United Automobile Workers of America (UAW)

1256257259261262406

Comments

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    You hit the nail on the head once again lemko. ;)

    -Rocky
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    I agree Wagoner made some mistakes BUT it's not his fault that he was competing on a UNLEVEL playing field. If we would of TARIFFED imports it would of solved the uncompetitive advantages of currency manipulation and 3rd world labor. We held the trump cards and we still lost the game. Put Richard G. Wagoner in charge on a level playing field and he will succeed. He proved it in China. They are all competing on a level playing field over there.

    Rocky, you AGREED with most of my points! You are even brighter than I thought! ;)

    Well Bill Gates competed and won with the current playing field. Steve Jobs is competing in the current playing field. Warren Buffet competes on today's playing field. Even John Deere, a successful UAW company, competes on today's playing field. I stand by the statement that Wagoner sucked. Life doesn't give you level playing fields; you make it what it will be. Those other companies didn't whine and complain, they just made it happen. Unlike GM.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well when you have a rigged system to give you a clear advantage why wouldn't you want to work with the company that is winning on the unlevel playing field. Take away the currency manipulation, unfree trade, national healthcare advantage for 50% of there cars and 8 years of hiding recalls and Toyota is in the same boat as the Big 3. ;)

    -Rocky
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    If he's a bum who comes in drunk every other day, I would fire him for the good of the company. His wage rate would depend on his job and skill level.

    You must not be pro union. They don't believe in differentiating for skill levels. There might be brown-nosing going on. It should be seniority ONLY. :P
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Rocky, you AGREED with most of my points! You are even brighter than I thought!

    Yeah we do once in a blue moon. :P

    Well Bill Gates competed and won with the current playing field. Steve Jobs is competing in the current playing field. Warren Buffet competes on today's playing field. Even John Deere, a successful UAW company, competes on today's playing field. I stand by the statement that Wagoner sucked. Life doesn't give you level playing fields; you make it what it will be. Those other companies didn't whine and complain, they just made it happen. Unlike GM.

    I guess I spoke too soon. :P The playing field is unlevel. The companies and people you mentioned outsourced millions of jobs to gain an unfair advantage against some small firm trying to grow his/her company here in the U.S. :( I think competition is good for the consumer and advancement but how is this small business owner going to compete with the giant names at such a disadvantage???

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    That is not true.

    -Rocky
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    "Weak door hinges which gagrice was talking about on his vehicle had a history of sagging down. The UAW worker didn't design those door hinges. They were crap which I agree. I owned a GMT-800 Chevy Silverado Sidestep and I can say as a owner I wasn'tsuper impressed with the fit and finish of those trucks"...that is simply the point...how many people, over the years since the 80s, have bought GM vehicles and were not "superimpressed" to use your words???...can you not see that your Big 3 basically drove (no pun intended) buyers into the arms of Toyota and Honda???...you talk about a little flaw here and a little flaw there...you have NOT paid attention at all...apparently many (millions?) of buyers will no longer consider a Big 3 car...why do you think that is???...does the concept of quality, or the lack of it, enter your mind???...don't you think they deserted the Big 3 for a reason???...have you any idea what it is???

    You posted GM is #1...have you noticed that means absolute NOTHING since they have lost 40 Billion in the last 5-8 years???...do you understand what it means to lose money and how meaningless being #1 really is???...think of a baseball team that lost every game in a season but had the #1 home run hitter with 100 home runs...so what???...they have to win games and GM has really won nothing except Chapter 11...

    Just read in current Forbes that Buick sales have dropped 81% in the last few years...someone tell me why keep Buick as a separate division...aside from one model, 2010 LaCrosse, and we don't know how good it is yet (except rocky, who states that every GM model is the best in the world as they file for bankruptcy), one model cannot keep a division going...the crossover SUV (Acadia???) is another rebadged car from Chevy, what else is there for Buick (Forbes also said that Lucerne sales were quite low)???

    Saab, Saturn and Hummer either sold or simply shut down...I maintain my prediction, Chevy, caddy and a truck division, pick your name of either Chevy Truck or GMC...

    In 90 days, GM will be the automotive equivalent of Pets.com, and they brouhgt it all on themselves...and anyone who thinks that the electric car will save them is on drugs...no one will buy them except Tom Hanks, Warren Beatty and Bill Gates...oh, and Al Gore...
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Outside of the door hinges on the drivers side was there anything else that went wrong???

