Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

GM News, New Models and Market Share

16768707273631

Comments

  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    While I'm not going there in general I will say that most rentals I've ever had have been more or less fine. Sure I got an occasional one that felt like a tin can (a Pontiac Sunbird once) but within the same year had a Buick Century for a week and while it isn't my cup of tea it was fine. The only time I had a car that was totally unacceptable was renting a previous generation Malibu last year and that wasn't the fault of the car. The car had an awful smell in it so I took it back and had them get me something else. As it turned out the something else was a Kia Optima. Hardly thrilling but it did what it needed to do for a week.

    While naturally I think my own biases are logically arrived at while folks who have different ones are using faulty logic I think there's a lot of truth in the thought that you develop different preferences as you go along and it would take something pretty major for you to shift from those preferences.
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • tlongtlong Member Posts: 5,194
    It's ok for so many to write how they rented a GM and can accurately determine it's rank in the lineup. Or knew someone who rented one, or say their friend or relative had an issue, or even use some editor's opinions as facts, or even just look at a picture of one in a magazine or some sales stats and jump to all kinds of conclusions. BUT I NEED to own a foreign car to determine if the GM vehicles that have done well by me are OK or not?

    Not necessarily. Which foreign nameplates have you driven or rented?
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Out in spring. Bad time to be bringing this out with $2 gas.

    I think they would have a winner on their hands if they incorporated it in the Lambdas or the Epsilons.

    http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/autoshows/detroit/2008/2009saturnvuegreenlinet- - womodehybrid.html

    As a full hybrid, the 2009 Saturn Vue Two-Mode Hybrid will be able to run on electrical power alone at low speed. The system uses two 55-kW electric motors integrated into its automatic transmission that are fed current from 22 nickel-metal-hydride batteries tucked under the backseat.

    All this means that the Two-Mode will get to 60 mph in an estimated 7.3 seconds, return an estimated 28 mpg in combined EPA-calibrated driving, and hopefully stop a little better. Also the '09 Vue Two-Mode, which goes on sale near the end of 2008, will be able to tow up to 3,500 pounds. If all this turns out to be true, then the Two-Mode will match or better the 2008 Toyota Highlander Hybrid in acceleration and fuel economy.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Wouldn't this be another decision which is now destined for being marked as short-sighted?

    Saturn will be gone. They should have done this on the Equinox.

    Regards,
    OW
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    No, Saturn won't be gone, they'll just say it is. Then they'll kitshan something like the Sky (which has already run its course) and claim it to be progress. :sick: Fear not GM fans, every single one of your brands are safe. Just wait till next year when they'll be something great!
  • dtownfbdtownfb Member Posts: 2,918
    Agree with everything you say.

    I think what Wagoner and his band of merry men (and women) are trying to avoid is filing bankruptcy at all costs since all their shareholders lose everything. I also believe they want to change their business model to match Honda's (as an example) where you build cars based on demand and not based on supplier contracts, labor agreements, etc. This is one of the advantages of not working with the UAW. If Honda and Toyota need to cut back production, they could. If they need to layoff workers because demand is way down, they can without having to still pay the worker. GM probably would like to get to this model but can't because they chin deep in the manure.

    The only way they can achieve this is by filing a Chap. 11 bankruptcy so they can deal with all of these responsibilities. The sooner GM realizes this market is going to last longer than July 2009, the quicker they will realize that more drastic, more immediate cuts are necessary. Wagoner announcing the lower forecast for 2009 is a major step. I think by the end of the month, you will see or read that GM is investigating a pre-packaged Chap. 11. It's the only way they can stay alive.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Can anybody talk trash about recent cars from GM other than mis-stating that the 'been around since '06' Impala is a ten year old design? 4 not = 10 to me.

    Well, the current Impala is no more than a refresh from the 00 model, which was heavy refresh from the previous gen. It basically used the same tactic Ford did with the Mustang (which basic architecture dated back to the 1970s) before it was finally completely redesigned in 2004.

