Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

Tires, tires, tires

1107108110112113149

Comments

  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    I do not think that you will find better grand touring tires than MXV4. Cheaper and comparable, yes. Better, hard.

    You need to step up to high performance summer tires like Dunlop SP 9000, Goodyear Eagle F1 GS D3 or high performance all season like Dunlop SP5000, Michelin Pilot A/S, Bridgestone Potenza RE960 A/S to get better wet grip.

    What were YOU doing to claim that they are unsafe in rain?
    Maybe you need to change driving to match conditions?

    Krzys

    PS RE960A/S is available in your size 195/60R15 for 77.00 from tirerack.com
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    MXV4 is OK but not special in wet traction becauee it is not a directional tire, otherwise it is the quietest and smoothest of all touring tires.
  • nodulenodule Member Posts: 118
    I am NOT an aggressive driver at all. Actually, im quite
    conservative. The tires just do not feel safe and securely
    planted to the road on wet surfaces.
    Please go to Tire Rack and you can see this MXV4 plus rated
    every close to the bottom of their catagory. I am certainly
    not the only gentleman who feels this way!

    I would think the Bridgestone Potenza G009 who be much
    better wet traction, while still providing a quiet, smooth
    ride! Or the Kumho Solus KH16!
  • dougb10dougb10 Member Posts: 185
    Agree 100% with NODULE.
    My '03 Camry XLE with only 38,000 km. has the original Michelin MXV4's with lots of tread left. The tires were lousy in ANY kind of snow from day one, and have been scary in the rain in the past few months. Sliding half way into an intersection at a light last week (with the ABS working like hell), made my mind up to change.
    I have been very pleased with the Bridgestone Turanza LS-H tires on our '05 Subaru Outback, but the Bridgestone dealer suggested the Potenza G009...equally good for less money. The Tirerack website confirmed it was the way to go for me. The G009's are ordered and will be installed on the Camry next week.
    Doug
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    I use the Nokian WR SUV on my Pathfinder. Great tires. Quiet, and work well in dry hot weather (wear very well), rain, snow, and ice. Not as good as an "ice tire", but as I said above, they wear very well.
  • timadamstimadams Member Posts: 294
    I need new rubber for my 2002 Nissan Maxima SE, size 225-50-17. I live in PA, and snow is a factor in winter. I realize that all-season tires are a compromise, but I want tires that are decent on dry, wet and snow-covered roads. I am willing to give up some performance for weather capability and tire longevity. Any suggestions? So far, I'm considering the Yokohama Avid V4S, Toyo Proxes TPT, Avontech M550 and Bridgestone Turanza LS-V, but I'm unsure how decent any of these are in the winter. Anybody have any suggestions?
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    Nodule wrote about rain not snow.
    I replaced my MXV4 at 30000 miles with Bridgestone Potenza RE950. It was winter and I had problems getting up steep driveway (when it was covered with snow).

    Krzys
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    My experience with Avid H4S (similar to V4S)is not so good on snow. But I know Michelin Exalto A/S is another option in good snow performance.
  • dougb10dougb10 Member Posts: 185
    Hi Krzyss,

    If you have another look at my posting, you will see my concern about driving with the Michelin MXV4's in the rain.
    When I slid into the intersection last week, the temperature was about 90F....rain...not snow.

    The bottom line is that these tires are poor in any kind of "wet". Tirerack surveys say it best.

    Doug
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    The Nokian WR comes in that size. They work very well dry, wet, and on snow. Not as good as an ice tire, but these tires wear well and are not noisy. Here in Canada they are warrented for 100,000 km treadwear - replacement no charge. That's about 62,000 km for those metrically challenged. ;) You don't have to give up performance either. These are called all-weather performance tires by Nokian. They are not cheap, but you get what you pay for.
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    Krzys
  • bottgersbottgers Member Posts: 2,030
    It depends on what your defnition of "optimum performance" is. I have a '99 Corolla that's just about due for a new set of tires. I'm going for a high mileage, all-season, touring tire. Here is a link comparing 25 tires for the Corolla:

    http://www.tirerack.com/tires/surveyresults/surveydisplay.jsp?type=st&width=185/- - &ratio=65&diameter=14&tiresearch=true

    Then click on "standard touring all season"

