Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

General Motors discussions

1216217219221222558

Comments

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...have mostly been vertical bar affairs since 1949 but there have been variations - mostly thin horizontal bars or, in 1958, 160 small chrome squares.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,676
    What kind of grill pattern would you recommend?

    I think any change they make they lose their recognition as a Buick. The LuCerne has changed the shape but still retains some of the Buick recognizability.

    If they change then they lose some people; if they keep the shape they lose some people who won't even look closer at the product.

    It's good that you recognized the durability of the Centurys even though they were lower level rental versions.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    New grill is on the way
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,676
    Can you share about it or hint?

    I would suspect something with more angularity along with sharper front and rear body corners--little more Sonatalike or Azeralike? That would take away the feminine look it has now.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • lahirilahiri Member Posts: 394
    It was generated by dealer's computer. I didn't want to remove the actual one on the window just to scan. Got the same one from Pontiac's website as well.

    Pontiac Website Link to Dealer's Inventory

    Do you think that someone hacked GM's website?
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    No, I think there is an error somewhere.
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    Your point?

    I can't say what the LaCrosse looks like in my opinion?
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    I cannot find a picture but there is an article with a show car in the background.

    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=109673

    Basically I wouls assume that Buick would continue the grill treatment that started with the Lucerne and continued with the Enclave.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Sorry, of course you can. However my response was to the start of the discussion that said the LaCrosse looked like an Impala.
  • kc_flynnkc_flynn Member Posts: 45
    Make the front a little sportier similar to a Pontiac (not too much though), and maybe change the logo.
  • nanc3nanc3 Member Posts: 8
    I doubt it. I noticed this two weeks ago for the Vibe (also 17/25). I notified the web site people via an online feedback form. I did receive an email confirming receipt. That was on August 31. Part of the reply: "Thank you for contacting Pontiac. We welcome the opportunity to individually review your e-mail and we will have a response to you very shortly. Every effort will be made to respond to your email within 1 business day." Yeah right.

    My guess is that they are lazy/disinterested. What a shame.
    GM could get a lot of valuable information just by having a few managers with some clout read these message boards and also spot check the GM web sites. If I was a manager in GM and found out about this MPG debacle, I'd be on it immediately. Maybe they found that the web site programmer is outsourced in India so they can't communciate real time, and would have no clout anyway! Ha!
  • nanc3nanc3 Member Posts: 8
    About GM styling: I think styling is one thing that GM historically had in its favor, and is probably what kept them #1 into the 70s. However they were caught and passed. Their better efforts seem to do OK (Cadillacs for example) but they let the ball drop on what should be bread-and-butter models like Malibu and Impala. They totally missed a great opportunity with Monte Carlo. Aztek just about killed Pontiac. I bought a Vibe this year which gets compliments on its cuteness (fortunately no one has mentioned Aztek to me), but the Vibe does have the oft-ridiculed Pontiac lower cladding. Pontiac probably lost a few sales because of the cladding (plus very little advertising.)
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,676
    They missed the boat about 1980 when they didn't take the cheap econobox small car competition seriously and build quality into theirs to squelch the imports. Once people bought the Datsuns, Toyotas, and Civics as economy cars and found that they had few things breaking since they were basic without lots of options, they took on the mindset that they were better.

    As the people got older the imports changed their cars to meet the needs of the aging buyers and incomes of those buyers. The domestics didn't want/weren't able because of wasteful costs to put out a loss leader to compete with them and best them.

    Now we're here with imports building cars here for companies headquartered there.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    The 2007 EPA guide has the G6 with 3.9 V6 rated at 17/24.
  • m1miatam1miata Member Posts: 4,551
    I stand corrected :surprise: There is such a car with horrible gas mileage. The G6 GTP with the 3.9 V6. Ouch! Which is fairly bad :(
    -Loren
  • lahirilahiri Member Posts: 394
    The programmers in India are probably using kilometers and liters instead of miles and gallons :D

    But the dealer has wrong information too. I stopped by to see the new G6. It's not just the website. GM's entire window sticker generating system must be a mess.
  • rorrrorr Member Posts: 3,630
    "They missed the boat about 1980 when they didn't take the cheap econobox small car competition seriously and build quality into theirs to squelch the imports."

