Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Isuzu Trooper

15556586061233

Comments

  • wildbucwildbuc Member Posts: 88
    When I start my 99 trooper in the morning and put it in drive, one must rev the engine significantly before it will move forward. After it has been driven and warmed it, it goes forward without hesitation when put in drive. Is this normal? Or, is it that the transmission fluid is low?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    It sholdn't be doing that. It means slippage is occuring in the T-case.

    -mike
  • sbcookesbcooke Member Posts: 2,297
    When it is cold, sometime the brakes feel sluggish on the first application, but I have never had a problem going with the transmission after start-up on my 99 Trooper.
  • ePaterlineePaterline Member Posts: 10
    Paisan,

    I think you may be wrong there. I have a 2000 Trooper and there is a hesitation when it is cold and you put it in gear and I don't think it means the trannie is going bad. I think it is just the way Troopers work when cold. On the other hand, maybe wildbuc and I should both run out and check our transmission oil levels!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yes they do hesitate if you drive em butt cold, I was under the impression that he was revving but not moving aka a slipping tranny tourque converter. If the revs go up, but there is little or no movement of the vehicle, that is not a good sign. If you hit the gas and it doesn't rev, then it's either cold or indication of an engineproblem.

    As for the brakes that SB mentioned, most brakes, especially the big ones we have need to come up to operatingtemp in order to be fully effective.

    -mike
  • vivayovivayo Member Posts: 32
    Most automatic transmissions don't pump much fluid (some none at all) when in Park. After sitting for several hours, worn components allow the fluid to drain down. To get the fluid pressure & flow up, start the engine, and let it idle in Neutral for 30 seconds or so before attempting to drive off.*
    Since the condition isn't normal, you may have something else going on. First guess would be low fluid as Mike suggests, or something worse. I doubt you're out of warranty on a '99, so I'd take it in for a check if it isn't caused by low fluid.
    Charlie

    * If you've worked an auto xmsn hard (e.g., towing a heavy load) it's also a good idea to run the engine a for couple minutes in neutral before shutting off - provided you have a transmission cooler to dissipate the heat, which the Trooper does. We even have a transmission temperature sensor, although it's hooked up to an idiot light instead of a gauge ;-( Excessive heat cooks the fluid, which leads to decreased lubricity, which leads to premature wear. Running low on fluid can also overheat what fluid you do have.
  • cjames3cjames3 Member Posts: 2
    Will I be ok towing a 6'x 12' UHaul trailer cross country with my 96 4 door automatic Isuzi Trooper? So far...most people say I will be ok...just don't want to damage my truck. Any thoughts?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I towed one with my Rodeo a few years back and that was only 190hp SOHC 3.2l AT. So long as you aren't filling it with lead, you should be fine! :)

    -mike
  • sdavitosdavito Member Posts: 71
    I suspect that you will know it's back there for sure. A few years back, I towed a 5 X 8 UHaul with a full size Chevy with a 305 V8. I was shocked at how heavy that trailer was empty. I've towed 2000 lbs with my 2000 Trooper, and was very impressed with the performance.

    If the 6 X 12 trailer is close to 5000 lbs loaded, and you are traveling over 100 miles, I would strongly suggest adding a tranny cooler to your Trooper. Coolers aren't that expensive.

    David
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    The Trooper has a built in tranny cooler in the radiator. I've spoken to several people about this and there is no need for an external one. My temp guage on the 2000 never moved even when towing 5200lbs over the mts. of PA.

    -mike
  • jcotjcot Member Posts: 3
    I recently bought a 2001 Trooper with a 3.5 engine and am disappointed with the gas mileage. I'm getting around 11 miles to the gallon with city driving but expected about 14 or 15. What sounds normal to those of you with experience? I've only got a 1000 miles on the vehicle, so maybe things will loosen up after a few more miles--I hope so.
  • boxtrooperboxtrooper Member Posts: 843
    jcot,

    11 mpg is something bad wrong. 11 mpg is what you should get pulling a 5000# trailer.