    I think I'll be going with the Kuhmo 795. It's ranked 4th overall, and at $37, it's the second least expensive tire of the group. I have a set of these on my daughter's car (which used to be mine) and I loved them. Most people who have posted reviews for this tire on the tire rack rant and rave about how good they are. I don't think they can be beat for the price.
  • jolpotjolpot Member Posts: 19
    I have been reading up on tirerack and checking with Tirerack/Bjs/townfair/Hogan and still not convinced what is the best thing to do - I am looking for all season tires, 195, 65R15(winters are horrible in the noreast). Currently, I have Michelin MXV4 Plus on all the 4 wheels and my odometer reads 46k and need to change tires asap. Can you please point me in the right direction, right shop? Prices for Michelin MXV4Plus, BridgeStone Potenza g9 varied remarkably...almost 20-30bucks for each tire. I am confused. Any help appreciated.
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    Contiextreme contact A/S is very good all seasons around, or if you prefer Michelin, use Exalto A/S.
  • dougb10dougb10 Member Posts: 185
    Just changed the tires on my '03 Camry XLE...from the original Michelin MXV4's to Bridgestone Potenza G009's.
    My decision was based on Tirerack reviews and surveys. The Michelin's were very poor in rain or snow.
    So far I love the Bridgestone's....have only had them for a few days, but have driven in heavy rain....very confident with them!
    Doug
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    Do you compare worn Michelins with brand new Bridgestones?
    Problem with most customer surveys is that they compare their old tires with new ones. Almost all the time new tires are better.

    Krzys
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,670
    My decision was based on Tirerack reviews and surveys. The Michelin's were very poor in rain or snow.
    So far I love the Bridgestone's....have only had them for a few days, but have driven in heavy rain....very confident with them!


    Think how much better the Michelins would have been compared to the old Michelins. People always feel much better with our new tires and think that brand is better than the old brand, but reality is that new tires always are better than a partly worn set. The shorted ridge for the tread and the aging of the rubber with hardening makes a drastic difference in quiet and feel.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • jolpotjolpot Member Posts: 19
    Thanks to everyone.

    So, I got the spiel from the townfair guys about TOYO instead of Bridgestone Potenza G009(Quoted $99 and was willing to pricematch to tirerack!)...I found tirerack doesnt sell them and the TOYO spectrum(promised 65k miles) was being quoted $89 and they were willing to sell it for $78.

    Any thoughts about TOYO and durability?

    There is a special going for Coopers, $46...I am tempted due to the low price...if it is halfway good...I will bite the bullet.
  • dougb10dougb10 Member Posts: 185
    I didn't just fall off the turnip truck! I am well aware that tires lose some performance issues as they age...particularly when they are more than 50% worn.
    My point is and remains....the Michelin's were poor in snow and less than satisfactory in the rain from DAY ONE. They became just plain dangerous lately although there was lots of tread left.
    The Bridgestone Potenza G0009's are rated as being far superior compared to the Michelin MXV4's. End of story.
  • sandman46sandman46 Member Posts: 1,798
    I've had good luck with them & I've also heard good things about Cooper Lifeliners.

    The Sandman :):)
  • waiwai Member Posts: 325
    G009 is a high performance A/S tire while Michelin is only a grand touring A/S tire. Of course G009 performs and handles better in the rain/snow. Secondly, I always insist that all OEM stock tires come with the new car are lower quality. G009 should be compared with exalto A/S.
  • exotropeexotrope Member Posts: 9
    Hello,

    Im about to change the OEM Michelin MXV4 plus tire on my
    2005 Hyundai Elantra GLS with 19000 miles. These tire are
    mediocore at best.

    Between these two tires, which one will prove to be the
    most smoothest and comfortable...Kumho Solus KH16 or the
    Cooper Lifeliner SLE?

    Thank you!
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    You are replacing them because you don't like them, not because they are worn right?

    The Coopers have a higher treadwear rating so they'll last longer. Don't know about the ride. The Kumhos' ride is rated at 8.8 in the tirerack customer reviews, but they don't carry Cooper so you can't compare.
  • yurakmyurakm Member Posts: 1,345
    G009 is a high performance A/S tire while Michelin is only a grand touring A/S tire. Of course G009 performs and handles better in the rain/snow.

    Wrong generalization. Performance tires not necessary handle better in rain, and they usually do not handle well in snow. The big tread blocks typical for performance tires, generally, are more slippery in snow and on ice than smaller blocks with many grooves. Winter tires have a lot of sipes in addition to grooves.

    For example, Bridgestone Potenza 950 performance tires, while specially designed for rain and great on wet surfaces, are bad in snow.

    G009 is a good exception in this respect.
  • kittenmeowkittenmeow Member Posts: 15
    Need a new set for our Infinity G35. Looked at the ebay, costco and tirerack thus far. I just can't stomach forking over $600. Well..I will if I have to,but ...perhaps there is a place to buy new tires at a discount? Anyone? Thanks in advance!
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    What sizes do you need? Brand preference? I just got new tires for my Matrix XRS. Got the tires from edgeracing.com and had a local mobile installer install them.
  • kittenmeowkittenmeow Member Posts: 15
    215/55/17. Hubby was considering either Goodyear Eagle ResponsEdge or the original ones Bridgestone Turanza El42.
    I have also heard good things about Avon. I don't think that he is completely set on the brand, just need something with a V rating and the right size and good overall quality.
    I promised him I would find something comparable below $600.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    Edgeracing has Toyo Proxes, V-rated, high performance, all-season tires in that size for $118 each. They'd have a harsher ride and be a bit noisier. Similarly the Tirerack has Yokohama Avid V4s which are also high-performance, all-season tires for $109 each. These will also have the harsher ride and noise.

