Lincoln Navigator

1192022242532

Comments

  • auburn96auburn96 Member Posts: 43
    I have bought the newest version of the CD Navigation for my 03 Lincoln Navigator and have noticed since that time that the system is acting screwy. At times it scrambles the screen and then just shuts down and comes back up right and other times it takes 3-5 minutes for the clock displays in the screen. Anyone noticed this that has upgraded...
  • ric1035ric1035 Member Posts: 32
    Ford offered vehicle replacement or buyback. It's a hard decision because my 00 msrp compared to the least expensive 04's msrp is at least 9k and we are responsible for the difference plus what we still owe on our 00 Navi. A buyback will net us less than 9k.
    I suggested to the dealer to buy the 2004 vehicle back upon delivery but it will only fetch a 40-41 k and that's with a 59540 msrp. hmmmmm ----depreciates close to 20k even without leaving their lot.
    We thought about taking the vehicle replacement and try selling it privately and maybe we can net a little more than 9k. A Navi with a msrp of 59540 (ultimate w/ dvd,chrome wheels) could possibly fetch in the high 40's but it seems like too much trouble for what it's worth. I wish Ford would allow an allowance for the Navigator's appreciation in 4 years. Hard hard decision. Really would like another Navi but will probably end up with a 04 w/ Luxury to make the numbers work out.
  • ford624ford624 Member Posts: 75
    After reading some of the latest POSTS, is it safe to assume that it is NOT wise to buy a '04 Navigator?
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    is it safe to assume that it is NOT wise to buy a '04 Navigator?

    It is safe to assume that some individuals have had problems and posted messages here. We provide the forum. You provide the wisdom! :-)

    tidester, host
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    Your post makes abslutely no sense.

    I went back 2 pages and the only problem I see being discussed are 2 owners who have occasional problems with their liftgate.

    If that scares you away, so be it.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Almost all cars depreciate like a rock right off the lot. That should't surprise anyone.
  • e350v10e350v10 Member Posts: 92
    From the 2005 ording guide:

    MAJOR PRODUCT CHANGES
    OVERVIEW
    The refreshed 2005 Lincoln Navigator continues with the performance and style that sets it apart as a premium full size luxury SUV. The Navigator is Adventurous, Confident and Refined. The luxury features provide the functionality, versatility, and comfort that bring new buyers into the Lincoln showroom. All Lincoln vehicles will come with Complimentary Maintenance for the first 12 months/12,000 miles in service.

