By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
The CTS is the only car close to being a performance sedan. The bit larger 300 may be another. Most of the domestics, MKS included, as just another FWD car. And the Montego, if ya want a FWD car, would be less expensive and get the job done with a V6. For high performance, you have to look elsewhere. The LS V8, if ya want a Lincoln is not a bad car. Seems like poor resale value compared to the CTS and that is may be an orphan soon. The RWD Mercury Marque, for those wanting a large car, with a decent ride, and durability, is IMHO a better value than a Towncar. Like the looks of the old Towncar -- this new bulb one does little for me. The classic, more rectangular shaped one was the last one which looked rich to me.
I guess IF I was looking for a FWD car the Fusion/Montego is OK
A used 2004 Mustang is a possible one towards the top of my list.
And if I wanted a boring looking car, the FiveHundred is very safe and practical.
See no Bold Moves yet. And the replica Stang is OK. Seems that the replacement parts, if Consumers Guide is correct, will be higher. My guess is that Ford will be looking to shore up profits on parts. Sort of like the exterior of the '69 replica car, the interior is not as good looking or as usable as the the previous model, and over all the styling is more subdued. Since I was around to see the real deal, perhaps this redo is not as exciting to me. Funny how it turns on some older people though. I thought the 1994-2004 were excellent years for new Mustang looks, with hints of the past. I am thinking that if I went replica car, it would be the AC Cobra. Nahhh, just get a modern day Boxster
-Loren
Soon was April. They discontinued the LS earlier this year and almost all of the remaining 2006 models were sold at a $16K discount.
I'm getting slammed for defending Lincolns current position as they "reach higher". I guess some posters think a brands turn around is suppose to happen over night. It just doesn't work that way. I also am not mad at Lincoln for using FWD biased AWD. It works fine in the Mazdaspeed6
If Lincoln can share platforms with other models like the Fusion or Montego, to save the consumer thousands of dollars like Honda does with Acura, I'm all for it. The Honda-Acura concept has yielded consumers premium cars at less cost without sacrificing large amounts of desired levels of performance and comfort. Cadillacs, have gotten way over-priced and the products don't reflect the sticker prices. A loaded out STS V-8 (not a V) with AWD will run ya $66K. The MKS loaded out will be $10-15K cheaper and have just as many "bells and whistles" thus is why I am a strong defender at the direction the brand is going.
I interpreted the MKS build date obviously differentLY than "heyjewel" and if he doesn't want to talk to me than fine. I feel I don't try to degrade everything he posts and perhaps it's best we don't reply to each others posts to avoid further conflict.
Rocky
As for bells and whistle........ Bells belong on church towers, and whistles belong on trains. :P Bells and whistles for clutter and glitch are but ornaments on the Christmas tree. German cars for handling make sense. Current cars, seeking to ad more STUFF, fancy junk, have but added more cost and repair time = headaches. Who needs electrical nightmares, and items never used? Perhaps fewer people using cell phones, navigation, DVD players, drinking, eating, smoking, and having sex in cars would make driving safer for everyone. I threw the last one in to see if everyone was awake. How large is the back seat on the MKS... oh it doesn't matter. Just by the Montego, and a Lincoln nameplate and stick it on the back.
-Loren
Okay:
If you want a FWD, then the Mazdaspeed6 is not a bad choice for a performance. Why do they need a Lincoln version of same?
Mazdaspeed6 is FWD biased AWD. Yes it performs but it lacks the (borrow from Cadillac) "art & science" of Lincoln's new technology, styling, quality, and heritage. The Mercury, and Mazda, are nice cars but they don't portray luxury like Lincoln. The Montego is a slightly nicer slightly more expensive/upscale AWD Ford five-hundred. The MKS, will be much more upscale and more expensive. It shares some of its underpinnings with both but it will have much more technology, better quality, and a revised dash, instrument cluster, upscale engine, thicker glass, carpet, sound deadening materials, etc. I really see no point in knocking car company's that start with a good platform and improve upon it. Sure some of us would of liked it to be built on the new Volvo S80 platform, but then again the MSRP, would of had to shoot up $10-15K to absorb the costs. I personally would just buy the original the new and improved 07' Volvo S80 if I'm going to virtually spend the same kind of money. I also see the MKS, will be more reliable, have a better navigation system, the best audio system on the market, and rumor to get adaptive cruise, lighting, and many other gadgets found and not found, on the Volvo S80.