    Not really. It did not get close to EPA estimates for mileage around town. It was ok on the highway. I think it was mostly the crap ethanol gas in CA. I did not like the auto stop feature as it was dangerous on slippery surfaces. Just glad I found a happy new owner. Much better electronics than the Toyota. Probably made in China.

    I think the GMT-900 is the best made truck in the world.

    Again, that is nothing to brag about. I think all trucks have taken a dump over the last 10 years. They are just foo foo trucks for kids and wannabes. I want a solid built truck with strong bumpers. Not some plastic piece of crap truck.

    That I blame on management and not the UAW. Just so you know.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I guess I spoke too soon. The playing field is unlevel. The companies and people you mentioned outsourced

    That's what we have been trying to tell you. The other companies left long ago. The migration started in the 1950s. The UAW workers should be happy they lasted the longest. Now it is their turn to look for a new career as so many others have done before them. If I would have stayed with the AT&T back in 1970 instead of quitting and going to Alaska for RCA, I would have been given an early retirement in the late 1980s. Those guys are all having to do WalMart greeter jobs to supplement their meager Pensions from AT&T. One of the guys I worked with got pushed out with 17 years service and when he turned 65 got $207 per month pension. He was 2nd level management at AT&T in their Denver Toll Center. He gets 10 times that with 24 years in the Teamsters. He is the one that just retired at 75 years of age.

    The UAW guys getting the golden parachutes should be counting their blessings. Most losing their jobs were not so lucky.

    how is this small business owner going to compete with the giant names at such a disadvantage?

    By giving good service to customers. Just like our little hardware store. It is more expensive. It is also 12 miles closer to home. We also do 90% of our grocery shopping at the local market that is not affiliated with any of the chains. They have good produce and that is the bulk of our diet.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    That's what we have been trying to tell you. The other companies left long ago. The migration started in the 1950s.

    50's??? Where did they go in the 50's??? People in the south were still driving horse and buggie and going to the rest room meant going out the backdoor outside in a wooden shack. :P I thought Fintail said it started in the 1970's??? :confuse:

    The UAW workers should be happy they lasted the longest. Now it is their turn to look for a new career as so many others have done before them. If I would have stayed with the AT&T back in 1970 instead of quitting and going to Alaska for RCA, I would have been given an early retirement in the late 1980s. Those guys are all having to do WalMart greeter jobs to supplement their meager Pensions from AT&T. One of the guys I worked with got pushed out with 17 years service and when he turned 65 got $207 per month pension. He was 2nd level management at AT&T in their Denver Toll Center. He gets 10 times that with 24 years in the Teamsters. He is the one that just retired at 75 years of age.

    So are we just going to roll over and die and allow this to happen??? Glad you made the right moves. It could of been the total opposite and you could of gotten screwed over worse if that was possible. Sounds like your AT&T friends got a screw job and I'm happy things worked out. Hope the union workers at AT&T have a better agreement now.

    The UAW guys getting the golden parachutes should be counting their blessings. Most losing their jobs were not so lucky.

    They are but most aren't happy about it. They wanted there kids and family to have the same opportunities as them. We are suppose to progress and not regress. As Duncan Hunter said it's a national security issue. :cry:

    By giving good service to customers. Just like our little hardware store. It is more expensive. It is also 12 miles closer to home. We also do 90% of our grocery shopping at the local market that is not affiliated with any of the chains. They have good produce and that is the bulk of our diet.

    You might be able to do that with a hardware store but you will not survive in technology sectors like Tractors, Cars, Computers, etc by only having good customer service. If that was the case then Saturn who always ranked at the top wouldn't be getting the axe! ;)

    -Rocky

    P.S. I thought Steak was the bulk of your diet??? :blush:
  • iluvmysephia1iluvmysephia1 Member Posts: 7,709
    gagrice is the farmer, not the cattleman, thus he eats like a farmer. :) You aren't a vegetarian though, are ya gagrice?

    And did everyone catch this news today, UAW workers for Chrysler actually decided to take less pay and benefits? rock, could this really be true?

    It now sounds like creditors are forgiving some $5B large of Chrysler debt. Daimler is bought off and gone, and Fiat is still talking to them to strike a deal before their April 30 deadline.

    tick..tock...tick...tock. Things are looking up for Chrysler, at least more up than they looked like a week ago.

