Has Honda's run - run out?

1132133135137138153

Comments

  • travlertravler Member Posts: 138
    I don't think Honda was targeting the $18k buyer. There are buyers for every price range, and a butt for every seat. Why does anyone need a Hummer that gets 10 MPG, or a $40K 2-seater to drive to work?

    There is a difference between wants and needs.
  • travlertravler Member Posts: 138
    Ridgelines start about $28K, not $30K. You can probably get into one for around $26K
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    you can get into $18K Tacomas and Colorados for $15-16K...same difference.

    I don't think Honda was targeting the people you said they were, because those people are mostly the people I described.

    I think they were targeting people who want a more carlike truck to be a family hauler, which is fine, but all I was saying before you posted was that the actual trucks that are already out there do a decent job of that, especially the Ford and Toyota.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    Real trucks are known for thier "trucklike" ride and handling. The first thing you always see mentioned when the Ridgeline is tested is that it doesn't ride or handle like a "truck". Again, Honda isn't trying to take over the entire truck market with the Ridgeline. But I'm sure they'll be able to get rid of the 50,000 or so that they have planned. And since they build the thing in the same factory they build thier other "trucklike" vehicles, they can always shift capacity to the other higher selling product.

    And even though you can get into a Tacoma for $18K, It wouldn't be a V6 or AWD. In my 30153 zip code carsdirect has a base crew cab 4WD pegged at OVER $24K.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    travler was talking about the "day-to-day going-to-work-and-back driver who just happens to like trucks" - it is my assertion that those folks are the ones buying up $15-18K Tacomas and Colorados with RWD and extended 2-door cabs. These are not the people you were referring to when you mentioned V-6s and AWD.

    Since the folks at C&D are so much into 0-60s and carlike rides, I would love to see what they came up with if the compared a Ridgeline to whatever 4-door 4WD versions of the F-150 and Tundra cost around $30K.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,739
    >But I'm sure they'll be able to get rid of the 50,000 or so that they have planned.

    They have a $1000 "marketing support" to help move them. Probably will make that low bar.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Curious......

    Rocky
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    They have a $1000 "marketing support" to help move them. Probably will make that low bar.

    So does every other truck on the market. Why should Honda be any different?

    The 50K units mark is a low number for total truck sales, but when you break things down at bit, it is easy to understand. (They made this target, BTW.)

    Ford, sells about 35-45K units of the Sport Trac each year. So Honda's goal is slightly higher than the volume Ford is doing in the personal truck market.

    I don't have especially solid numbers for Toyota, but back in October they sold about 14,500 Tacomas. Of that, only 6,000 were 4WD models. That number includes standard, extended, and crew cabs. In the same month, Honda sold about 5,000 Ridgelines... all of which are crew cabs with AWD.

    So, IMO, Honda's target of 50K units is about right. The only reason why we see much higher numbers for vehicles like the Tacoma and Frontier are because something like 60% of them are 2WD vehicles. And, don't get me wrong, I think they are correct in offering namby-pamby trucks like the Prerunner. Honda is shooting themselves in the foot with such a limited set of options. But the Ridgeline is what it is. And it's doing well for what it is.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Maybe 2010. Depends on whether you mean the Acura RL or the Honda Ridgeline. (Some folks call the Ridgeline "RL" for short.)
  • bumpybumpy Member Posts: 4,425
    Not anytime soon. A better bet would be a milder, street-friendly version of the V10 in the forthcoming NSX.
  • travlertravler Member Posts: 138
    As I said earlier, no truck will suit everyone. I have a neighbor that drives a Hummer to work every day. Obviously some people have more money to spend than $18k on a new truck.
    Don't be so narrowminded in thinking that your needs and perceptions are everyone's needs and perceptions.
    If there isn't a large enought market for the Ridgeline it'll fail. It won't be the first time Honda has missed their mark. Remember the Passport, older Civic SI's, the first Odyssey?
    Another point that we're all missing is that gas prices have seriously hurt all catagories of the truck market. The Ridgeline was introduced just before it hit. More people were trying to unload the ones they had than were buying new ones.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    NHTSA's tests are too easy nowadays, so the 5 star thing doesn't mean a whole lot nowadays. Basically it's embarassing *not* to get 5 stars, at least for a new product.