    One guy a long while back either here or on ITOG.com posted 10 mpg and lots of drivetrain trouble, turned out he was driving around highway speed on dry pavement with his non-TOD trooper in 4wd. It was too late for him, needed lots of expensive non warrantee repair. If you have TOD I think you can run on dry pavement.

    Maybe you have a real bad batch of gas.
    Maybe the engine computer needs reprogramming.
    Be sure to find out what it is soon.

    Thank You
    BoxTrooper
  • sbcookesbcooke Member Posts: 2,297
    You should see your mileage improve. The first 1000 miles are not representative of the mileage. However, your driving habits could dictate mileage. I have never gotten better than 18 MPG, all highway, gas station to gas staion, no tolls, etc. My commute is 15 minutes, I do around 12-14 with this type of driving. Flooring it, to hear the motor or see the TOD lights can lower mileage (it is fun to drive with all the low end torque).

    PS Don't forget to check your oil. I burned a quart in my first 1500 miles. Some people here burn 1/2 a quart or more per 3000 miles. I am lucky and have very little burn, but don't be alarmed it is common.
  • bluedevilsbluedevils Member Posts: 2,554
    This is much lower than I would expect with ME driving our 98 Trooper (3.5L). I expect, and usually get, 15-16 in city driving. However, each individual's driving habits have a LOT to do with fuel economy. If you have a heavy foot on the accelerator and brake pedals, that will take a huge bite out of your fuel economy. Make sure that your tires are properly inflated, too.

    Since your truck has only a thousand miles on it, things are likely to get noticeably better in the next few thousand miles.
  • tidestertidester Member Posts: 10,059
    jcot,

    The problem could be as simple as an error in your arithmetic. Try again and see what happens making careful note of how much gasoline you put into your tank and the miles you drive.

    tidester
    Host
    SUVs
  • wildbucwildbuc Member Posts: 88
    The hesitation I was referring to involves the transmission, not the motor. The motor runs perfectly fine when started in the morning. It is just that the vehicle itself is much slower to move forward compared to my Accord and Nissan truck when placed in drive. As I noted, there is no response lag when the vehicle is warmed up. The trooper has only 19K miles on it, and this characteristic was evident from day one. So I suppose it is not from wear. I was suspicious about fluid levels since the motor itself had too much oil in it when I bought it---1 and a half inches above the high mark.

    Regarding mileage, I have actually obtained 19.6 on trips but most often from 18 to 19 mpg. I do drive more conservatively than most, and use correct air pressure in tires.

    Regarding oil use, I was adding a quart every 3000 miles until I switched to Mobil One around 6K miles. After successive oil changes since the change to Mobil One, I seem to be using less and less oil. My latest figure is 1/4th quart every 3K miles. It does seem important that the Trooper's oil level is measured on level ground. Ground variations seem to affect the reading more so than on most vehicles I have owned.
  • chomama1chomama1 Member Posts: 15
    My 2001 4wd Trooper is not getting great gas milage either, but it only has 2000 miles on it and it does seem to be improving. This is a fairly heavy vehicle, 4wd, with a 4:10 rear end. Hard to get great milage with that combo.
  • sdc2sdc2 Member Posts: 780
    FWIW newer Troopers have 4.30 gears, not 4.10. That is, unless they changed something since my 99.
  • texasappraisertexasappraiser Member Posts: 16
    I am in the market for a used SUV. I'm looking for the perfect combination of style, utility, and reliability. I first researched the Jeep Grand Cherokee. WOW, reliable they are not!! I do not like to take my vehicle to the shop, ever! I maintain(pamper) them myself. Then I decided 4runner. But they're expensive! Even several years old! I will be purchasing a Trooper or its close kin, the Acura SLX. I am glad that there is so much information to research!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I get 12-13mpg max.