    Absolutely correct.

    "Once people bought the Datsuns, Toyotas, and Civics as economy cars and found that they had few things breaking since they were basic without lots of options, they took on the mindset that they were better."

    Huh? You make it sound like the unreliable reputation for the domestics was due to the OPTIONS breaking. Not the case. The basic Toyota/Honda was simply more reliable (and DROVE BETTER) than the comparable domestic, REGARDLESS of the 'option' level. They took on the mindset? Maybe those small cars simply WERE better than the comparable domestic.

    "As the people got older the imports changed their cars to meet the needs of the aging buyers and incomes of those buyers."

    Damn their unfair business practices. Imagine, actually CHANGING their cars to meet the needs of their customers....

    My .02 on 'why' we're here:

    Generally speaking, we're here because Toyota/Honda were better managed, with better engineering, and with better quality of assembly than the comparable domestics. For too long the domestics HAD counted on attempting to undercut the imports on price and wave the flag to keep their market share. In short, the imports KNEW they would have to actually compete while the domestics felt the only real competition was themselves. They overlooked the imports. And it's come back to haunt them.

    The problem now is that folks left the domestics because the domestics screwed up. If Toyota/Honda DON'T screw up, what would it take to lure those folks (or their kids) back?
  • lahirilahiri Member Posts: 394
    Are you sure that's not an error? 17/24 is close to the 99 Blazer that I owned. The 4.3L V6 in Blazer was rated by EPA at 16/20 (and in reality it was something like 15/21). G6's styling won't help if the engines remain this thirsty.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    The 3.9 is a large, sport engine option. People who buy sporting options and sports cars expect they will get less gas mileage than people who buy economy options. People who buy economy options understand that their cars will not drive as fast as the sports options.

    This is the same for every make of car that offers multiple options. This is nothing unique to GM or Pontiac. Yet it nevertheless has consumed your attention for an entire day.

    The 2.4 and 3.5 options get considerably better mileage. Currently, there is some malfunction with the Pontiac site, as it shows stickers for all engine options with the same gas mileage.

    I buy most of my merchandise on line. I have encountered errors on many websites for top end merchandise. Because such errors happen most companies, GM included, provide ways to contact product experts, either by e-mail or telephone. I've found that contacting the expert is a good way to get the correct information about the product.
  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    the same engine for the 2006 G6 was rated 18/25 - note this is the 3.9 performance engine with automatic.
  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    The 3.6 dohc v6 with the six speed automatic probably has the best performance and does get 20/28 I think.
  • lahirilahiri Member Posts: 394
    Well, bad in comparison to Accord's V6 which offers similar power output. Hope 3.6L V6 will solve that problem (as mentioned by sls002).

    Also, I'm happy to see the I4 now offers more power - 170 HP. Hope Malibu gets this engine too for 2007 model year.
  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,593
    What kind of grill pattern would you recommend?

    Right now the grill looks like this :D only a little more oval.

    Something more daring, more original, more creative would help. Nash had that same grill in 1950!

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • njstsxnjstsx Member Posts: 2
    I think that the styling is the one thing GM needs to succeed. They need a more sexy styling influence or go retro. They are just sitting when they need to get up because the Japanese automakers are taking over. German and Japanese cars have so much more appeal. Another thing is the interior. GM makes some of the worst interiors in the business. They are so plasticky and bland. If they dont make a turn soon they will regret it.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    Malarky.

    Honda does not have an entgne like the 3.9. The 3.9 hits high torque low and keeps it over a wide band. An engine for people who like to launch. 3.6 and its ToyHon engines with autos at least are for people wanting smooth cruising.

