By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
-Rocky
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/car/112_0801_2008_cadillac_cts/overview.html-
13. GORGEOUS COCKPIT is as striking as CTS exterior, boasting rich materials, superb fit and finish, minimal cut-lines. Interior coverings (leatherette is standard, leather optional) are hand-cut and sewn and trimmed with French stitching. Center-stack sports satin-metallic accents or Sapele Pommele wood. "V" medallions decorate front seats (which offer optional heating and ventilation).
My point at the time was, when many of you seemed to think that the CTS was really a 5-series or E-class model, that the interior would have to be seriously upgraded if it was to compete in a more expensive price class.
Road & Track has done a comparison test too, and there is a sidebar on a 6 cylinder 5-series that they planned to include, but did not as it was priced $20,000 more than the CTS. I suppose it is a bit much for me to expect you to read something though
Always interesting how opinions diverge. One mag says not as good, another says fantastic.
-Rocky
(Know it's off-topic but still...)
JAE
SRX interior is gorgeous with cut and sewn material on the IP and doors. AND future Cadillacs will even be nicer than the CTS to compete in the segment they are aim at.
Malibu interior
http://www.chevrolet.com/2008malibu/photogallery/
The brown and black interior shows that Chevy's trying to break away from the boring beiges and grays, but why not go all the way and offer a blue or red? Heck, I would love to see a bold red and white or blue and white two-tone!
Specialization costs. That sort of thing can be done by companies who are making money hand over fist, while GM is still losing money hand over fist.
I do know the answer to this one. Used to offer red and blue interiors in Regals and Centurys. Sorry
The only vehicle cost involved is the engineering time to get the "extra" colors validated through the quality approval process (approving parts to qualified color panels) which is pretty much done by the source now which is next to nothing in cost. The other real cost is the stocking of the "extra" material at the plant. While this is a real cost it is not much. Most parts come into the plant preassembled and in build order form the source or a prebuild assembly line. While there is some cost in the above it is minimal and if GM really thought it could sell more cars in apppreciable volumes it would do it.
GM does keep a limit to the number of colors for each model for many reasons, from simplificiation at the engineering, manufacturing level and the marketing/dealer stocking level. I think it is 3 or 4 interior color choices depending on the model.
Polarizing may be a positive in terms of overall sales, since there are other coices for those who prefer another interior.
Sorry Lemko, but the 3800 is lame. Sure it's responsive to 3krpm , but after that it's a dog. I think my Suburban pulls harder at higher rpm. Not to mention it sounds like a scalded dog when pushed.
The GP at 13k miles rattles almost as much as my Suburban with 96k miles on it. Mainly from the cheap plastic panels on the passenger side of the dash. Not to mention the whole car creaks when you drive at at 45 degree angle up a curb. I guess the W platform doesn't have a very stiff structure.
The only new GM vehicle I've sampled lately was a Saturn Aura XR and overall I thought it was a huge improvement for GM. Still had some cheapness in odd areas, but probably no worse than most of the competition.
The Malibu looks pretty nice. I like the looks better than the Aura or G6 which both leave me a bit cold for one reason or another.
http://www.motortrend.com/oftheyear/car/112_0801_2008_cadillac_cts/photo_02.html- - -
The consol is mostly brightwork.
In the SRX:
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/MediaNav/year=2007/make=Cadillac/model=SRX/- - firstNav=Gallery#
You will have to click on the "interior" to see the interior but note that there is more wood around the shifter and on the consol. Also the dash has bigger pieces of wood trim.
The question is how did they do this and do it so well for the money ???? :shades:
-Rocky
Nuh uh, that was the original LS400. The CTS is the best Cadillac ever made for the money.
The question is how did they do this and do it so well for the money ????
Lots of borrowing, at onerous interest rates.
Art and Science. They took a leap and used technical grains and they just looked bad. They also used "technical" styling on the outside ands it was a hit. The interior actually used expensive materials.
