Lincoln MKS

1131416181958

Comments

  • displacedtexandisplacedtexan Member Posts: 364
    I'll second those who have said it's good to see you around here. I'm glad you're back!

    So, is it going to be MKR or Mark R? I really hope Lincoln uses this car as an opportunity to return to names instead of designations, and Mark R would be a vast improvement.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    So, is it going to be MKR or Mark R? I really hope Lincoln uses this car as an opportunity to return to names instead of designations, and Mark R would be a vast improvement.

    More than that - it should return as a Continental....
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    NvBanker,

    Congrats...although when it's time to replace the Explorer, it won't be what and how we see it now, as it is and have known it in the past.

    On the MKR,

    Blur your eyes a bit, and that what you'll get. You need to decipher them a bit to get the real story on them. The grill will be toned down, just a tad. The front and rear bumpers I can tell you won't make it, because crash standard's wouldn't allow for it. Other things such as beltline, greenhouse shape (not design), tapered "C" Pillar, fender details, etc can easily make it.

    But like anything else, much will depend on consumer clinics. But it's safe to say that it'll definatly be a dramatic face on that, and the MKS. And this pays homage to the 41' Conti/Zephyr grills/details.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Congrats...although when it's time to replace the Explorer, it won't be what and how we see it now, as it is and have known it in the past.

    Yes, I've heard that - and it doesn't please me. Why screw with the best selling SUV on the planet? I, and lots of others, still need a mid sized truck based SUV that will tow a decent sized trailer behind us. What am I supposed to do when it does become time to replace it if it's gone? Get a 4-Runner? I've not had 6 of 'em for no reason - they, IMO are the best designed mid sized SUV on the road.
  • displacedtexandisplacedtexan Member Posts: 364
    And this pays homage to the 41' Conti/Zephyr grills/details.

    Yes, I can see that. Very nice. It's a nice interpretation of that original classic look.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Well such things are still up in the air. Doesn't mean the vehicle will be whimpier, rather, the construction of it will differ from how/what we were used to.

    Ever seen a LR LR3? Very capable vehicles, and their construction isn't typical of what the breed traditionally has benefitted from...
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Ah hah...... Got it. Thanks. I can die happy now..... :blush:
  • ehaaseehaase Member Posts: 328
    Some on other message boards speculate that the Explorer name will merely be used on the next generation Freestyle.

    However, a Ford enthusiast website, about five years ago, posted internal documents showing that the Explorer would move to a unitized body by the end of the decade. This website got into legal trouble for posting many internal Ford documents.

    If Ford does produce the MKR, I don't think it will be out before the 2010 model year.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Well, fact is the Jeep Grand Cherokee is a unibody, always has been, so I guess I should change my thinking a bit... But if they lighten the towing capacity by much, it's gonna hurt.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Don't forget the LR3 also uses a uni-body and Fields said they would be looking to share more global platforms.....
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    And we're assuming L/R remains a Ford Division? Personally, I hope it does, as I think properly run, L/R & Jaguar could make money. Here's how:

    Combine Jaguar & Land Rover dealers, so they have both cars and SUVs to sell on a related basis, ie; Land Rover is Jaguar's truck division and vice versa. Throw in Volvo if you want to, but not essential.

    Put someone in charge of the Jolly Old Company who can do what is necessary to save the brand and make some money. Merge the two if necessary, and clean out the head office. It could be done. They both have some prestige, and Land Rover is putting out some great looking product now. Jag is putting out quality now. Between the two, they should be able to merge the quality with the good looks, and create a great dual brand.
  • fsmmcsifsmmcsi Member Posts: 792
    Do you think Ford has that much time left? Whatever they are going to do, it seems that they had better do it in less than 3 years.

    As for Lincoln, they really need to focus on rear wheel drive V8 vehicles, or rear-based all-wheel drive. I also have a new Explorer (EB V8). Rear wheel drive and a V8 are features I will always want. A large sedan with a wide and large trunk (revised Town Car??) could give me the cargo capacity I need. No matter how good, a 6 sounds like a 6, and I much prefer an 8. The new 3-valve 4.6 sounds much better than the old 2-valve version, and the additional power is certainly welcome.
  • displacedtexandisplacedtexan Member Posts: 364
    Combine Jaguar & Land Rover dealers, so they have both cars and SUVs to sell on a related basis, ie; Land Rover is Jaguar's truck division and vice versa. Throw in Volvo if you want to, but not essential.

    That sounds like a capital idea. LR and Jaguar seem like a natural mix. Volvo should also be included as an entry point to Jaguar.
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    Mercedes = Cars & SUV's
    BMW = Cars & SUV's
    Lexus = Cars & SUV's
    Infiniti = Cars & SUV's

    Jaguar = Cars. No SUV's
    Land Rover = No Cars just SUV's
    Hmmm...That's a tough one.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    No matter how good, a 6 sounds like a 6, and I much prefer an 8. The new 3-valve 4.6 sounds much better than the old 2-valve version, and the additional power is certainly welcome.

