Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see the latest vehicles!
Options
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
They're growing in the same market the Japanese did in the late 60's and during the 70's.And one they seem to have forgotten. {and the U.S. never tried very hard in...STILL]. Not a bad marketing model.And can almost hear the echoes of the commentary about them as re:Korean brands,but in that era it was VW you'd be comparing against the Japanese.
Have spent a lot of time haunting the Hyundai dealer checking out their cars.They're nicely crafted nice to look at and I would actually consider several of their offerings all the way up to the xg300[?]..[give the damn thing a name,please].And not to start the style thing again.... but I prefer their looks to the Japanese makes much as I prefer the Focus 4door or wagon[NOT the 2 door],the Cavalier[still nice after all these years, lol] or the Neon over them as well.
Personally, depreciation does not concern me as I keep cars for wayyyyy past their prime trade-in value anyway.[I've had a 63 Plymouth Valiant Signet 2dr. hardtop for 20 years.]
A prior post took note of the fact that all cars are vastly improved over just 15 years ago and that is sooo true. Try some of the cars from the 70's and only a Yugo would still be lousy, so even if the cars have 250 problems from 100 is what? 2.5 per car? In the 70's the average recorded by consumer reports was something like 12 to 15 per car. The worst was a 74 Dodge Coronet wagon with 57 defects.We've come a long way, so what looks "bad" these days is probably still at least acceptable or not unexpected.So I'd have no fear of buying a Korean car. The Leganza is a nice looking vehicle as well and I hope Daewoo makes it.
I'm tired of the Japanese mantra as well, BUT, that doesn't change the fact that they remain at the top of the charts as regards reliability and build quality. I think they need the Koreans to create some fire in their styling departments tho.It's an interesting era we're living in,just wish all these studies and tests and regulations and institutional busy bodies would stop already and quit trying to squeeze the last bit of pleasure out of automobiles. You can run yourself into the ground chasing minutiae to find the "best" car and be totally paranoid afterward by some "report"or study or something you found out on the Internet.Takes all the joy out of the simple pleasure of a new car.And that's sad to me.
My first new car:99 Cavalier and I love it, no problems,nearly 20,000 miles, but after reading everything on Edmund's available I wasn't able to look at it the same for 2 weeks.The posts ran the gamut.
All I know is that it's been a completely enjoyable vehicle, with more safety equipment than I had on my other car, an 86 Calais, is better built but pretty average and I know I'll still like looking at it long after I've paid for it.The mileage has been great.[4speed auto.]
Would I try to convince anyone on this topic to buy one, No.Just to explain that all our priorities are different.This car suited mine perfectly and I haven't been disappointed.
I simply like the fact that there are a few players actually trying to produce reasonably good looking, efficient and inexpensive cars. The Big Three and the Japanese makes have handed it over to Koreans at this point.I'm looking forward to seeing what will happen.Nite all.
The fact that the asking price for a used Sephia was more than what you paid for a same year new Sephia is NOT the same as the asking price for a used Echo being higher than the original MSRP.
Anyway, you seem pretty level headed and able to see both sides of an issue so I have a question for you.
You made reference to the Japanese mantra. Just what is that?
Well, you know what? Toyota thought of all the occupants when they designed the Echo.
Most cars are designed with a look in mind first and the passenger compartment is almost an afterthought. Toyota did the opposite with the Echo. They designed the interior first and then did the exterior.
It is this new way of thinking that causes the WiLL to look the way it does also.
For anyone who has not seen the WiLL, the website is whatswill.com.
No, I'm not related to Frank Zappa, just need a name with enough letters to log on!
Have really enjoyed these posts.People are passionate. Saw about three different Echoes today. They're strange, but to me in the same way a 58 Rambler American must have been parked next to a Continental MK II!!!The head room and seating position are fantastic. The center dash pod....well, that is a mite different...lol.
Have suggested the Echo or the Elantra to my folks. They see them on the road and ask me what I know about them. If they go new that's probably where they'll wind up. They drive the Calais now and love it.Think my Mother has turned into an enthusiast!