    2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick

  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    good for them, they should support the co they work for...GM signs their paychecks
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    good news, i hope dodge survives...i am pro big 3, but i think union was too demanding over years...i read tonite GM had 310k hourly workers in 1991, it will be down to 40k or so by 2010...i think if uaw had worked with GM more there would a 100,000 more jobs now for them...i think uaw screwed themselves
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    rock, my neighbor bought a used ford danger ranger that was a Napa delivery truck...it has 316,000 miles on it and still runs...i know someone else who drove a ford to deliver parts and he said truck ran 10 hrs a day, had 180k on it and they changed the oil every 12k with el cheapo oil and filter...the driver was really impressed...my friend had a 3.0 ranger and didnt even bother to change oil last 60k, just added oil when it started ticking....assembled in minnesota by the lazy uaw workers..mustve been only 3 good ones of course
  • 2007_tundra2007_tundra Member Posts: 10
    I would like to first say that I am sorry for those that have lost their jobs. My family in Detroit has been auto workers for many generations. I would like to share with you all a discussion we had at our last family reunion in 2002 there in Detroit. As I sat on the porch. I listened to my family brag about how great their vehicles were that they were building. And, then another family member would brag about how great the vehicles were that they were building. This went on for a good 2 hours. disputing on how great the ford was compared to Chevy at every level. The pride that they had was just dripping wet. And I was getting soaked. However, What they did not know. was, that I was the owner of a Ford F-150 .And, that I owned a Chevy before that. They were always breaking down. and, always at the most unpredictable times. I told my family that I was tired of the constant repair costs. I asked them. When are those people that run GM or Ford going to start building a great vehicle that is dependable in a good way. What I had was a hunk of junk! They should have rolled it into a junk pile after building it.And, that if something did not change where they worked. They will be losing many customers. Including me! I am sorry if this ruffles a few feathers out there. But, This was something that I felt needed to be said in hopes that things would be turned around for the better. Case in point! Take a good look at that new Chevy with the duramax and allison tranny. Sounds good huh? Then look at the so called leather interior. WTH? Only the front seats are leather? not the back seats The front seats headrests are plastic? And, they want $60,000 bucks for this? I don't think so! I hope they quit cutting corners on quality and start building fine vehicles again. American auto workers have always been the best and most reliable consumers of their own products. Who is going to buy all of those vehicles if all the workers are unemployed. I'll stay with Toyota! Why? you may ask! They hired many of the 1800 unemployed auto workers that were laid off by GM. Here is a message to those that are in charge of running those Companys. You have been kicked to the curb by me until you can show me that you are what you say you are. And quit cutting corners. Americans deserve better than that from an American made automobile manufacturer. AND, KICK THAT UAW TO THE CURB TOO! They are hurting the auto industry. can you not see that? Here is a challenge for you to chew on. Lets see what you got! We Americans want a 3/4 ton truck that gets 50 miles to the gallon hwy. 40 city. and, keep the price to around $23,000 Think your up to it? Or, is that too much to ask from a Company that Brags about being the best in the auto industry? You have some of the most gifted and. talented minds working there. LET THEM SHOW THEIR STUFF! This challenge is for FORD, GM, DODGE.
  • 2007_tundra2007_tundra Member Posts: 10
    I use to think that way about buying American trucks till my Ford f-150 soaked me of hundreds of dollars. Now I have a 2007 Toyota Tundra 4x4. It's better than Ford or Chevy has put out there on the market for a long time now. I have many Family members that live in Detroit .and, have either retired or are working for one of the big three back there. I hope the big three can recover! and, show the world that they are # 1. Not just say it. but, prove it with a superior vehicle. Read my post called the challenge in the UAW section. We have so much talent and technology in this Nation. If we can put a man on the moon. we can build a 3/4 truck that gets 50 mpg on the hwy and 40 mpg in the city.or better. and gas powered! Not the battery crap either.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    And did everyone catch this news today, UAW workers for Chrysler actually decided to take less pay and benefits? rock, could this really be true?

    Is this really shocking too you? :confuse:

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    The UAW workers were screwed either way. GM, wanted to outsource for cheaper labor and those jobs were gone as a result of it. Thank-you NAFTA and the unlevel playing field.

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Welcome to the forum.

    Case in point! Take a good look at that new Chevy with the duramax and allison tranny. Sounds good huh? Then look at the so called leather interior. WTH? Only the front seats are leather? not the back seats The front seats headrests are plastic? And, they want $60,000 bucks for this? I don't think so! I hope they quit cutting corners on quality and start building fine vehicles again.