    Conditions:
    1) TOD Engaged
    2) Heavy footed stop and go traffic (lots of small sprints)
    3) Oxegenated fule
    4) 500lbs worth of gear that I usually keep in the truck. (hitch, hitch bar, tools, floor jack, etc)

    -mike
  • texasappraisertexasappraiser Member Posts: 16
    I am surprised at how many post's there are stating that their Trooper burns a substantial amount of oil. Isn't this a GM drivetrain? I've owned many GM's, all over 100K miles with little to no oil use. Many post's say they burn oil from new, and throughout the life of the engine. Why?
  • sbcookesbcooke Member Posts: 2,297
    I don't think the initial oil use is "burn" (however I am not an expert); I think I have read, at least in the 3.2 version, that some oil deposits in parts of the engine. Not a lot, but some. The rest is burn. Yes it is common and supposedly "normal". I don't know why, but probably just blowing past the rings? It doesn't seem to effect the life or performance of the truck, as long as it is watched. I am fortunate, even after a rebuild, I only burn very little, and mostly on long road trips.
  • sdc2sdc2 Member Posts: 780
    I wouldn't say it is a GM drivetrain...the tranny is made by a GM company (in France, I think), but the engine is pure Isuzu. I can't remember who makes the transfer case - is it Borg-Warner or Gertrag?

    Anyway, I am doing a 5,000 mile oil change interval. Sometimes it will drop to the fill line after about 4K and I will add a little oil till the next change. I don't think that is too bad at all. When I was doing 3K intervals I never had to add any oil between changes. FWIW I use Mobil One 5W-30.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Only the tranny is made by a GM company in France (as posted above). Borg-warner makes the T-case,and Isuzu makes the engine. Other than *some* people (myself included) having to add 1 quart per 5000 miles driven (on synthetic) these engines are near perfect. I rather add 1Q per 5K miles than have my tranny or engine or other components break at 100K miles.

    -mike
  • bsmart1bsmart1 Member Posts: 377
    Just got back from vacation; catching up on reading these postings.... Made a trip from Arkansas to Colorado last week, total about 2300 miles. Best mileage posted was 19 mpg, worst was 13 mpg. Average between all tanks was 16 mpg. You can guess who was driving each time, I bet. My wife has a LEAD foot and loves to stay between 80-90 mph. I drive a bit more sensibly around 70-75.
    On the oil consumption thing, I checked the level before I left, and several times along the way, then again when I got back home. It consumed about 3/4 of a quart of Mobil 1 5W-30. This is my 01' Trooper and it has only 6250 miles on it now. I don't hold out much hope of seeing better mpg numbers as the engine accumulates miles. I have given thought to finding a later model rear-end and putting it under my 97' Trooper. That would couple a higher speed rear with the engine that is a bit more economical. Might yield around 20-22 mpg. Of course the cheapest way to get better mileage has already been mentioned previously... put on a size larger (diameter) tires. You won't see the mileage numbers improve in a straight calculation of mpg, but you will actually be going more miles than your odometer is registering. With the Trooper, there's plenty of engine so it will not load down and loose efficiency with a bit bigger tire. You could easily increase mileage 10-15% with the right tire size.

    Oh yeah, great post on the windshield noise issue. That screen spline sounds like 'just the ticket' to cure the problem! Happy Trooping !!!
  • keepontroopinkeepontroopin Member Posts: 297
    Let me know if any of you try my window spline windshield trick! I want to make sure it worsks for other people too.
  • sdc2sdc2 Member Posts: 780
    From a purely mathematical gearing standpoint, you should be able to increase your gas mileage by puting bigger tires on. However, other considerations may negate the benefits of bigger tires:

    1. Bigger tires are heavier. The heavier the vehicle, the more energy (gas) needed to accelerate it. This actually affects city driving mileage more than highway mileage.

    2. Bigger tires lift the vehicle, causing greater wind resistance drag, both from the larger profile of the tires and, more importantly, greater exposure of the undercarriage to the wind. This affects highway mileage more than city driving.

    Also, in some cases bigger tires will have more rolling resistance due to their construction. LT tires have slightly higher rolling resistance than passenger tire, primarily due to stiffer sidewalls.

    Obviously these are simplifications of real world conditions, but the bottom line is, bigger tires don't necessarily mean better mileage.
  • keepontroopinkeepontroopin Member Posts: 297
    Bigger tires mean Crappy gas mileage. I went up to a 265/75-16 tire and now my mileage sucks. But they kick ars off road!
  • sbcookesbcooke Member Posts: 2,297
    Don't bigger tires reduce the gear ratio, thus causing more energy to used to move the vehicle?

