By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I have nothing but disdain for the UAW, having spent 10 years in Detroit, 1980-1990, at the height of what I will call the "Big 3 Junk Era" and the simultaneous beginning of the Japanese auto invasion...
I was amazed...those who worked in auto families thought the UAW was the Almighty...almost ANYONE I spoke to who was nonunion was fed up with making payments on the crap they made and wanted the free choice to buy a Honda, Toyota or Datsun, and, as those makes became more popular, you could almost see the spite in their eyes as they fionally bought a product that THEY believed was better made, ran better, and got better mileage...it was almost a Hatfield and McCoy attitude...
I bought 4 Hondas, 1985, 1986, and two in 1988, and, to this day, I believe they were the best cars I ever owned...
So, when you combine the attitude that the UAW makes junk, and add that to the wage they make for tightening 5 lug nuts on a wheel or sweeping the floor, it is ridiculous, quite frankly...
While I understand the free market (if they can get it, than they are worth it), the shifting of much manufacturing to cheaper places means that they really AIN'Y worth it, except the last 3 UAW members left, one to turn out the lights as they leave the last remaining plant for Ford, GM and Chrysler...
Sorry to add this, but wouldn't the loss of textile industries imply that garment workers are included in the "they aren't worth what they are paid to make a shirt" group???
With the UAW, it seems to be more take than give. They are hard to lay off or fire(unlike most). There is only one union for all auto makers (something I feel is foolish). They don’t handle insurance or retirement or training. They just don’t seem to give enough both to the employer and to their members.
So now Nike not only has to worry about the public reaction (and potential loss of sales) from sweatshop stories, if their Chinese factory is dumping dyes into the rivers and turning them red, concerned consumers in the first world will quit buying that product and they'll demand the companies clean up the contract factories (this is already happening btw - link). Throw in a Triangle Shirt Factory fire disaster and the negative public relations could sink a company like Lands End.
The UAW should be sending investigators to the third world to gather evidence of toxic waste dumping by auto suppliers. It may cost so much to clean up their act, some of those suppliers may decide to return to North America.
With hybrids, I wonder if they could be made without a China or India that has little environmental control. I don't think the US or Japan would allow NiMH battery manufacturing. Have we ever manufactured NiCad, NiMH or Li-Ion batteries?
In smallish quantities. Production on the scale required for a passenger fleet of hybrid and/or straight electric cars would require some hefty environmental mitigation in the US. Li-ions would come from China anyway since they have the world's largest lithium supply.
Never heard of Tom's of Maine? link. Now you need to check out Ford's of Detroit. :shades:
Brains are only part of it. Although I know of very few successful people who are truly stupid.
Who do you consider an Indian? And who do you consider an American? We might be getting onto something here.
Not everyone can do what a Ph.d. do but almost everyone can be a 7/11 clerk or an auto worker. The US's future is in to become the innovative center of the world NOT the manufacturing center of the world. Let the developing countries take the low skill jobs, the US has to remain advanced in order to lead for the next 100 years.
1020 foot poleTrue. But it is still harder (Waaaaaaaaaaayyy harder) to get a PhD in anthropology or literature than learn how to install the engine into a car on the assembly line.
I have a new found respect for all PhDs after I learned what they have to go through to get that degree.
G.W. Bush comes to mind
I know people with multiple degrees that make you wonder what they require to get them, one I know of looked down the barrel to check if a gun was loaded.
Biggest problem in this country is who you know is more important than what you know when getting jobs.
Replying to: cooterbfd (Aug 26, 2007 4:11 am)
I, personally, would never hire non-union electricians, plumbers or other skilled tradesmen. Those union guys really know what they are doing. They have to go to training and are held accountable by the other union members to do a good job."
that is exact opposite of what I have seen with union labor here.
When you have more than enough PHDs they cannot demand the pay. Unions try to balance out the pay so you do not suffer when there is a glut of people willing to do a given job.
Some parts of the country are in a big time labor shortage. Montana and Wyoming are right at 4% unemployment. McDonald's are paying up to $10 per hour for burger flippers. One is outsourcing his drive up window.
McDonald's throughout the United States have difficulty finding and retaining good workers; but in a place like Gillette, Wyoming, the search for any help can be nearly impossible.
McD's outsourcing
Example: a degree in engineering can have a good chance of leading to a job with a compnay that requires an engineer, whereas a degree in, say, English, Psychology, History, Art History, unless you intend to teach that material, rarely leads to a job...
As I say, while education for the sake of education is a good thing, just what can you do with a degree in English or History (aside from teach it or go on to law school or an MBA) that makes it so valuable???
If we are to become the technology leader, 4 year liberal arts degrees, where one just extended adolescence for 4 years, just do not seem to have much of a future...at least in the area of gainful employment...
I am certainly willing to be corrected...
You see Marsha, with the federal minimum wage at $6.25 you now could argue that NOBODY in America is worth that, compared to what you can get done in emerging countries.
Even people with engineering or computer programming degrees are finding their work being undercut by people in China and India.
In your last post, you brought up a valid point about getting a degree that MEANS something, as opposed to a liberal arts degree (like that comment about 4 more yrs. of adolesence
My question is that when do we as a country start saying:
"Hey, wait a minute!!! I understand farming out a textile job, but THIS person just invested $150,000 in a college education to be a mechanical engineer. How can you justify sending their job to India, just because you can pay them $500 a month to do the same job???"
I could understand it if there was a lack of people here to do the work (something that may have been the case 30-40 yrs. ago up North that also helped shift textile work down South, and eventually out of the country), but I find something inherently wrong with putting able bodied people out of work here because somebody over there will do it for pennies on the dollar.
So, when you combine the attitude that the UAW makes junk, and add that to the wage they make for tightening 5 lug nuts on a wheel or sweeping the floor, it is ridiculous, quite frankly...
