We have temporarily turned off the ability to post while we deal with a massive spam attack. Thank you for your patience.

Honda Fit

1565759616280

Comments

  • carentcarent Member Posts: 1
    Hi all, first, thanks for this forum, it has sustained me over the last eighteen months waiting for this car. My dealer, who I gave a deposit to in January, called me this morning to tell me that the first Fit had arrived. It is not mine--I am waiting for a Lunar Mist (base, MT) but I did want to actually sit in the car. I did and I'm waiting now even more impatiently for mine to arrive. I took some pics and you can look at http://homepage.mac.com/cst/PhotoAlbum12.html

    Best to all, and good luck with those purchases.
  • w9cww9cw Member Posts: 888
    As an ex-new car salesman, PDI is always included in MSRP. Honda is notorius for mark-ups above MSRP for new vehicles. Whether or not it's American Honda Motor Company sponsored is unkown, but Honda's dealer network has done it since I bought my first Honda in 1972.

    If I was interested in buying a Fit, I would stop being obsessive/compulsive about it (after all it's only a car!), and wait at least a year, and let the first adopters pay the premium prices.
  • backybacky Member Posts: 18,949
    C'mon, give the poor guy at the Nissan display a break. He told you what he was paid to tell you--keep off the elevated display. That's his job. As you say, it's OK to make a living. At my auto show, one Fit (basic) was open on the floor, the other was no-touch on an elevated platform--just like the Versa. The guy with the Versa was very nice, answered all my questions, but explained the car was a prototype. There's plenty of photos available of the Versa's cargo compartment to let you see if it will hold your dog.
  • raychuang00raychuang00 Member Posts: 541
    Here in the Sacramento, CA area, I think Honda dealers are kind of reluctant to do major markups on the Fit because it would make them more expensive than the Civic LX sedan, which Honda dealers are starting to get plentiful supplies of. This especially in light of the fact the Civic has more or less the same real-world efficiency as the Fit! :surprise:

    As for bamacar's choice, it really depends on how much you plan to carry outsized cargo. If you do that fairly frequently the Fit is an obvious choice over the Civic sedans. I also find it strange that bamacar didn't like the automatic Civic, since I've test-driven a Civic LX sedan and found that automatic to quickly shift up and down gears, even on hard acceleration going up freeway ramps.
  • hungarian83hungarian83 Member Posts: 678
    Someone asked earlier about towing the Fit with all four wheels down.
    So far what I've seen is that the owner's manual only talks about 2 things regarding towing.

    1. Don't try to tow a trailer.
    2. Emergency towing.

    It only talks about towing with the front wheels on the ground if damage prevents you from using the rear wheels, but nothing about towing with all four wheels behind another vehicle. Maybe I'm missing something, but I really can't find it...I will keep looking.
    Personally, I would ask the dealership.
  • lykenslykens Member Posts: 13
    Honda has in the past asked dealers not to overprice with additional dealer markup. However, Honda dealers are not the only brand to ever ask more than MSRP. Locally the new FJ and 07 Camry are $2k over sticker. When the new SSR and the Z06 came out they where $10k over. I really don't know a new introduction that some dealer wasn't asking for more than MSRP. I will agree that MSRP is a fair price on any new car and maybe a little over if its hard to get, but I can't see the $2,$3 or $4k people have paid. Makes me think about Christmas time this past year when people where paying $1000 for a $299 X-BOX 360. Just to show I guess that simple supply vs. demand.
  • mauicedarmauicedar Member Posts: 34
    I don't think Lykens is a dealer. He may be a salesman. He may be a teenager who wants to be a salesman. I really can't tell. According to the MSRP and invoice on Civic's and Accord, Honda has about 8% difference between the two plus that have a holdback. My guess is they have about 10% overall. 1400-1600 range for a Fit. Honda may have a little less to compete with Scion. The fixed pricing on the Scion appears to be about 800 and Honda may be more like a grand. In any event it cost money to run a business, advertise, pay and salesman etc. They need and deserve a markup to stay in business. If there is plenty of product and the lot is full of unsold cars (Think General motors) The company will be offering extras to the dealers, cash back to the public and the dealers will be discounting off MSRP, maybe cost. But hey, this is Honda and the Fit is going to be limited. 200-400 off is going to be an excellent price IMHO. :sick:
  • mainefitmainefit Member Posts: 7
  • mainefitmainefit Member Posts: 7
    Hi, it's me again. I have been reading these posts but am still not clear on what is what when you buy a car. I am buying tomorrow and would like to know what doc fees are and why one would pay title and license fees at dealer rather than at Bureau of Motor Vehicles.