    -juice
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I'm surprised at the 4WD vs. 2WD Tacomas being sold. I guess it all depends on where you live, as I see mostly the 4WD models. Maybe they're mostly Prerunners, as they look like the 4WD models with the big tires and all.

    Bob
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    is the single most popular trim of the Tacoma, or at least it was in the last generation, haven't seen recent numbers.

    But they sell a lot of the small 4-cylinder, steel-wheel models too.

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    You don't notice a lot of the base models, they're lower down and less flashy.

    -juice
  • gee35coupegee35coupe Member Posts: 3,387
    Doesn't surprise me a bit. But that's less than 5% of the base price. Considering it's a first effort at a truck-like vehicle, not bad.

    Check the discounts on the big 3 trucks.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Well, like I wrote in the original post... I don't have the best data. The month of October 2005 is the only month I have and the information was provided by a poster here at Edmunds (thanks Wooddorker).

    But since October is generally a normal month (not like January and July, which are big fleet months), I figure it serves well enough as a rough sketch.

    And, once again, this is not a dig at Toyota. I think they have the upper hand in being able to offer an extended cab and standard cab in addition to a crew cab. They have the advantage in building their truck BOF to save on costs. Honda's approach gives them one heck of a stiff chassis and terrific ride, but it costs them in terms of production flexibility.

    But when you look at how well others are doing targeting the same narrow market Honda is after... the 50K goal is pretty good.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    A better bet would be a milder, street-friendly version of the V10 in the forthcoming NSX.

    The last thing offered by a Honda exec was this (paraphrased). "We're going to built a V10. Once we do that, we're going to see if a V8 is worth doing."

    One of the mainstream mags (R&T, I think) published some rumors about their already being plans for both the V10 and V8. Both to be found in hi-po Acuras. They had some pretty drawing to go with the rumors. They were based heavily on the Sports4 Concept shown this past year. But neither of them was any more than a photochopper's pipe dream.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    The "RL" I was referring to was indeed the Acura RL. I'd personally would like to see a mininum 350 hp. RL whether it be V-6, V-8, V-10, with a 6 speed manual. If they added ventilated seats also it might be the best all around car money can buy. The current Acura RL with it's
    "state of the art" SH-AWD is the perfect 4 season car. I just wished it had a bit more power and a 6 speed manual as a option. If Acura would deliver just a little more then they would have the perfect car at any price. I do think Acura does need a "fullsize truck" that looks more like a Titan, Silverado, F-150, but with all the technology and luxury that Acura customers would expect. I think that would be a winner for Honda. Do any of you agree on the (Truck) idea ?

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    What I mean is their any planned updates to any of the existing models i.e. Acura RL or TL ????

    What are the rumors and/or plans for new models ?

    Rocky
  • anythngbutgmanythngbutgm Member Posts: 4,277
    Next in line I believe is a new MDX and then TSX, with an RSX replacment to coincide. The TL probably not until 09'. The rumored V10 powered RL I wouldn't expect until the full model makeover which would be somewhere around 09' as well. But even before that, the new NSX,HSC or whatever it'll be called should rear its ugly head (By ugly, I mean a car that is going to stir up the italian/German supercar makers like the first one did). I am also hearing rumors of a Luxo coupe like a MB CLK priced in the mid to upper 40k range.

    Hope this helps.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Whoa ! :surprise: I hope your rumors are true. I'd like to see Toyota get knocked off it's perch and thus make the domestic cars that more competitive. Us consumers could have some great products in the not so distant future. I hope that V-10 VTEC RL comes to life. :surprise: I hope Acura could restrain itself from raising it's prices to much. If they could build a car like that and keep it at or below $50K it would be the best selling premium ride on earth. I do hope they keep the TL sexy and don't ruin a good thing.

    BTW- that RDX is is going to be a HOTT vehicle. Nothing else like it on the market.

    Thanks for the insight.

    Rocky
  • hansiennahansienna Member Posts: 2,312
    Most people who own REAL Trucks do NOT consider the Ridgeline, Odyssey, Pilot, CR-V,MDX a truck. The Sienna, RAV-4, Grand Caravan, T&C, Freestar, Freestyle, etc. are also NOT trucks.

