....and GM is the only car company selling vehicles in the USA!
Now I feel better! Go Hyundai and Kia. Saw the '11 Optima and it's really nice!
Regards,
OW
Don't forget the 3-speed automatic from Chrysler was a huge culprit as well, as it was no star itself (oh why oh why did they use it in the Neon mid-90's) It was known to be a terrible transmission and likewise, gave me all of a pathetic 65,000 miles of use in a 132 HP engine?
But Chrysler's first 4-speed FWD transmission, the "UltraDrive", which came out in 1988 or 1989 with the FWD New Yorker and Dynasty, was horrible. And I'm not convinced they ever got it fully right. It actually wasn't too bad as long as the car wasn't too heavy or torquey, but in later years it was also engineered to somehow "dump" some of the hp along the way to the drive wheels, so that it would last longer, but you didn't get the performance promised by that horsepower. For instance, my 2000 Intrepid had 200 hp, and would do 0-60 in about 9.5 seconds. A 2000 LeSabre also had 200 hp, but would do it in about 8.0. Of course, having a 3.8, versus the tiny 2.7 in my car, probably helped a bit.
When they started putting 4-speed automatics in the RWD Dodge trucks, they were pretty bad, too. But that little 3-speed that the Neon used, actually traced back to the 1978 Omni and Horizon, so Chrysler had decades to get the bugs worked out!
I had a 1988 LeBaron turbo coupe that was a fairly good car up to around 90,000 miles. Incidentally, that was when I divorced my wife, and let her have it. Now admittedly, she didn't take care of it, and it got stolen and abused a few times, but that sucker was basically dead at around 118,000 miles. At that point the turbo was dead, head gasket blew, engine was just about shot, a/c compressor seized up, power antenna was broken, trip computer was on the fritz and would lie to you about how much gas was left, and she had to have the radiator replaced recently. The transmission was the only trouble free part of that car!
Still, I've had a lot of good Chrysler products over the years, and would consider another. I was happy with my 2000 Intrepid, and still miss it sometimes.
I was surprised to see Chevrolet Malibu in basic configuration selling for $45,000 in Israel (see here: http://used-cars-for-israel.com/)
They offer it there at that price, but how many actually sell?
In what?? The car they couldn't afford?? That's why they lived in company housing. They could walk to work. Go to an old NE mill city. All you'll see are triple deckers for blocks around the mills.
That's my point. Chrysler used a transmission from the 70's in a car that was supposed to be of the 90's. The mechanic even said something like "I can't believe they are still using that old 70's era tranny sill in these cars," as he handed me the $1,200 tranny rebuild repair work order breakdown to be paid.
Best tranny Chrysler had in the 90's??? Obviously, not ALLL the bugs were worked out, as mine had to be replaced between 60,000 and 65,000 miles.
RIP 3 Speed transmission 0-65,000 miles (died an early death even though tranny was serviced and transmission fluid changed at all heavy use recommended intervals of 15K, 30K, and 45K miles).
I believe for every 100 bad reviews you read about the old Neons on Edmunds or MSN user reviews about 10 to 20 will mention a bad transmission.
There's an article in today's WSJ that indicates US manufacturing is on the rebound. Perhaps the issue is more Philly than manufacturing in general?:
"U.S. manufacturing, viewed as a lost cause by many Americans, has begun creating more jobs than it eliminates for the first time in more than a decade."
Perhaps the issue is more Philly than manufacturing in general?
Agreed. Detroit started falling apart more than 40 years ago and has yet to recover. Whether or not the same happens to Philly rests in the hands of the city counsel.
IMO what happened to places like Detroit should have created a lot of lessons learned for other cities. We had areas of Boston, MA that were in need of help too and thankfully change is taking place there.
Having been exposed to the auto business from 1967-2002, it was a blast and let's face it, our politicans on both sides had the "wrecking bar" hellbent on killing the industry..
Drive what ever makes you happy...You know what I drive, all red, white, and blue...We all have a choice..
That is interesting...I did not know that...the only thing I know about the "Company Store" is the song "Sixteen Tons", but I never really knew what it meant...
I happened through there a couple of years ago and it's changed a great deal. Those company houses are now individually owned. Solid little things but definitely cheap. The demographics have changed with the times as well. Used to be all Baltic and Japanese (there's still a Buddhist temple in town) but now it's largely black and Hispanic.
The factory is still going.
For example, I wanted a streetfighter style motorcycle. Should I have purchased a Harley Fat Boy or a Victory Eight Ball -to "support America"- even if it meant that I'd hate riding it? Or should I have done without a bike altogether?
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-2021 Sahara 4xe-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
Wife's: 2015 X1 xDrive28i
Son's: 2018 330i xDrive