Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

General Motors discussions

1540541543545546558

Comments

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I have saved my 1989 Cadillac Brougham and I know it's not worth much to anyone else besides myself and maybe another guy I know who's a Brougham enthusiast. I kept it all these years because it was my first new Cadillac. It's got all the gold bullion in Fort Knox worth of sentimental value to me.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    If this is the best they can do after ALL this time, and with their toes to the fire of potential bankruptcy, then they will never make it as a carbuilder in the globalized market we have today. Never.

    As a truck builder, maybe.


    Well, the problem is they don't measure up with SUVs either yet. Although the TraverseAcadiaOutlookEnclave is pretty up to date, they still haven't figured out to make a third seat you can sit in, or that folds into the floor like Ford did in 2002, and Nissan has, and Chrysler has and most everybody else but Toyota has. So I'm not sure they deserve to be making trucks either.......

    I would love to see GM succeed, but I totally agree with you - the Malibu is still inferior, and sales back that up too, even with fleet sales included, they sell half of what Honda and Toyota sell in the same class. The Malibu is not yet there, and it's the best they can do.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I felt that Ford started the style trend in '53

    I agree with you. Although GM seems to get credited with leadership in the 50's, the fact is they usually played catch up to Ford in the innovation, design and feature department, but also usually outsold Ford, except in 57. The 49 Ford started the design revolution from the pre-war era. Ford always had a superior station wagon to GM, the Mustang invented the pony car, followed by the Camaro 3 years later. The Corvette preceeded the Thunderbird, but the Thunderbird was the one with the hot engine, which Corvette then had to come up with later. The list goes on with the Falcon, the downsized 62 Fairlane, etc. The boardroom over at GM always wondered how Ford got new product out so quickly, which they did - often by using old components and re-skinning old stuff. GM had a new product development process that could not be violated, making it hard to compete, but when they put a new product out, it was more new than Ford's was.

    Yes, GM did own the 50s generally, and the 60's, but they lost their leadership somewhere in the 70s, and totally abdicated in the 80's. Now is a crummy time to try to regain the glory days.......
  • stewpidasostewpidaso Member Posts: 45
    I'll admit the stats on that vehicle are impressive cooter,

    why would I weep? I think it is great and if i had the money i'd just might buy one. Although, this is diamond in the rough among many american vehicles. It is a step in the right direction. I own a 2001 gmc sierra & it has actually been a very good truck. It's just the crappy ford ranger, mercury sable & ford explorer prior that were no good. My wife always buys foreign (hyundai elantra & honda odyssey) also good no problems. Although it may have been the time frame too. the fords were from the 80's & early 90's. I'm just pissed there is no american car company that makes a good(according to CR)mpg hatchback or small crossover that I can use as a commuter. although the sierra has been good she's got to go (startin to rust-michigan winters). I'm not a die hard foreign car advocate, but they do make more cars that people want to buy. I wouldn't buy a chrysler or gm right now because of their business situation. They say ford is making better cars now but the vehicle lineup has a lot of holes in it, until next year when they come out with the fiesta hatchback, they also need a minivan. So i guess they make it hard to buy american even though I want to:)

    I proudly stand behind my name :cry:
    so stick that in your pooter, cooter!!!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    The Torrent is well accepted? Mayb e by rental fleets. Nobody else is buying them.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I wish the soup names would go away. I would love to see the legacy names return. Part of the mis-management of the company IMO was to capriciously way all the names were changed for all models.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,414
    Wildcat, Invicta, Catalina, Centurion, etc...nice names
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    and Roadmaster! Dont forget that.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I guess no-one wants to see the return of the Cutlass? Cool name, totally overused in the past at GM, but if they could limit themselves to using it for JUST ONE MODEL, I wouldn't mind seeing that come back.