    EXTERIOR CHANGES
    • All new front fascia with redesigned bodyside
    cladding, mold-in lower grille and redesigned fog
    lamps
    • Bodyside cladding color changed from grey to
    black
    • Upper grille in new silver finish
    • Updated rear fascia
    • Redesigned fixed running boards
    Colors Added:
    — Light Tundra Clearcoat Metallic (DV)
    — Charcoal Beige Clearcoat Metallic (T7)
    — Satellite Silver Clearcoat Metallic (T3)
    — Vivid Red Clearcoat Metallic (G2)
    Colors Deleted:
    — Merlot Clearcoat Metallic
    — Medium Wedgewood Blue Clearcoat
    — Mineral Gray Clearcoat Metallic
    Carryover Colors
    — Black Clearcoat (UA)
    — Silver Birch Clearcoat Metallic (JP)
    — Oxford White Clearcoat (YZ)
    — Light French Silk Clearcoat Metallic (G3)
    — Cashmere Clearcoat Tri-coat (G4)
    INTERIOR CHANGES
    • Relocated the heated and cooled seat switches (if optioned) from floor console to Electronic
    Temperature Control panel
    • Heated and cooled seating temperature control
    dial has been replaced with a 3-position button
    • Redesigned floor shifter with chrome bezel
    Colors Added:
    — Camel with Light Parchment headliner (KC)
    Colors Deleted:
    — Light Parchment
    Carryover Colors
    — Dove Grey with Dove Grey headliner (KD)
    FUNCTIONAL CHANGES
    • New 5.4L 3V SOHC engine
    • New ZF 6-speed automatic transmission for
    improved performance, powertrain refinement and
    fuel economy
    SAFETY CHANGES
    • AdvanceTrac® with Roll Stability Control (RSC) is now standard on both arrays
    • Modified Tire Pressure Monitoring System
  • shamahlshamahl Member Posts: 13
    e350v10, from the ordering guide do they give a release date.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Well, my next vehicle will be a 2006, but most of what I read above excites me a bit. Interested to see the redesigned front end.
  • maililymailily Member Posts: 1
    Does it make sense to buy a 2000 Navigator with 101,000 miles? My brother's still in grad school, but he heard about one being sold and he's dying to buy it. Of course he's going to have a mechanic check it out, but I'm just curious to see if you think, generally speaking, a 2000 Navigator with 100k miles on it is a good buy? Assuming that it's in good condition considering the mileage, do you a 2000 Navi could last for a while yet? It's going for $16,000. Thanks!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    assuming the car has been properly maintained, and doesn't have an odd issue, you should get another 50,000 out of her easily before needing much work. One word of caution though - the air suspension could go, or could have already gone bad in it, and that's about $800 per wheel. Although there are aftermarket solutions to that that are cheaper if you have that problem.
  • e350v10e350v10 Member Posts: 92
    Job1 is August 2, 2004.
  • shamahlshamahl Member Posts: 13
    Being that Job 1 is Aug. 2nd, does this mean that they will be at dealerships in Sept. I'm currently getting ready to purchase a '04 and was wondering should I wait if the release is sooner than later. Price is not an issue being that I qualify for X-plan pricing but lincoln may not have the low APR for '05. By chance have you or anybody else seen for found on the web what the '05 will look like with the new changes and that may be a deciding factor.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    My understanding is that changes will be minimal, if any.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    It's just evolutionary. Don't expect much... It'll be unmistakenly and undeniability a Navigator from any few point.
  • ken9ken9 Member Posts: 2
    which SUV do you prefer, Lincoln navigator or Land cruiser. I know this is navigator club, I really hope somebody could me some suggestion. I am going to buy a navigator, but somebody told me that the build-quality of navigator is worse than land cruiser, but it seems that Land cruiser is not as strong as navigator. What should I do.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    LR better than Navigator? Read this and decide for yourself. My personal favorite is "windshield vibration".

    http://rangerovers.net/rrmkiiiremedies.html
  • mtnbikermtnbiker Member Posts: 3
    The Land Cruiser is a Toyota vehicle - not a Land Rover. It is a very nice vehicle. However, when it comes to power, it does not compare to the Navigator.
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    I had just read the Land Rover issues and totally misread the question.

    From a reliability standpoint I don't see any major differences between the two. Neither will be perfect and neither have any long term or major problems that I'm aware of. I would not base your decision on reliability. Base it on features, price and personal preference.
  • gteach26gteach26 Member Posts: 576
    Navigator: More features, more room, more power, very poor resale if you buy anywhere near MSRP, perception of "lower quality", and in some cases (my case actually, a few annoying quirks that cannot get resolved).

    Land Cruiser: Less features, less room, less power, quieter, high quality look and feel inside and out, perception of "high quality", good resale, and a small legion of dedicated owners who swear this is the best SUV on planet earth.

    Why did I choose a Navigator? Power-fold and fold FLAT third row, room to fit a horse if you needed to, neat gadgets and gizmos everywhere you look, better warranty (4 years,50K miles with free maintenance for 3 years).

    My lease is up in January. Will I get another one? I'm not sure.

    Good luck!!!!
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I feel the Land Cruiser is very good and very solid. But it's smaller, underpowered IMO, and unattractive, especially outside. The Navigator appeals a great deal to my eye, inside and outside, especially inside. The quality is nearly as good, the power train is superior IMO. Smoothest power train I've ever experienced, plenty of guts & power for my towing needs.

