Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Are automobiles a major cause of global warming?

1208209211213214223

Comments

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    However, the GW cult are making this hot summer in the midwest and east out as a sign of Global Warming. It is a crappy year for you all and a wonderful Summer for us. It has happened way in the past and will happen again. It is NOT whether the climate is getting warmer, it is trying to pin the bulk of the change on man kind. AND if it is man doing it, what would be the solution, taxing Americans to death? Most of the very verbal proponents of AGW are also the biggest producers of that horrible CO2 and GHGasses. I would like to see statistics on the members of Congress that are pushing the Carbon Credit agenda. What do they come to work in? If they come in a Limo, they are part of the so called problem. I don't mind doing my part to keep the environment nice. I just don't want to be a chump in the AGW Scam.

    I did check out the Cree LEDs at Home Depot. Best price for the CR6 was $40 each. I will wait to see if SDG&E does a promotion like they do on CFL bulbs.
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    Good post kernick. You are right, there is no way most of the youngsters today can afford a new $25,000. automobile. No jobs, no money. They are barely eking by on welfare, unemployment, and handouts from family members...and mostly through no fault of their own.

    Hopefully 2013 will show some economic improvement.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • ClairesClaires Member Posts: 1,219
    Bill Gates funds an experiment by two Harvard scientists who plan to spray sun reflecting chemicals 80,000 feet above Fort Sumner, N.M. with the help of a balloon. "Since it is impossible to simulate the complexity of the stratosphere in a laboratory, Keith says the experiment will provide an opportunity to improve models of how the ozone layer could be altered by much larger-scale sulphate spraying."

    MODERATOR

    Need help getting around? claires@edmunds.com - or send a private message by clicking on my name.

    Tell everyone about your buying experience: Write a Dealer Review

  • kernickkernick Member Posts: 4,072
    I'd be curious to know if the EPA knows about this? or if the scientists got EPA approval? and does one have to file a flight plan with the FAA, so as not to be a hazard to aircraft?

    It would be interesting legally if mankind did develop the knowledge to have a basic control of the weather/climate. So maybe we could divert the path of a hurricane from hitting Miami, but it hits 50 miles up the coast. Can the people there sue? What if you rent a place at the beach for 2 weeks, and the government decides there hasn't been natural rain for a while, so they're going to make it rain for a while? Pretty crazy/scary stuff.

    I always say - be careful what you wish for. I'm sure many might wish for some great energy source to be found - a cold fusion, and then we don't need gas/oil. But what sort of misuses would that lead to - it would make car-bombs look like a candle.

    Global warming is not a terrible alternative.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Forty years after “The Limits to Growth” imparted momentum to environmentalism, that impulse now is often reduced to children indoctrinated to “reduce, reuse, and recycle.” Lomborg calls recycling “a feel-good gesture that provides little environmental benefit at a significant cost.” He says that “we pay tribute to the pagan god of token environmentalism by spending countless hours sorting, storing and collecting used paper, which, when combined with government subsidies, yields slightly lower-quality paper in order to secure a resource” — forests — “that was never threatened in the first place.”

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/SOMNIA/2012/08/17/fcf89ed6-e7fb-11e1-936a- -b801f1abab19_story.html
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    One man's trash - haven't heard much about Zhang Yin lately.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    As a previous owner, I can tell you two things factual:

    1. Segways are overpriced and not worth the money if you are a working stiff, and

    2. Anyplace which has "outlawed" them has not done the proper research.

    They are safe and environmentally sound. They take up less space than a wheelchair. The are not any more dangerous than riding a bicycle without a helmet. They are so easy to learn that I gave 30-second lessons to 8-11 year old kids at my daughter's middle school and let hundreds of kids ride it over a 2-year period.

    They get a bad rap, undeservedly so, in almost every situation.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I think I would rather be able to get my feet on the ground easier than you can with a Segway.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Nah. Takes a split second to step off a Segway. I did it fast a few times for a few reasons.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I saw GW Bush do an end over. And he is a lot more athletic than I am. No Thanks.

    http://politicalhumor.about.com/library/images/blbushsegway.htm

    This is far more interesting to me than the Segway.