    Nothing wrong with either. Don't know why all you folks want the same thing for everyone. I kind of like going to the jazz club one night, the opera another, the cinema the next. Guess others want to stop for McDonalds and go home for the MASH reruns on Nick at Night every evening. Fortunately, in autos there is still some cariety.

    The 3.5 is closer to what Honda does. And gets better mpgs.

    The I4 with better hp (and better mpgs than the messed up link you post) is larger than the earlier version (.2 larger, to be exac. .1 larger than what ToyHon offer -- or are they up to 2.4 now?)
  • 210delray210delray Member Posts: 4,721
    Toyota Camry and Honda Accord 4-cylinders are both up to 2.4L now.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    that the 3.9 is actually a police car engine. It's meant to be rugged and durable and over-built, but that's going to cost when it comes to fuel economy. The 3.9 is "the" police car engine for the Impala, and GM is probably offering it in civilian applications to help spread out the costs.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    I thought that to be the case, but am pressed for time tonight and could not verify.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    Yeah. An engine for nailing it. Not for everyone. But cool for those who like it.

    Now why the Pontiac web site is showing its mpgs across the board is a great mystery.

    The whole y2k scam exposed geeks for the no nothing phonies they are. GM should know enough to be watching them like hawks. They aren't, and the geeks are messing up per usual :sick:
  • drjamesdrjames Member Posts: 274
    "Now we're here with imports building cars here for companies headquartered there."

    Is that worse than the companies headquatered here (domestics) who build cars over there (Mexico, China...) for sale here, at the same time closing plants and relocating those jobs too?
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    The whole y2k scam exposed geeks for the no nothing phonies they are. GM should know enough to be watching them like hawks. They aren't, and the geeks are messing up per usual

    You've got that. It's the geek's fault that the world's #1 car company has so many errors on their web site. And don't forget those NAFTA people. The government isn't doing enough for GM. The states are giving tax credits to the foreign makes. It's all WalMart's fault for hiring workers on the cheap. Why can't we let auto workers make $150K year with their high school (maybe) educations? Lastly, Consumer Reports is biased. They never rate GM well enough, as they are paid off by everybody who is against GM. And the styling is fine, I like cladding. The Aztec wasn't so bad.

    How can a company be successful when the unfair world wants quality checks and competitive products... what a conspiracy!
  • driver100driver100 Member Posts: 32,593
    They need a more sexy styling influence or go retro.

    I was just thinking that the other day. Saw an attractive lady drive up in a new LaCrosse and the first thought I had was, that doesn't look right, her husband must work at GM or it is his car.

    Now an attractive women's car could be a Mustang, G6, almost any sports car. Attractive practical women who like cars that are easy to handle choose Toyotas, Hondas, Mazdas etc. Classy ladies choose Mercedes, sexy ladies who appreciate cars drive BMW's and Audis. Sexy ladies who are a little rugged (nothing wrong with that) drive SUV's and pick-ups. Adventurous women drive PT Cruisers. One sexy car is an Altima, practical yet good styling.
    But what women chooses by free choice a LaCrosse? Not being mean, but I can see room and comfort.....but it sure aint sexy (the car at least).