    Paisan, what kind of differences are you noticing? I wouldn't call the gas mileage "good" to begin with.
  • sdc2sdc2 Member Posts: 780
    Depends what you mean by "reduce". Bigger tires do effectively reduce the final drive ratio, though without changing the gears, meaning the vehicle will travel farther per revolution of the engine, by virtue of the greater circumference of the tires.

    Going from 245/70 to 265/75 tires is about a 7% change, equivalent to changing your differential gearing from 4.30:1 to 3.99:1 (while keeping the same tire size). As discussed above, this could theoretically improve gas mileage, but other factors may negate any advantage gained.

    Not that I am an expert on gears or anything, that's just the way I understand it.
  • bsmart1bsmart1 Member Posts: 377
    Well it's interesting how everyone is an EXPERT on this subject!! There are several good comments in the preceeding replies to my posting. I was only speaking from my experience related to this. I have changed tire sized on my 1988 Trooper a couple times and had mixed results. Of course it has a 4 cylinder engine, which is underpowered to start with. BUT, when I went from 235/75/R15's to 950X15's, I saw no impact on my calculated mileage. The 950's are somewhat larger diameter, yielding a small increase in effective mileage. When I went to 31.5X15's I did see a small decrease in calculated mileage, but these tires are considerably larger in diameter and width than the original tires. Overall, I still got a bit of mileage increase. I really believe the larger motor, late model Troopers could handle larger tires with minimal impact in mileage. Haven't tried it yet, but I would be surprised if they take it down much.

    OK paisan, what has your experience been with your change in tire size?? Happy Trooping !!!
  • wildbucwildbuc Member Posts: 88
    When calculating mileage with larger tires, what did you guys use to determine the distance covered? Inquiring minds want to know.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Well from my calculations (spot checks) which are always calculated on the same stretch of highway at 77mph cruise control...

    With the 5.6% larger diamter tires I am getting about 15-16mpg, with the stock tires I was getting 16-18mpg.

    The best idea would be to run something like 245-80-16 or 245-75-16 with the same tread pattern as the stockers. Barring that, I believe that the larger diameter tires do hurt milage due to:

    1) Weight. The pirelli Scorpion ATs I run now are considerably heavier than the stockers. Especially harmful because it is un-sprung weight.

    2) Tread width. The tread is putting 30mm more tread x 4 onto the ground that ammountsto 120mm more surface area than what was there previously.

    3) Tread pattern. The Stockers are not truely AT tires, so the AT treads on my Scorpions will present much more resistance than the smoother Duelers.

    -mike
  • bsmart1bsmart1 Member Posts: 377
    All very good points paisan. I assume the lower mpg numbers are directly calculated miles against fuel consumption, no adjustment for tire size factored in? All reasons stated make good sense to me. BUT, if you keep the tire width about the same or a bit narrower than stock and increase the diameter slightly, you WILL yeild slightly better mileage. I've done it on my 1988 Trooper. I will not speak for the later model Troopers. There is definitely a point of deminishing return. Maybe others have tried this and can add to the discussion on this board, to pin it down.

    Now the Uh Oh.....slipping a higher speed rear-end under the Trooper won't work. The gearing in the rear and the front driveline have to match exactly for the 4X4 owners. I realized this last night when looking at my owners manuals. The gearing on the 01' model is 4.3 to 1 and on the 97' its 4.555 to 1.

    The curb weight of the two vehicles is listed at about 100 lbs different, with the 97' being heavier. I assume they are assuming each vehicle to be 4X4 which my 01' is not. Thus my estimate of it being several hundred pounds lighter. Wish I had access to some truck scales to measure the difference. I KNOW it 'feels' lighter when driving the 01' and going across rough terrain. Happy Trooping !!!!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    MPGs. I correct the milage figures before calculating the MPG to the proper # of miles.

    Yes, a narrower or same width tire with the same weight will yield better fuel economy, but you will also increase your rollover risk considerably by increasing the height w/o increasing the width. You would never catch me putting a narrower tread on a vehicle than what was stock, unless it was a car and they were snow tires and even at that it would be 205->195 or 215->205, not more than 10mm narrower.