    Thanks for your help.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    You pay the fees at the dealer to avoid standing in line. You don't have to do it though.
  • bprendersonbprenderson Member Posts: 99
    Thanks, H! Your answer tells the story.

    Regards,
    bprenderson
  • gearhead1gearhead1 Member Posts: 408
    I don't feel my job is bad. I am not a doctor making $300k just to tell you that you have a cold.If I was I wouldn't be looking at a Fit.

    Funny you should say that. My wife is a doc, and the Fit is exactly what she is excited about. The Fit transcends class. It's a cute sporty little car, and she's buying it. Plus it has magic seats.

    ......and she would say it's not just telling you that you have a cold, it's also ruling out that you don't have cancer. :)
  • bamacarbamacar Member Posts: 749
    I noticed they have finally got everything on the Honda site updated to be similar to other Hondas.

    I am going to be patient to get exactly what I want (probably a blue Sport with 5 speed). I do not want to pay for dealer addons and definitely not more than MSRP.

    I think short term the Fit will actually reduce demand a little for the Civic DX and LX. Hopefully with lower Civic prices that follow, it will then work in reverse and draw a few buyers up to the discounted Civic LX leaving more Fits to satisfy demand.
  • dewaltdakotadewaltdakota Member Posts: 364
    Check it out now... still has the stupid aliens, though.
  • lykenslykens Member Posts: 13
    No offense toward doctors, but most doctors don't drive 13-16k cars. And I wouldn't see an oncologist for a cold.
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    And they get parking spots at hospitals (from a technical hospital worker that can only park in the hospital garage on nights and weekends). :mad: :P
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    31
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    The new UK Civic would have been nice. I would have liked it more than the US civic which I think is very over rated. :(

    http://www.honda.co.uk/civic/ :)

    And yes, that is exactly the position I am in. I have ruled out the Matrix (just too many things not right about it) and am trying to make the cost/benefit analysis of a Fit vs a Mazda 3 5 door. I like both, but for different reasons.
  • lykenslykens Member Posts: 13
    Let's see. I am 13 years past being a teen, I have already stated I wasn't a salesman (If I didn't I will do that now) as I have never tried to sell a fit on here. I was just in the conversation about the trade in value. As stated before, with the destination and hold back the dealer will make about $1000. Out of this he will have to pay for the PDI. I never mentioned a sales mans pay, floor plan or marketing. Just stating a point about the invoice to base mark up excluding the destination. If you can get $200-400 off I wish you well. I wish everybody well. That will not happen at our dealership (not going to mention which dealership,that way some people can wonder what dealership they shouldn't put a foot in) but there is not that much margin. I could have been a real jerk since I have laid eyes on the invoice and listed here about $1500 below that way people could [non-permissible content removed] about getting screwed. But as I stated before, without getting into the exact numbers, the Sport is about $100 less and the Base manual is $28 less than BASE MSRP without destination. I was just trying to help someone understand why the trade in was less but some people took that as bs/some sales tactic that wasn't meant to be. Anyway, my blood pressure has been up and down and now that its down I will let the other genius's on here figure it out, make there rude comments about other people's comments and laugh at how many people will go on and on about really stupid stuff. To the people that have bought the Fit, congrats! I am excited about our dealership getting them in. Our dealer rep says this is one of the tightest cars to come in from Honda (Japan) in a while.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    43
  • cmkcmk Member Posts: 59
    Actually, today I heard a salesman telling another honda employee that there is a $1200 markup on the sport.

    So, that sounds more reasonable than 100 dollars, doesn't it, now?

    Anyway, I spent a LOT of time with it today, test driving, interstate, etc. No surprises. I did really like it, but I sure do think it could be cheaper. That's why I'm still on the fence.