    I admit I dont know much of the older cars you mentioned, but put it this way: during those years competitors, except perhaps the Germans were still in their early days and they had little to no experience building better cars. Dont compare old models with current models.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    I don't remember how many miles that '75 had on it. 107K? Anyway, I sold it to a friend of my Dad's who trashed it. My Dad then told me this guy didn't really take care of his cars AFTER I sold it. Geeze, had I known that, I would've held onto it a bit longer. However, it was starting to nickle and dime me by that time (May 1993) and I bought my 1994 Cadillac DeVille in November of that year. Even at 1993 fuel prices, the '75 was expensive to run. It had a 28.5 gallon tank that took forever to fill and an appetite for premium. Still, even at 18 years old and despite being one of "those lousy '70s cars" Edmunds posters like to rag on, it was a sweet ride!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Weird. If the price of oil is falling, then why is the price of gasoline going back up? Anyway, I hope all those oil speculators who ran the already shaky world economy off a cliff are out there in 8 degree weather begging for quarters on Chestnut Street. I might toss them a discarded soda can!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Sure can't be the big RWD car with the 307 V-8 I have. If it was the FWD car with the 4.1 litre, that I can believe. The 4100 engine makes an excellent boat anchor. Funny thing is, my 1994 Cadillac DeVille had a 4.9 litre which was a descendant of the 4.1 and was a pretty decent engine. It was only rated at 200 hp, but the car seemed a heck of a lot faster. If I was out on the turnpike and not watching the speedo, I'd be easily cruising at 100 mph!
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    Well, now I believe you. Those early FWD C-body Caddies were crap! I was in college when they debuted in 1985 and feared I wouldn't have anything to look forward to buying once I graduated. Thank God, GM held onto the B-body Caprice and the now D-body Brougham a bit longer. If GM was still building Cadillacs like the 1985 C-body DeVilles and Fleetwoods, I guarantee you I'd be driving a Lexus or a Mercedes today!

    Funny I ended up with a FWD C-body Park Avenue many years later and it turned out to be excellent. I bought my '88 Park Ave cheap with the expectation that it might only last a year and then blow-up, but here it is four years later and it's still running well.
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,023
    Supposedly the 4.5 that came out for 1989, and then the 4.9 V-8, were much better engines than the 4.1. My grandmother's cousin has a 1989 Coupe DeVille wit the 4.5, and it's still on its original engine and transmission. Which is a bit of a miracle, because she doesn't take very good care of it. I think it only has about 90,000 miles on it.

    A few years ago, she asked me to drive it around because it was acting funny, and she was hoping I could figure out what it was. I took it around the block, and noticed it did seem to be shifting oddly. When I got it back to her, I asked her when was the last time she had the transmission serviced? She just gave me this look like I was speaking in a foreign language! She didn't know that it was something that needed servicing! :blush:
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    GM trucks, SUVs prone to losing power steering while parking but company says it's no problem

    link title
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    GM trucks, SUVs prone to losing power steering while parking but company says it's no problem

    So, is this what some of you guys call "professional grade" and "world class", that "there's nothing wrong with them" and "we're just dishing GM"?
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    General Motors Corp. bondholders formed a committee to negotiate terms of a debt-for-equity swap, a key requirement of the auto maker's loan from the U.S. government, GM executives said on Thursday.

    Terms of the government's $13.4 billion loan program requires GM to have a plan in place that would cut its $27.5 billion in unsecured debt by two-thirds by Feb. 17. It also must reach a cost-cutting agreement with its union workers.

    Both sides could be in for tough talks. Even if the auto maker reaches a deal with the bondholders' committee, it will still have to persuade individual bondholders to sign off on it, said Daryl Robertson, who has represented bondholders at Hunton & Williams LLP, a Dallas law firm which isn't involved in the negotiations. "It could be contentious," he said.