    And the foreign looking dash on the Tundra is a beacon of quality, eh? I'll take the fit and finish of the Silverado/Sierra combo over the Tundra any day. ;) Why don't you buy a 3/4 ton Tundra with a diesel??? Oops they don't make a diesel let alone a 3/4 ton. ;)

    I'll stay with Toyota! Why? you may ask! They hired many of the 1800 unemployed auto workers that were laid off by GM.

    Got some proof to back that claim? :confuse:

    Here is a message to those that are in charge of running those Companys. You have been kicked to the curb by me until you can show me that you are what you say you are. And quit cutting corners. Americans deserve better than that from an American made automobile manufacturer. AND, KICK THAT UAW TO THE CURB TOO! They are hurting the auto industry. can you not see that?

    Go visit the Tundra forum and look at all the upset customers. Plenty of recalls and quality issues especially on the 2007's ;)

    Here is a challenge for you to chew on. Lets see what you got! We Americans want a 3/4 ton truck that gets 50 miles to the gallon hwy. 40 city. and, keep the price to around $23,000 Think your up to it? Or, is that too much to ask from a Company that Brags about being the best in the auto industry?

    You might see something like that 10 or 20 years from now. We don't have the technology to get there yet. If you think it can be done for $23K you are nuts. That is as much as a Prius and you want a 3/4 ton truck??? You better go see China or India. ;)

    You have some of the most gifted and. talented minds working there. LET THEM SHOW THEIR STUFF! This challenge is for FORD, GM, DODGE.

    True but technology is expensive. It's called R&D and it ain't cheap to develop.

    -Rocky

    P.S. The back seats in the Duramax aren't plastic
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I use to think that way about buying American trucks till my Ford f-150 soaked me of hundreds of dollars. Now I have a 2007 Toyota Tundra 4x4. It's better than Ford or Chevy has put out there on the market for a long time now.

    I've driven em' all and I beg to differ. The dash is a real "eye sore" in my eyes. How is that sub 14 mpg hwy treating you??? :surprise:

    have many Family members that live in Detroit .and, have either retired or are working for one of the big three back there. I hope the big three can recover! and, show the world that they are # 1.

    I'm sure they are disappointed that you purchased a Toyota despite at that time a Silverado was the best truck on the market and arguably still is. Why would you pass up on a discount you would get from one of your relatives to buy a Tundra? :confuse: You could buy a extended service contract and still have thousands in your pocket. They might recover but they are going to need help.

    Not just say it. but, prove it with a superior vehicle. Read my post called the challenge in the UAW section. We have so much talent and technology in this Nation. If we can put a man on the moon. we can build a 3/4 truck that gets 50 mpg on the hwy and 40 mpg in the city.or better. and gas powered! Not the battery crap either.

    I can appreciate your enthusiasm "2007_tundra" but the technology at this present momment doesn't exist and if you think it's possible in a 3/4 ton body without batteries and powered by gas I'm sorry you are going to be severely disappointed. A diesel gets better mileage than gas and with all the programmers and technology to tweak them you are only able to get about 26 mpg hwy. The 4.5L V8 Duramax that was suppose to go into the 1/2 tons might of pushed the 30 mpg mark. Getting to 40 let alone 50 mpg is technology limited. We've hit the ceiling without using another power source such as "cold fusion"

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Here's an article OW posted in the GM forum.

    While unrelated, here is the latest recall from Toyota...hardly the same as an engine oil leak that could cause a fire.

    TORRANCE, California — Toyota on Monday said it is recalling 121,000 2008 Highlander and Highlander Hybrid vehicles in the U.S. because an optional stainless-steel exhaust tip may fall off.

    "Due to improper heat treatment, the original clamp used to secure the stainless-steel exhaust tip to the exhaust pipe may develop microscopic cracks," said Toyota Motor Sales USA in a statement. "If this occurs, the crack may expand, causing the clamp to break, and in the worst case, the exhaust tip may fall off."

    The Japanese automaker said there have been 10 reports of incidences of this condition in the U.S. It estimated that there are about 39,100 accessory kits that may be affected. "Because this accessory is installed at the Toyota vehicle processing centers and dealers, and is available over the counter, all of approximately 121,000 vehicle owners will be notified," Toyota said.

    The recall is expected to begin in early May. Owners can contact Toyota at (800) 331-4331.