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sXhhWXw9V7A
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    OK, time to get educated on the Bush thing. That was the worst thing that could happen to the Segway, and it was not even a fault of the device !!

    The Segway has indicator lights on the panel, which basically say it is "READY TO STEP ONTO."

    In Bush's case, he stepped on it before it was in a ready state. Simple as that.

    No properly trained rider would to that.

    When I taught 100+ kids to ride it in 30 seconds each, they all stepped on it when it was READY, not before.

    Myself, when I just had owned it a couple of days, made that mistake of stepping on it before it was in "balance-ready" mode and quickly realized it and stepped off without incident.

    So the Segway (and Bush) both got a black eye that day, and for not even a real reason.
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    Why did you get rid of it?

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Well, coupla reasons:

    1. It made me FAT. Well, it didn't REALLY, but I did get up to 203 pounds back when I was riding it to work. ( I'm now at 175. )

    2. It had a problem with the internal mechanics, and would start shutting down after about 30-60 seconds of riding it. Warranty was out, and repair meant shipping it to Vermont and paying shipping and labor and parts. That's where the "they are too expensive for average working Joes" comment comes in - they are too expensive to fix unless you are rolling in the dough.

    I had a great time with mine, though. My kids loved riding it, as did almost everyone I let try it. It was a once-in-a-lifetime experience, but was cut short too early. I wouldn't have traded the experience for anything. (Well, maybe $1 million)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The reality is a golf cart would be less expensive to own. And you could haul your kids around faster. I see them here a quite a bit around town. Cheap batteries to replace. Very simple mechanisms.
  • larsblarsb Member Posts: 8,204
    Yes, but a golf cart and a Segway are for two different things. I can ride my Segway around the lake, to work, to the store, etc, while a golf cart would be illegal on any street with a speed limit higher than 25 MPH.

    Different purposes.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    They are illegal here on any road posted over 25 MPH. The Cops don't bother them.
  • kernickkernick Member Posts: 4,072
    I'd think the owner of the company would have a defect-free unit, and know how to ride it, since he could have a full-time trainer, mechanic and spare parts. But apparently the segway isn't so safe.

    http://www.gmanetwork.com/news/story/202078/scitech/segway-ceo-dies-after-riding- -two-wheeled-scooter-off-cliff

    That's about the worst publicity a product could get. It would be like Bill Gates being killed by some Windows controlled device in his automated home.
  • kernickkernick Member Posts: 4,072
    Since anitque autos like Model T's are allowed on the road, I have little problem with other unique vehicles being on the road. I've seen a few kit-car dune-buggies lately and am looking into a reputable, quality model.

    It'd be fun to put a 1,500 metallic lime-green 60's style dune-buggy together. Something reliable for an engine like a 4-cyl Honda from a Civic.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Probably the most common engine on dune buggies today is the Subaru, both 4 and 6 cylinder engines. I often think a Meyers Manx style buggy would be fun for toodling down to the store. And beating around on the dirt roads of our back country.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Like a bad lover, the EPA is a nagging, beguiling mooch. The EPA unconstitutionally barged into our lives and we need to break free from this destructive relationship; let’s give the EPA a two-letter title beginning with ‘E’ and ending with ‘X.’

    President Nixon formed a group called the President’s Advisory Council on Executive Organization to help him sidestep Congress and mold public policy. On April 29, 1970, the Council wrote a memo advising Nixon to establish: “an Environmental Protection Administration, a new independent agency of the Executive Branch. … [and the] Executive Branch should be so structured that a high order of public interest is served in making policy, rather than a narrower advocacy position.”

    Four decades later, the EPA has grown into the President’s pet behemoth—a darling dragon he can fly to over Congress and blow fire onto America’s energy producers and job creators.

    EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson recently told University of Wisconsin-Madison students that she is proud to work for a President who will bypass Congress and create his own rules via executive order: ‘I’m proud to be part of an EPA that has mobilized science and the law to create modern and innovative protections for the health of the American people. I’m also proud to be working for a president who has said that “we can’t wait” on these issues.’


    http://townhall.com/columnists/katiekieffer/2011/11/28/dump_the_epa
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    The world stopped getting warmer almost 16 years ago, according to new data released last week.

    The figures, which have triggered debate among climate scientists, reveal that from the beginning of 1997 until August 2012, there was no discernible rise in aggregate global temperatures.

    This means that the ‘plateau’ or ‘pause’ in global warming has now lasted for about the same time as the previous period when temperatures rose, 1980 to 1996. Before that, temperatures had been stable or declining for about 40 years.


    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2217286/Global-warming-stopped-16- -years-ago-reveals-Met-Office-report-quietly-released--chart-prove-it.html
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    More ice on the bottom less on top. We could stand a bit more warmth in the Winter.

    Daniel Stone

    National Geographic News

    Published October 13, 2012

    Despite frequent headlines about a warming planet, melting sea ice, and rising oceans, climate analysts pointed to a seeming bright spot this week: During Southern Hemisphere winters, sea ice in the Antarctic, the floating chunks of frozen ocean water, is actually increasing.


    http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2012/10/121013-antarctica-sea-ice-record- -high-science-global-warming
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited October 2012
    Wanna buy a slightly used snowboard? :P

    There's a tick story floating around (peanutallergy.com). Ticks are moving north and one side effect is that people are somehow developing allergic reactions to beef because of them. So if the trend continues (right now we're talking maybe 1,500 severe allergy cases), beef consumption will fall and fewer cows will be contributing to global warming. :D
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Why I would NEVER live in a big city and depend on the government for transportation. It could be weeks, months or never before the NYC subway is back in full operation. 5 million people with no good way to get around.

    http://apnews.myway.com/article/20121030/DA284GAG3.html
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited October 2012
    Irene hit Manhattan hard back in August 2011. Didn't take long to get it back up in service. (nbcnewyork.com). The buses are running today and TKTS is open - chill and go see a Broadway show. You sure aren't going to get there faster in your car with most of the bridges and tunnels jammed.

    They'll probably be up and running before our friend down in Port Huron gets her power back.

    With global warming increasing the frequency and severity of these storms, all the agencies are getting plenty of practice in shutting down and restarting. :P
  • robr2robr2 Member Posts: 8,805
    It's a 100 year storm. It would be like heavy rain falling in your area and the mountains sliding into the ocean. Roads would be out and you'd be stuck. Didn't San Diego have flooding back in 2010 from a few inches of rain?

    The postive is that in NY people can take cabs or walk to work, the store, et al. San Diegans would be stuck in the house trying to figure out how to walk the 6 miles to get bread and milk.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Yes this is a 100 year storm. I don't think Irene did near the damage with saltwater that Sandy has done. Electricity and saltwater are not compatible. Maybe if the subway was run on diesel electric they could be back up soon.

    If I went to NY I sure would not waste time at a Broadway show. The Statue of Liberty. If I ever venture into a big city it would be DC to see the Smithsonian. I drive a 100 miles on back roads to avoid big cities.

    Having a 4X4 SUV would make it easier to get around in flooded areas. San Diego does not have the same problems that parts of So CA have with flooding.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    This could be a good opportunity to actually do some upgrades and act on some of the planning that keeps happening without any dirt moving. There's a recent (2010) study to put up portable levees to protect against storm surges for example. Just need, oh, $10 billion or so. The subway is 108 years old and acts as a big drain. Pumps work all the time, even when it's not raining.

    But people have short memories and as sea levels rise, it'll be rinse and repeat. And that $10 billion will start to look cheap.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    If this kind of weather is going to become an every year occurrence they should be using stainless steel parts. Can NYC afford to repair the damage. Or are they going to dump it on the rest of US? Borrow from China and buy steel from China.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    They can't afford not to repair the infrastructure. Be like closing all the freeways around San Diego; the economy would really go into a tailspin.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I guess you'll have to define "full" operation. Seems like some trains have been down the few times I've been to NYC.