    The Ridgeline, Odyssey, Pilot, CR-V, and MDX are very nice vehicles that offer people a quality, flexible vehicle. The Ridgeline may have an open bed at the back similar to that of a pickup but Honda does NOT make a real truck.

    Manufacturers call minivans, light utility vehicles, small SUV's, etc. trucks to avoid the more strict regulations of sedans that trucks do not have to meet.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    How can you call a Ridgeline not a real Truck ???? I agree it might not have the same capabilty's of a Silverado or F-150, but it does do the things neccessary to make it a truck. You can pull your average ski/bass boat, it can go anywhere a 1/2 ton Chevy, GMC, Ford, can go if not further because it's lighter in sand, and it can store and hual as much as the average person is going to need. BTW- it also get better gas mileage and actually has more gadget technology than a CD player. ;)

    Rocky
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    Most people who own REAL Trucks do NOT consider the Ridgeline... a truck. The Sienna, RAV-4, Grand Caravan, T&C, Freestar, Freestyle, etc. are also NOT trucks

    Trucks don't need 18-wheels, only real trucks do. ;)

    And who cares if some people don't consider Ridgeline a truck... it is them who have issues and keep whining about it, while the Ridgeline goes about doing the duties that serves most pickup buyers' needs. Ask my colleague who just learnt about Ridgeline from me (last week), and now considering to replace his "crappy" Dodge Dakota that he bought couple of years ago.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Doesn't the Dakota have a gutless V-8 ???? What a sloth ! :confuse:

    I think the 07' GM trucks are better styled and just as refined but the Ridgeline will still have it's advantages. The RDX will have every advantage over every mid-size SUV made and that includes the Yuppie BMW.

    Rocky
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The RDX is scheduled to arrive in dealerships this summer.

    The MDX is scheduled for a remodel at the end of the year (it's actually a year overdue).

    The RSX is widely rumored to be a lame duck. This will be its last year and no car will replace it.

    I'm not so sure the next supercar will stir up the Italians and Germans quite so much. Most of the rumors coming out of the mill have indicated that this will be a front-engine AWD coupe. Think AWD Viper, Vette, or Aston Martin. Not a mid-engine design like so many of the European exotics.

    Also, the market for exotics has gotten a little crowded. We've got Bugatti, Mosler, Lexus, and others. Even Maserati and Aston Martin are sending cars to us again. It seems to me we've had a revival of sorts in the exotic department. I think it will be more difficult for Acura to stand out than it was back in 1990.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Dunno about that, Rocky.

    Acura is supposed to be a performance luxury brand. A truck doesn't really fit into the picture. If they were interested in branching out into luxury utility vehicles or cruisers, I'd think we would already have an Acura version of the Odyssey.

    It's not that luxury utility is a bad thing to get into. (Look at how well vehicles like the Navigator and Town & Country have done.) It's just that Acura has bigger fish to fry.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    What Lexus is an Exotic ? :confuse:

    I think the next NSX will meet customers expectations. However I do find it weird that they are going to a front engine car. :surprise:

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Just a little food for thaught. I do think they could engineer a Truck. Think RDX with a bed. ;) A true drivers truck with other capability. However I agree the fish are starting to fry and toyota is asking for flour. :D

    Rocky
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Well the difference between the LF-A and the NSX is production. The NSX is actually has been made and the next one is coming. I personally haven't heard or read anything about the LF-A "finnesse"
    (is that a French made Lexus ?) :P

    being made. ;)

    Rocky
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Well, the market for Real Trucks is shrinking quickly. Owners are flocking to more car-like crossovers and car-based SUVs.

    Why join the fight for a slice of a pie that keeps getting smaller? Look at the sales pace of the new Explorer.

    -juice
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    Exactly.

    Rocky
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    New Motto for the segment:

    Invest billions only to sell fewer units!

    :P

    -juice
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I think if Acura wanted to hurt Porsche they could slap on another Turbo and use performance mods and approach four or five-hundred horsepower with the RDX. A RDX
    Type-R for $50K :blush: Perhaps someday that fish will get fried. ;)

    Rocky
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Actually, I recently learned something interesting about the Explorer situation. The Sport Trac, Explorer Sport (2dr), and Explorer were always published as if they were one truck. Apparently, a big part of the drop in sales is because they stopped producing the Sport Trac a while back.