I will say that the comment about certain of these lower end cars being sort of tinny is true. Something I miss about the Olds was the solid feel to it and the substance of the doors.It handled like it was on rails. The Cavalier was almost a direct new replacement in size weight and room. The ride is better it's quiet in a different way, but hollow sounding where the Olds never was.And the Olds was a take off on the J platform. Sort of weird;not that distant a relative even now and its been 15 years!
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
Well that is certainly looking at the bright side of a recall. LOL.
Don't get me wrong, I agree with much of what you have to say, but I can do without the recalls.
Just before I went to sleep last night,I finally realized where Toyota was going with the Echo. It's really a "retro" deign, in that a lot of late 50's/ early 60's Fiats and British cars had very similar shapes.I finally got it and the more I see them, the more obvious that becomes. Pretty clever.
I'm disappointed to see this end abandoned, especially by GM. The "J" is according to GM's own stats a large number of people's first intro to their cars. As such, they haven't spent the time or energy on it to allow it to represent what's available up the scale, but go for the fast buck and hope to make up for it with lots of SUV sales.With the Japanese makes, that first one makes you think there's even better up the product chain, or at least as good.
Don't get me wrong, I love my Cavalier,but I don't think any significant improvements have been made since the 95 was introduced except for offering the 4 speed auto or the Getrag 5 speed a year ago.That's criminal,the car itself is pretty pleasant.There used to be virtue in avoiding planned obsolescence, now you never hear of it.
In the '80s and'90s, I leased or owned a Renault Alliance, Dodge Colt, Dodge Shadow, Nissan Sentra, Nissan 200SX SE-R, Dodge Neon, Chevy Nova, Mitsubishi Mirage, and Honda Civic as "entry level" autos (in addition to more expensive trucks, minivans, SUVs, sedans, and convertibles). Most of these entry level autos had prices that ranged from around $6000 in the '80s to close to $11,000 in the '90s. The SE-R was an exception at nearly $14,000.
Now in this forum we're talking low end as being less than $20,000. Yikes! Does anyone want to guess how much my first house and five acres cost? (Try $7800.)
If we stick to cars whose MSRP STARTS BELOW $14,999, then we clear the field considerably. That pretty much eliminates European cars, including the repriced Golf. That leaves about 8 American cars, 8 Japanese, and 10 Korean. Of course there are a multiplicity of variations (2-door, four-door, wagon, hatchback, etc.).
So, what's the point? Well, two points, actually: 1) There is a good distribution of low end cars from the US, Japan, and Korea; 2) the Accord, Camry, and Galant don't fit in my definition of low end car. (The Hyundai Sonata squeaked in but the Kia Rio didn't.) Now the task might be to do some winnowing.
So is $14,999 too low for a low end car in 2001? If 26 vehicles make the cut, I'd say it's a good demarcation point.
Seems as if the manufacturers are not even TRYING to keep the prices down. It's an amazing thing though, that so many features that were the exclusive province of luxury cars so long ago have become common equipment on even the least expensive cars.
Small doesn't necessarily mean inexpensive,simple or uncomplicated.
I have a hard time thinking about 20,000 dollars being spent on any car, much less a "bottom end" one.The condo I bought in 1994 was 50,000; not so long ago. Sold it for 69,000 4 years later and this in L.A.
I just wonder if a car can even be sold any longer without all the extra slop on it.The Elantra I believe even has power windows as standard equipment [just something else to go wrong down the road] and while a base price may seem attractive to buy a couple of options you have to take an entire package of things you may never need or want.
While I like your cut off point; In a year or so there may be no cars available at even that price,*0).Who'll enter the market then? Proton? Will we see the Hindustan Ambassador finally? Dacia? I shudder to think what will be available then...........call it"Yugo's Revenge"?
I know I'm dating myself but... My first brand new car, a '74 VW Beetle, was one of that decades entry level vehicles. I paid about $3K which, at the time, was almost 40% of my yearly wage and I was making decent entry level union wages back then. Heck, I was able to buy my first home for about $30K the following year with only a couple of modest pay raises in between.
