By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
I don't see all the vehicles with fatal design flaws, either via accident or wanton negligence, being crushed. At the least, the offenders could be exported. All of the bleeding heart one worlders should know of the economic benefit said vehicles could provide in developing areas.
Junking polluting cars is probably a lot cheaper than making dirty air clean again.
Perhaps the cars can be patched up and won't be junked. We don't know yet.
By the time these diesels are crushed, their life expectancy will have been considerably reduced. Eventually, through wear and tear and accidents, they'll all be off the road. In the meantime those used VWs would be good values for consumers on budgets.
Finally. VW will be made to pay a very stiff price for breaking the rules. I'm confident they will never knowingly break the rules again. There's little additional financial penalty to VW to be gained by crushing the cars, but there's harm to consumers.
As with the "cash for clunkers" program, I believe there's minor environmental gain, when the environmental damage of replacing vehicles and crushing them is considered. Consumers lose when useful assets are destroyed, and our politicians come out looking better than they deserve.
Besides, the crushed cars arent' landfill. They'll be recycled. Today's Toyota is tomorrow's Turkish teapot! (or tomorrow's Toyota once again---you never know).
Nobody is advocating putting non-conforming cars on US roads, where is that being advocated. But crushing them, and producing the direct and indirect waste that comes with such acts, is very hard to defend, IMNSHO.
VW wants to put this behind them, stuff in a steel drum and weld it shut. They don't want this ghost to keep rising up from the dead.
And yes, it's the lying (and temporarily fooling some very self-important people who found out about the lie due to research from a small school), not the pollution.
Excellent solution, gagrice. Simple too. Of course, that's why the regulators didn't take your suggestion.
"We ship all of our polluting cars to poorer countries without emissions regulations. Working for a better world at Volkswagen of North America".
And I suspect the cheater VWs are still worlds cleaner than the fleet in less developed countries, so it would be doing them a favor there, too. All automakers already have models for countries with less stringent regulations.
Regarding courts vs regulators, isn't that like cops vs prosecutors, or cops vs prosecutors vs judges? Often on the same side, to say the least.
http://www.smh.com.au/world/chinese-billionaire-mining-tycoon-liu-han-is-executed-over-his-links-to-a-mafiastyle-gang-20150209-139w2z.html
As for Germany, the "crime" wasn't committed against them.
IIRC, Eurogreenies have claimed certain automakers have cheated there, too. To be fair, the punishment given by the US authorities to domestic automakers is a slap on the wrist compared to what those same authorities might give to others. And the other regions certainly prop up their industry more, and usually have less of a socio-economic chasm to show for it. We also like to scream about financial impropriety (hidden accounts for dirty money, etc) in Switzerland et al, while welcoming it here.
Also, those who are entitled to live in a large detached house (often bought for nothing years ago) with a private car or two, you can live in a shoebox apartment and use your feet, or if lucky, have a bike. Also often the same group who cashed in on the past 40 years of asset appreciation and/or public sector rewards and will now cry about how minimum wages are too high, to heck with you, I got mine, buzz off.
Veering back on topic here, VW has obviously been staggered by all this but they have consistently shown that they can make cars that are more fun to drive than Toyotas and cars that have more "cred" than GM. Whether that will translate into future dominance in the marketplace-----hard to say.
I think VW was also able to plan ahead well enough to weather this storm, and will have healthy sales and profits in no time. The brand has cachet in so many markets.
http://autoweek.com/article/vw-diesel-scandal/carb-rejects-vws-fix-30-liter-diesels
Power Sheet: GM Put Volkswagen to Shame (Fortune)
The author seems to think that VW will be dragged down by Dieselgate for a long time, but my guess is that it'll mostly fade away in the US. You could argue that it mostly has already and we're just in the mop-up phase.
Prices for the new Amarok in Germany start at €25,720 net for the rear-wheel drive Trendline version with double cab, the V6 TDI and 120 kW (EU6, available from the second quarter of 2017), making them just €940 more expensive than the previous entry-level model with a with double cab and 103 kW TDI four-cylinder engine. The top-of-the-range Volkswagen Amarok Aventura with the V6 TDI and 165 kW engine, 4Motion all-wheel drive and 8-speed automatic transmission comes to €46,525 net and will be launched at the end of September 2016.
Makes the US competition look rather plain jane.
http://pbn.com/VW-sued-by-Mass-Md-NY-over-pollution-linked-to-diesel-cheating-device,115809
I still can't believe we're bussing school kids all over in diesel fueled buses.