    Regards,
    OW


    -Rocky
  • kipkkipk Member Posts: 1,576
    "He did not nail it. You still see plenty of camcords to this day around here but note quite as many here lately as the people around here are buying Detroit iron once again. It might also have something to do with how they are treated at the local import dealerships around here. It's like it's a priveledge as a consumer to buy one of there products which turns people off."

    Spent a good deal of time over the past couple of years helping other folks with vehicle purchases. . .

    The trick is to instill confidence in the customer that the product is the best there is, without appearing arrogant. Unfortunately some just can't seem to manage that.

    In this area,Toyota tends to appear more arrogant than most others. For years they had one of the most reliable cars on earth. Not necessarily true any longer. On the other hand, Kia and Hyundai sales personal appear to be the most knowledgeable of their product line and the least "Pushy".

    Of the domestics, GM, especially trucks, act as though they have absolutely the greatest products on earth, and that is OK. Problem is, that I can do it their way or not at all. Chrysler product dealers seem more willing to work with the customer as well as being extremely knowledgeable.

    Biggest problem I have with the Domestics is the manufacturers unwillingness to help the customer with known problems after warranty.

    Anything can go wrong with any vehicle. Regardless of the make. Many of the domestic and import parts come from the same vendors. They key is, how was the vehicle assembled in the first place and how does it and the manufacturer satisfy the customer down the road.

    Kip
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,699
    >LAID off due to budget cuts! That's because this teacher was low on the seniority scale. Let's not brown nose and let the excellent ones rise to the top! Reward mediocrity and laziness at all costs! At least the old dog teachers with all those years of experience

    The teachers in a school are professionals and the UAW workers are assemblers. The teachers with more years of experience, and who survived to hold those years rather than leaving teaching for a higher paid alternative profession or job, are much more effective at teaching and the ancillary things part of the job. I want my child in the classes with the most experienced teachers in our high school. BTW my wife is a retired teacher so I've been around those so-called "old dog teachers" via my wife's friends for years; I'll take the ones with experience.

    I realize the attempts to tie in AFT and NEA to the unions with UAW, but there are two different types of work in those two unions. E.g., I've watched a friend near death in the ICU for almost a week being treated by those highly paid nurses. Of course the hospital could just pick up workers at the local Lowes or temp agency and let them handle the life-saving job of a critically ill patient's care. Do the top nurses have a union? I don't care, but I've seen the same high intelligent decision making occur by the best nurses in the hospital. I'll take longevity over the younger ones I saw in the post surgical floors.

    Does that mean a higher seniority UAW worker provided value added to the job they were doing? Probably. But the younger workers could have been trained to do the same work in most of the cases, so seniority is not a factor. So we probably agree about UAW seniority not being meaninful, but criticizing teachers in a profession is different than someone pushing buttons and assembling parts.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Spent a good deal of time over the past couple of years helping other folks with vehicle purchases. . .

    Are you some sort of a consultant for people buying vehicles?

    The trick is to instill confidence in the customer that the product is the best there is, without appearing arrogant. Unfortunately some just can't seem to manage that.

    It really depends a lot on the customer too. I have been on the sales consultant side with my previous jobs and I can speak first hand that some Toyota Kool-Aid drinkers were so disrespectful to our products I was chewing my lip and eventually broomed them. I asked them what in the hell are you doing here if a Toyota is what you want??? :confuse: So it works both ways. However I have played the consumer a few times "shopping" dealerships for my sales schools and we had this honda salesman so fired up it was hilarious when we told him we were looking at Chrysler's vans also. He started trashing his competition a big "No No" when selling cars. ;)

    In this area,Toyota tends to appear more arrogant than most others. For years they had one of the most reliable cars on earth. Not necessarily true any longer. On the other hand, Kia and Hyundai sales personal appear to be the most knowledgeable of their product line and the least "Pushy".

    They made reliable cars because when you went in for a oil change they were secretly being fixed to give that perception. ;)

    Of the domestics, GM, especially trucks, act as though they have absolutely the greatest products on earth, and that is OK. Problem is, that I can do it their way or not at all. Chrysler product dealers seem more willing to work with the customer as well as being extremely knowledgeable.

    That really depends on the dealership. I don't trust one our local Chrysler stores. They will say anything to sell a car and it cost my mothers coworker a service visit because they told him a LTZ Impala in 2007 with a 3.9 V6 could run on E85 which wasn't the case.

    Biggest problem I have with the Domestics is the manufacturers unwillingness to help the customer with known problems after warranty.