    It's mostly about size though. They're not really comparable in size or capacities. I have 18 months on my lease too, and intend to get another one unless somebody comes up with some real competition. So far no one has. The QX-56 was a near miss, but a miss in my opinion.
  • ken9ken9 Member Posts: 2
    Thank you guys, I appreciate for your information
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    I've always found the Land Cruiser subpar compaired to other's... more like "An appliance when your boring and you just pick it, to pick something"... Or like picking beige carpeting, because you know it'll go with anything.

    I would put a couple of vehicles above the Land Cruiser actually just in functionality and power. As for perception, like I say "No one is paying my bills, so who cares what my friends say".... YET...whenever it's time to go out "Oh, I want to go in your car"...this when a few minutes earlier the car was insulted for being a Ford heh... Yet when I do some trick manuever to avoid an accident, suddenly the "WOW" comes into play when they see how well the car performs.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    For those who were wanting to see the changes of the front fascia of the Navi, here's a link with a pic which just became public today.

    http://media.ford.com/products/presskit_display.cfm?vehicle_id=11- 12&press_section_id=403&press_subsection_id=421

    Source: Ford Media
  • gteach26gteach26 Member Posts: 576
    e350V10....
    Thanks for the info... It's good to see Lincoln getting awards... they are headed in the right direction for SURE!

    ANT.. thanks for the link... GREAT INFO! VERY subtle changes to that front. That new tranny sounds like a nice step up - a little more "uumph" and little more refinement,and from the sounds of the article, quieter as well. Neat.

    Also, I hope to GOD that the "revised side cladding" means that no one will ever have to deal with flapping doors while doing 60 like I've had to for the past 2 years!!!!
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    They may be headed in the right direction as far as SUVs are concerned, but from a car standpoint it's not nearly as evident.

    The Zephyr will be FWD/AWD which is fine as it's entry level. But the rumour is the next 2 cars will be the Continental and a Town Car replacement and both will be AWD only built off the FWD Volvo S80 platform. No mention of a serious sports sedan to replace the LS. Looks like Lincoln is going the way of Audi instead of BMW/Mercedes/Cadillac/Chrysler. What a shame considering they had a 2-4 year headstart on GM and DC with the LS.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    "No mention of a serious sports sedan to replace the LS"

    So you think a AWD sedan wouldn't be a credible alternative to the RWD LS ?
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    I suppose we'll have to wait and see how it turns out but the general consensus of LS enthusiasts is that FWD based AWD just isn't the way to go for a serious sports sedan.

    I think it can be a very good car and should have luxury in spades but whether it can fill the LS' shoes in the sports sedan department is questionable.

    I think it's clear that this is being driven by budget concerns and having to use existing platforms rather than develop a brand new one. But that begs the question - why not use the Mustang platform instead?
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    My cladding flap was fixed the first time by the dealer - my only real beef with this vehicle has been a problematic (and currently inoperative) power liftgate. I'm hoping they get that little puppy smoothed out in the next version.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    " consensus of LS enthusiasts is that FWD based AWD just isn't the way to go for a serious sports sedan."

    The majority of those buyer's won't even know where the platform stems from. Just yesturday I walked into a "Ford Enthusiast site", and they thought the Taurus and Mondeo shared the same platform....and yet, no one has bothered to correct them. Wait till they hair their Conti and Freestar are also Taurus based, heh...

    "But that begs the question - why not use the Mustang platform instead? "

    You could, but again, we'll have people whining "But it's just a Mustang platform, it's just not enough"... IN this business, no matter what you do, you will never please anyone fully.