    It is a sweet engine isn't it? AND, it's getting better mileage than my old 4.6L does in my Mountaineer too. Mo power, mo mileage. Now, we're talking!!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Jaguar = Cars. No SUV's
    Land Rover = No Cars just SUV's
    Hmmm...That's a tough one.


    I know! You'd think they could think of that without my help, wouldn't you?? :blush:
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    They've been combining Jag and Land Rover dealerships for several years now. Not sure how many succeeded but that was the plan.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I'll take your word for that - they have done nothing like that where I live, but it only makes sense that they would.
  • displacedtexandisplacedtexan Member Posts: 364
    They've been combining Jag and Land Rover dealerships for several years now. Not sure how many succeeded but that was the plan.

    Not here. Jag and Volvo are in a combined dealership, though. LR belongs to someone else.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    In Vegas, Jaguar and Porsche share a dealership. Land Rover and Volvo are stand alone stores.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Obviously dealers are independent businesses but Ford was encouraging the combination of Jag and LR dealers because it gives a more complete lineup under one roof. I don't know if they're still pursuing it or if they gave up but at one time it was a goal to combine them where possible.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Darn good idea - I hope they haven't give up on it. It's complicated though, where each store is currently by different entities, to combine them - unless they duplicate the exposure, often on one street, and give each the other brand to sell as well. :confuse:
  • pnewbypnewby Member Posts: 277
    :D I agree on at least a couple of points. The '06 Explorer is great, the V8 is really smooth and sounds like the Mustang (as it should). Had lots of compliments, which I never had on the '02. Even with the early build issues, the '00 LS is still my all time favorite. Lincoln needs to get back to Continentals, Mark ?? and the LS along with a good Town Car. The Jag and L/R dealer here (Lex., Ky) is combined and seems to do well. Volvo is sold by the Caddy dealer, and seems to do well there. The MKR and MKS look good, and need to be rebadged Continental and Mark IX or whatever. And if stretched and a little taller may make a great Town Car. BTW- Great to hear from you ANT14, I was fearing you had been shown "the way forward", but glad you are still around.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    NvBanker, The next Explorer will have a different OUTLOOK in life, but be a leader in a few other aspects considering the competition.

    Pnewboy,
    No chance of that ever happening actually.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    OUTLOOK Oh no, they're not going to change the name, are they???? IMO, the Fusion should still be called Taurus. No offense, I think you were on that project.....
    I just hate to see brands with so much equity scrapped. As evidently great as the new Fusion is, it would have revived the Taurus brand just as easily, BUT, didn't start with an F. I guess Faurus was too dangerous....... :P
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Howard - you might want to peruse the new Saturn SUV offerings for midsize unibody SUVs....... ;)
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Not so sure it would have revived the Taurus name as much as the Taurus name would have pulled it down to rental car status. If they had brought it out 6 or 7 years ago I think they could have kept Taurus but not now. Too much baggage.
  • ehaaseehaase Member Posts: 328
    Maybe ANT14 means that the Explorer will be similar to the Saturn Outlook.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Ok, alright, I get it (dense sometimes) but (barrrrfffff), just the thought of buying something "like" a Saturn makes me ill..... Clearly, I'll be getting a 4 Runner, I guess.
  • arumagearumage Member Posts: 922
    I heard that the Explorer was going more towards a lower volume, off-road type vehicle for the future. I thought the Fairlane was going to become the more "Outlook" type vehicle.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    It's ironic how the media reported that the Explorer would be car-based, everyone perceived it to be D3 based. Has anyone Intercepted the idea that the next Explorer could be a RWD offspring of something else? I mean, the Freestyle was/is an offspring of the 500.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Oooh....good one!
  • scootertrashscootertrash Member Posts: 698
    subtle.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Have we "explored" the idea of dropping the "F" words yet, or will we have to call it the Fexplorer? :blush:

    I get your clue (and thank you) but have little imagination how it will look or work out. I just hope Ford does a good job with it - no door panels like my new Explorer has please! (Hope that designer was fired "way backward".)

    FYI: I'm picking up a Red Freestyle for a friend next Friday....a blonde headed Grandma..... I finally get the market for that car! Personally, I like it. From a practicality standpoint, it's probably the best car out there today. Just not "attractive" enough, I guess. But, I digress.

    Trying to think of something topical to say here - ummmm - wonder what the Lincoln version may be???
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Many people were shown the way "Ford-ward". My favorite was the one in charge of the new Escape. OUT!!