    The committee, which represents 10 institutions holding GM debt, has held its first meeting by telephone, said the Paul, Weiss Rifkind spokesman. The names of the institutions on the committee couldn't be immediately learned.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    LOL! The dude bought another GM truck after all that?!

    On a separate note, GM should continue the Colorado line with a same-size truck (perhaps a touch smaller even) with the 2-mode hybrid from the new Vue under the hood, and also the 1.4 that will go in the Cruze as a base engine. Both would offer 30 mpg driving, perhaps the hybrid could reach 40, and the model would improve GM's CAFE average while providing people with a smaller truck with great gas mileage if they didn't need a big one. They could charge almost as much for this truck as they do for a base model Silverado, I would think. There is no Silverado making more than 20 mpg, and lots of people use pick-ups for all kinds of light delivery, etc, that wouldn't require a full-size truck.

    Ford will have the 40 mpg Fusion this year, do you really think a 40 mpg Escape will be more than two years behind? And a new Ranger/F-100 with the same powertrain would make sense. GM could beat them to that punch. And is it true (as has been implied here) that there will be no two-mode hybrid Equinox?? GM can't afford not to do that. Dump the hybrid Vue if need be. The volume sales are at Chevy.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    I think they would have a winner on their hands if they incorporated it in the Lambdas or the Epsilons.

    Supposedly the FWD version is too big to fit in those, let alone the Cruze. Oops. :cry:
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    This might help explain the price variance. Looks like gasoline producers have cut back production which is affecting supply.

    Meltdown 101: Why gas prices rise while oil drops

    At the end of the day, it looks like the target will be over $2.00 by summer.

    Tom Kloza, chief oil analyst at the Oil Price Information Service, predicts prices will move sideways over the next few weeks before they begin to climb in the spring, reaching $2 to $2.50 a gallon. He said he doubts prices can get much higher than that given how weak the economy is.

    In another forecast, the U.S Energy Department has said gasoline prices will likely average $2.37 a gallon through 2009.


    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Well, now I believe you.

    I feel better now. :)

    Regards,
    OW
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Yes, this happened to my wife's Denali making a slow turn into the mall. The P/S pump actually blew up.

    "You can't tell people they're getting the greatest car manufactured on the face of the earth and then three months later admit it doesn't steer right," said Megna, who is looking into the possibility of a class-action lawsuit.


    It's not about me or anyone else dissing GM for no reason. This stuff actually happens, guys.

    Regards,
    OW
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Yes, this happened to my wife's Denali making a slow turn into the mall. The P/S pump actually blew up.

    "You can't tell people they're getting the greatest car manufactured on the face of the earth and then three months later admit it doesn't steer right," said Megna, who is looking into the possibility of a class-action lawsuit.


    this thing has just gotten to the press and from what I read it is not power steering pumps blowing up. Seems to be at very low engine RPM (parking) with brakes applied (parking) and lots of effort out of the power steering pump (parking) there is not enough power to power the power steering so it goes into a manual condition. I cannot figure this one out. If the steering pump was vacuum powered I could see how it could happen. Is the engine going so slow and that it is below the rpm required to power up the pump? Easy fix for that would be to have the engine rev a little higher under those conditions?
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    ...have "electric steering?"
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    no
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Just got a special preview of the new LaCrosse. This car is super premium. The old one had a very nice interior with good fit/finish and premium materials but was, well lets just say, a little mundane. This new one is very nice and will easily give the ES a good run. Quite amazing. Was not able to drive though. Much niner interior than my Enclave which has gotten a lot of kudos itself.

    I know the emblem is an issue, thanks.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    This could be the third car out of dozens that competes. About time.

    Regards,
    OW
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    GM trucks, SUVs prone to losing power steering while parking but company says it's no problem

    Interesting. My 2000 Suburban had the same problem, but it didn't develop until about 50-60k miles. It would occasionally lose assist at parking lot speeds. Very annoying, as usual the dealer would say they couldn't find anything wrong. Did give me some bicep exercise.
  • dave8697dave8697 Member Posts: 1,498
    Which foreign nameplates have you driven or rented?