    The P2 platform is very efficient in space, and is easily tailored. As for it being capable, they won't ignore the LS buyer's..if anything you might see an improvment in handling. But that program is still being planned out, so give it time.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    for my business partner in 01, and driven it often, I'm a huge fan of the S-80 despite the FWD layout. I'd be ok with an LS AWD on that platform I think. It may not have the charm of the current one, but would be a great car still.
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    "The P2 platform is very efficient in space, and is easily tailored. As for it being capable, they won't ignore the LS buyer's..if anything you might see an improvment in handling. But that program is still being planned out, so give it time."

    They already have a platform. It's been amortized for over 5 years now. It's called the DEW-98. I'm sickened by what appears to be going on at Ford and Lincoln-Mercury. The new Ford/Mercury vans are pathetic. I said that the first time I saw a Monterey last October. They can't give em away. The Marauder was a great idea. But then they built a car that is beaten 0-60 and 1/4 mile by a stock Honda Accord. They've had 5 years now to do SOMETHING with the LS. What'd they do? removed the manual tranny and made lower body mouldings an option called the "LSE". In the meantime, Cadillac has come up with one of the best sports sedans ever - the CTS V. Chrysler has the 300 and Dodge Magnum and the Crossfire and ...

    Lincoln makes a new SUV by reducing the design drawings for their big SUV. Comes up with the Aviator. A very nice vehicle. Then within a year of launch, they begin presenting a totally different vehicle as the next Aviator.

    I won't even mention the Blackwood. But now they're building another pick-up truck. What is it? An F-150 with a Lincoln grille. They didn't even change the interior. Is it groundbreaking in any way? NO. Meanwhile, Cadillac has their version of the Chevy Avalanche, and it looks much better. Beautiful in pearl. And of course, they're switching to RWD. And then theres that wonderful comvertible based on the Corvette. When's the last time Lincoln built a convertible?

    All this said, I have an 04 Navigator and love it so far. I have an 01 LS and love it too. BUT, Ford is on my fecal roster for the way they have handled a service issue. Did u know that if your HVAC in your Ford vehicle begins blowing 110 degree air from the center vents and 68 degree air from the demist/defrost - which can clearly be felt on your face - that it's NORMAL? And once the regional engineer says it's normal, your only alternative is a lawyer. I can not in good conscience recommend a Ford vehicle anymore. And check my posting history if u think I'm a Ford basher. Quite the opposite has been true.$100,000 worth of Lincoln vehicles over the past 7 or so years and they treat me like an idiot in service and at the regional level. When's the last time your vehicle blew cold air on your face while the heater was running? Normal? Maybe for a '63 Yugo.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Ok let me see if I can address as I go....

    DEW98 will be kept solely for Jag use.

    Caddy is going upmarket, Lincoln isn't nor does it need to compete with them. That's what Jaguar/LR and AM are for.

    Mark LT, based on the F-150 which itself is a great vehicle. YES they can go up and just put a grille on to make it a Lincoln. IF Caddy can do it, Lincoln can. And unlike the Avalache/Escalade, it'll actually have interior materials fit to be in the luxury class.

    Yes get a lawyer I agree it's not normal.
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    ANT;

    You've been very informative about Ford etc, so thanks for that. BUT:

    Who the h*ll is Lincoln going to compete with if not Cadillac? This is ridiculous. Lincoln had Caddy in their rear view mirror as recently as 2001. Now the tables have more than turned. Sorry, but Jaguar does NOT compete with Cadillac for the simple reason it's priced about 20% or more higher. So is Lincoln then going to compete against, what, Honda? Cause Acura is in Caddys league. Toyota? Not Lexus for sure. Mazda? Ooops - Lincoln now IS a Mazda. Thanks a lot, Daryl Hazel. Great job.

    And, if Lincoln is moving downmarkrt, I guess Mercury is targeting Kia?

    As for a lawyer, I, like most people, can't afford one. Ford of course knows this. In fact, the wonderful customer relations rep at the Lincoln Committment Center said, when I asked if Ford would rather I get a lawyer than for them to fix a simple problem, she said "Go ahead. I don't care. I hear this all the time."