Now, throw in the vastly improved product (the VW didn't even have a fan to heat the interior) we get today and these cars ALL start to look pretty darn good. However, I realize this is all relative and $15K is still $15K and that IS a lot of money. I just don't think the burden has gotten any worse with time.
MSRP........................................$26,840
Edmund's TMV...........................$28,120
Sister's NEW Ody EX on May22....$26,660
Edmund's TMV was $1,460 MORE than the actual selling price. Isn't TMV supposed to be the actual price one should pay?
If we made the max $20,000 for the definition of a low end car, wouldn't that mean that the Camry is a low end car since you can get some sort of Camry for under that?
I don't know about you, but the Camry is not my idea of a low end car.
Domestic Manufacturers
Chevrolet... Cavalier, Metro
Dodge... Neon
Ford... Focus
Pontiac... Sunfire
Saturn... S-series (SC, SL, SW)
German Manufacturers
Volkswagen... Golf
Korean Manufacturers
Daewoo... Lanos, Nubira
Hyundai... Accent, Elantra
Kia... Rio, Sephia
Japanese Manufacturers
Honda... Civic
Mazda... Protege
Mitsubishi... Mirage
Nissan... Sentra
Suzuki... Swift, Esteem
Toyota... Echo, Corolla
That's 21 vehicles that I would consider "low-end". Note that I put them in alphabetical order (before I get flamed because someone's favorite is below another car). Some cars were well under the $15,000 barrier, while others barely squeaked by (VW Golf at $14,900). Including some of the midsize cars that fall under $20k just wouldn't be "low-end" anymore (just try going to the Accord and/or Camry board and call that car "low-end").
Not whining about prices,because it IS relative, stebu, as you've correctly pointed out.In addition I believe we are getting the best interest rates since the 60's.Don't worry about dating yourself;my folks bought a 72 AMC Ambassador Brougham that listed at $5000.oo and the price made my heart constrict even then and I was barely old enough to drive.It's just a normal reaction I think.5 figures seems like a lot more than 4, and yet some of the equipment on even the least expensive cars was never ever available on anything but Cadillacs, Lincolns or BMWs at ANY price.The MK III had an anti skid system available as an option in 1969, now every car has as std. or as an option.
I just wish there was a car out there engineered to be simple to fix and build right out of the box.
Don't know if it's possible any longer, though the Saturn comes close,with it's removable panels and underhood layout.
There hasn't been much discussion about the Saturn among the posts. Have they become so dated that they are no longer competitive?
In MY case, however, it matters because I'm a cheap s.o.b. who hasn't forgotten what it was like to have to scrape by, schlep radiators and flat tires, dead batteries across town, sometimes on the bus, sometimes with a shopping cart and back again, because that's what I had to do to get my car running again.,} I learned thrift at an early age and never forgot.I learned the difference between want and need, so I really couldn't justify buying a new car when the old one was still reliable.Until recently when I bought that bloody Cavalier that I found so attractive because I WANTED IT.Even then, I had a psychological price point where I just would not cross.Got it new with air, spoiler[I know;but it was already on the car!] and 4 speed auto for 11,808 , 2 years ago this coming Monday.
Just wanted to know what having a new car was like before I'm so old my license gets yanked.Even tightwads have to unbend a little once in awhile!!!
Car and Driver ranked the SL2 ninth out of thirteen cars in their "Small Cars" comparison test last year. Even though it was the most expensive car of the bunch, it ranked last in rear seat comfort, near the bottom in front seat comfort, and last in quality. They complained of super-low-grade plastics, poor fabric, and a definite lack of room. It had a strong engine but terrible shifter, brakes, and below-average handling.
There have been many rumors about Saturn's demise. As GM cuts and consolidates, Saturn is not looking very good. The company has never turned a profit and sales have drastically slacked off as the "Different Kind of Company" started to go on strike and GM had to step in and take over. It was a good attempt, certainly stronger than the Geo line of vehicles. However, in the next ten to twenty years, we will see a lot of lines go away and become consolidated. We have already seen two in the past year... Plymouth and Oldsmobile.