    Not a whole lot lately, New Sonata in 2006 and 2008, 2003 Accord to name a few. My last new purchase was a 30,500 msrp Silverado for 23 plus tax and 7 years later It draws compliments. Does Toyota even have a 23k vehicle with alloy wheels, 4x4, autotrac, posi, tow pkg, and a V8? At the time, Tundra was about 8" less ext cab foot room and my friend with the Accord's dad couldn't get acceptable mileage with his '00 V8 Tundra and got rid of it. I get just under 19 hwy loaded to nearly 3 tons.

    My wife and her friend each got a new vehicle in '98 and both negotiated the same price, $22k. We got an Astro Ext with rear a/c, alloys, V6, auto, power everything but seats, captains chairs, dutch doors, roof rack and then got $3300 more off with GM card earnings. Her friend got a 4 cyl Civic with manual trans, manual windows, man. steering and man. mirrors and complained about how floormats were almost a $200 option. After hearing that, I was not second guessing our Chevy value compared to Honda. I prefer utility, comfort, power, and features for my hard earned money. I recently rode in that very Civic at 10 years old. The Chevy still drives like a Rock and the Civic sounds and feels like it has missing bolts or motor mounts. No a/c, cracked windshield, drivetrain parts clanging with every clutching, and the last dealer service was $1100 earlier that month. To me, 5 years isn't a long term test.
  • fosgenfosgen Member Posts: 2
    Sorry for offtop
    I am assistant counsel from Russia and I need some info about the letter of General Motors, in which the company apologized to customers for the low quality of its products.
    This treatment has been circulated in the American automobile magazines in early December.
    I need a link to the source, that is the site of one of these magazines to read the original text of an appeal. It is very difficult for me to do it myself because I'm not familiar with the American press.
    If any of you has such information, I would be happy to get an answer to my question
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    The P/S pump actually blew up.

    Funny, my neighbour's 03' Escalade faced the same problem. However back then Cadillac quickly responded and replaced the item under warranty, so he was pleased enough and didn't complain at all.

    Is the engine going so slow and that it is below the rpm required to power up the pump? Easy fix for that would be to have the engine rev a little higher under those conditions?

    The beauty of those Vortec engines, it keeps going even at the lowest rpm possible. As far as I know its possible that the rpm gets too low to operate the power steering pump. Youe easy fix makes sense, but I wonder why GM didn't even bother do it.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
  • bpizzutibpizzuti Member Posts: 2,743
    Very annoying, as usual the dealer would say they couldn't find anything wrong.

    \Maybe it's a "feature" rather than a problem. You know, like the Windows blue-screen? :shades:
  • dieselonedieselone Member Posts: 5,729
    The beauty of those Vortec engines, it keeps going even at the lowest rpm possible. As far as I know its possible that the rpm gets too low to operate the power steering pump. Youe easy fix makes sense, but I wonder why GM didn't even bother do it.

    That wasn't the problem with mine. When it would act up, I could put it in neutral and rev the engine to 3,000 rpm and still lose assist. It just wasn't as noticeable when the vehicle was moving. Some times you could turn the wheel with your pinkie, other times it took both arms and the dealer was useless other than it said it would start replacing parts with no guarantee it would solve the problem. My solution was to get rid of the POS.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    Agreed...the 1994 Sub (purchased new) was not top quality either. We had blew a head gasket at 60K. Whoever thinks these trucks are top quality should guess again. I maintained that truck according to the manufacturers specs including a tranny tune up filter/fluid at 50K. By the time we traded it in 2004, around 78K miles, there were annoying issues like the turn signal would not automatically return after a left turn. That truck ate batteries like they were tasty treats and the head gasket failure, alternator failure and water pump failure were the big issues over the life of the truck. I have to say major tune-ups were a breeze to do on my own due to the carernous engine bay and NO PLASTIC HINDRANCES.