    Obviously, the Corvette needs to stay, Impala, Malibu, Silverado, and Tahoe are good ones too,and........that's it I think. I only believe GM should consist of Chevy and Cadillac in the future, and my ideal Cadillac does NOT include an Escalade in the lineup. Apart from that, all the letter-designated Cadillac names suck, they should go back to real words for model names.

    And none of the other current Chevy names are keepers either, including the upcoming "Cruze". The Spark or the Beat, however, they can keep. That seems to be just right for that sort of car.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,414
    Oh yeah, certainly a keeper. A simple name like 'Limited' for a highline model works too.

    GM had it very right, once.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,414
    Impala and Malibu are good names. Chevelle is also a nice name. There are more good old names than GM can make into viable models, IMO.

    I don't like "Cruze". I generally don't like names with wrong or trendy looking spellings. Like the upcoming Kia "Koup". Give me a break.

    Cutlass is good by itself, but it loses a lot with additions stuck on to it.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    ...to get rid of is "GM". It has a connotation of everything that has been wrong with US carmakers. Rename GM to Chevrolet Motors or something else (American Engineering). GMC should only be work-duty trucks - big ones that no individuals woulb buy for personal use.

    Many of the vehicle names would be ok, it's just that there is such damage associated with the vehicles they represented that they need to go. It's easier to talk about what to keep than what to get rid of - there isn't much that should be kept that has a good reputation.

    Keep:

    CTS
    Malibu
    Suburban
    DTS

    That's about it. Can't think of any other names that really have a very positive impression.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,414
    That's an interesting strategy, making GMC the heavy duty commercial brand - no trucks normal consumers would buy. There's some sense there. I have heard defenses of GMC that it makes money etc...but really, would the GMC truck buyer defect from GM rather than buy Chevy? I can't imagine that.

    A new name for GM....that's a tough one.

    Corvette and Silverado are worthy of keeping too, of course.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    that Buick would dust off some of its old names, like LeSabre, Electra, Centurion, Wildcat. Century and Regal were decent names too, even in spite of that joke about Century being named after the median age of its owners! :P

    Of course, if Buick ultimately goes away, it's a moot point. But I like those old names better than LaCrosse and Lucerne.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I agree, there is no longer any positive brand equity with GM. However, I disagree that DTS is a keeper, they should go back to DeVille, Eldorado, Seville, etc. People buy the CTS in spite of its name, IMO. The STS is a joke because you can't tell it from a CTS, even if you're driving it. Why pay more for the extra 1 inch of shoulder and hip room you get in the car.

    Bob Lutz tried to revitalize the GM brand by putting the little badge on every car they make, which wasn't a bad idea, if the GM brand actually meant something, but the problem is, it doesn't.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Special, Century, Super, Roadmaster, Limited and, most important of all ... BUICK
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    It's too late for Buick. There's not enough equity left there, not enough product either. Buick is over.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    I agree with you, Cadillac should stick with the DeVille and other classic names. I think they still convey a certain prestige to them. What the hell does CTS convey? Sounds like a city transit company or something.

    Buick has an image problem which probably limits use of names like Century, LeSabre etc. for awhile because they currently connote "old". I always liked Invicta. They used it as the show car name for the new LaCrosse (and it may be in use in China?). Maybe the Lucurne replacement can use Electra again. A Wildcat performance car woudn't hurt their image either.

    I think Cutlass still has a ring to it since its been awhile since its been around. However, not sure how GM can use it with Olds long gone since it is so closely tied with that nameplate?

    Not sure what will happen to Pontiac yet? I think Catalina is still a great monicker. They could also use a real, American based GTO.

    Chevy should keep Corvette and Malibu. I think Nova or Corsair are better names than Cruze. In fact, they might be able to use Bel Air, Biscayne or Chevelle for it as well. Cruze just sounds hokey to me, more like something used on a customized car or a go cart. Impala probably needs a rest since it now means rental or fleet car, but its a name they can ressurect down the road and I think there is a small market for SS version cars as well.