    The turanza and response edge are grand touring tires. Is that what he would want to stay with?

    The V-rated Turanza is listed twice at Tirerack. Once for $186 and then for $123. Seems odd. In your size, the treadwear is only 260 so you'll be lucky to get 30k miles out of them. The Goodyear should last significantly longer as its treadwear rating is 440.

    I wonder why the grand touring tires cost more than the high performance tires.
  • timadamstimadams Member Posts: 294
    My 2002 Maxima has 225/50/17 tires on 7" wide wheels. Would I have any problem changing to a 215/50/17 tire? I know it would be 10mm narrower. The diameter would be about 2 percent less, which wouldn't be a problem with my speedo. Any problems with doing this? Moving to this size opens up a lot more tire possibilities, at lower prices. I'm thinking of the Sumitomo HTR+ tires, which aren't available in 225/50/17.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    Have you tried the size tool on tirerack? I've never switched tire sizes. I am running 215/50R17 and I thought it was an oddball size, but apparently some are odder.
  • mazda6iguymazda6iguy Member Posts: 365
    I am a member of Sams Club. I was considering buying my next set of tires there (I can special order them). Just wondering about the pros / cons of going there vs. a traditional tire shop like Goodyear or NTB, etc. Also if anyone out there has gone to Sams or Walmart for their tires, if you have any opinions, please post.
  • capitanocapitano Member Posts: 509
    No idea about Sam's. Tires are tires and it should be hard for them to mess them up. Selection could be an issue, but you've already got that covered with special ordering.

    I avoid the Tire stores like the plague now because they all seem to have adopted the Jiffy Lube model. They don't just do tires, they want to flush your tranny, change your oil etc. It's fine that they have these services available, but I resent them pushing them on me.
  • jt2000gtjt2000gt Member Posts: 2
    I am putting an 18 in wheel on my mustang but want to increase the tire size. I am looking to go from a 245 to a 265. Is that possible without having to do anything to the fenderwell or ahould I I go with a 255?
  • capriracercapriracer Member Posts: 907
    "....Tires are tires and it should be hard for them to mess them up....."

    Well, not exactly.

    I don't want to throw mud at the big box discounters, but it is quite possible to have different,lower quality tires at these locations. Besides, they treat tires like they treat - oh say,- toilet paper. They really don't know or understand what's involved and can't help you if there is a problem. Besides, any warranty work has to be done by them. It can't be done at another retailer.

    Personally, I think its better to use a local tire dealer. Tires are his business and his livelihood depends on repeat business. He's "Been there, Done that" and his expertise can help you select the tire that's right for your application. And if you buy a name brand from him, you'll be able to do warranty work anywhere (except at the big box stores).
  • jolpotjolpot Member Posts: 19
    Got Toyo spectrums for my honda accord 2000. Townfair has it marked it up at $99. Edgeracing.com has these for $48 each(ofcourse, I had to pay shipping $12 for each), still at $60 per tire(plus taxes), I think its a nice buy.
  • imidazol97imidazol97 Member Posts: 27,670
    at Sam's serviced at Walmarts? If so, that's an ideal situation if you travel and might need tire work/replacement.

    If a national brand is bought at Sam's is it serviced under warranty by any of the national brand stores? I.e., Michelin.

    2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,

  • capriracercapriracer Member Posts: 907
    "Are tires bought at Sam's serviced at Walmarts?...."

    I can't speak for Sam's or WalMart, but I don't think that is either of their policy.

    In fact, my experience is that it can sometimes be difficult to get warranty assistance at any location other than where the tire was purchased. And this seems to be doubled if the tires are unique to some mass retailer such as WalMart, even if the name on the sidewall is a name brand - it's the design name that matters.
  • imoldfellaimoldfella Member Posts: 15
    Goodyear makes an H rated snow tire (Ultra Grip) and a Q rated tire (Ultra Grip Ice). H rated is a few more $ but that is not really a consideration since it is for my daughter's car. It would be a mix of suburban and highway driving.

    The car is OEM with S tires, so that makes me think it is better to go up to H's instead of down to Q tires. It's hard to locate the H's; most dealers carry Q's. That makes me think that most people must buy the Q's and I must be crazy to think H. Thoughts?
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,373
    Are you sure the H-rated and the Q-rated are available in the same size? I've noticed that as you go up in size (wider, low-profile), you get different speed ratings, even with the same tire..