    2017 MB E400 , 2015 MB GLK350, 2014 MB C250

  • C2456RonC2456Ron Member Posts: 58
    I have no idea where you have any TASTE at all in cars, and NOW you want to Profile Ladies in something to make anyone turn their heads for a 2nd look? I see absolutely No Class in Compact 4 Door Foreign Cars, or American for that matter! You seem to think that a 4 door Altima is Sexy? You also seem to think that a woman has to be rugged to drive an SUV or Pickup Truck? I have to respectfully disagree with your Profiling or choice of Ladies in particular vehicles! If you want to see a woman in a Sexy car, put her into a Corvette, Viper, 2 door Mercedes Benz, Mustang, Monte Carlo SS, or even some of the more affordable, better looking Foreign 2 door cars, HOT 2 door Trucks (even 4 doors, with hidden back doors, NOT Crew Cabs, half the length of a Football Field) or good looking SUV's, but there is nothing Sexy about anyone/anything in a 4 door (very bland, stereotype Soccer Mom, Grocery Getter, or Family Taxi Cab) vehicle! IF you really want to see a Sexy Lady in a Sexy car, you have to put her into a 2 door vehicle, one that will turn heads and take notice, you will NEVER turn heads with a 4 door vehicle, unless it is a Bugatti, possibly a Charger, maybe JUST maybe a BMW, but not many affordable 4 door vehicles out there that would make ME want to take a 2nd look at the car, which would then make me look at WHO is driving it! That would be like saying a Prius is a SEXY vehicle!!! That Prius has to be one of the ugliest :sick: vehicles out there, the ONLY thing it has going for it, is it's economy that is ALL, as far as looks :P , I wouldn't drive a Prius unless it was really dark, and in a city where nobody knows me!!! But this is only MY humble opinion, I have NEVER owned a 4 door vehicle, and safe to say never will, and I've purchased a new car every 2 years (or less) since 1970!!!
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    I saw a recent Saturn in which people kept asking "Is That a Saturn" or "That's a Saturn" and it really caught my eye. This was due to the Sky and Aura. Has GM finally seen the light with the whole U.S. Opel styling theme? Is Saturn on the upswing now? What do you think of their new found attrativeness? Well scratch that awful Ion and Vue from your mind when you answer that question...lol!

    Now I look on their website and they have a pic of the new Outlook. While not as hot as the Aura or Sky, it does looks worlds better than the Vue and Ion.

    Thoughts? Is Saturn on the right track? What do you think of the Sky and Aura?

    M
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    So is GM styling working or is something else helping? So far this year 2 qtrs of profit from a company that should have been bankrupt by now. End of 3rd qtr coming quick. Will a profit hurt the negotiations with the UAW? Will a loss put them out of business?

    So far this year, GM's
    resale value is up 7 percentage points on cars and 3 percentage points on
    trucks.

    Bob Lutz, earlier this
    year said "GM" U.S. market share is sustainable in the low-to-mid-20 percentage
    range over time.

    The average age of a Chevrolet buyer is 46, matching that of the industry

    The average new car buyer holds on to his
    car for 52 months and 82,000 miles.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Nippon,

    OMG, 35% of october sales, you got to be kidden :surprise:

    Rocky
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    The story here is that this “different kind of company” is now selling
    products with a definite European flavor as part of a broader
    product-sharing strategy between it and Opel. While the Aura rides on the
    same 112.3-in. Epsilon wheelbase as the Pontiac G6 and Malibu Maxx, the
    exterior styling, interior fitments and driving dynamics give the
    impression that it is totally different.

    The detailing is impressive, from the
    larger projector-beam headlamps to the use of chromed accents on the window
    surround, side molding and door handles on the upscale XR model.
    Even the smallest detail is not overlooked, including lips instead of plain
    cutouts over the exhaust tips.

    Inside, the rich look of the Aura concept car has been faithfully executed
    in our test vehicle, which was equipped with the textured two-tone Moroccan
    leather interior. The dash is covered with high-quality, soft-touch
    materials and even the center stack, which is usually done up in matte
    black, has a textured gray finish. The analog instruments have carbon-fiber
    facing in the center, a white background behind the graphics, and lighted
    instrument pointers. The fit and finish are top-notch – even the base XE
    model has the same level of attention to interior detail, but offers up
    cloth seats (with a heat option) instead of the leather.

    The doors and rear decklid close with resounding thunks. This
    carved-from-billet feel to the body is reinforced out on the open road,
    where the cabin is Lexus-quiet, thanks to the use of acoustic laminated
    glass on the front doors and windshield as well as the extensive use of
    silent steel (a steel-and-composite sandwich) in the firewall.