    GMC might make sense if they put out more luxurious trucks rather than Chevy clones, although I don't really know how big that potential market is since Lincoln trucks haven't seemed to really work.

    Whatever they name them, I'm hoping GM can turn it around and get back to being a style leader in American vehicles. As they catch up with Toyota and Honda in quality, the next step should be the exciting styling leadership they had until badge engineering homogonized everything starting sometime in the 70's. No more A cars, X cars, etc. - put more individuality in the cars while using common components underneath.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    I agree with you, Cadillac should stick with the DeVille and other classic names. I think they still convey a certain prestige to them. What the hell does CTS convey? Sounds like a city transit company or something.

    Back in college, I worked as a waiter for Denny's for awhile. One of our entrees was chicken fried steak...basically a hamburger patty with fried chicken breading on it, and deep-fried. We would abbreviate it CFS. And I hate to say it, but "CTS" makes me think of it!

    I'd definitely like to see the Catalina nameplate return! As long as they don't put it on some crap car. I don't like the GX nomenclature Pontiac's using. Makes me think of an Apple product. Heck, I have a G5 sitting under my desk at work!
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    That thing got a hemi?

    No, a Core 2 Duo.

    The way car electronics are going, it's not that much of a stretch.

    Nissan gets a lot of mileage out of their "name" VQ engines. But it's still not as snazzy a name as the Rocket 88 (you could rename that the Rocket 8088....).
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    What's in a name? The Hemi comeback was pure marketing strategic genius, especially since the actual Hemi engine is nothing more than an old fashioned pushrod big american V-8 with slightly hemispherical heads, not unlike several other similar engines. But it worked. It resonated with the boomers, but also with all the younger generations too because it connoted power. It was the right name for the right idea at the time.

    If GM is going to stage a comeback, marketing will play a huge role, to be sure, but the main thing, is the product. The product must be spectacular, not a warmed over DTS called Lucerne, or an SUV in 4 flavors.....
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    That's an interesting strategy, making GMC the heavy duty commercial brand - no trucks normal consumers would buy. There's some sense there. I have heard defenses of GMC that it makes money etc...but really, would the GMC truck buyer defect from GM rather than buy Chevy? I can't imagine that.

    A new name for GM....that's a tough one.


    I can go with Silverado.

    I think GMC can mean something for construction or *really* heavy-duty trucks. Things that are 8K pounds or more. Not anything of the F150/F250 size. Purely industrial. There should be no "GMC" dealers that you or I would go to to buy something we would put in our own driveways. No rebadges of Chevies. Toyota manages without a different nameplate, so do Chrysler and Ford. GM needs to lose the love of many brands and get the love of quality vehicles instead.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    It either needs to go one way or the other;

    A) GMC sells all trucks, from light duty pickups to Tractors, or

    B) Chevy sells light duty trucks, and GMC only sells heavy duty, nothing passenger friendly.

    One or the other, no more crossover. It needs to be cleaned up. The reason this hasn't happened earlier is that GMC is the second best selling brand GM has in passenger cars! Hard to shut that down. This is why I would consider option A. Eliminate the Chevrolet truck, and make a GMC Silverado, plus the Canyon, and all heavy duty trucks, and GMC is your truck brand. They should drop their SUVs though, and give those back to Chevy and Cadillac. There is plenty of overlap there.

    I wonder if ANYBODY from GM ever monitors these boards at all......
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    G3! G5! G6! G8!

    You sunk my battleship! :cry:
  • aldwaldw Member Posts: 82
    The B option makes the most sense to me, and if GMC became the corporate parent name to replace GM, that could be interesting.
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    even in spite of that joke about Century being named after the median age of its owners!