    BTW, that's a definite NO on the locking gas cap.
  • lykenslykens Member Posts: 13
    You are the first person here to actually say they belived a salesman. Now, that sounds like someone who sales cars trying to get the show a rolling with now up to $1200 mark-up. :P
  • timbuk3timbuk3 Member Posts: 17
    Thank goodness - they finally updated the website. Still a few aliens and goofy stuff sprinkled in, but now you can color, price, and accessorize on the web. Nice! http://automobiles.honda.com/models/model_overview.asp?ModelName=Fit
  • jeffhendrjeffhendr Member Posts: 9
    1) I don't see how your capability to spread misinformation (listing invoice at $1500 below its true value) adds any credibility to your position or makes up for the entirely inappropriate way that you've been handling yourself in an otherwise fun forum.
    2) Insults and name-calling don't add any weight to your argument; they simply cause others to quit listening.
    3) If you're going to present numbers that are highly unusual ($28 profit on the sale of a car at MSRP), you should expect to be ready to defend your numbers with facts, rather than emotions.
    4) The biggest reason that I'd never want to set foot in your dealership is because of the attitude that you've presented in this thread. You've stated that you don't care what anyone thinks (hard to have a discussion when faced with that), and rather than admitting and apologizing for your rude behavior, you continue to unsuccessfully attempt to justify your actions and make everyone else a criminal.

    This really isn't cool. Please move on to another forum. Your good wishes for all and your excitement about the "tightness" of the Fit just don't mean that much when weighed against everything else you say.
  • cmkcmk Member Posts: 59
    Lykens, I'm not sure I understand what you are saying to me.

    BTW, I will probably end up buying the AT Sport, even though the base model "felt" a lot better on the road, I imagine it is because of the 14" wheels (more tire). The 15" were noticably more jarring.

    I have to get the sport because I have to have cruise, no question. I would -like- to buy some 14" alloys that look like the 15" ones, and the sell the 15's on eBay. Does that sound feasible?

    Might anyone point me to a source for the 14s I'm looking for?
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    Tirerack.com is always a good place to start. Many local tire dealers also carry wheels.

    You might also consider a different style of tire before laying down a lot of money for new wheels. Something from tire rack with a good "ride comfort" rating such as a Michelin Pilot Exalto A/S coudl be good. Honestly I did not mind the stiffness too much, but was noticable.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    is the lucky one - my local dealer still doesn't have a Fit in stock, I went by tonight hoping to eyeball it in person. Oh well. :-( Thanks to the person above who put all those digital pictures up to look at - I like the way it looks from most angles.

    If I go with the Fit, mine will also have to be the Sport - gotta have the cruise also, not to mention want the better stock stereo and alloys. But at close to $16K, there are a heck of a lot of options out there - maybe the test drive will be very convincing...

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    I'm 18, and would consider this for my next car (I already have a new Accord, so I'm set for awhile).
  • timbuk3timbuk3 Member Posts: 17
    18 with a new Accord...I'm 30 and still driving my '83 Corolla! It is time for an upgrade.
  • charmedseedcharmedseed Member Posts: 6
    Tomorrow I will be picking up the Fit that I purchased last Saturday, sight unseen, as tomorrow is the arrival day for the first shipment. I'm really looking forward to it!
  • chris777chris777 Member Posts: 126
    I sure hope they at least redesign the front facia it lookes dated when compared to the accord and civic, it could probably hold out till they update the cr-v and excrement, but I was surprised how dated it looks.

    Has any one cross shopped the fit with a scion xb?