I would say that the Golf is a questionable entry. I sold VW/Audi/Porsche up until seven months ago, and we never, ever saw a base Golf come in. Even attempting to order one resulted in a 3 month wait from VW, which resulted in customers looking elsewhere or moving up to the readily available models (well above $16,000).
One model which should be included on the list is the Hyundai Tiburon, which comes in at $14,499, and is a spunky, tossable coupe at that price.
Otherwise, it's a good list, and it shows we have lots of choices.
Amen to that!!! There is nothing scarier then peeking under the hood of one of these, so called, entry level cars. Something as simple as air filtration now has all sorts of ECU monitored sensors and meters that practically require an automotive engineering degree and the manual dexterity of a watch maker before one dares to modify anything.
In contrast, I recall working on an old 74 AMC Sportabout wagon that I briefly owned. When it started running a little rough, I just ripped all the PCV and smog hoses off the car and plugged any leftover holes with wine corks... it ran great! And when I had to change it's radiator, I was able to stand IN the engine compartment while unhooking things. Times sure have changed.
There already are signs of it in the high end cars where the distance sensing cruise controls are showing up. It's just a matter of time before it finds its way into a Hyundai or a Cavalier.
I've only owned one of the Americans, but I've rented some of the others. The Neon (owned it) and the Saturn were unsatisfactory in my experience. My stint with a Focus was encouraging, albeit I was not taken by its looks. Some reports say it is a bit problem prone, too.
I've sold and driven a ton of Golfs, but like I said, I don't think it belongs here. It's a fun and functional car, especially if you move up to GTI territory, but then it's many thousands out of this range. It's reliability and workmanship are suspect, unfortunately.
The Elantra and the Tiburon seem to be the cream of the Korean crop. I looked at all the Korean cars before purchasing a Sonata. I leased a 2000 Tiburon last year. The Kias and Daewoos I test drove just didn't match up, even though they were in many ways superior to the bottom rung American cars and at a much better price.
My ownership experience with Japanese cars includes the Sentra, Civic, and Mirage, but I've only test driven the most current models, plus I rented an Echo. The Mirage seemed cheap. The new Sentra was nice, but bland and soulless, and the Civic was unremarkable. Based on my past experience, these are probably solid cars, but they're boring. The Echo (like the Focus) challenged my visual preferences, but it seemed pretty solid overall and had a distinct feel to it. It was not boring. The dash was bizarre in a deja vu sort of way: it got me thinking about a few International Scouts I owned where the bulk of the instrumentation was decidedly to the right of the steering column. Among the Japanese entries, the Echo probably wins the "bang for the buck" honors.
That's an overview of my experience. What's yours?
jstandefer: thanks for the insight on the Saturn. I know the Cavalier is probably about the same level. I test drove them both, but was surprised to find that after you added what was std. on the Chevy[abs, power steering],the price went up quickly.Even considering going without auto.you were in the 13,500 range-and this in 99.Manual just isn't the way to go in Hell-Ay;it's hard to get out of second any time after 10a.m.!!!!
Drove the Saturn without power steering and it wasn't bad, though I'm used to going without in the Valiant [3 on the tree if anyone is interested...I know:NOT! :} ]
More on price:it's a series of trade offs for me;at this point it's about juggling a house payment [and repairs],planning for retirement[years away, but.....],saving for home improvements and upgrades that need to be done,emergency fund and having a little left over to spend without having to think about it.The sort of thinking you'd find with someone whose parents were Depression children.Off to the rock pile, you guys, I'm gonna be late!
You opinion, please....which car do you think will give me better long term reliability? (I had my last car for 12 years!) and can you explain why you have your opinion? (people I've spoken to in person say "get the ford...I'm a ford guy" or Get the nissan...don't trust th edomestic cars." But no one talks about the reputaiton of the car company or anything like that.)
