By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
The other would be charge with failing to obey a traffic sign.
So MUCH liability in that. I can see it now, I'm suing Canada because I just got rear-ended/T-Boned and the accident was entirely avoidable if i could of just sped up 5 MPH, but your device made the accident happen, and failed to mitigate disaster. Pay up! $$$$$ BIG DOLLARS.
the real/true/actual/enforced speed limit on rural I-89 remains 80++, just like it was back during the double-nickel speed limit. a driver at that speed won't be detained or signalled to slow down, unless they are driving aggressively/idiotically/racing.
I can't believe so many local governments got caught up in the Scamera business. The people lose their tax dollars, the camera companies get rich. The only possible explanation for such stupid, wrongful, and downright damaging behaviour from public officials is complete and utter greed! (and maybe low IQ's).
Studies have shown lengthening a yellow light by 1 second will be far more effective than even a $1,000,000 fine from a Camera.
Really? How would you study that? :surprise:
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Another way to do it would be to measure the length of time the light is red for your typical violater. I believe around 95-99% of red light violations occurred within 1 second of the light going to red from yellow. Therefore you reduce the violaters from "guilty" to innocent by lengthing the yellow light by 1 second.
Further studies have shown that people do NOT adjust or "learn" to adapt to the longer yellow thereby changing their driving habits to change these percentages.
People should also remember that the dangerous red light runners are not the one's that miss a yellow light by a split second, but the one's who blatantly go through a red in the middle of its period. That is when nasty injuries and/or fatalities from T-Bone/side impact collisions can occur.
Our son has used the same guy so many times that he gives him a discount! He pays this guy 250.00 and the lawyer go's to court on our son't behalf.
He does not guarantee results and even admits that there have been times his clients were found guilty but this sure doesn't happen often!
I just wonder what they say in court?
How do you study that? Million dollar fines?
In other words, let's see a link to that study... :surprise:
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Maybe the lawyer gives the judge part of his proceeds. Wouldn't surprise me, especially in some counties around here.
It's not the ticket itself that makes the legal fee appear better; it's the insurance surcharges! Here in NC, just one ticket can cost a driver well over $1000 in higher premiums over 3 years.
I've heard of a lawyer in CA who does a "BAZOOKA" defense for speeding tickets, but they charge $1,500.00. I'd pay $250.00 as fast as they could take the money from me!
I'd rather a lawyer get rich than the corrupt gov't officials lining their pockets with traffic fine revenues.
I stopped speeding after my last ticket 11 years ago cost me $125 even as I took the Defensive Driving class to keep it off my record.
It's not that important to speed. I'd rather keep my hard earned money in my own pockets..... :shades:
There are tons of studies and links, the following link provides a link to many of the most relevant studies (all kinds, all sorts):
http://www.motorists.org/red-light-cameras/yellow-lights
One of the best links is:
http://www.motorists.org/red-light-cameras/identifying-treating
and
http://www.motorists.org/red-light-cameras/fairfax
and
http://www.thenewspaper.com/news/30/3055.asp
Court doesn't always get it right, you win some, you lose some.
I once got three in the same week and two of those were on the same DAY by the same motorcycle cop. I had NINE in one year.
Somehow...I kept my license although it was on probation for a year and to my amazement, my insurance company never found out.
Now, that was a long time ago on the streets of So. Calif. I was young, stupid and I had a fast car. By the grace of God, I haver had any kind of an accident.
Now, I don't speed at least on purpose and I no longer worry about getting pulled over.
Welcome to the real world we live in!
Agreed. Use the 85th percentile rule .. set the speed limits to the speed that 85% of the public won't exceed.
Here in my town there is a 4 lane divided road that is 4-5 miles long and is mainly rural - no stoplights, minimal intersections. Initially, it was maintained by the town and the speed limit was set to 45. Lots of people were ticketed for speeding and the town made lots of money. A couple of years ago, the state took over the maintenance of the road and the speed limit was increased to 50.
Since February, this stretch of road has gone through a complete overhaul .. the existing road base was stripped and new concrete has been poured. Curbs and shoulders have been added.
Here's hoping the speed limit will increase to 55 once the work is complete in the next month or two.
A very simple rule that all logical engineers share value in. It is most efficient for the purposes of maximum traffic flow and safety to set speed limits to the 85th percentile.