    I only got to look in the windows as the dealership was closed.
    But I do tend to lean toward those that think it is a bit overpriced. Id it drives circles around an xb then maby.
    but as i see it cruise control, is just not worth the extra grand or so the fit commands. And I ahave wanted a good hatch for over 5 years. I am actualy kind of irked at honda for playing the sissy and waiting on everyon else to go first before they jump in the boat.
    They do all this boasting of innovation, yet they inevitibly end up being the follower. I really hate that too, its a shame. I wanted the last model civic hatch 5 door so bad I was scheming on importing, (even though I knew it was fantasy)The new one is very interesting and seems to grow on me the same way the xb has the more i see it the more i like it. Too bad it will probably take honda loosing marketshare for them to lift theit heads up out of their rectums, and give the consumers more choice, instead of some clueless executives deciding. 5 years ago I only had used hondas, and a few less than desirable brands to get a hatch or 5 door/wagon, and I made it known every time I looked. Now I have plenty of choices besides honda, Word of advice WAKE UP. Because You have already lost several sales on these types of vehicles, because of your foolishness, and now that the market has finally started going into this trend of vehicles , that many of us hatch/wagon lovers want, you may just find yourself left behind. Case in point The excrement, I almost bought an accord wagon a week before it was released, but decided to wait, until I was dissapointed by the element in person, I could kick myself for not getting the accord. Just remember your brand loyalty only goes as far as you actually offering the vehicle someone actually wants.
  • kagedudekagedude Member Posts: 407
    I priced my dream Fit and it came out to $16769.70. I can't believe they are charging $165 for a piece of tarp. Let's see if they honor KBB's trade in price for my Mazda 3i. If so, I'm definitely getting below.

    Model: 2007 Fit
    Trim Level: Sport Manual Transmission
    Exterior Color: Storm Silver Metallic
    Interior Color: Black Fabric
    Accessories: Wheel Locks ($54), Cargo Cover ($165, overpriced piece of tarp), All-Season Floor Mats ($109), 16" Alloy Wheel ($836)
    Total Vehicle Price: $16,769.70

    How do you get the ambient blue lighting? I don't see it as an option.
  • sd_driversd_driver Member Posts: 49
    Sport MT Milano Red

    We started at 17.710 -- $1995.00 over MSRP.
    For that price it did come with a few add ons:

    Tinted windows
    Ding guards
    Cargo mat
    Interior accents
    Pinstripes (I like pinstripes)

    My best guess is about $650.00 worth of stuff, maybe $750.00.

    They came down to 17,000, but that was still too high. But then the salesman offered me $1500.00 for my trade in.
    KBB on my car was $513.00 for trade in. Which was about what I was expecting.
    Essentially, they were offering $1000.00 more off the price: $16,000 with the accessories.

    I took it.

    Final deal:
    Fit w/accessories: 17,000.00
    TTL: 1,544.00

    OTD: $18,544.00

    Trade: (1,500.00)
    Down: (4,000.00)
    Finance: (13,044.00) @ 4.9 APR for 60 months

    Payments: 247.12 Beginning in 90 days

    I’m happy with the deal. I could have tried to grind another couple hundred out of the dealer, but I wanted the car. And people were coming in hot to see a Fit. I got the last sport.

    Maybe because I’ve been in my old car for so long, but the Fit is a MAJOR improvement over my 92 Civic. Better acceleration, better handling, better ride, better feel.

    And only 40,000 in North America this year!
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    BTW, I will probably end up buying the AT Sport, even though the base model "felt" a lot better on the road, I imagine it is because of the 14" wheels (more tire). The 15" were noticably more jarring.

    Might anyone point me to a source for the 14s I'm looking for?


    The European ones are frightfully pricey to buy and import. There are several older generation Accord and Civic wheels what will happily go on it, but the best match, IMO, and BY GOD THE PLASTIC COVERS SUCK... is to get the optional 14 inch alloys from the Civic hybrid.

    As for handling, yes - that's because the car was engineered with 14s in mind and the 14 are much taller than the 15s.(my Mercedes uses 195/70/13s - very tall as well - but they feel very soft, despite their small size)

    If you get them swapped on a brand-new car, they can put the still new stock Fit wheels into their parts department and give you a chunk off of the 14 inchers. Most of them run about $150-170 - a lot less than the aftermarket ones, AND you don't have a spare set cluttering up your garage that you have to sell.
    ****
    Now for the review. I spend an hour poking around the Fit - every inch, every option, every last position.

    - The light interior is way WAY more luxurious looking than the black, especially for the seats - and the black is that sort of get really dirty and stained fast color. It also makes the thing feel much less airy.