    Anyway, I don't think a truck is the way to go for Acura, just yet. Even if it's another hybrid chassis truck like the Ridgeline. They have other projects which need to be completed first.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    The LF-A is just as solid a rumor as this business of an Acura V8 or V10. Lexus has been showing cars like this for a few years. The project has a green light. It'll be here sooner than the Acura.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Interesting, but demand has also dropped. The # of days supply of the Explorer is still way higher than the ideal for the industry (60 days).

    -juice
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    while we wait for production LF-As and V-10 NSXs, can I continue to hope/wish that there is a replacement for the RSX coming in the fall? How sad if it goes away - the car that FOUNDED the Acura line. My, how we have matured here at Acura Corp.!

    Hope is fading though - I am sure SOMEONE SOMEWHERE would have leaked some rumor or a spy pic by now if there were a new RSX in the works. What about a new Integra in Japan? Surely they are not just dropping the whole line?

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    It is possible that Acura might just create a TSX Coupe eventually, to replace the RSX. Of course, that would also mean a higher price class but that is understandable being that it is supposed to be an Acura.
  • nippononlynippononly Member Posts: 12,555
    Yeah, well I don't want a 3200-pound midsize coupe with reflexes of rubber - can you say, CL? (which failed due to lack of sales)

    I want a 2700-pound compact coupe/3-door with reflexes of steel! :-)

    2014 Mini Cooper (stick shift of course), 2016 Camry hybrid, 2009 Outback Sport 5-spd (keeping the stick alive)

  • soopereddsooperedd Member Posts: 32
    Truck [non-permissible content removed]...the Ridgeline is ugly. I don't care if had a V8, got 30 miles to the gallon, could haul two pallets of bricks, pull an M1 Abrahms and ride like a Lincoln, it is UGLY, and I wouldn't but it. Who designed that, the guys that got fired for designing the Aztek?
  • robertsmxrobertsmx Member Posts: 5,525
    CL would still be around, had Acura used the right formula... styling. It didn't have to have the appearance and size of a midsize sedan. Besides, TL actually looked sleeker and stylish, and that should never be the case with a coupe/sedan duo.

    Besides, the demand for more power, safety, features and refinement come at a cost that you mention... curb weight.
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    Slap an RSX badge on the back of a Civic Si and save yourself $3K. :P

    Acura needs a sporty coupe, but I think it needs to be something north of the $30K range. I have high hopes for the Sports4 concept we saw months ago. Perhaps they'll do a Sports2+2.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    A TSX coupe would be nice. ;)

    Rocky
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    There will always be real trucks—even as lifestyle vehicles. Can't tow big boats or horse trailers with crossovers.

    Frankly I see crossovers eating more into sedan, wagon and mid-size SUV sales; those currently being used as family vehicles. Those who need/want full-size trucks (pickups & SUVs) will always be there.

    Bob
  • varmintvarmint Member Posts: 6,326
    For the sake of discussion, I'm going to disagree with this.

    Can't tow big boats or horse trailers with crossovers.

    I think that's simply because no one has built a large enough crossover. Are any of them larger than mid-size?

    I mean, the mid-size Touareg tows something like 7,000+ lbs. That's actually more than most mid-size pickup trucks. So, if somebody built a large crossover that is beefy enough, I don't see why it couldn't tow as much as a large BOF design.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    A month before its showroom debut, we take a close look at — and a hard drive in — Honda's entry-level hatchback
    By Peter Lyon Email

    Date posted: 03-09-2006

    Honda's mighty little Fit is already big news in Japan and Europe. Arguably the most practical super-mini on sale in both markets, the Fit will finally land in U.S. showrooms in April.

    So why did Honda wait until now to introduce its four-door hatchback into the U.S.? Ask the PR types and they'll tell you that the company wasn't sure this small people mover would catch on. Or they might say that it didn't have the size or space for the local market. Well, things have changed over the last couple of years in the U.S. since the Fit took on Europe (and won). Gasoline is more expensive, and with the high-profile hybrids making waves, the mood is changing stateside. People are starting to care more about emissions and mileage. And the success of the chunky Scion xB has proved that compact, well-packaged crossover types have a place in the U.S. market.