    Oldsmobile was like that with the 88s and 98s.....
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    I think the GM concern is that they need consumer truck product to compliment the rather thin Pontiac Buick lineup. Commercial vehicles are often sold at dealerships that specialize in that customer niche rather than consumer car market dealers. A GM lineup of just Chevy and Cadillac makes some sense, except there appears to be concern that if GM drops Buick here, it will lose face and status in the growing Asian markets where Buick currently does well. Sometimes there is more to it than just US focused logic. The US may well no longer be the largest car market in another decade or so.
  • stewpidasostewpidaso Member Posts: 45
    speaking of dodge and the Hemi, I always liked the sound of the chevy bowtie block.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Although it hasn't been officially confirmed by GM, reports on CNN, today's Wall Street Journal and Edmunds' Inside Line suggest that GM will discontinue the Pontiac brand.

    Since Pontiacs have been on the automotive scene for decades, and were prominent for many years, many of us have memories, thoughts and feelings to share about Pontiacs. For example, my family, including parents, have owned five Pontiacs, including a '47, '49, '51, '52, and '86. All were good-excellent cars, but you'll notice there were no recent examples.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    We moved to Oregon with my step dad in a 1940 Pontiac coupe. That was 1952. We left Portland in 1956 in a brand new 56 Pontiac 4 door hard top that was pink and gray. That was my dad's favorite car of all. My first car was a 1947 Pontiac Convertible. The top was missing and I never replaced it the year I owned it. Got wet a few times. Though it does not rain that much in CA. Our neighbor bought a brand new 1957 Bonneville convertible with fuel injection. I think it was the fastest car in town. And still one of my favorite cars. If the cars I have rented that were Pontiacs over the last 10 years, are an indication of the direction they are headed. It is good riddance. The rental Grand Ams are pure JUNK.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    My sister got a bright yellow Firebird in 1967. I remember her parking it in the front yard when it was new so she could look at it from her bedroom window (and show off to the neighbors :blush: ).

    She was older and off at college most of the time, so I didn't get to ride in it much, much less drive it.

    image
  • tcguytcguy Member Posts: 1
    is it true that at the end the prices of the cars will go down because they want to clear the lots and all i have heard this from my friend, who works at a dealership.

    if this is true i would be ready to buy a solstice and maybe something else but is it really true that the prices will go down to like $5000-$10000 for any car? :(

    since i have a g8 on a lease also anything about this would help
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Buick's rising sun in China keeps coming up here as a reason to continue it in the US.Howevver, Ford's Mondeo is wildly respected in Europe yet not sold in the US, so I see no reason not to make Buick a Chinese brand and streamline down to Chevy & Cadillac. GM needs to get serious about this, or close up shop.
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    I always thought the 58 Bonneville was hands down a better looker inside and out than the 58 Impala, but the Impala gets all the interest.

    Some of the other Pontiacs that I liked were:

    61, 63, & 65/66 Catalina and Bonneville

    65 LeMans (including GTO)

    69 Grand Prix

    I also thought they had perhaps the best looking of the 77 downsized GM full size cars.

    Unfortunatley, for a good decade now Pontiac was mostly a bunch of pinball machine gimmicks like funky dash lighting and seating. The cars weren't comfortable, didn't appeal to most buyers and ended up as rental car queens. The current Grand Prix is one of my most despised rentals. What an uncomfortable piece of junk - you'd almost think it was a Chrysler!
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    Asia is a different place than Europe. I believe they would consider the US market dropping Buick as a loss of face for the brand and move on to something else.
  • hpmctorquehpmctorque Member Posts: 4,600
    Yeah, Pontiacs ceased being exciting long before they introduced the excitement tag line.

    To me, the exciting ones were the '49 (the first post-WWII all-new Pontiac), the '55 (modern new styling + modern new V8), the Grand Prix (plural sp. ?), The '64-'68 GTOs, all Firebirds and Trans-Ams, the down-sized '77 large bodies and the downsized intermediate '78 LeMans.

    Honorable mention could also be given for the Fiero (good try, neat styling, but mediocre result) and the STEs (a good value and a decent alternative to the European sport sedans of the '80s, which, for the most part, also had some serious deficiencies [can you say Audi 5000?]). Similarly, the '85-91 Grand Ams were nicely styled and good values, but needed better engines. I also think the new-for-'88 Grand Prix was a nice styling exercise, but, unfortunately, it was a troublesome car.