    Aura feels surefooted with nicely controlled body movements over twists and
    turns. The long wheelbase also helps the ride – it’s a nice blend of Euro
    taut with American comfort. The steering is a hydraulic-boosted
    rack-and-pinion system, which has better feel and more precise action than
    the electric boost found in base Malibu and G6 models.

    it does deliver on one of the brand’s founding
    tenets: tremendous value. fully competitive with loaded Toyota Camrys and Honda Accords and
    less than a comparably equipped VW Passat.

    The Aura delivers solid road manners, great looks inside and out and
    tremendous value. As the name implies, it’s the perfect halo car for the
    new Saturn.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Ongoing talks between General Motors, Nissan Motor Co. and Renault SA could lead to a limited partnership on specific models, but is unlikely to produce a broad alliance, a leading private equity investor said.

    "I am not sure where the GM-Nissan-Renault thing goes," said Tom Stallkamp, an industrial partner with Ripplewood Holdings, at the Reuters Autos Summit on Tuesday, Sept. 12. "There is so much overlap on that."

    Stallkamp said he sees more of a product-related partnership, as seen in Europe where rival automakers have collaborated on powertrains and other components.

    "I see it more toward that product-specific joint ventures and collaborations ... than let's just throw our companies together," he said.

    Stallkamp, who is a former Chrysler president, said there may be opportunities for the three companies to partner in new markets such as India or China.

    "Maybe there's something in these talks that has nothing to do with North America," he said "Maybe it's, for the sake of argument, Bolivia (where) they are going to come out with a truck."

    GM and Nissan-Renault have launched a 90-day study into the possibilities of a three-way alliance, and small teams of executives will report back to the chief executives in mid-October.
  • lweisslweiss Member Posts: 342
    Maybe Bob Lutz is right about GM's market share stabilizing in the lower 20% range (or maybe it is wishful thinking or public relations on his part!). At one time they were aiming for 29% but maybe they are facing reality. With fuel prices stabilizing for now and with some upcoming models coming out over the next few years (and they had better be nicely styled and technically up to date inside and out), they may be in a position to stem their losses. I would just hope that GM's management can see the error of their ways in the past and learn from them. Companies have come back from bankruptcy or almost bankruptcy and prospered. But they need more than hope, they need flawless design and execution. Wall Street thinks they have a chance- GM's stock is at a 3 year high.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Style wise the Sky is a big yes and the Aura not so much. Way to watered down from the sexy showcar that was supposedly 95% or something complete to production.

    FWIW, I gave the Sky a look when they first came out and while very good looking in the flesh, the low squishy seats, the need to prop yourself up just to see over your shoulder, the balky shifter and some interior fit and finish issues were enough to walk away (I wasn't really a serious buyer that day anyways).

    And as far as the Aura goes, if you like the design and you want to save a few bucks, just buy a G6 sedan. The Aura interior upgrade may be worth the price of admission to some though.
  • merc1merc1 Member Posts: 6,081
    What I can't understand about the Sky is how in the world anyone sighted at GM could have signed off on that soft top fit. It looks like it is tearing apart even when up. How can an entire group of people responsible for a car miss something so obvious?

    M
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    I have seen two Aura's in person and like them a good deal. The metal trim interior is very Opel looking.

    I am more excited about the forthcoming Saturn Astra and the next Gen Vue in either full hybrid or the value hybrid.

    I expect the new Corsa is going to find its way into the Saturn show rooms sooner or later as well.

    You and I have talked a lot about Saab in the past. Don't know how GM could work this with the dealers, but I think a Saab/Saturn combination dealership like they have in Canada would really start pushing Saturn in the direction it was originally intended.