    Enter the Fit with its sharp looks, great packaging and class-topping performance and handling.

    Employing a simple, but uniquely Honda-like, grille and bulbous headlight design inspired by the S2000, the Fit offers best-in-class interior space, on-road performance more like a sports sedan than a minivan and above all, mileage topping 33 mpg (city mode).

    Dropped onto a newly developed "global small platform," the technical highlight of this "big" small car is its centrally located fuel tank. Positioned right under the front seats and nestled between the reinforced side members, the 10.8-gallon tank configuration gave designers the chance to pen a flat floor, thus opening up substantial legroom and headroom in addition to a sizable luggage area. Although it's only 157.4 inches long, 66.2 inches wide, 60.0 inches tall and sits on a 96.5-inch wheelbase, the Fit feels as spacious as a minivan one size larger.

    The Fit doesn't just seat four adults in comfort; it actually offers minivan-like cabin height and 41.9 cubic feet of cargo space with the seats down. And its numerous seating configurations give you the ability to carry three adults and a 7-foot surfboard — at the same time. It might be packaged like a mini-minivan, but it handles corners like a sports sedan.

    The Fit is powered by the latest in Honda's new generation of compact, lightweight i-series engines. The 1.5-liter four-cylinder VTEC produces 109 horsepower at 5,800 rpm and 105 pound-feet of torque at 4,800 rpm. Married to either a five-speed manual transmission or a five-speed automatic, the low-vibration front-drive unit delivers strong power and torque response from low down in the rev range right up to the 6,500-rpm redline — surprisingly low for a Honda. The torque curve is flatter than most rivals and comes on power like a much larger engine. To add to the thrill factor, Honda is offering steering-wheel-mounted paddle shifters on the automatic. Obviously, the manual extracts the most performance out of this engine, with its tightly spaced ratios and short-stroke gearshift, but the auto's paddles and unexpectedly quick gearchanges make you feel like an Indy driver, and in a minivan!

    So the Fit's VTEC power unit might not be as dramatic as that of the Civic Type-R or NSX, but the little hatch's gearbox ratios are superbly matched to its 1.5-liter's torque curve, thus delivering surprisingly quick acceleration.

    But it's not just the well-balanced, fuel-efficient engine and transmissions that enhance the Fit driving experience. A quantum leap in chassis and suspension rigidity takes the Honda into a league of its own in the handling department. One minute of driving is all that is needed to realize just how rigid this minicar is. You soon find yourself leaning into the next corner a little quicker. With bend rigidity jumping 210 percent and twist rigidity up 116 percent, the car feels planted to the road. Completing the Fit's underpinnings in a very un-minivan-like style are MacPherson struts and coil springs up front, an H-pattern torsion beam setup at the rear and side-force-canceling springs — which work to counter body roll.

    The speed-sensitive electric power steering is well weighted, if a little heavy, and could do with a touch more natural feedback from the road. Ride quality is stiff but compliant enough for U.S. roads.

    The end result is that you can throw the Fit into corners at speeds you shouldn't be able to. Choose your line and enter a corner at 50 mph, and the Fit traces the arc with perfect balance, with just the slightest hint of understeer.

    Honda has also incorporated its G-CON high-integrity body frame, which passes the world's most stringent crash standards, including 40-mph offset, 35-mph side impact, and 31-mph rear-collision absorption. Dual front and side-impact airbags, antilock brakes and Electronic Brake Distribution with brake assist have all been fitted as standard equipment.

    On the earth-friendly side, HC and NOx emissions have been reduced by 50 percent and more than 90 percent of the Fit is recyclable.

    Each model also gets power windows, power mirrors and central locking. Set to raise the stakes in the small car market, the Fit will start at around $13,000.
  • rockyleerockylee Member Posts: 14,017
    I thaught this "tinament" on wheels was suppose to get 70 or 80 MPG :confuse:

    Only 33 mpg, :surprise: Hell I could buy a good used GEO and get those number and keep the change left over for gas. :D

    Rocky
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.