    I didn't mention the wide-tracks because they didn't do much for me. They were too big and space inefficient for my tastes.
  • irismgirismg Member Posts: 345
    I realize I'm very much in the minority here, but you couldn't give me a Pontiac, personally. Only the Vibe, before they changed the looks of it and took off the roof rack, had my respect, and only because it was a Toyota in sheep's clothing. Makes me wonder now what will happen to the many, many leftover stock, not to mention the warranties. At any rate, I say better Pontiac than Saturn. Saturn needs to go back to the polymer body, back to what made it unique.

    Anyway, my two nickels.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    My Dad had a 1965 Pontiac GTO convertible that looked very much like the one pictured below. I remember my brother and I riding around in it in the mid 1970s with the top down.

    image
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    You may be right - cultural issues aside, if the Chinese Buick were offered in the US, even I would be a Buick fan! Have you seen it? Very Lexus-like...nothing like the offering we have here from Buick. (Warm Wallpaper paste comes to mind...)
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    on these 60's Pontiac's you and I are on the same page. It's too bad GM didn't keep the designing of car's inertia up like this through the 70's, 80's, 90's and of course the famous 2000's.

    But I realize that the stupid oil/ghastly crisis of the early 70's made things tough and nasty all over. That is a beautiful GTO. The Detroit metal was just about as good as it gets in the mid-60's, man. What a design decade!

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    I had some of these really neat memories you all have of Pontiacs from the 50s and 60s, a time when I sense the brand was strong.

    Alas my only memory of Pontiac will be the junk they have produced since the mid-80s, the kind of stuff that was so bad that even when you were offered one at Hertz or Dollar you would ask "do you have anything else?".

    As we see some of the General's brands fail in the next 6-12 months, it seems to me we will discover that most actually died years and years ago, maybe decades ago, even though it is only now that we are officially recognizing it.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...for what made Pontiac great!

    image
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...for what it became! :(:cry: :sick: :mad: :lemon:

    image
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,414
    hahahaha

    I am surprised the Storm didn't exist in Pontiac trim...the "Fiero II"

    There's a special place in hell for Wall Street suits and bastardly automotive execs.
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Only two personal experiences with Pontiacs. I learned to drive on a 67 Tempest wagon. Shall we say it had issues - an OHC engine that barely made it past the 50K mark, a tendency to stall when accelerating and keep running after you parked it and removed the key. Still, we got more than 120K on it and it was still going a couple of years after that.

    When my dad was in his $150 car period one of them was a 1958 Pontiac wagon that he picked up in 63 or 64. It was pretty much gone at that point but did provide a lovely moment when we all thought it was the end - the gas pedal stuck in his parking lot and the thing went flying with us inside. I believe that was the end of that car.
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • lokkilokki Member Posts: 1,200
    My first Pontiac memory is when one of my sister's boyfriends came to pick her up for a date in a 67 GTO convertible.... the most beautiful and powerful car I'd ever imagined at that young age.

    The second was when we were on the expressway and a 1969 Trans Am screamed past us at well over 100 mph! The word 'lust' was invented to describe the moment I saw that car.

    The next significant memory comes in 1986 - I'd been out of the country for most of a decade... I flew into Dallas, where our company HQ is located, and went to the Hertz counter. The rental car clerk said to me, "And we have a brand new Pontiac LeMans for you tonight, sir". She looked at me like I was some sort of a pervert when I said, "A LeMans? Oh, good!". I thought that odd, until I went outside and couldn't find the car. All they had were these little pieces of daewoo..... She had to point it out to me. I got in the car and the headlight switch came off in my hand.