How does one feel over the other? Drive both.How do you fit behind the wheel? Cramped or comfortable? Quiet or loud when you drive it? Look for the livability aspects as well, because after the "new" wears off, you'll really resent making payments on something you can't stand driving every day.
And then there's the button pushing that Major mentioned. Which one gives you a goose? Will it make you grin from ear to ear seeing it parked in your driveway because you KNOW you made the right choice? Or will you walk away from it without a second glance and no memory of the drive home?
Is it a pleasant place to be in a major traffic jam,or look and feel like you're sitting in a dentist's office [THAT will only make a long drive home longer].
I know these are all sensory and emotional responses mixed with some practical aspects,but it's YOUR money and you should be happy on all levels IMHO. Dave
Thus Echo would be the low end offering from Toyota and Corolla would be pared from the list. The Rio would be considered the low end offering from Kia and the Sephia/Spectra would be pared from the list. And so on.
I guess if we did that though, the list would really be more on the order of "starter" cars and not really low end cars.
Just a thought.
I'll agree with Dweezil that I've always had a seating problem in Nissans as well: Sentra, 200SX SE-R, 240 SX, and Altima. I just couldn't ever get really comfortable. I've had a few quality problems here and there with Nissans, but never a recall and never a problem that left the car unusable.
The bumper to bumper warranties are identical on the two cars, but the Nissan drive train warranty is longer. Unfortunately, you may need the longer warranty on the Focus if its repair history stays the same as in its first few years.
FWIW, my 2001 Echo has had zero recalls and the Echo has only had one recall since it has been on sale in the United States. And that recall was only for cars in cold weather states.
There's a term for that kind of advertising known as "bait and switch". The car exists "somewhere", but we ordinary slobs will never see it. Somehow,"We just sold that one; but we DO have a nicely equipped [fill in the blank] for $16,999.99
before freight, taxes, dealer installed glamour package, documentation fees and prep.We can have you out the door today for $19,275....if you act NOW!"
Would that they actually had more cars WITHOUT all the extraneous junk available. 1 "package" with one item you can actually USE only comes with 7 or 8 others and quickly runs up the price.
I miss the days when you could essentially tailor a car to your specific needs via the options list.
I am somewhat confused about your statement on the 7500 mile checkups. Are you saying a checkup at 7500 miles or a checkup every 7500 miles?
My Scheduled Maintenance Guide does suggest maintenance every 5k or 7.5k miles. The maintenance is the same if your Toyota has 5k miles or 7.5miles on it. At this amount of miles, the first maintenance is oil change (with oil filter change, of course) and tire rotation. Therefore if your statement applies to the former, I don't know what your friends are having done when they hit 7500 miles.
I am following intervals of 5k and so my next service is due at 10k. All I have to have done at that point is oil change and tire rotation.
At 15k, I will have the oil changed, rotate tires, and inspect various components.
At 20k, I will have the oil changed and the tires rotated.
The first "major" maintenance is not until 30k where they replace the engine air filter, replace the engine coolant, replace the oil, replace the spark plugs, and rotate the tires.
I don't know about the Sephia, but do you know when I have to replace my drive belt? Never, because the Echo has a drive chain.
Granted I have only had my Echo for about six months, but you want to know how many times I have had it at the dealer for unscheduled maintenance? None.
I am not trying to be insulting but just pointing out that if the past is any future indication, it looks like you will be at your dealer with your car more than I will be at my dealer with mine.
The most unreliable American brands are those where there is Japanese content such as Chevy Chevette, Chevy Tracker, Ford Probe, etc. However, the Chevy Prizm (Toyota clone) is very reliable.
Daughter and son in law's 1984 Honda Accord has so many problems at 177,000 miles (and has engine AND transmission rebuilt/replaced) they cannot afford to fix it. Meanwhile, their 1978 Impala with 187,000 miles on original engine and transmission runs well...but needs to have grille, fender, lights, etc. fixed after he was in 2 wrecks with it. Japanese quality? Only Toyota.