    SO there you have it folks. The Lincoln Committment. Consider this before u buy a Ford prodeuct. Once they have your money - they treat you like an idiot. Hey, maybe they figure you are cause you bought their product in the first place.

    I really hate to be posting like this, cause my LS and Nav and Mark 8 bfore them really are great vehicles. But I don't care how good the vehicle is if the company is going to treat me like a fool to save a few $$$s. And here I am, 3 Lincolns in a row and I'm not even into my Lincoln buying years. Well, Ford, you've alienated this Lincoln buyer probably for good. Just as well I guess since a Lincoln won't be a Lincoln anymore. Just a Mazda with leather seats standard instead of optional. Pathetic. I'm tired of beating the drum for American manufacturers. They can all go to shareholder h*ll as far as I'm concerned now.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Lincoln is staying where it is..American Luxury from $30K, to $60K. Cadillac is going upmarket only because GM doesn't have divisions to compete in the $60-100K segment, while Ford has Jaguar, AM and LR.

    And because Caddilac is leaving this segment, they are placing Bucik up against it. Therefore, Buick is being rejuvinated to reflect that price level. And Ford has mentioned this publically, as in...Lincoln staying where it's at...it doesn't need to chase Caddy upwards. Notice how some of the new vehicles are being priced higher.

    Who might be Lincolns competition... Would be luxury segments between $30K to $60K. You have Acura, Volvo (not against, but with), Infiniti, Lexus (although Toyota has mentioned they want to go up with a larger super-sedan), Buick, Saab, to name a few off the top of my head.

    Traditionally, the luxury car segment is vehicles that are priced over $40K. And Lincoln sells 92% in that price class, much more than any other manufacturer. Although keep in mind, many like Acura, MB, BMW, sell many more vehicles under $40K. Interesting tidbit I learned.

    Mercury is just a Ford clone with more Chrome. Tradtionally it's best sales have been just that...when they have been re-grilled Fords... Granted, I would have love to see Mercury become something different. But investment wise, it's not feasable at this time.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I hate to see you filled with this much vitriol, George. As you stated, you like your Lincolns, but don't like this design flaw, nor the lack of concern expressed by the builders. Don't blame you. Let me tell you how I deal with these things.

    Recognizing first of all, that I vote with my wallet, as do we all ultimately - I will have the last word, and my revenge. Example: I have been a Town Car fan for years. That is, up to 1998, when the new design came out. I noticed when they redid - (undid, IMO) the interior of the Town Car, they forgot to include a blower for the A/C. It has the most anemic excuse for a blower I've ever seen! The HVAC gal/guy for this car must have been from Sweden or something, because a normal strength in a Ford product, is a very healthy hurricane blower. This one is not only weak, but still noisy as well! In the two climates where I have a home, this will just not do.

    So, the Town Car has been off my list of potential sedans now for a while. I hear they know this is an issue, but the fix isn't cheap, and they will likely address it in the next makeover. If they do, it may get another look. Meanwhile, I check from time to time to see if they have this problem still. They do. I always check out the HVAC first in any prospective car I'm going to buy. Your problem would be hard to spot without a thorough test drive, but that's another reason I'm in Lincolns, my dealer lets me take cars home overnight until I find the one I want, so I can spot some potential design issues that I'm not going to be ok with. Meanwhile, this Navigator has the best and coldest A/C I think I've ever had, and I love it. It's my "hot" button, if you know what I mean. No point at getting steamed at headquarters, because Mercedes is the same, as is Toyota, as is GM. Frankly, Ford has been the most responsive to my complaints over the years, pathetic as they are......

    The best way to make your point, is not to buy next time, if the problem persists. Some design flaws however, just can't be fixed. Hence, when they say, "it's normal", that translates to me as "we have no friggin clue how to fix this"........
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Now you mention the A/C blower (something I've had to explain to other people)... Because of the newer "temperature control systems", might make use of a heating element, even if it's supposedly cooling... As in, you might set your A/C temp at 75 degrees, it REACHED it, but you might feel that the blower is blowing at the same speed, YET the cooling of the air is NOT as it was prior to it reaching the desired 75 degree mark. What happens, is heating element is introduced into the cooling air exhaust, to reach 75.