    That depends on the dealership. Our import dealerships don't do it around here. That is why the warranty has limits. If highly recommend to customers Paint Protection and Extended Service Contracts. If you negotiate right you can get a good deal on them. :) My brother got paint protection and extended service contract on his 08' Impala. I like the paint protection because you don't have to wax your car and trust me I'm a hot mess with wax. :blush:

    Anything can go wrong with any vehicle. Regardless of the make. Many of the domestic and import parts come from the same vendors. They key is, how was the vehicle assembled in the first place and how does it and the manufacturer satisfy the customer down the road.

    True. I think it more so boils down to how it was designed and engineered. A vehicle made today is only as good as the material and parts that is put in them. if you buy cheap parts and cut corners your vehicle probably won't be a good one. I have a lot of confidence in what the Big 3 make today. The new 2010 Buick Lacrosse if I had the money for a daily driver would be at the top of my list. :shades: I'm very likely going to get rid of the 04' Impala after my final divorce hearing on the 11th of next month and go after a low mileage car from the mid 90's that I can buy cheap until I get in a better financial situation. I would love to find a steal on a low mileage Aurora 4.0 but am open to other options. I just need to buy something for under $5K that will be reliable. I know it will be a hard find but I am up to the challenge. ;)

    -Rocky
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I thought Fintail said it started in the 1970's?

    We were buying electronics and steel from Japan and Germany in the 1950s. Part of the rebuilding after WW2.

    So are we just going to roll over and die and allow this to happen?

    What choice is there?

    I thought Steak was the bulk of your diet?

    I use to eat lots of steak when the company paid for it. Sound familiar?
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    The UAW workers with senority are better at there jobs than the younger ones that are wet behind the ears. The veteran has the experience to know what is going on when a machine breaks down. If it is straight manual labor like slapping pieces on a car the younger probably is better because he/she is faster due to their youth factor. I agree 100% with your take on Teachers. ;)

    Gagrice - So you are a meat eater. I thought most of you in California were veggie eaters. :blush: If you like good fish come to Michigan. Everyone has to try our Lake Perch at least once in there life. YUUUUUUUUUUMMMMMMY!!!! :shades:

    -Rocky
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,699
    >Anything can go wrong with any vehicle. Regardless of the make. Many of the domestic and import parts come from the same vendors. They key is, how was the vehicle assembled in the first place and how does it and the manufacturer satisfy the customer down the road.

    True. I think it more so boils down to how it was designed and engineered. A vehicle made today is only as good as the material and parts that is put in them. if you buy cheap parts and cut corners your vehicle probably won't be a good one. I have a lot of confidence in what the Big 3 make today


    The same parts maker does the parts for BMW, MERCEDES, GM, and Chrysler cooling systems for HVAC and engine. So they make top quality parts for BMW and terrible parts for GM? NOT.

    Local Behr nee Chrysler plant lays off 40 more workers.
    Behr lays off 40 more workers

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I can appreciate your enthusiasm "2007_tundra" but the technology at this present momment doesn't exist

    That is not true. Both Ford and Toyota build diesel PU trucks sold all over the world that can get 45 MPG and haul 3/4 of a ton in the bed.

    The 4.5L V8 Duramax that was suppose to go into the 1/2 tons might of pushed the 30 mpg mark

    More vaporware from GM. Too big of an engine for a 1/2 ton. A 3.0L inline 6 diesel would have all the power you would need in a 1/2 ton PU truck and could get at least in the mid 30 MPG range.

    You can thank the UAW for blocking trucks that are capable of high mileage. They used their political clout to pass the Chicken Tax in the 1960s. Remember the VW diesel PU would get 50 MPG. Many are still on the road today that were built in the 1970s.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Everyone has to try our Lake Perch at least once in there life.

    I am sure it is good. My best fish days were living on my farm in MN. I love Walleye, Crappie and Northern Pike, fresh out of the lakes. Alaskan fish is so seasonal and the good fishing spots you have to fly to. Kind of takes the fun out of catching your own.

    So to answer your question about what will the UAW workers do. Let them eat PERCH.
    :shades:
  • marsha7marsha7 Member Posts: 3,703
    "we had this honda salesman so fired up it was hilarious when we told him we were looking at Chrysler's vans also. He started trashing his competition a big "No No" when selling cars."...on this I do agree with you...while I do have a "small" place in my heart for Hondas, I expect salespeople to be professional...tell me why YOUR product is better, don't trash the competition...point out legitimate differences (their V6 needs premium fuel, ours runs on regular, or they get 25 EPA hiway we get 27) but don't trash the others, simply because I may be the one that buys the other, and I will not have them insult MY intelligence because I bought something else...