I have never owned a Toyota but all research indicates Toyota is THE most reliable brand. Not one unreliable Toyota in the numerous ones of all ages owned by friends. Can not say that about any other brand. I have had Chevrolet that had problems and Chevrolet that were almost perfect. All 5 Volkswagens we owned gave us problems. Our NEW Volvo was unreliable and expensive to maintain. A co-worker had same experience with a new, later model Volvo. So far, our 1999 Grand Caravan SE in 27 months is acting as if it were built by Toyota...completely reliable with zero problems.
If I recall, Toyota's V6 had a really bad reputation a while back and even Consumer's Reports rated it as a bad buy. MSN's CarPoint rated the previous generation Camry with only 3 points of 5 possible. There were several engine problems that ended with "V6 only."
Toyota makes good vehicles and they probably have the highest reliability on the market, but they are certainly not perfect and the other manufacturers are not very far behind. Virtually every car sold today will run past the 200,000 mile mark.
As far as "duds"... Has anyone seen the crash-test ratings on the Toyota Previa? Notrotious at best. Just as bad, if not worse, than the Ford Aerostar. That's why the Sienna came around so quickly. The MR-Spyder is a nice vehicle, but someone forgot to design in everyday liveability (virtually no trunk space). And the Celica with it's VVTi-L engine is quick if you rev it past 6,000rpm. Where did the torque go? I like to drive hard, but revving well beyond 6,000rpm all of the time?
But I'll discuss it with everyone. I know about a dozen people that will never buy a Toyota again because of their bad experiences with them. I have never had a problem with any of the Ford's or Mazda's I have owned and I will continue to buy from them. Toyota? I'll consider them, but they're priced a bit high and they're just plain boring to drive (IMHO).
But then I realized that people here are just as passionate about their $12,000 cars as they are about their $72,000 cars. In that perspective, then, this discussion is pretty good after all. I don't agree with every poster here but a lot of you make good points and it's great to see such interest in the "bottom" of the price spectrum.
I just purchased my first brand-new car last week. My wife and I wanted a smaller car with four doors. We wanted to spend less than $20,000. I've never owned a small Toyota, Honda, Ford, Chevy, etc. My previous car was a Geo Metro. So I spent about eight months researching all the usual small cars. And after digesting all the information I gathered from just about every source I could think of, what did my wife and I do? We bought a Hyundai Elantra GT. And why? Because we liked it. That's all. Liked the way it drove, liked the room, liked the styling, liked the features and liked the price. All the 0-60 times and re-sale values went out the window.
We looked at Echo, Protege (great car, our second choice), Corolla (too small), Civic (dull), Focus, Sonata, Beetle (too small) and others. All fine cars in their own ways, but none was right for us. We certainly don't feel like we sacrificed anything with our choice.
Will our Korean car hold up over the next eight years? Who knows? It's my first one, but it has given me no reason to suspect it won't. To us, it was just as refined and appears as just well built as any other compact we looked at. Is our car the best? Probably not, but it's good enough for us.
I guess the point I'm trying to make (and, I suspect, other posters here are trying to make, too) is that we buy the cars we like, regardless of what we hear or read. And becuase we like them, we want others to like them, too. Sure, we can talk about them all we like, but at the end of the day if you didn't like Daewoos when the sun came up, odds are you ain't gonna like 'em when the sun sets, either.
So love your Kia, Hyundai, Toyota, Ford or Honda. Don't let anyone try to put doubt in your mind about your choice of vehicle. And respect the choices of others. After all, we buy what we like.
Happy Motoring!
CJA
Have you also found our very active discussion on the Hyundai Elantra? If not, just click on that link to check it out. I'm sure you will find lots of interesting previous conversation there, and will be welcomed there as a new owner.
Pat
Host
Sedans and Women's Auto Center Message Boards
2021 Kia Soul LX 6-speed stick
As I said, the maintenance guide does not list any maintenance at 7500 miles other than an oil change and rotating the tires if you are using the 7500 mile interval schedule.
I think that someone has pulled the wool over their eyes.