    Meanwhile guess what - lots and lots of problems but subways started rolling in much of New York City today. (staradvertiser.com)

    Forget boring Hawaii and head to NYC for some fun stuff to visit. :P
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    You are a funny guy. There are fun things to do in San Diego. I hate going down there with the unwashed horde. Not likely I will ever step foot into NYC. Upstate NY, Rochester the grape country and the Adirondacks are nice. Except for paying to drive on substandard rough highways.

    No comparison to the appeal Hilo Hawaii has for me. Until we demolish the ignorant Patriot Act with their arrogant TSA losers, I will have to just stick to the "roads less traveled".
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    With global warming increasing the frequency and severity of these storms, all the agencies are getting plenty of practice in shutting down and restarting.

    Wow, I didn't realize that anyone was still clinging to that tired old debunked g/w theory.

    Nat'l Weather Service stats dispute your claims that the frequency and severity of hurricanes is increasing. Their stats show just the opposite.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited November 2012
    Sounds like it's time for a link fest. :)

    "Professors and scientists say although there are some contributing factors, they do not believe Hurricane Sandy is directly caused by global warming."

    But ...

    "Some individual parts of Sandy and its wrath seem to be influenced by climate change, several climate scientists said." (Sea level rise, the Atlantic is warmer, longer hurricane season).

    http://t.news.msn.com/us/scientists-look-at-climate-change-the-superstorm?ocid=a- - - - - nsnews11 (MSN)

    In a Bloomberg opinion piece we find this:

    “Would this kind of storm happen without climate change? Yes. Fueled by many factors. Is storm stronger because of climate change? Yes.”

    Back to my point about getting lots of practice, the piece quotes a reinsurance exec:

    “all alerts and measures against it [climate change] have become even more pressing.”

    It's always fun to remind people about the results of the Koch brothers funded study too. :D (RedOrbit)
  • alltorquealltorque Member Posts: 535
    I believe this storm is called "Weather". Climate is somewhat different and longer-term.

    And..............if we creatures are the cause of so-called Global Warming, what/who was the cause of previous cooling and heating cycles over many millions of years ?

    GW has far too many vested-interest supporters for my liking and their half-truths are shameful. :mad:
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    Of course you are right. Only the lib politicians and their supporters are shouting that g/w was the cause of Sandy. The scientists say no.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    edited November 2012
    Love the Bloomberg "opinion piece". The headline shouts, "It's Global Warming, Stupid". Then, in the article itself, the writer says that he believes it is global warming even though scientists disagree. Very convincing.

    I kept waiting for him to say that, also, in his opinion, the moon is made of green cheese.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    I'm reminded of the stories I've read about Newton and his efforts to disparage the scholarship of Leibniz.

    The science will out in the end. Going to be a lot of infighting and politicking until then. Just like back in the 1670s.

    Meanwhile every new "100" (500?) year storm will bring out a new round of links. :)
  • carnaughtcarnaught Member Posts: 3,576
    edited November 2012
    And..............if we creatures are the cause of so-called Global Warming, what/who was the cause of previous cooling and heating cycles over many millions of years ?

    I believe that melting of the glaciers is one example, well before automobiles and Al Gore.
  • alltorquealltorque Member Posts: 535
    Alien Space Cruiser exhaust ? Dynosaurs on Harleys ? Flintstones and wood fires ?

    Yup, melting glaciers is a great example but then we have to address global cooling cycles that formed those same glaciers.

    The Bloomberg rubbish was an "Opinion Piece". Opinions are like - you know what - everyone has one. Why Bloomberg's or L de Caprio of any other talking head should carry credibility is the eternal question.

    As a friend in Texas always says............"If it doesn't make sense; follow the money". All these GW/Green taxes mean we're paying 'em and someone else is getting the financial benefit.

    No no no, must not go into rant mode.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I think our President plans another end around Congress to get a Carbon tax implemented. I am sure it will raise the price of Gas or utilities or both.