    From rear to front:
    + Good quality paint. Identical to what's found on the Civic and Accord.
    + Body-colored bumpers and trim. Nothing says "cheap" like a two-tone color scheme on a small car.
    + The back door is nice - high and no bumping my head.
    - The rear opening's rounded corners are um - bad. I could so easily fit a 36*36*36 inch box in the rear - but the opening isn't as wide as the cargo area is.(?)
    - The fuel door has the pin in it, but it's not hooked up for the locking(and there's no cutout for it to flip into - odd)
    + Best middle seat seatbelt option EVER in the rear. It's hidden in a little nub in the roof.
    + Great back seat. Reclined, with the Driver's seat in the middle position, it's more spacious than a Buick. Seriously - the new RAV-4 has simmilar seats and it's great, if a bit firm.
    + There's a small bit of inclined metal under the front seats - perfect for placing your feet against. Also, just being able to put your heels under the seat is big(as well as a backpack or whatever)
    - No place to store the footballs.
    + FLAT FLOOR. I mean flat with no major protrusions. The Scion XB is a hodge-podge of flaps and mounting points and so on by comparison. Reminds me of an old Civic Wagon's rear seats. Dead-simple and nothing in the way of actual cargo.
    + Spare wheel is in a big well and mounted face-down(open side up - empty in the center. This means you can easily put a set of cables and some oil and rags and so on in there, as you should be able to. Try that on an Xb.
    + Good cupholders in the rear.
    - No rear audio or A/C vents. The center console reminds me of my old '86 Dodge Colt. Missing something.
    + rear pocket on the passenger side. I keep my road atlas there.(Thomas Guide)
    + with the light interior, best looking door panels and surfaces in its class.
    - rear doors need an extra "stop" to open as wide as the cargo area with in the "tall" mode will allow.
    + fantastic visibility. I really REALLY like the cutouts in the front A-pillars to improve visibility. 4 times better visibility than the new Civic.
    + Best radio controls, ever. Big, huge volume knob 2-3 inches from the steering wheel.
    -/+ glovebox is decently sized for a car this small. About the same size as my old Buick or Volvo 240. Not wide, but also the stuff in it will stay in, so you can fill it up pretty deeply. OTOH - no MP3 jack there.
    + Manual vent/recirculation slider. Big plus that there's no automatic climate control - it's dead-simple and will work fine even 20 years old.
    + Tons of room. Reminds me of my Mercedes - long and narrow. Perfect for 4 people, even on a long trip.
    +++ A real clutch! Automatic is a dreadful slug. Stickshift is pow! pow! pow! in your face quick. No contest - the stickshift is not two, but five worlds better than the automatic, especially in highway maneuvers. Downshifting to 4th to pass is quick and solid. Reminds me of my Volvo 240(stick) in this way.

    Why? Because it is light and has maybe 4 inches of travel. It's also halfway down, so you are pushing DOWN and not forward, like on most cars. Better clutch than a Celica. Best clutch on any car in its price-range other than a Golf.

    - OTOH... The clutch needs to be moved to the left 2 inches. The brake pedal is hardly any bigger than the clutch pedal.(!)
    + Doors "thunk" like my old Dodge Colt 2-door did. No tin-can.
    --Rear seat is "split" reversed, like in UK and Japan. The large side is towards the driver's side and not the passenger's side(where the curb is) it's far more comfortable than the smaller section. Only "reversed" feature I found on the car, other than the fuel gauge(full is to the right?). Most Japanese cars suffer from half a dozen of these problems.
    + Front seats are the way they are because you sit *in* them and not perched on top like in a GM car. Very comfy. 200% better than the PT Cruiser's front seats.
    +++ Headrests on the front seats can be put up high enough to actually work as such for anyone under 5'10" tall.!
    +++ Rear work the same. No need to fear rear impacts.
    - Needs leather. Badly. Light tan leather plus leather and wood trim on the doors and so on - it would look like a Mini does - very attractive with interior upgrades added.(but for tons of money less)
    + Dash is broken up and has a curved indention along the length - so your maps and pencils and so on have a place to stay in a pinch. Try that in a Xa.
    + Front passenger sensor for the airbag. Most GM cars still don't have any way to disable or sense a child in the front seat.
    + World's first electric steering that doesn't suck. No - seriously. This is acceptable. Every other one I've tried was a disaster.
    + Adjustable seatbelt height/anchors. You'd be amazed at how many cars still lack this little feature.
    + Intermittent wipers. Again, little features that don't cry "cheap car". Considering that 1970s Buicks had this, it's about time it's considered standard for all cars.
    + Car has zero "plastic wall" feel to the interior, doors, dash, and so on. Only a Mini and the Golf are simmilar in this reguard. You feel like well, it's a smaller Civic instead of a car to not be left out of the segment entirely like every small car GM and Ford make(or have made for them).
    --- No center armrest.
    -- Drink holders in the front are too forward - can't possibly "fit" a supersize drink and have it accessable while driving. OTOH, they did have to move it forward a lot for the 5-speed. A good center armrest would solve this 200%.
  • plektoplekto Member Posts: 3,738
    Review Part 2