    Regards,
    OW
  • bvdj84bvdj84 Member Posts: 1,724
    Regarding the commitment letter, I am glad their able to be honest. But, I am still not sure they will be able learn from this. As they seem to be doing the same thing. Some cars that just arrived in showrooms are pure examples of why they are in trouble. They continue to let it happen. They stated "lackluster design". But they cannot show their commercials that simply gloat their brand and ask you if you are surprised. Well, No, I am not. Also, with rumor of them getting the corporate jet back and a few other issues. I cannot believe we are supporting that. Of course they'll take that away to show they need a loan, but now they have it, they have their jet back.

    I honestly feel, they made those mistakes, and yet we should bail them out? I am not sure they'll change. They'll keep putting a million SUV's out that are all the same, like the Enclave, Outlook, Tranverse, etc. They are all the same. The Caddy Escallade Hybrid? Kidding right? If a consumer has to pay that much for any caddy to get the "GM" quality then there is something wrong. They are way in over there head. They cannot possibly put all that quality when they have so many cars. It sounds harsh, and this is coming from someone driving an 08 GM car, but I never wanted it, and I'll be out, soon! Now that they are not leasing as well, or not at all, I would definitely not get one. Leasing a GM car would be the only way. Luckily, I am leasing, worse case scenario, I keep it the full term. :) I am just mad that they seem to be getting their jet back, and when they had the opportunity to pull cars from hitting the show room to save money, they did it anyway.

    I think a few others said this, focus on your most premium cars, and lose the others that aren't selling so good. That way we can put some updates, quality into the face of the brand. Any company would have this issue. You think if honda put out a million cars, you think they would have they same quality? Probably not.
    Focus on quality, not quantity. Pride getting to the head their CEO's? Enjoy your jet? On our dime.

    Believe it or not, my 08 Pontiac G6 is quieter and has less rattles than my 06 Accord. Seems to be a solid build. I am impressed. Is it truly the car I want, no, I want my Accord. The Accord 4cyl engine blows the G6 engine right out the water though, I miss that. Its lacking that refinement.

    lol anyway.
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    I have to say they only have 2 contenders at this critical time in the market from my point of view. CTS and Malibu. The Lamdas are the usual way they produce cars. Really only need ONE. It should be the best blend of all FOUR.

    If the 2010 LaCrosse proves desirable in the market, this will be number 3. NONE of the Pontiac domestics are exiting vs. the competition, again, IMO. I am glad you are somewhat pleased with your G6 The G8 is the only bright spot. The quality at GMC is low vs. the competition. That I have proof of in my garage.

    I have been a life-long customer and the problems I experienced with GM have moved me out of the need or desire for their products. The Corvette still piques my interest.

    All in all, time is not on the side of GM. They need to vastly downsize to the new market realities...and stop using junk parts.

    Regards,
    OW
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Not to take away from your point but who the heck would pay $22K for a stripped Civic in 98? In 99 I got an Accord EX - the top of the 4cyl models for about $20K even.

    Now back to our regularly scheduled program....
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • 62vetteefp62vetteefp Member Posts: 6,043
    Also, with rumor of them getting the corporate jet back and a few other issues. I cannot believe we are supporting that. Of course they'll take that away to show they need a loan, but now they have it, they have their jet back.

    Jets are gone with all the people and support. Wagoner has cut his travel schedule way back because he can no longer meet the commitments due to time constraints.
  • lemkolemko Member Posts: 15,261
    The only foreign rentals I had were a Toyota Corolla and a Mitsubishi Galant. Nothing special about either one of them - they were plug average though I thought the Mitsu had a pretty cool instrument panel.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    Not to take away from your point but who the heck would pay $22K for a stripped Civic in 98? In 99 I got an Accord EX - the top of the 4cyl models for about $20K even.

    Ha, I was wondering the same thing. I paid exactly $19,000 including tax for my green EX Civic back in 98. No offense, Dave, but it makes no sense.