    Pontiacs stayed off my radar after that until my wife put her car in the shop for a month for facial reconstruction... The insurance company gave her a G5 to drive as punishment for wrecking her BMW at their expense. It wasn't so bad, except for the fact that the engine shook like it was running on 5 cylinders and the steering wheel wasn't connected to anything except in passing. In short, sitting still, it was OK but you wouldn't want to actually drive it anywhere.

    My last memory however, will be finally seeing a G8 on the highway last week. Finally a car that looked like it might be genetically related to that 1967 GTO

    Good bye Chief Pontiac!
  • jrosasmcjrosasmc Member Posts: 1,711
    Have any of you ever seen the 1989 documentary "Roger and Me," Michael Moore's first big hit? To this day it remains one of my favorite films. I will admit that some parts can be haunting, especially the one where Moore travels to the very depressed downtown of Flint, MI, where Buick City once stood.

    I'd have to say that the best part takes place near the end, when Moore finally confronts Roger Smith himself at the annual GM Christmas party.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    of Pontiac reminisces, but I'll slip them in, a bit at a time, instead of just blurting them out all at once.

    Anyway, my Mom's first brand-new car was a 1966 Pontiac Catalina convertible. She was 17 when she bought it. Saved up half the money waiting tables, and one of her aunts lent her the rest, and she was able to pay cash for it. Roughly $3200 total, I think.

    My uncle, her brother, would've been around 14 at the time. Granddad had taught him how to drive, even before he got his license (I dunno if they did learners permits back then). Well, one day, my uncle decides to lift the car and go joy riding. He picked up one of his friends, and they went out goofing around. I don't know the exact details of what happened next, but they were stopped along the road, with the headlights on, during the day. A cop pulled over to see if they needed any help, stopping in front of them. My uncle panicked and tried to get away, by throwing the car into reverse and backing away! Needless to say, he got caught.

    I don't think my uncle got into any serious trouble, but when they went to court, my grandmother got pretty scared when the judge asked my uncle who taught him how to drive. She thought Granddad was going to the slammer!

    My Mom still had that car when she met and then married my Dad. Dad had a reputation of buying crappy cars that broke down regularly, and could also mess up a nice car in record time. Well, he started driving Mom's convertible, and ragged it out. By 1972, the car was pretty shot. Mainly the brakes, I think Granddad said. Mom also didn't like driving around in a convertible with a baby, although she waited until I was two years old before getting rid of the thing! She gave it to my grandparents, who gave her their '68 Impala 4-door hardtop. They then used the Catalina as a trade-in on a new '72 Impala 4-door hardtop.

    I'm too young to remember that Catalina, alas, and we only have a few vague pictures of it. Not really pictures OF the car, but say a picture of someone standing in the yard, and you could see the car in the background. I think it was some kind of period goldish/copperish color.

    I wonder sometimes, if that car is still around. Perhaps it got saved and restored, or at least, maintained? More than likely though, it just got run into the ground and then junked. :sick:
  • berriberri Member Posts: 10,165
    The Chinese Buick is nice. But I wonder if it has GM quality, or it is a typical shoddy product from China? It seems a lot of stuff made in China is defective with parts that don't fit right or hold up, or is fraudulent or contaminated. I'm reluctabnt to buy Chinese if I can help it, particularly higher ticket products. I've heard some GM products already have Chinese engines and they aren't impressive?
  • iwant12iwant12 Member Posts: 269
    Man, Lemko, that Firebird makes my heart race! My first car was a three-year-old '73 Firebird. My dad had a green on green on green '55 Fire Chief (think that's the year) and then he had a couple LeMans; my mom had a Catalina (they're on their 5th Camry now). Later in life, I had a '73 Grand Am with a 400 cubic inch; very fast car. In '98 I bought a new T/A, black with T-tops and leather. What a POS that car was. Always at the dealer for something. Still, it was a fun car. It saddens me to see the Pontiac nameplate fade into history, but, besides the G8, what do they have currently that makes you want one? Thanks for the fond memories, Pontiac.
This discussion has been closed.