    ++ Reverse is off of 5th gear. Reverse off of first(my car) is a PITA. Trust me on this. :)
    + can move the seats with the side lever. Makes moving up a bit for real passengers nice - just let them move it up an inch. No more "is that okay?" nonsense.
    - Can't see the hood at all. OTOH, it's one arm's length in front of you. Feels short - like a VW Bus. Needs a honda symbol on the hood(like the old Mercedes used to have)
    + Same insturment design team as the "new" Civic.(The U.K. model is the "real" New Civic). A thousand percent better than the Yaris. Tach is lovely.
    - Don't like speed-sensitive volume on my radios.
    + Turn levers are good - feel simmilar to the Mini. Solid and yet not a big heavy mess.
    + rubberized coin/stuff tray in the center dash.
    - Needs a homelink/garage door holder near the rearview miror.
    - A/C is strong, but the vents are too small. They need to be big round things like on old Volvos and on some nwe cars. The A/C is "weak" purely because of airflow problems.
    -/+ Plastic wheel covers stink. Any alloys in the WORLD will be a massive improvement.(ie - most anything looks good on it - kind of a wash. 14 inchers are recommended.
    + Engine reminds me of a Mini. The whole car IS Mini sized - very agile. Nice layout with two exceptions.
    - Brake fluid refill is hard to reach.
    --- Dipstick is 1 inch from the manifold. The hole is facing towards you(with the manifod right behind it), so either way you pull on it, you risk getting badly burnt.
    ****
    Whew. :)

    Overall, the car is worlds better than everything in its class except the Golf/whatever they are calling it this week) as far as interior and build construction. The Aveo is flimsy. The Yaris is ticky-tacky cheap feeling. The Cobalt is a wide expanse of tap on it it sounds like a child's drum plastic paneling.

    Overall, I'm impressed. My recommendation - get the light interior and get 14 inch alloys on your own.
  • pinwillypinwilly Member Posts: 6
    I have a few questions about the fit what is so differnt about it then the old civic hatchback. Its powered by a little 109 hp engine their is no cargo area with 4 people in the car the mileage is terrible for an engine that big. The focus gets that mpg. Honda enthusiats dont even recognise the chevy aveo which was out first and is a similar type of car. People open up your eyes. I would like to know where these people live who are driving 83 hondas that arn't rusted apart i'm from the north east 80s [non-permissible content removed] cars were rusting out in 5 years or less.
  • bamacarbamacar Member Posts: 749
    You actually need to look at one before making an inaccurate review. The cargo area is massive with 4 people in the car. It is the Aveo, Yaris hatch, and xA that have no cargo areas with 4 people. As seen in Car and Driver the engine powers the Fit to a tied for first 0-60 speed.
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    Yes it is quite sizeable. My issue was not 0-60 it was 60-75 (see my test drive report).
  • jonniedeejonniedee Member Posts: 111
    Holly Bummer - I've had a deposit since Jan. on a Storm Silver Sport - dealer didn't even call me to tell that it didn't come in - I had to visit the lot last night and find a base in SS and 2 blues. I am pissed and looking for at another dealer several extra miles away today with my fingers crossed.
    I thought dealers were supposed to know what cars they were getting in advance :confuse:
    Thinking I got the run around.... :mad:
  • anotherscottanotherscott Member Posts: 93
    > Has any one cross shopped the fit with a scion xb?