As for bells and whistle........ Bells belong on church towers, and whistles belong on trains. Bells and whistles for clutter and glitch are but ornaments on the Christmas tree.
Loren, while you and others are happy with 50's and 60's technology, you can buy a five-hundred, Montego, or a mazdaspeed/mazda6
Current cars, seeking to ad more STUFF, fancy junk, have but added more cost and repair time = headaches. Who needs electrical nightmares, and items never used? Perhaps fewer people using cell phones, navigation, DVD players, drinking, eating, smoking, and having sex in cars would make driving safer for everyone. I threw the last one in to see if everyone was awake.
My generation does do all of the above. We don't want to give up our technology to the few whom are computer or gadget illiterate.
How large is the back seat on the MKS... oh it doesn't matter. Just by the Montego, and a Lincoln nameplate and stick it on the back.
-Loren
The MKS, will be much more than just a rebadged Montego w/ similar room. :P
Lincoln: Reach Higher :shades:
Rocky
Rocky
Obviously a few of you have seen this already. It seems to me Lincoln, is great at getting a reaction and then fix what most don't like. I appluad Lincoln, and Ford, for taking marketing to a new level and listen to the consumers for a change. :shades:
Rocky
Rocky
Rocky
Rocky
I totally agree.
i have driven a chipped m3 and a built 350 camaro(nitrous disconnected). they were more powerful than i would want on the street.
Just my $0.02 for whatever it's worth.
Rocky
Thanks for the advice, but I prefer 4 doors. My "track" is the farm and market roads here in the Panhandle of Texas.
Then buy a fusion for a daily driver.
They are very ugly and unsafe, so no thanks.
It will be faster and cheaper than getting a CTS-V and trying to modify it.
Why would I have to modify a 2008-2009 CTS-V ? It will run 11's in the Quarter Mile out of the factory. I'm not much of a Mustang GT fan which would cost $20 something thousand used and a fusion is $20 something new, so for those 2 prices plus insurance, maintaince, etc, I can have one superior car for less money that can do everything well.
I appreciate the advice, but would pass on that scenario.
Rocky
Maybe you could buy a Corvette. The C5 era used are getting to be a bargain. Big trunk for the kids, or wife
Bob, the father of the Miata has a saying, which I may not be quoting to exactness here..... " If you can't go fast on 90hp, 900 won't help you". The gentleman has a point. I am thinking a CTS with 255HP, I think it is, is more than enough. Better gas mileage and insurance and has a zero to a speeding ticket which is pretty fast. It is all about balance. Most fun is in cornering, and challenging the yellow signs. A straight line, with white restricted speeds has its limits anyway. The V6 will deliver the best weight balance and will achieve posted limits in a hurry. The CTS, made to be a handling RWD car, should be able to handle anything Lincoln sends its way.
-Loren
And Cadillac says it does the quarter in 13.1 seconds. You'd need modifications to get it down to 11's and those won't be cheap. And see the above note on "wheel hop".
What do I like? I like the instrument panel that seems to have been inspired by the classic 1961-64 Continental. I also like the use of the Zephyr nameplate - it was used on the groundbreaking aerodynamic Lincoln Zephyr of 1936. I'd have hoped Lincoln would steer away from the yuppified alphabet soup names. Believe me, I'm not happy with the nameplates Cadillac uses these days. My refer to my car as a Seville and not an STS.
I so agree with that, Lemko. I hate the 3 letter confusing designations. The heritage names, Continental, DeVille, Eldorado, Town Car meant so much more. The conversion to "international symbols" is an irritant. :mad:
I heard it pronounced that way by the narrator on a "Emm Kay Exx" commercial last night and it really sounded stupid when said aloud. "The new Lincoln Emm Kay Exx". It just aint workin for me.
My wife (former marketing gal, now back to reality), and I had the same opinion of the commercial - cute but nothing to do with the car. (It showed a babe getting out at the beach and all the dudes watching her disrobe to her bathing suit IIRC.) Typically, showed little of the car, more of the babe. Said nothing about the car except it offered AWD. One could infer it will hold a surfboard cause the babe took one out. Oh I think she took some kids out too, but I was watchin the babe.
With Ford's great management, the future Lincoln looks alive as Abraham Lincoln looks now. Who hired these guys?
OKAY:
Well the Fusion is not really unsafe. I do believe it to be a match to the CTS in the crash tests USA.