    But, I, as a poster here, have every right to insult the intelligence of the UAW people, because I must get under rocky's skin any way I can...it is my mission in life, waiting to express itself for the last 20 years, just waiting for the internet and edmunds.com, knowing that a "rocky" or someone just like him, would exist solely to haunt me... :P ;):blush: ...:):):):):):):)
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    >8.4% of the total cost is greed???

    That is the profit margin in most businesses.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    "we had this honda salesman so fired up it was hilarious when we told him we were looking at Chrysler's vans also. He started trashing his competition a big "No No" when selling cars."...on this I do agree with you...while I do have a "small" place in my heart for Hondas, I expect salespeople to be professional...tell me why YOUR product is better, don't trash the competition...point out legitimate differences (their V6 needs premium fuel, ours runs on regular, or they get 25 EPA hiway we get 27) but don't trash the others, simply because I may be the one that buys the other, and I will not have them insult MY intelligence because I bought something else...

    I as a sales consultant might think you are an idiot for wanting the other car but I'm not going to tell you that. What I'd try to do was get them sold on a pre-owned unit if that other make/model was a must have by the end of the sale to not lose the customer. This strategy worked for me a few times. ;)

    But, I, as a poster here, have every right to insult the intelligence of the UAW people, because I must get under rocky's skin any way I can...it is my mission in life, waiting to express itself for the last 20 years, just waiting for the internet and edmunds.com, knowing that a "rocky" or someone just like him, would exist solely to haunt me... ...

    You are doing a damn fine job of it too!!!! :P :P :P :P

    -Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I don't buy that pal....Got some proof? I have worked in retail sales for far to long to buy that. Everything I sold or knew the cost of was marked up 100-300%.

    -Rocky
  • chikoochikoo Member Posts: 3,008
    I said Profit, not markup. read properly pal.
  • motorcity6motorcity6 Member Posts: 427
    We realize wages in the real world did not keep up with escalating prices of homes,cars,food, and life's goodies during our last boom period; however the boom flipfloped and we find ourselves upside down on the money side..I have been through a few of these in my 76yrs., and there will be more..Just watch our elected officials and it will be of a greater frequency in the future..

    Profit is why we are in business, the Govt deals in charity funded by our taxes..In running a UAW infested plant, my last year the net profit was 20%, six months later the 3 plant operation was sold to some big shooters who were ex-titans of big business..Long story shortened, within 5 yrs all operations vanished--gone..I went into sales after the sale was completed, for I could foresee the problems after they paid for something they didn't know a thing about..You sell things at the peak and let the buyer beware!!!!

    Sales were always more fun and much more profitable, with tons of free time for Florida, golf, and playing..

    We did all this w/o computers!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Wow, impossible today...Times change..
  • PMOPMO Member Posts: 278
    What is with Chrysler being 55% owned by UAW and GM 35% UAW ownership ,Kinda makes you think you are realy paying the UAW to work for themselves?
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    I think he is saying that 8.4% would be net profit for a company. That is not a great profit but more than GM has made in the last 20-30 years.
  • PMOPMO Member Posts: 278
    I would suggest you are looking at American GM because GM Canada has Never other than the last years when the UAW wanted Canada to stop building Trucks for ever when our Quality was the best in the world on GMC and Chevrolet Trucks . it has always turned a profit for GM.and did before it became GM in 1918. McLaughlin built cars with Buick motors and Chevrolet before GM was GM
  • PMOPMO Member Posts: 278
    This is true ,We didn't but looking back it might have been better for them if we had ,other than those that were killed in the cars that thy bought. because we all make choices and we feel sorry for the deaths that most of them have had because of the wrong one.
  • PMOPMO Member Posts: 278
    Guess you don't read the articals on JD Power for GM Canada it is CAW not UAW but has had the worlds best Quality for a number of years.
  • junkyardogjunkyardog Member Posts: 44
    Rocky your 04' Impala is only worth $5K. You aren't saying it is unreliable are you.
    Being a GM it should last you an other 5 years being UAW built. :blush:
  • junkyardogjunkyardog Member Posts: 44
    THE ASSOCIATED PRESS
    April 29, 2009
    DETROIT - Three people briefed on the deal say Italian automaker Fiat Group SpA will sign paperwork by Thursday to become a partner with Chrysler LLC.