    In base configurations (as I would buy them), they price very near each other.

    For me:

    The Scion advantages are traction and stability control, and a 6-speaker stereo with steering wheel controls and MP3 CD compatibility.

    The Fit advantages are in larger and more flexible cargo space, better fuel economy, and side and side curtain air bags. (I also like a little thing, the "maintenance minder" that monitors mileage and driving conditions to tell you when to perform various kinds of maintenance.)

    Reports indicate the Fit is probably more fun to drive, but I won't know that for sure until I drive one.

    Someone told me that you can actually remove the rear seats in the Scion completely. I have to check that out. If that's true, that may change my conclusion about which has more cargo area.
  • tomsr1tomsr1 Member Posts: 130
    My wife drives a Highlander and I love the
    seat height and commanding view of the road
    so I want the same feel without the poor MPG.
    The Scion Xb fits the bill but it is uuugly.
    What about the fit?I am hesitant to go to a dealer because of the vultures.
  • dudleyrdudleyr Member Posts: 3,469
    "Nice, roomy, commuter car in Dallas = Fit Sport AT

    Fun yet functional car in New England that feels like it costs a lot more than it does = Mazda 3s Touring 5 Door

    A sedan that fulfills both driving styles, but does not give you much cargo room: Mazda 3i Touring 4 Door w/ABS and Side Air Bags option (standard on S) "

    Best of both worlds - Mazda 3i hatch. Too bad they don't make one. :(
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    "Best of both worlds - Mazda 3i hatch. Too bad they don't make one."

    I know. I would snatch it up in a second. There would be no contest. To add insult to injury they DO make it for the European market. :cry: (there is also a more efficient 1.4, and 1.6 gas as well as 1.6 diesel that gets nearly 57 mpg in the euro market.) :cry:
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    The Fit is low to the ground compared to the highlander but has ENORMOUS windows with very good visibility. Unfortunately there is no seat height adjust or telescoping steering wheel so you can not jack yourself up. If there were,the car has plenty of head room to do so.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    Well, I got that for getting a full ride to college, so my parents took the college fund and gave me a car (I still drive my 1996 LX w/ 160k miles everyday to school; saving miles on the new one where I can).
  • bodble2bodble2 Member Posts: 4,514
    If the Mazda3 is a valid alternative to the Fit, why not the Mazda5? About the same price as the 3, only slightly bigger on the outside. In terms of interior room and utility, would trump the Fit. And aside from an antique 4-sp auto, the equipment level would be pretty much on a par with the Fit.
  • crimsonacrimsona Member Posts: 153
    Thought about the Mazda 5 back in November. Rejected due to the far worse fuel economy ratings. It's a pretty big jump from the Fit to Mazda 5.
  • hungarian83hungarian83 Member Posts: 678
    "+++ A real clutch! Automatic is a dreadful slug. Stickshift is pow! pow! pow! in your face quick. No contest - the stickshift is not two, but five worlds better than the automatic, especially in highway maneuvers. Downshifting to 4th to pass is quick and solid. Reminds me of my Volvo 240(stick) in this way."

    I couldn't agree more. This is the most fun I've had with a manual transmission car ever. The more I drive it the more I love it. Granted, I haven't driven an S2000 or anything, but really the clutch and shifter are quick and smooth.

    Also, the more I use it, the electric steering has a very "real" feel to it, and it's set well for high speeds, but very maneuverable at low speeds.
  • thegraduatethegraduate Member Posts: 9,731
    The Mazda 5 STARTS at $18,500 vs $14,000, gets 21 MPG vs. 33 MPG, has an engine that has been considered "overtaxed" for its weight (MotorTrend agrees w/me) and offers options that push its price well into Malibu Maxx (the only comparble thing I could think of) territory. This doesn't make it a bad car, just in a whole different unclassifiable category than the Fit.
  • cephmecephme Member Posts: 26
    Mazda 5 Door has a big issue for those of us in the colder climes. The sliding door latch has a tendency to freeze. It also gets worse mileage and looses the sportiness of the 3s. Personally I would avoid it.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.