    A tax starting at $20 a metric ton of carbon dioxide equivalent and rising at about 6 percent a year could raise $154 billion by 2021, Nick Robins, an analyst at the bank in London, said today in an e-mailed research note, citing Congressional Research Service estimates. “Applied to the Congressional Budget Office’s 2012 baseline, this would halve the fiscal deficit by 2022,” Robins said.

    Hurricane Sandy sparked discussion on climate protection in the election after presidential candidates focused on other debates, HSBC said. A continued Republican majority in the U.S. House of Representatives means Obama’s scope for action will be limited, Robins said. Cap-and-trade legislation stalled in the U.S. Senate after narrowly passing the house in 2009.


    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2012-11-07/obama-may-levy-carbon-tax-to-cut-the-u-- s-deficit-hsbc-says.html
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    Indeed follow the money. It's going to get expensive.

    Warmer still: Extreme climate predictions appear most accurate, report says (Washington Post)
  • lostwrench1lostwrench1 Member Posts: 1,165
    Global Warming? Please send some over to my house.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    edited November 2012
    We're about 25 degrees above normal here. No snow for the deer hunters again for opening week; harder to track 'em.

    Iowa Scientists: Drought a Sign of Climate Change (NY Times)

    Guess it's an advantage living next to "da Lake".
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    National Geo may have to take another look at their bright spot.

    "Antarctica overall has been losing relatively small amounts of ice at a more or less constant rate.

    One tricky question is whether the overall accelerated melting of the ice sheets can be linked to man-made climate change. Scientists say they cannot make such an attribution directly.

    However, they note that current climate-change models predict that some parts of the Antarctic ice sheet will grow while other parts will shrink, and that parts of the Greenland ice will also melt. Observations have borne out these projections so far.

    The shrinkage of the permanent ice sheets cannot entirely be explained by any of the decadeslong or centurylong natural shifts in climate cycles, according to Prof. Shepherd."

    Polar Ice Sheets Melt at Faster Pace (WSJ)
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    Obama and the msm have really started their full court press on GW. In the wake of Sandy (never let a crisis go to waste) there is some sort of major scare story about GW every night on the national news. All to take advantage of Sandy. Get ready for those $1,000 a month utility bills next year and a further crack down on fossil fuels.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Here are 3 case studies in California on just how stupid environmentalist can be.

    For a lot of very good reasons, California’s environmental regulators have earned a reputation for being, well, crappy to the rest of us. Three ongoing California regulatory battles over poop reinforce their already well-deserved reputation.

    Sewage treatment plants are located at the low point of local geography — the coast in California — because it’s much cheaper to let the sewage flow by gravity to the plant than it is to pump it uphill to an inland plant. In Morro Bay, the commission’s staff, on its own, found a site about one mile from the coast, then decreed that site to be the superior location for wastewater treatment. It is recommending the commission force the city to build the plant there.

    If the eco-bureaucrats prevail, they will turn the three-year project into a 10-year one and raise its cost from $60 million to $90 million. They will also saddle Morro Bay’s 10,000 residents with higher bills, since it takes a lot of money — and burns a lot of carbon fuel — to pump sewage uphill. This fact seems to be lost on the commission’s staff, which claims it wants to move infrastructure off the coast not for aesthetic reasons, but because of sea level rise caused by global warming — which in turn is caused, we’re told, by burning a lot of carbon fuel.


    http://www.calwatchdog.com/2012/11/30/crazifornia-three-crappy-regulatory-battle- s/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=facebook
  • houdini1houdini1 Member Posts: 8,351
    Another big flop, thank goodness. Nothing accomplished but a lot of lavish spending and hand wringing. One of the good things about the U.S. going broke is that the U.N. would probably have to disband.

    2013 LX 570 2016 LS 460

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Let's hope that is one of our FIRST defaults is on the UN. What a useless bunch of humanity. And the whole GW thing has been a hoax perpetrated to generate cash from the USA. Who is now beyond Broke. If the planet gets warmer we deal with it. Some will like it some won't. Big Deal. If CA were to become Tropical I would love IT. I am tired of this desert like weather with not enough rain to grow anything but cactus.
This discussion has been closed.