    As for the SKY, I think your criticisms somewhat misplaced. The '06 line up is sold out. Almost half the '07s are sold. The Redline is probably going to sell even quicker. You may not like it. That is fair. But the people buying do. Long and short, as a two time Roadster owner and long time Roadster fan, I really like the idea of being able to tuck the top under the trunk and can live with the short comings in luggage space and how it looks top up. Given Sky's sales, it seems enough of the market is with me to make it a good idea.
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    I have yet to see a Kappa with the top up surprisingly. I didn't even try the top mechanism when I was at the dealer. But I can see how those two humps on the rear deck can add an element of complexity to the softtop design. In the pictures, it looks like it is pulled pretty tight.

    image

    I'd be curious how Edmunds long term Solstice holds up although I expect in sunny california, they just leave the top down.
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    You've got that. It's the geek's fault that the world's #1 car company has so many errors on their web site. And don't forget those NAFTA people. The government isn't doing enough for GM. The states are giving tax credits to the foreign makes. It's all WalMart's fault for hiring workers on the cheap. Why can't we let auto workers make $150K year with their high school (maybe) educations? Lastly, Consumer Reports is biased. They never rate GM well enough, as they are paid off by everybody who is against GM. And the styling is fine, I like cladding. The Aztec wasn't so bad.

    Thanks for putting a lot of words in my mouth, pal.

    Go back five years here. Look at all my posts. There are hundreds of them. I have never had a bad word to say about NAFTA. I don't support tax breaks for anyone. I would never shop WalMart - they have a lot of junk there - but could care less how the company operates. I have stated many times that the unions have sweetheart deals. I blasted Aztec styling but pointed out that GM made a relatively good save with the Rendevous.

    My point here was directed to one area: Techies. And how bad a job they do not just with the GM site (and by the way, we have only pointed out one error, as best I can see), but on the many sites I visit.

    I work with techies a lot in my job. I consistently run into their day to day inability to listen to what I say, to explain what they can do, and to make a product that I want. I watch them like a hawk because I know they will mess up otherwise. And as my post points out, I blame the GM market people for not watching the techies closely.

    A little sensitive about that aren't you? Given your inability to follow my points, I wonder perhaps if it cuts to close to what you do.
  • lahirilahiri Member Posts: 394
    I will carefully read the Edmunds' review (which at this point seems positive). After reading Edmunds' review of VUE, I decided to not waste time test-driving VUE.
  • au1994au1994 Member Posts: 3,705
    The Aura will get a look from me when its time to replace my wife's Volvo S40. I've not seen one in person, but reading about it and the pics I've seen look good.

    The Outlook looks good as well. Not in the market for a SUV/Crossover, but would consider it if I was.

    Sky is a good first effort. If GM listens to the complaints/critics (something they have not been good about)it could be a hit. But it is what it is, a niche car, never going to pull a company out of the hole financially.

    Will be interested to see what Ion replacement looks like as it is supposed to be heavily Opel influenced as well.

    2024 Jeep Grand Cherokee L Limited Velvet Red over Wicker Beige
    2024 Audi Q5 Premium Plus Daytona Gray over Beige
    2017 BMW X1 Jet Black over Mocha

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    in person a week ago, and was favorably impressed. The sales folks try to steer you towards the XR if you are under 50, and with good reason, but even the base XE is very competitive in terms of interior and fuel economy, as long as you WANTED a V-6.

    However, the XR is a very nice vehicle, and really shines the spotlight on the fact that the previous L-series (of which they still have PLENTY sitting around the lot looking kind of sad) was stuck in 1993 all these years. And that was 1993 GM, which was significantly behind 1993 rest-of-the-market, IMO. At $25K for the base XR, which includes the 3.6L DOHC engine from the uptrim Caddy CTS and upper-grade Lucernes (all cars costing more than $30K), the price is just right, I think. However, it will not hit Toyota/Honda where it hurts - the sales of their 4-cylinder Camrys and Accords. It is more expensive and has lower fuel economy than those models. But for V-6 shoppers, I think Aura will steal a few CamCord buyers. Or maybe a lot of them.