    I had a set of Goodyear Eagle Ultra-Grip, and they were V-rated.. (225/45-17).

    What kind of car is it? Chances are, if it comes with S-rated tires, the Q-rated winter tires would handle similarly, and would also give much superior traction in winter conditions.. The superior handling of the H-rated winter tires might be wasted on a car like that, and at the expense of snow traction.

    regards,
    kyfdx

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    It depends on the vehicle, but chances are if it's shod with S-speed tires, then the Q-speeds will work well. They have better winter traction than H-speed, which are meant for H-speed and higher tires (V and Z as well).

    Stick with the Q's.
  • imoldfellaimoldfella Member Posts: 15
    2004 Malibu with the 3.5 V6 (new style malibu on Saab designed epsilon platform).

    For the particular size I am looking at, 205/65-15 both the H rated GW3 and Q rated Ultra Grip Ice are available.

    Our area has pretty mild winters (snow tire temperatures Dec, Jan, Feb) and these tires are going to be on dry pavement most of the time. Our street is steep and can be icy, especially in the morning when she gets off. I have generally not bothered with snow tires myself, but want to give my daughter (and my insurance bill ;) ) every advantage.
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    2004 Malibu with the 3.5 V6 (new style malibu on Saab designed epsilon platform).

    I'd still stick with the Q-rated. I'd also recommend getting all four tires, especially with a FWD vehicle. H-rated tires are overkill with a Malibu, especially when you sacrifice ultimate winter traction for a little better dry-pavement performance, compared to the Q-rated tires. If it was my daughter, I'd take every advantage as well.
  • imoldfellaimoldfella Member Posts: 15
    Thanks, I appreciate the perspective.

    I read this on http://www.consumersearch.com/www/automotive/snow-tires/fullstory.html

    "Consumer Reports says that more expensive H-rated tires generally get better performance at lower speeds in ice and snow. Q-rated winter tires are usually less expensive."

    Do you think CR was misquoted, or confused? I am not a CR subscriber although maybe I should look this up at the library.

    Jim
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    Q rated tires are usually winter ice tires. The compound, that gives traction on ice, does not like high speed operation.
    H or higher winter tires are usually winter snow tires with better dry traction (still cold but dry - like plowed road).

    High speed rated winter tires should outlast lower speed rated ones because of compound. High speed compound wears better (especially on dry roads). This is exactly oposite with all seasons or summer where performance tires usually have lower treadwear that is traded for grip.

    Krzys

    PS How icy can it get? Have you had problems with all seasons on your street?
  • mz6greyghostmz6greyghost Member Posts: 1,230
    According to Tirerack.com, comparing Bridgestone's Q-rated Blizzak WS-50 to their H-rated LM-series:

    "What Makes the Blizzak LM-18, LM-22 and LM-25 Tires Different?
    These studless winter tires are performance winter tires developed for use in Europe and around the world. In order to accommodate high-speed European driving, they trade some snow and ice traction for handling and high-speed capability by featuring a winter driving tread compound able to support its H-speed rating..."

    Just more food for thought.
  • pathstar1pathstar1 Member Posts: 1,015
    I'd look into Nokian WR tires for that application. They wear well on dry roads and give good traction on ice and snow.
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,373
    Well... I had V-rated GW-3 on a BMW... and, I have to say... I never had a problem in the snow.. and we had some nasty stuff in the two years that I used them.. and this was in rear-wheel drive car..

    So, it all comes down to your driving preferences.. Like you, we have dry roads for 95% of the time in the winter, so there is some credence in getting the best road tires that you can, while having just enough winter capability to get through...

    But, if the car is basic transportation, and the main driver wouldn't know an S-rated tire from a Z-rated tire, then you probably shouldn't spend extra to get those H-rated Goodyears.

    I'd get the H-rated tires, but I don't consider myself exactly normal... :surprise:

    regards,
    kyfdx

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • imoldfellaimoldfella Member Posts: 15
    Ok, I thanks everyone for the perspective. For the record the price difference is neglible (roughly $10 a corner more for the H's). Right or wrong I'm going to get the H's. They've got to be better than the oem all season rubber she's got now, and if the weather's really bad the car will stay in the driveway anyway.

    I'll report back in March, but I've never read anything bad about these GW3's so I think I'm going to like them.

    Jim
  • tbronsontbronson Member Posts: 1
    If I can offer some credibility I work at the northwest's largest tire dealer, les schwab and that tire is a little wide for the stuff we work with. u might be able to get by with a 235 on that rim
  • krzysskrzyss Member Posts: 849
    but a reply for 4 years old message is probably 1 dollar short one day late ;-)

    Krzys

    PS I did it a few times myself.
Sign In or Register to comment.