What the heck does that even mean?
Caddy was showing off a CTS on the street next to Radio City a few weeks ago. It was all right. The glove box door wasn't lining up right which they should have taken care of before showing it off, but the rest of the interior was nice but not stunning. For my taste, the exterior is a little overdone. The 3 stil manages to be more conservative yet sporty.
What the heck does that even mean?
made up, not animal grains. Most surfaces in a vehicle mimic some kind of leather type. The "skin" shows random patterns. There are some technical grains that may be used on small parts like switch plates or thin trim plates but never on large parts.
In the old CTS the large IP top pad is all geometric dots or something like that. Just looked fake/cold/unfriendly. Also the huge use of black did it in also.
As it should be. Germans are not known for being anywhere near flashy. Look up the work teutonic.
Well I looked it up and everywhere it says it means to be German like. But in industry usage it means very plain/simple/to the point/"correct"/balanced.
Here is it's usage on an old Honda webpage:
The Accord has already made a significant dent in the German dominated Upper-medium D-sector. It offers not just supreme build quality with superior advanced technology to the class-leaders, it also has a distinct personality - reflected in the now infamous 'Cog' advertising. At Honda, we call this 'warm engineering'. It proves a stark contrast to the cold, impersonal approach of the Teutonic car makers.
However they are changing and the German are now getting much more expressive. Cadillac has always been more into the avant garde/bling thing.
-Rocky
But have you really looked at the G8 and seriously compared it with a German import or are you just blowing smoke
I just saw the new Chevy Malibu...WOW!!! I remember when we got our '04 Nissan Maxima and '06 Nissan Altima, and there just was not anything from GM in their class. Well, times are a' changin'. That Malibu has way better interior quality than the altima and the exterior doesn't look half bad either. Since Lutz made such a big point about the panel gaps, I took a look and they sure are tight. The car is just amazing. I love the way the doors/trunk close, the seat support, and the dampening (?) on the dials. Unfortunately, I couldn't take it out for a drive [mainly because I'm only 18 and the salespeople completely ignored me, but also] because the one I like, the LTZ was on the showroom floor and there were no V6's on the lot (I don't like I4s).
It was funny when I was there because the car had the two-tone black+brick interior and this lady said it looked ugly like that, but I thought it was okay. Definately better than pictures suggest. I had the impression that the car was much narrower and that the center stack was skinny, but it is pretty hefty in person. Of course, there are drawbacks: Nav, rear armrest; but in all honesty we got the nav on the Maxima and love it, but not on the Altima and it works well in our family to just have it on the one car because if we are going somewhere far everyone is usually together.
I guess I'm in awe because I didn't really expect to like it that much. If anyone is in the market...PLEASE...consider the Malibu, its that good; I actually wish we could have waited for it. So, I am just completely optimistic about GM's future now, there is next to no way for them not to succeed. It is not that this car will be their savior (because I don't predict 400K sales a year given perception and all), but the level of execution on this car represents a complete change in the corporate mindset and guarantees future products will measure up to and probably surpass the competition to eventually regain some marketshare in the US; Lutz talks about 25%, I don't think 30-33% is out of the question, though
Let's take it easy. The Malibu is definately a step up but we've heard this before. Being competitive in this segment is ultra-important but not one car will make or break this company. They still need to get serious about smaller cars if they're going to drive conquests. Most of the Malibus sales will be won from other GM cars. It will really take 2 or 3 solid product cycles to start winning back import buyers.
It doesn't guaranty anything about future products. Let's take it one car at a time. 3 or 4 really solid mass market cards will indicate a trend.
I just bought a brand-new Cadillac DTS Performance in Black Raven with an Ebony leather interior Friday night! Love the XM radio and cool touches like the automatic folding mirrors! It will take me a while to figure out the nav system. My previous system was a 1990 Rand-McNally road atlas.