Well Volvo didn't help em out on side impact safety since the fusion got a "poor" rating on side impact.
Now the offset Euro testing, may be another matter. As for the look, I kinda like the Schick shaver chrome front. The button is a bit high and large, but that is true for all the line, no doubt. The Lincoln is just another Fusion. The Montego scores better in rear collisions for neck injury, so that along with better interior looks makes it the logical choice.
The MKZ, is much more than just a rebadged fusion IMHO. way better interior, better engine, better quality inside and out, and lots more gadgets. To me it's like what honda, did with the accord to make a premium upscale car on the same platform called Acura TL. The Montego, I agree is safer and better platform, since it came from Volvo. This is why I'm confident the MKS, will be a very nice car for the extra "change"$$$.
As for HP the V6 is adequate. And the CTS 3.6 V6 is MORE than adequate. I did have the pleasure of watching and hearing the wonderful CTS-V track car at Laguna Seca. Maybe GM would sell you one like that ... ummm, for a few bucks, no doubt.
Loren, I don't like the CTS-V only because it performs so well on the track. I also want comfort, a good quality interior/exterior, along with gadgets. The CTS-V, is the most bang for your buck like the Corvette, in its sports car segment. It's like going from a BMW 3 series to a M3. Well that's the way I see it.
As for high tech, well it works wonders for computing. High tech is cool. And some advances in car engineering which makes sense are cool as well. Tech, for the sake of geek luv or glitz in a car does little for me. The most fun car to drive which I have ever owned was the little Miata. A bit too little, but for driving excitement it had it. The car had roll-up windows. Could not hear the radio for all the noise in a '96 Miata, but the tail pipe did sing a song.
Well Loren, I think that is a age and generation gap we have. Older folks prefer more often than my generation simple function. Nothing wrong with that. You are more like my father, and his brother, (My Uncle) and like the plain Jane. However my mother, grandmother, grandfather, I would say are the exceptions to the "generation rule"
Maybe you could buy a Corvette. The C5 era used are getting to be a bargain. Big trunk for the kids, or wife Don't tell her I said that.
She read your post and chuckled. I told her it was a good idea. I told her I could put some tall blonde, golden tan, California beach bikini wearing girl in the passenger seat. :P
Bob, the father of the Miata has a saying, which I may not be quoting to exactness here..... " If you can't go fast on 90hp, 900 won't help you". The gentleman has a point. I am thinking a CTS with 255HP, I think it is, is more than enough.
It's sufficient for most, but for us few the CTS-V, is the only way to go IMHO.
Better gas mileage and insurance and has a zero to a speeding ticket which is pretty fast. It is all about balance. Most fun is in cornering, and challenging the yellow signs. A straight line, with white restricted speeds has its limits anyway. The V6 will deliver the best weight balance and will achieve posted limits in a hurry. The CTS, made to be a handling RWD car, should be able to handle anything Lincoln sends its way.
-Loren
I agree with most of your post but the gas mileage difference isn't all that different. The insurance I agree is a big difference, but their is nothing like taking a high performance car on a empty Panhandle "farm and market" road to the car limits, or at least near them.
Rocky
I'm pretty sure the much more modern 08' CTS-V which I'm referring to will have eliminated those early Y2K problems. With 500-600 hp. on tap it will run 11's in the quarter mile with a new and improved suspension. I could be wrong, but I doubt it. I read on the net somewhere that was what the test mule was running. I've read through perhaps 40 or 50 websites info pertaining to this car.
Rocky
Rocky
Oh well, to each there own I suppose. :P :shades:
Rocky
The Montego I did get confused with the Milan. The Milan is the deal, if you want that style and not the Lincoln. The Montego/FiveHundred, if not so plain jane looking, is actually a good car. One of those technically, it is correct, less expensive Volvo cars as a Ford. Not bad - just not too exciting. That said, the Montego is attractive in its own way.
If you are talking modified cars as a bargain, Cadillac did that with the Cavalier to Cimmeron. already. So Lincoln does the same -- big deal. Must admit it is a Bold, if not silly Move. :confuse:
-Loren
Rocky
You don't know what you are talking about.
Volvo reliability has steadily improved like everybody else. My 2 2004 Volvo's are way better than my 1988 was. Thats the one which left me stranded on the side of the road.
Rocky, if you have lots of ice, and maybe some snow in your part of Texas, that AWD would be a good thing. I would get a Legacy AWD. That is a company which knows their AWD. Or get an Audi.