    In most systems (to defeat it)...Just turn the A/C temp to the colest setting (usually 60 degrees) and just alter the blower speed. What this does is blow VERY cold air, but keep blowing.

    One friends Saturn L300, this is quite evident. When it reaches it's set Auto Temp, it'll mix heated air, into cooling air, to keep it at 75 degrees, BUT keep the blower at the same speed. SO when I need a quick cool-down, I turn it to 60, take it off the "Auto" mode, and just alter the blower speed. Yes I find it annoying to do as well... You would think "automoatic" ment just that.

    Also, there's numerous systems where on it's highest blower speed, it's not shooting out the coldest air, and you be better off placing it on the 2nd fastest blower setting, than full all-out speed.

    Many who had Ford's in the late 90's might notice that, Place it on MAX A/C (recirculates, saves gas, cools faster) and maybe speed 3 (out of 4) and it'll cool a bit quicker.

    As for complains, write a letter to customer service...CC: to All those your able to, and describe WHY you have chosen another brand/make, over a particular one. This helps them have an idea what needs to be improved. I think it's a positive way to vent...I've been "venting" with VW/Audi for years, they still haven't improved their quality/reliability...OK sometimes no one is listening.... :-)
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    There clearly is a difference between the unit in my 99 Navigator, and the HVAC in my 03. Both were supremely cold, even when it's 111 degrees like today. The difference was, the 99 would just throttle back the fan speed to pretty much nothing when the cabin got to the desired temp. The 03 does what you just described. Either is ok, it just took a little getting used to in the 03. Both of them blew like a typhoon, which is wonderful!

    Now, the Town Car just has no air volume. It's the only Ford product I've even seen with this problem. One of the main reasons I like Fords is the factory air is second to none usually. But not in the T/C. Hell, even the Volvo has great air, and they don't even know why in Sweden where they're made!! :)
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Heh, yes you are correct. Each Ford I've had has always had supremely cold air, and they are quick to cool as well. I know some with 80's Mustangs, Cougars, Tbirds, that have the original A/C system still working without any issues...Amazing.

    Volvo's A/C systems have improved.. GEE wonder why heh...MB/BMW still lag in the industry.

    TC does have a subpar A/C system. The Explorer as well (trick is, gotta keep it accelerating on the Explorer). Actually those are just the 2 offender's I complain about.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    Far be it to argue with you, ANT, you're da man, but I've found my Mountaineers (Explorers) to all have great air as well. Not quite as powerful as the Nav, but very cold and adequate air volume. Plus, I get the auxiliary rear air unit, so we're hanging meat in my SUVs in minutes no matter what the climate. AND, my last 3 have all been black too.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Well color doesn't have much to do with it... It's an old myth. The studies have been done comparing various different colors exterior/interior, and the same vehicle had the same temperatures no matter what color it was.

    I always stick to black only because if someone scratches the paint off your bumper, the only thing that will be under, will be black...hence, it'll show less. And for interior, grey... because it hinds dirt the best.
  • heyjewelheyjewel Member Posts: 1,046
    nv: Yeah, maybe my vitriol has gotten out of hand. I still think my LS and Nav are top-line cars. But still think Ford is completely wrong on this issue. Next thing I'm going to do is file for arbitration, unless someone has a better idea (no pun intended:>)