As far as this goes, I think the attitude began to change when GM put it's Spring Hill, Tenn. Saturn plant online in 1989 or '90. Those employees had the power to shut down the assembly plant if they saw something wrong or had an idea to make an improvement-something I believe they gleemed from the Japanese- that helped boost morale because they were actually making a difference, as opposed to just being a "tool" on the assembly line.
Someone pointed out that talks amongst the UAW and the Big 3 were really quiet, which can be seen as a sign of a lack of acrimony-a good thing. Let's face it, EVERYBODYS future, from Wagoner and Mullaly all the way down to the lowest person on the totem pole depends on it.
http://www.philly.com/philly/hp/news_update/20070829_Poverty_rate__As_the_U_S__l- evel_improved__Phila__and_Camden_were_among_poorest__the_suburbs_richest_.html
Couple of questions...
Who is sending their jobs to India? Why are they sending those jobs to India or elsewhere?
But, many college grads theoretically will want/need a job of some kind to pay bills, assuming they do not go home to Mom and Dad (or marry Paris Hilton)...
I do wonder, while they sit on a job interview, what they expect History and Art to do for them...does it expand the mind???...I am sure it does...but I still question what the English degree will do for someone if they do not teach English or go on to grad school...
It is my belief, maybe wrong, that college for most is an attempt to set oneself up for future employment, and my limited mindset wonders just what good a general liberal arts degree will do for someone seeking employment in the real world...
Please enlighten me...
I think some undergrad degrees (or minors in a liberal arts subject) could help a transmission design engineer in her work - everyone has to sell themselves (or their ideas), and if the engineer can only describe why her 6 speed tranny is a smart design in engineer-speak, the beancounters may not pick up on the shades of gray that help distinguish the design.
Those nuances may help the sales staff move the car on the floor because 6 speeds are smoother or save gas -- the beancounter may just hear that the engineer solved a challenging design problem and turn the design down in favor of last year's 4 speed because they don't see how it'll profit the company down the road.
Then there are those, my brother among them, that indeed get a nice liberal arts degree and go on to law school. Another brother went with his poli sci major into business school and is an executive in a major Fortune 500 company.
That is so very true. To get a teaching job in San Diego you have a few choices. You can get right on if you are willing to risk your life in an inner city school. To get a job in one of the many suburban school districts you work several years as a substitute. Then many more as low seniority. My sister in law has been at her school 11 years and is still not tenured. So that teaching degree may or may not pay off. Lots of out of work college grads that are not willing to work at McDonalds.....
If you are going to be in sales, it makes sense to take a sociable person and teach them some rudimentary technical skills to speak competently about a product than to take a socially inept technical person and try and teach them some people skills. It is a waste of the technical know-how to turn a technical person into a salesman. Conversely, a lot of very skilled technical people make lousy managers and leaders. They are completely different skill sets.
People should do what they are best at.
Robert Nardelli is now CEO of Chrysler - he has a BS in business and an MBA.
Rick Wagoner is chairman and CEO of GM. His bachelor's is in economics and he also has an MBA. Blogging Bob Lutz is chairman and gets more press. He's got a bachelor's in Production Management and an MBA.
Alan Mulally of Ford has a bachelor's and a master of science degree, plus another masters in management. Bill Ford, now the chairman, was a history major and has an S.M. in management (equivalent to an M.B.A) form MIT.
Watanabe of Toyota has an economics degree. Fukui of Honda has a bachelor's in applied chemistry. Winterkorn of VW has a Ph.D in metallurgy and metal physics. Ghosn of Nissan has an engineering degree.
The next question is what education did the founders of these companies have.
Steve: BTW, it was a psychology degree that I earned that was my ticket into law school, but I did say that many degrees are useful if they are intending on grad school...
Thanks for expanding the mind of an encrusted brain...
For once I agree with Lemko!!!
As for founders, here is an interesting bit on Soichiro Honda...
A lack of formal education in automotive mechanics brought Honda to the Hamamatsu School of Technology. Robert L. Shook, in his book Honda: An American Success Story, stated that Honda was a poor student in his school days. "Honda reluctantly attended classes while continuing to run his business. Honda stubbornly paid little attention to anything in class that did not relate directly to piston rings. He took no notes, nor did he bother to take written examinations. The head of the school told him he would not receive a diploma if he refused to be tested. With that, Honda retorted that a diploma had less value than a movie ticket. 'A ticket will get you a seat in a movie theater, but a diploma won't get you a job!'"
In addition to the zaibatsu, Japanese industry relied heavily on the gakubatsu, described by Shook as "the 'good old boy' networking system that placed more emphasis on what school a person graduated from than on his or her ability to perform on the job." Honda had no respect for this system.
Link to the article.
Not at all. I DO blame the management of OUR companies who send those jobs away, just to fatten their paychecks.
To correlate this to the topic at hand, what if ALL auto mfrs. moved ALL their operations out of North America? Sure, car prices might drop by 1/4-1/2, but wouldn't that STILL mean BILLIONS of dollars in lost wages? How do we make up for that??
Just because YOU or I may not have anything to worry about, or we may think we can adapt to a new job w/ a similar wage, doesn't say the same for everyone.
I don't mean to sound like a doomsayer, but I just have some concern for our economy, and what will drive it now and in the years to come if we keep exporting jobs and importing goods and services. The title of this forum could be Buying American...........What Does It Mean? Insert ANY career and ask yourself that question.
How many people out there have a job that DOESN'T rely on the American consumer purchasing (directly OR indirectly) their goods and services???
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Good thing we have a contract that states they can't move more than 7/10ths of 1% of our work out of the area (more than 50 mi.) each year. For my wife's call center, that would mean 3 jobs each year (out of 350 employees)