    So I guess Chrysler stays alive to fight an other day.
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    But first, the bankruptcy filing?

    Obama Said to Plan for Chrysler Bankruptcy, Alliance (Bloomberg)

    "Chrysler has made progress in its out-of-court restructuring, including reaching labor deals with the United Auto Workers union and Canadian Auto Workers on new contracts. Nardelli said today in a memo to employees that the company is waiting to hear whether its 46 lenders will agree to take cash to wipe out $6.9 billion in secured debt.

    The possibility exists that a bankruptcy filing won’t be needed, one person said."

    It sounds like Nardelli will be gone but the UAW will live for another day.

    Heavy negotiations continue. I bet. :)

    Chrysler To Be Taken Over By Fiat; Bankruptcy Not Ruled Out (AutoObserver)

    UAW voting was today. "Meantime, Chrysler hourly employees represented by the United Auto Workers union were voting Wednesday on a contract that would give them 55 percent of Chrysler's stock in exchange for a pay freeze, work rule changes and other modifications to the current contract negotiated in 2007. Workers were expected to approve the new deal."

    Chrysler Deadline Looms; Progress Made, Nardelli Says (AutoObserver)
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    well at least you bought a truck assembled in texas...is your family ripped at you now?
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    the highlander is assembled in japan...no uaw workers there
  • chetjchetj Member Posts: 324
    i have never had to take any of my uaw made cars back to stealership for warranty cuz they all ran good...i have a 05 sunfire i might sell for 4k...NH is a long way from michigan though...i never bought a extended warranty either because i am cheap and i was confident my american cars would run well...it seems like chrylser and GM might be doing better than i thought they would after restructuring
  • 2007_tundra2007_tundra Member Posts: 10
    Rockylee: Look up GM-TOYOTA Joint venture that took place in 1983. on www.heritage.org and see for yourself the troubles that GM was having way / way back then. It seems as though the mind set has not changed within the auto industry. The question is. WHY? We all know WHY. Pride comes before the fall! and that is a very true statement. I wonder where we would be if Tucker was allowed to continue building the vehicles that he built before he was hurt by the other auto companys? I think that would have changed things for the better. maybe I'm wrong. we will never know. But! I think that that same thing could happen today. someone coming up with a real head turner. When I was back in Detroit in 2002. I was sitting in the Greek town area. I saw many new cars and trucks that had body styles that were not in California. or, anywhere else for that matter! Why is that? no one has been able to answer that question. So,Rockylee! enlighten me. since you seem to have all the answers. ;) And, you are right. I am NUTS! and I have the BOLT to prove it. Oh! and the back seats are plastic," Vinyl" An Organic radical derived from ethylene and entering into the composition of numerous PLASTICS! Here is a message to GM and FORD. SCRAP THE CRAP! BUILD THE BEST! Until then I'll stick with my TOYOTA TUNDRA.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    JAW workers and the currency manipulation plays a role in making that a very profitable vehicle for them. ;)

    -Rocky
  • steverstever Guest Posts: 52,454
    "According to restructuring plans proposed this week, the union will have more than half the stock in Chrysler and a third of General Motors, meaning it will have tremendous influence, with the government, in determining the future of the companies.

    The United Automobile Workers union said Wednesday that its members ratified a cost-cutting deal with Chrysler by a 4-to-1 margin."

    As Detroit Is Remade, the U.A.W. Stands to Gain (NY Times)
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    They made reliable cars because when you went in for a oil change they were secretly being fixed to give that perception.

    Rocky you make that sound like a negative for HonToy. I wish GM would have done that with their KNOWN bad hinges from 1999 - 2006. Or the defective bolt in the passengers seat of my Suburban that broke and the seat collapsed. The dealer that replaced the bolt said they used too low of a hardness and many had broken. It is lucky the passenger did not get hurt when the seat went back abruptly.

    Again the UAW puts together the parts sent to them. I think to be competitive the D3 cut corners on content to make up for the higher labor & legacy costs. Don't forget that GM is at least down $20B on the pension plan they will have to make up the end of this year. If they sell 2 million vehicles that is $10,000 added to the cost of each vehicle. Plus $3500 for legacy health care for the retirees tagged onto each vehicle. That is $13,500 per vehicle sold off the top. Promises made to the UAW that they will not be able to meet.
Sign In or Register to comment.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.