-Loren
Can't disagree with you here. :P
Rocky, if you have lots of ice, and maybe some snow in your part of Texas, that AWD would be a good thing.
Loren, we get all of the above pal. It sometimes gets worse here than it does in Michigan, because of the wind. The brutual wind and sunshine rapidly melts the snow during the daytime, and by night time you have roads that Michelle Kwan's, blades would easily grip.
I would get a Legacy AWD. That is a company which knows their AWD. Or get an Audi.
-Loren
Both make superb AWD systems. So does Acura with it's SH-AWD, which IMHO is the best on the market. I pretty much think all AWD systems are pretty darn good like Volvo/Ford/Mazda's and now Lincolns Haledex? of course created by Volvo. Some like infiniti call theirs "intellegent awd" and the most basic units usually do a 60/40 RWD/FWD plit. Some send the tq. to the wheels that need it most, others send front to rear.
So yeah AWD is a good option and even on dry pavement with the amount of wind we have blowing debris (sand) here daily, AWD can enhance safety and performance. Audi's Quattro system wasn't banned from racing for the heck of it. So in some cases 4 wheels are better than just 2. Full Grip of AWD vs. 2 slipping/squealing wheels has advantages in certain situations.
So the bottom line is Lincoln, now has a proven very capable system.
My $0.02
Rocky
Rocky
P.S. I miss rorr, on the boards.
DEARBORN, Mich. — Lincoln is tapping into what it figures is the secret desire of the automotive media to be secret agents for a day, as it celebrates the premiere of Casino Royale later this month.
http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/do/News/articleId=117498
Rocky
Do any of you think Ford will take the money, or some of it, and shore up Lincoln's line?
Or will they only use the monies to help Ford itself, and let the other units, particularly in this case Lincoln, soldier on as is?
If Lincoln was to be "Oldsmobiled", do any of you think buyers, whether current or potential, would move up to the PAG group, down to Ford / Mercury, or "defect" to the competition?
Can the rebadges work for Lincoln? Can these products be competitive in the near-luxury and/or luxury markets?
Personally, I would see a good Ford line up as the Euro Focus sold in USA as the base car, then the Milan. Next up a modern day, with some retro hints Ford Fairlane or Galaxie in RWD. Then keep the Gran Marque as a Ford Marque, and upgrade the interior and exterior. Update the Mustang with a modern interior, with easier to read speedometer, and some chrome or anything to spruce up the dull exterior. Maybe lose the sad face up front somehow. No, don't put the happy face from Chevy or Saturn on it.
-Loren
A lot of the Lincoln/Mercury lineup is driven by the need to keep L/M only dealers in business. Don't see that changing.
Ford will invest in Lincoln eventually - it just wasn't the priority in the past. Think about it - Ford had to develop a brand new mustang and significantly modified F150 followed by a brand new 500/montego/freestyle followed by a brand new Fusion/Milan/Zephyr followed by the Edge/MKX. Now that the car and CUV markets are covered with new products they can focus (no pun intended) on Lincoln and possibly Mercury.
The problem with Lincoln is there are no suitable RWD sedan platforms readily available as was the case with the CD3 and D3 platforms. I'm sure they're working on it and I think they'll have a smaller Lincoln based on the new Mustang platform. These things take time.
Seriously, the review I just saw of the Edge or emmkayexx complained that the thing had no assist handles and that it was a pretty obvious cost cutting measure. Not to mention that the interior materials are below par compared with everyhting else. Not to mention D-L shifter, ... I don't know why we cant strike a reasoned position here, but your quote above makes no sense to me.
Have you driven an Australian Ford lately? Unfortunately, no one in a position of authority at Ford Motor Co. knows how to make a left-hand-drive version of these cars.
I know you're not exactly optimistic but at least give them a chance to deliver on what they're saying.
I do agree with you on the cost cutting not being wise, but I give them a little credit for making things like the Vista Roof and Navigation available on the Edge. Even that wouldn't have happened a few years ago.
IF they sell all of the PAG or maybe all but Volvo, I think they'll have to fix Lincoln, or get out of the luxury car business altogether. Lots of IFs......
I could see Ford get out of the car business altogether in North America and become primarily a truck manufacturer. The only Ford car anyone is passionate about is the Mustang. Does anyone really care about the Mazda and Volvo based sedans that have debuted the past few years? Besides Rockylee, who cares about the MKS?