    ANT: Your market division eplanation makes a little more sense. But I remain unconvinced that anyone at L-M has much of a clue what they're doing. Briefly: Lincoln needs one or 2 cars to complement the LS and TC. Define the brand better. Yet, all I've heard about is the MAZDA-based Zephyr. And that maybe the LS won't be back in '06. Some rumblings about a new Continental but nothing definite. The one vehicle they should build to create brand 'gravitas' is the Mark X convertible, but Lincoln themselves said no way they'd build it about 2 days after it was first shown. In fact, I think they said they didn't like it.
    Mercury being 'Ford with chrome' has not always been true. (In fact today, except for taillights, there ain't much diff between Taurus and Sable at all.) They can and have diff'd the Ford-Merc quite well. Take the 60s and 70's Mustand/Cougar. Same platform. Very different personalties. Look at the, eg, '65 Merc compared to '65 Ford and '65 Lincoln. The Mercury is clearly more related to the Lincoln. It can be and should be done. What's the point of the Sable? OK nuff of this.

    Last, the discussion about HVAC above is pretty interesting. ANT's description of the way it works is accurate. I've got the maintenance CD for the LS now and have been looking at the HVAC system description. And I can identify with 90% or greater certainty what's causing my problem. Basically, there are 5 blend doors. One is called the cold air bypass door IIRC. It allows A/C air to bypass the heating element ANT mentions and go DIRECTLY to the demist/defrost, which is exactly what I'm seeing. So, either this door opens too much on mine, or at the wrong time - calibrated wrong or I just need to get the darn thing to stay closed. (And whose bright idea was it to bypass the heating for demist/defrost anyway?) I know it can work right, my Nav and Mark 8 before it proves they can do it right.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    " just need to get the darn thing to stay closed"

    I would caulk the sucker, but might lead to other issues. Next up, remove the heater core element altogether. (This in FL might be workable).. Although you won't have a heater in the winter (not something we worry about down here).

    Next LS and TC will be AWD Volvo P2 platform based. The TC itself will be a vast improvement since it'll go on a unibody platform, and get rid of the Body On Frame contruction, ditch the 4 speed auto, and bring in a fresh air of modern sophistication badly needed....
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    if they dump the panther platform for the P2, where will the Limo business, taxi, and police fleet business go? You can't drive an S-80 over curbs and keep driving - I've tried!!
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    Doesn't mean they'll give up on the Panther... That'll stay around for fleet sales/taxi's/police.
  • nvbankernvbanker Member Posts: 7,239
    I see where you're going with this. That may be a good solution. But doesn't keeping extra platforms around cost a company more than consolidating into just a few? Like Toyota does? Ford has so many friggin platforms now, and engines too, it's gotta cost them money overall.
  • ANT14ANT14 Member Posts: 2,687
    The engineering of the Panther's has been paid for, for soooooooo long, that it's one of Ford's major cash cows. Let's not forget, Body on Frame construction is much more inexpensive to design and produce, than Unibody. So just like Ford's SUV's, each one of those Panther's makes a good chunk of profit. They can sell at least 50K units and still post a profit (even after all the rebates).

    Ford is consolidating platform's, but in a few years, they'll be very few platform architectures, than can be increase/lengthened/widened to serve numerous purpose.

    Almsot any platform can be altered, but MOST will require hefty weight gains... With Ford's plans, it's quite minimal. We have already seen what C1 (S40, Mazda3, Focus(Euro), C-Max) can do. Next up, Volvo's P2 and a few other vehicles from that plaform, and CD3 (Mazda6 based). Each of those are quite flexible to turn them into pretty much anything.

    Plus while some other vehicles/platforms might not sell well here (because most american's prefer larger sized cars), they might be selling well overseas... Mazda MPV as a good example.

    Navi is possible because of the Expedition. YET as a first venture, they were somewhat similar when the initial Navi debuted. Seeing it's success, Ford has been able to differentiate it a bit more from it's Expy cousin. And sharing platforms makes that possible.
  • e350v10e350v10 Member Posts: 92
    You gotta love Lincoln's $1,000 "Cadillac Conquest" incentive cash!
  • akirbyakirby Member Posts: 8,062
    The last commercial I saw it was Buick Conquest cash. That pretty much says everything.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.