    All venues as usual on all vehicles are being explored, and researched to death. Of course, it's the support of the publics comments which help. But there's a very cohesive plan overall, and definately much more going on, and debuting, that people expect.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Which project are you on - still Fusion? It's getting rave reviews from even harsh critics...

    I'm serious when I say this - if Lincoln can come out with even a "similar" car to the Lexus LS, not saying it needs to be comparable because that's a price point Lincoln can't get to, I'd be very happy to drive a Lincoln again. Still like the feel of Fords and especially Lincolns.

    BTW, thanks for your nagging on the hp of the 4.6L and getting it boosted. The engine in my new Explorer is a HOOT, I'll tell ya! Makes that car even 10x more fun to drive than my 04 with the 4.6L 2V.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    "But there's a very cohesive plan overall, and definately much more going on, and debuting, that people expect. "

    ANT, revolution happens when somthing coming out that people do not expect, like original Taurus.

    Lincoln MKR is also something no one expected. But it is not production model alas.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    Nv, sometimes we consider ANT as being kind of G_d, I mean Ford version :) So if we pray loud enough it may happen.
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    Well, ANT may need to do some praying of his own.

    Today I saw pix of the new redesigned Ford 500. Ahem, ... well I guess if u like the Edge and the Fusion you might like the 500 now. But it's still bland and boring, though at least it's got the 3.5 in it now.

    Also, the redesigned Focus is being shown and geez, it aint much better either.

    Ford better hit something out of the park soon or it's game over.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    I can go on and on, with the 500, but this is MKS, so I'll have the topic police cite me.

    The MKR is the styling direction the MKS will undertake, well at least for the front that is. But there's some elements that the MKR displayed which can't be changed on the MKS, because it's too far along in development, other than the front area will be changed dramatically as well. Side stampings, flanks, pillars are usually harder to alter at this stage.

    The MKR is cohesive enough to produce, provided there's some up-roar over it. Ford was surprised it even made the front cover of a magazine, so thats one good step...The publics acceptance.
  • displacedtexandisplacedtexan Member Posts: 364
    Is it too late to change the MKS' hind end? Other than that, I warmed up to the car.

    If it adopts styling cues of the MKR so that there's some Lincoln family resembalance, I think that would be a very good thing. As for the MKR, this member of the public accepts it!
  • laxmanlaxman Member Posts: 30
    So MKS will take a few cues from the MKR. Understandably so as it looks like the Interceptor has taken some views from the old Continental concept from 3 or 4 years ago. I haven't warmed up to the MKR but I really like what I had seen from the MKS. I liked the Continental concept and the Interceptor concept now. I just wander if anything will come to a dealer showroom in the next 3 years.

    Also, if the MKS is getting a little bit of a makeover when might we see the next version as the MKS is no longer on Lincoln's website?
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Might not see the production version, till it's ready to debut. But yes, there's still things that will be tweaked prior to that. I believe it was Fields request to send it back and tweak it a bit more, make it bold.

    The Interceptor points to the direction of where Ford is taking it's RWD sedan market. To have a cohesive plan, just ask yourself how many different model vehicles(S) can be built upon such a platform. This also dispells rumors that the D2C Mustang platform wasn't flexible. Anything can, just depends upon the investment risk your willing to make.

    And as usual, flexible manufacturing is vital for a financially feasable plan. Just like the 500/FS/MTG can switch from one model to another, with a flick of a switch depending on how well one model is selling over another.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    ANT, I heard that only one RWD platform will be supported and most definitely Australian one. SO why do you say "This also dispells rumors that the D2C Mustang platform wasn't flexible"?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    Maybe the D2C will be the new Aussie platform as well?

    I think you just need to Explore the other options.
  • savethelandsavetheland Member Posts: 671
    Don't tell me that new Explorer will use stretched Mustang platform!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    ANT already intimated that the new Explorer will be car based. What do we care which one it is, as long as it's RWD configuration?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    You haven't been paying attention, have you?
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    The more vehicles that can be supported by a platform that's workable in other markets, is also a plus, always explore your options. Take note, some countries require different safety requirements on certain vehicles.
  • brucelincbrucelinc Member Posts: 815
    For what it's worth, I like the styling of the MKR and I am glad to hear some of its cues will end up on the production MKS. The split grill theme would help but I think the rear of the MKS could use some work, too.

    More importantly to me, what do we know about the engine to be used in the production MKS? I assume a NA 3.7 will be used at launch. How about the Twinforce? If the NA 3.7 is used, will it feature direct injection or other upgrades to provide more power? I drove an MKZ recently and was impressed with the smoothness and refinement of the 3.5 but the performance was disappointing. If they just bump the displacement to 3.7 and stick it in the heavier MKS, I can't imagine that being acceptable for a "flagship" Lincoln.

    Also, any word on whether the production MKS will have that nifty D-L shifter that heyjewel and I are so impressed with? ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.