It has not been a "radical" change. Fot the last 4 years, since Lutz entered the picture. GM has been making large strides in improvement. The LaCrosse was the first to get some action from Lutz and the interior of that vehicle was greatly improved and used better quality materials and finishes than the competitive Accord and Camry. Issue with that interior was some of the styling and it was too late for Lutz to make changes to that. Most all surfaces are soft, low gloss and used 3d graining technology.
The CTS/Lamdas/trucks are just the ones in the last year that have gotten the medias attention.
Congratulations on your new purchase, Lemko! Does the new DTS Performance replace one of your other cars, or do you have enough space to also keep your older Cadillacs and Buick(s) ?
Congrats... Now you can find your way around w/o getting a paper cut;)
What other cars in recent memory have gotten the [nearly] unanimous positive attention of the media?
SRX interior
The Solstice also got great reviews but that is one vehicle that GM cut corners to keep it under $20k. Did that because Lutz said he would sell the show car for that. Would have been better off to sell it for $21k and put $500 into the interior and trunk space. But the car did great in media and sales.
What else has been new in the last 3 years? I guess the Cobalt which is a great car but the styling has not been well received.
I find it looks very practical. In this area there have been a whole boatload of them sold. There are only a few on the Chev dealer's lot that I browsed last Saturday evening while on an outing with my kid. They must be selling them since they're not sitting.
After looking at some Ions, new and recently used, I noticed the Cobalt's price and practicality. After seeing one crash into a Saturn at 35 approx. I was further impressed.
Sometimes car impressions come from the self-declared experts in the media and the east/west coast foreign car people make an image that's not real here in flyover country. I just watched most of Motorweek on the local PBS channel. I'd forgotten what arrogance the people on there decide what to test using. Yes, I was planning to buy a Ferrari, especially the 16 cylinder model, for myself and am very interested in the long term test. Long term test choices appear to be more what car the workers wish to have fun driving than in practical cars that 90% of he American buyers would like to see tested.
Please give me reality in the media.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
The kappa cars are a good point (I think they are Lutz' first borns) but like you said there were caveats because the interior and trunk are less than perfect. I guess to that I'd argue Lutz had to come in and cut his teeth on something right away, so they were produced before the change in culture I described.
As for the Cobalt, it came in 2005 (before the Solstice) so I'm sure it was in planning before he was hired.
I mention Lutz not to suggest he's getting everything done on his own, but I think its pretty undeniable he was some sort of catalyst (I don't know how) to get from the 2004 Malibu to the '08.
There were a few changes in Lutz's philosophy over his early years at GM. At first he was cutting "unneeded" content out of current cars and asking for huge cost cuts. Some of this was needed but some was a mistake. He had the 4th and 5th APO (lighter) removed from the big trucks. An ok thing to do. His biggest was to remove ABS as standard on most cars. The competition pretty much had it optional and we were giving away cars with huge incentives. His thought was to remove this content and then get it back as optional thru customer vehicle comparisions. I mean why should someone compare a standard Camry w/o ABS to an Impala/Malibu with it? It is a $600 price difference. At the time most seemed not to care about ABS. Unfortunately (or fortunately if you were a customer) the media crucified GM for removing standard safety equipment, even though others had it optional. Lost the PR war on that one. As part of this cost reduction philosophy all his underlings cut wherever they could to please the boss. This led to even cheaper interiors, etc. and then it all caught up to him.
Then he went into an upgrade the interior and exterior mode and that is where we are today. All his underlings are fighting to get the media kudos for the new cars interiors. With the recent UAW givebacks they can actually afford to add some cost.
'02 STS, in terms of handling, comfort, chassis dynamics, and drivetrain performance?
Per features, the '07 DTS makes my '02 STS seem like a plain jane and I thought the STS was pretty well-optioned. There are some things I don't like. My STS had an automatic parking brake release whereas the DTS has the same manually operated foot brake as my girlfriend's LaCrosse. I also liked the design of the STS' steering wheel much better than the one in my new ride.