States like CA already have rules and laws that tell govermental bodies to obey this convention of setting speed limits to the 85th percentile. Now all we do is have to get the rest of the court employees, local goverment employees, politicians, and law enforcement to obey and enforce the rules and laws we already have. It would help perhaps if legislators clarified and corrected any confusion in the "right" way. The logical way.
Those guys are basically burning our flag and constitution in their own backyards every night before and during their slumber. All so they can make a buck off of illegitimate fines.
ISELLHONDAS - it doesn't surprise me that you received numerous speeding tickets but never had an accident. It wasn't a miracle or divine intervention from God either.
The reason is simple - speeding does not cause accidents. Period, end of story.
Going too fast for conditions on the other hand, COULD POSSIBLY be a causal factor in an accident, but speeding in and of itself is never going to get anyone in trouble the way our speed limits are currently set.
" COULD POSSIBLY"...Gee, do ya THINK?
No further response from me.
The conditions could be that you've placed 15 - 100 lb. bags of concrete in your cargo area, have underinflated tires, drive a wallowy soft suspended car, have low rolling resistance tires, and the pavement happens to be wet around a bend in the road. You might not make that turn at 10 over the speed limit in those conditions.
Or you could have a 3,000 lb. car with only the driver in it, with properly inflated HIGH performance tires, a sporty suspension, and the pavement is dry, and you can make that same turn at 40 over the speed limit; let alone 10 over.
Both are speeders, but only one is unsafe.
Not only does speeding not lead to accidents, but the numbers show that speeding (moderately) actually will REDUCE your chances of being in an accident.
My theories as to why this is so are as follows:
1) avoid getting rear-ended by driving slow, slower, and slowest.
2) you naturally pay more attention when driving faster than you do when driving slower (weaving in and out of traffic requires more concentration and effort than mindlessly following a LLC). Also, slow driving might cause you to get bored, tired, fatigued, and distract yourself with something else in order to take you brain out of boredom.
3) You stay around bad slow drivers for less time, so your exposure to being in the vicinity of bad drivers is reduced.
4) You reduce your time on the road, thereby reducing exposure to potential accidents even moreso.
Slower traffic move right is the law.
This morning I had a great example of why you are so dead wrong.
I was driving through town in moderate traffic in a 25 MPH zone.
Without warning an idiot suddenly pulled out from the curb without looking forcing me to react instantly and slam on my brakes.
There is ZERO question in my mind that had I been going 35 instead of 25 I would have hit him. As it was, it was VERY close.
I've never had an accident for a number of reasons.
1. I'm attentive. No cellphone usage, no drinking coffee.
2. I've always had quick reflexes and for some reason, I still do.
3. I don't drive if I'm tired or fatigued.
4. I never tailgate and I watch the cars around me.
5. I HAVE BEEN EXTREMLY LUCKY!!
That's why they are called "accidents" - they HAPPEN with or without the involved party's permission.... :shades:
I'm overdue and I am well aware of that!
If you have none, please sign here. This is not an admission of guilt, but only a promise to appear. You have 15 days in which to either pay the fine, request a mitigation hearing or set a court date. If you refuse to sign, it will be noted on the citation and result in a mandatory court appearance.
Drive safely. Have a better day.
:P
My theories make perfect sense, and I'll show you why your the one that is dead wrong.
In your scenario, yes, if you had been going faster you may have hit that guy (assuming you still decided to brake rather than speed up to avoid the accident), but you would not have been the cause of the accident. Speed/speeding would not have been the cause of the accident. Failure to yield the right of way would have been the cause, probably due to inattention/distraction of the other driver. You wouldn't have been at-fault. I'm not advocating to get ONLY into not at fault accidents, it is best to avoid ALL accidents where possible.
However, get this... the 10 MPH differential you use in your example gets you 1/6 of a mile further down the road EVERY MINUTE. Since your vehicle isn't 1/6th of a mile long, it only takes a second or two of driving 35 MPH down that road to have avoided that knucklehead all together. Therefore, if you had been driving 35 instead of going 25 for even a split minute, you'd of been close to 1/6th of a mile away and in front of the accident he caused with the "other" guy going 25 MPH and not paying attention with fast reflexes like you were. Again, if someone's firing missiles broadside, by going faster you are in the area of influence for a shorter period of time.
Therefore, by going faster, you have more options to avoid accidents as you can speed up, or slow down with greater variablity by starting at a higher speed. You can always slow down quickly, but you can't just always JUMP out of the way unless you drive something very quick!