By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
http://townhall-talk.edmunds.com/WebX/.f0c139c
But it's nothing horrendus.
If Fit is like any other Honda Car (or my CRV) I've been in recently, should result in an intense "interior buffeting" sensation...not comfortable but easily adjusted by opening ANY other additional window just a crack...
Real funny sd...
Or just keep all the windows closed! :P Who would open a window on the highway anyway?!
Or I suppose you could open the sunroof. Oh... never mind!
Its going to be SO hard to work through most of the day tomorrow.
Do you guys think fit will go down that road after current model? I am in Singapore where gas price is twice as much as in the states and stripped down fit costs over US$40K. So any small honda is sacred for us honda lovers. Americans are really lucky! You can pick and choose any honda. We envy you.
When Honda redesigns the Fit within the next two years, I expect the vehicle to have about the same size as the current car, but with a lot more safety features built-in such as side airbags, anti-lock braking and a body structure designed to get EuroNCAP five-star crash safety rating and IIHS Gold crash safety rating.
Thanks for the feedback. The buffeting's not that big of a deal. I talked with another Honda owner about it last night. He said that any similarly shaped four-door hatch would have something siimilar going on.
BTW: That same Honda owner was dying to drive my Fit, so we swapped cars. I drove his Element. I'd never driven one. The engine is very strong, torquey. But it drives...like a truck compared to the Fit. I'm afraid the Fit is going to spoil me. Drove a different friend's 2001 Sentra yesterday. Oy. It felt like a low, cramped tub compared to the Fit.
Might be nice if the rearmost windows popped open for extra ventillation though. Fewer and fewer wagons have that feature nowadays. It used to be common.
Get a Canadian Fit DX, add latched windows and forget about A/C. Now that's a entry level car!
What are folks here experiencing as they drive on the hwy...MT versus AT?
No problem reaching pedals and still being far enough away from those scary airbags.
My only complaint is that the headrest cantilevers forward at a bad height. A common problem for short people.
It is a Sport, manual transmission in Storm Silver, which, I'm happy to say, is sitting in my driveway now. I've been told that there is a considerable wait to get one unless you get lucky. It's the first car in a while that I paid MSRP for but I did. $15720 plus California tax and license fees. I washed up our 2005 Accord V6, covered it and put it in the garage. I'm sure it won't see too much action soon.
As far as size goes, I'm 5 foot and didn't feel my lack of height was going to be a big deal. If I want to be a bit higher, I can always get a pillow (what I do in our current daily driver). Ask me again in a week what I think.
Thanks.
a lot has to do with where you carry your height. you can be 6'2" and have a 32" inseam or a 36" inseam.
keep in mind that one size DOESN'T fit all.
only one way to know if you and a car are made for each other... test drive it.
The fuel filler door is still a mystery to me though. All of the other Fit/Jazzes around the world have side-impact door beams on the side. The area just below the NA-market fuel filler door (where the door is on the Japanese or European version) is just empty space.
The reason for VTEC over i-VTEC is that Honda wasn't about to design a new engine for the car this late in its generation cycle. The L-series was introduced in 2001 for the new global small car platform vehicles like the Fit/Jazz, Fit Aria/City, Airwave, etc and its a good fit for the platform. You can be sure that future generations will incorporate i-VTEC, but the 1st generation NA-market Fit still uses the first generation L-series engines.
Moving in, I find the cabin suffers from cheap-seat syndrome, which
Driving position isn't to Jon's liking, but then again, very few vehicles are. (Photo: Justin Couture, Canadian Auto Press)
forces an entirely too upright seating position because of fixed lumbar support and limited adjustability (seatbacks tilt, and base slide fore and aft), a symptom of most price-point designed cars.
Cheap Seat Syndrome? Not good. I owned a Tacoma that was great in all areas except the seats as it suffered from cheap seat syndrome.
I've only test driven the Fit and did not notice cheap seat syndrome.
Question to Fit owners, what is your opinion of the seats?
Are you a metro-funky?
Very favorable.
Edited to add: I just drove it around my small neighborhood, then down the main road a bit, not much longer than a test drive, but a bit more varied with terrain. It is much quieter than a soft top Unlimited (that doesn't take much). It has very little body lean, better than the Wrangler (which isn't bad) and much better than what I remember of the 2WD Tacoma (sold about 2 years ago). It felt much quicker off the dime than the auto Unlimited, and probably better than the 5 speed Wrangler Sport. The turning radius is better than the Unlimited, but might not be as good as the SWB Wrangler Sport (there aren't many vehicles that can beat it). It just seemed so effortless compared to anything I've owned recently.
The one thing I wasn't crazy about is the headlights. That might be because I was driving at dusk, well past sunset but not completely dark and I thought the low beams dropped off a little sooner than I would like. However, the high beams are excellent, and the fog lights will be useful to find the edge of the road in poor visibility.
Tomorrow I'll spend my time on the way into work reading the owners manual. I wonder if there's a problem using chains on it (some cars, including the large tired Wranglers, don't have clearance)? Guess I'll find out tomorrow.
Once the car has proven it’s profitability, then I think we’ll see a more refined package, if this generation lasts that long. Remember also that this car wasn’t originally designed for this market, so it’s natural that they would have some ‘loose ends’. I’m glad it’s here.
(I’m beginning to sound like hungarian83)
My 1992 Mazda 323 is about the same at ~3500 at 70mph.
That's my observation. If you're not a tall person (and you have to be tall in the torso), then you cannot tilt the seatback too much because you cannot crank the seat up to compensate. Is it tolerable? Yes. I've owned lots of car in the past with similar basic seat adjustments. But then I've also owned cars with crank windows, 8-track decks, bias-ply tires.....
Simple things that are available on Fits and Jazzes around the world could have been easily been incorporated in the car...and not to be picky, but the accessories list that they seemed so proud of at the NAIAS turned out not to be that spectacular.
I'm very happy with my car though. I do wish I didn't have to import accessories though. :P
Just saw a Silver Storm, parked near where I work ... with a baby seat in the back. Honda is doing something right!
Kia, somehow, manages some terrific seats in the Rio5 with the sport package,
I would take the car for a test drive on the freeway before you decide. I find the shifter and clutch to be light and fun to drive.