    Dieselone, I guess the power steering was a dud in design then. Shame on GM for not recognizing it and fixing it.
  • gagricegagrice Member Posts: 31,450
    Dieselone, I guess the power steering was a dud in design then. Shame on GM for not recognizing it and fixing it.

    Now that you bring the subject up. My 2005 GMC hybrid PU would act funny every now and again. Real stiff steering. Especially when I would turn into our road. The engine would do its auto stop and then when I hit the accelerator to go up the hill the steering was real stiff and the hesitation would cause wheel spin when the power came up. One of the annoying little aspects of that truck. I attributed it to the hurried up hybrid system. Just another reason I am glad some one finally came along and bought it from me. I am very picky about vehicles and I have a list on this Toyota Sequoia. So I don't just pick on GM. The most trouble free car out of the last 4 new vehicles was the 2005 Passat TDI wagon. I only had it for 13 months and 8300 miles. I was sorry to see it go. When I sell this Sequoia there will be no tears.
  • dave8697dave8697 Member Posts: 1,498
    It could have been the local Balt. area market. It could have been Honda sales tactics. It could have been gender related. It happened
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    ...if GM makes it as a viable company. I believe everything needs to go perfect for 3 months for the bailout to work WITHOUT infusing more government (taxpayer) funds. What are the odds?

    Rod Lache, the Deutsche Bank automotive analyst who set the target price for GM shares at zero, told the Society of Automotive Analysts that GM might have to consider bankruptcy given complications that arose with the rescue of GM's minority-owned financial arm, GMAC.

    "The probability is greater than not that there will be bankruptcy" at GM, Lache said, "but not the kind of disruptive, scary bankruptcy with calamitous impact that a lot of suppliers are afraid of today."

    UAW President Ron Gettelfinger told the Wall Street Journal on Monday that it is unclear what kind of reductions the union will have to agree to under the terms of the loan agreements.

    "We are still trying to figure out what that means," he told the newspaper. "We have no documents, no contact with the federal government."

    GM could still go bankrupt
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Oh, I don't doubt that it happened. It did really catch my eye though!
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • fosgenfosgen Member Posts: 2
    Thank you VERY MUCH!!!!!!
  • circlewcirclew Member Posts: 8,666
    De nada.

    Regards,
    OW
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    It could have been the local Balt. area market. It could have been Honda sales tactics. It could have been gender related. It happened

    Yes, Dave that makes sense. I forgot that Toyota salesmen in my area tend to put more pressure on women as well. I just read my post again and I meant to say "the price doesn't make any sense". Either way it's my mistake, sorry.
  • m4d_cowm4d_cow Member Posts: 1,491
    ...if GM makes it as a viable company. I believe everything needs to go perfect for 3 months for the bailout to work WITHOUT infusing more government (taxpayer) funds. What are the odds?

    I can describe it in 3 perfect words: impossible to happen. :P ;) :shades:

    I bet GM will ask for more bailout, look forward to March 31st.
  • fezofezo Member Posts: 10,386
    Yeah, I can't tell you how many times I've heard tales from women dealing with the same car guys I've dealt with and they've gotten killed while I negotiated a pretty decent deal. A couple of them have had me come along to look over things as what one salesman called me "her curbside lawyer."
    2015 Mazda 6 Grand Touring, 2014 Mazda 3 Sport Hatchback, 1999 Mazda Miata 2004 Toyota Camry LE, 1999.
  • cooterbfdcooterbfd Member Posts: 2,770
    I noticed the same problem in my '04 Silverado, yet when I inflated the tires to the proper pressure (70 psi, there was only about 48 at the time) it went away.
  • robbiegrobbieg Member Posts: 350
    Could someone please tell me why GM cares about how many dealers it has. From everything I have read, everyone says that GM has too many dealers and must reduce the number of dealers, among other things, to become profitable again. They always cite the fact that Honda and Toyota have far fewer dealers. To me it doesn't make sense to me because the dealers are not owned by GM.
Sign In or Register to comment.