    After seeing Aura, I can't wait to see if they can achieve the same level of execution on the Ion replacement. I sat in an Ion again while I was there, and the stark contrast with the Aura just makes it seem disgusting that they still sell such a substandard product. They should have just gone without a small car for a year while they prepared the Ion replacement.

    Now the Saturn salesman I was chatting with also mentioned that they will have Aura Green Lines by the first of the year, and that they are just starting to get Vue Green Lines. I will be very interested to see the roll-out of their hybrids, and read up on how well people do for fuel economy in those models.

    I do like the looks of the Outlook (that's the clone of the Buick Enclave, right?), and it certainly seems fully competitive in its segment, although Pilot and Highlander are just about to be fully updated, so we have to wait and see what those models look like after that.

    Overall, Saturn's future is much brighter now than it was a year or two ago, IMO. There was a cheerful sense of purpose and the hustle-bustle of having lots of new customers at the dealership when I was there. Of course, I also found out that one deaelr group has bought all three of the closest dealerships nearest to me, and decided that in an area of 3/4-million people, three dealerships was more than the sales demand would bear, which is why they closed the one in my county and I now have to drive 25 miles just to look at a Saturn. :-(

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    We lost two Saturn dealers in my area too, one of them being the dealer I visited. The nearest to me is about 45 mins away.
  • sls002sls002 Member Posts: 2,788
    The 4 cylinder engine and the 3.5 V6 have the same transmission but different axle ratios: the 2.4 I4 has a 3.91:1 axle while the 3.5 V6 is 3.05:1 except for the GT which is 3.29:1. The overdrive ratio for the transmission 0.68:1.

    The 3.9 V6 has a 3.69:1 axle ratio and the transmission's overdrive is 0.71:1. The manual transmission for the 3.9 engine has a 3.55:1 axle ratio and an overdrive of 0.62:1. The manual V6 is rated much better than the automatic for fuel consumption.

    The 3.6 V6 has a 2.77:1 axle ratio and an overdrive of 0.74:1.

    So what does all this mean you may ask: the 3.6 dohc v6 has an overall low gear ratio of 12.4:1; the 3.9 is only 10.8:1. The overdrive overall ratios are 2.05:1 and 2.62:1. So the 3.9 should have a worse highway rating. The GT with the 3.5 has an overall overdrive ratio that is 2.24:1, much better than the 3.9's ratio.

    The EPA 2007 prelim numbers for the G6 are:
    2.4 I4 - 23/33
    3.5 V6 - 20/29 or 20/28 with manumatic
    3.6 V6 - 20/28 (manumatic)
    3.9 V6 - 18/27 with manual six speed
    3.9 V6 - 17/24 manumatic
  • logic1logic1 Member Posts: 2,433
    However, it will not hit Toyota/Honda where it hurts - the sales of their 4-cylinder Camrys and Accords. It is more expensive and has lower fuel economy than those models. But for V-6 shoppers, I think Aura will steal a few CamCord buyers. Or maybe a lot of them.

    There will be an Aura value Green Line on the market around March. I have not heard whether there will be a full dual phase Aura hybrid.

    It seems a good sedan for the dual phase if GM plans on using dual phase in sedans. I expect at the start, anyway, GM will be using all of its dual phase supplies for the SUVs and vehicles such as the Outlook.

    After seeing Aura, I can't wait to see if they can achieve the same level of execution on the Ion replacement.

    Probably will be called the Astra. I am looking forward as well.

    I sat in an Ion again while I was there, and the stark contrast with the Aura just makes it seem disgusting that they still sell such a substandard product. They should have just gone without a small car for a year while they prepared the Ion replacement.

    Actually, GM was set to cancel the ION later this year but extended the run because sales are up modestly. It may not be the prettiest car in the world, but it is a good bargain and has a very low cost of ownership.
This discussion has been closed.