    -mike
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yes, you need to keep the front and rear diffy's the same on 4wd models.

    -mike
  • breakorbreakor Member Posts: 398
    I made the switch from the factory tires to the 265/75s. I also upped the pressure on the new tires as they seem to ride better at the higher numbers. This no doubt helps lower the rolling resistance.

    Conversely the new tires do weigh more so it takes more energy to get them up to speed thus decreasing the mileage. They also have more tread so they theoretically flex more and use more fuel. Whether the new Michelins are better compounded and/or designed to offset this I do not know.

    In any event, the net effect is that my mileage, adjusted for tire size, is up on the highway but just a hair less in the city.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Be careful you don't go too high. I was running 5psi above stock pressure on my Bridgestones but then I dropped to only 2.5-3psi above stock on the 275-70s because I don't want them to buldge in the centers and have excessive center wear.

    -mike
  • jimmyp1jimmyp1 Member Posts: 640
    Paisan, you did factor in that a mile is no longer a mile on your odometer, right?

    Jim

    P.S. For the record, I probably wouldn't have thought of it. At least not right away.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yes I take my Odo reading and add 5.6XXX% (whatever the tire-calculator says the % difference is for the larger tires) to get the true milage I've travelled then divide that by the # of gallons at the pump :) Same way I try to re-calc the speed on the fly, aprox 2.5XXXmph @ 50mph about 3-4mph @ 75-80mph.

    -mike
  • jimmyp1jimmyp1 Member Posts: 640
  • breakorbreakor Member Posts: 398
    As it turns out I did the old chalk test on my tires to determine the ideal pressure. That was numerous miles ago and everything is wearing just fine. I am running about 4lbs higher than on the Bridgestones. This is also well, well below the maximum for the tire.
  • chris194chris194 Member Posts: 6
    We have elected to replace our 96 trooper LTD with a new SUV with 3 seat rows. Has anyone tried the web based advertising such as autotraderdotcom or ebay? Any recomendation?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Why not buy a 3rd row for your trooper? Just a thought.

    -mike
  • chris194chris194 Member Posts: 6
    The real answer regarding why not add a 3rd row seat in the Trooper is that I forgot that is possible. We looked into it a couple of years ago, but never went beyond that. Now that we have started talking about a new car, my wife (who drives the trooper) is pretty much set. She likes the fold flat 3rd row seats that some of the newer SUV's and (or MV's :(). She is constantly carrying something in the back and wants the seat to"disappear" without to much trouble. I am afraid that I have passed the point of no return!
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Bummer :(

    You could buy a new trooper, and import the 3rd row of seats from Australia? They fold against the outside windows.

    -mike
  • boxtrooperboxtrooper Member Posts: 843
    I read that Toyota is talking with Isuzu about using 4L and 5L Duramax type Isuzu diesels in Toyota SUVs for the USA. They said GM was not going to stand in the way of such a deal. In the rest of the world diesels are the default engine in Troopers and they cost no more than the gasoline version.

    The Yukon and Tahoe/Suburban 6.6L Duramax versions are delayed because there is such high demand for the Duramax pickups.
  • sdc2sdc2 Member Posts: 780
    Anybody ever compare 0-60 times with and without 4WD engaged?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I did do 0-60 seat of pants test and seems like the AWD is a hair slower than 2wd, but it could just be psychological. I may break out my buddy's G-tech and do some real tests.

    -mike
  • bsmart1bsmart1 Member Posts: 377
    I've made a purchase of a Trooper thru Ebay about a year ago. It used to be a pretty competitive market there, but that has changed since 9/11/01. There aren't a lot of Troopers listed there, and they don't demand much traffic in lookers any more. You can take a look and quickly see what I mean. With the new Trooper market fading quickly, the resale values are way down.

    I would be interested in hearing more about this 96' model you have if you care to give me all the particulars on it. I own a 97' and these two years were pretty much identical. A 96' with reasonable miles and price would be appealing to me. Let me know.... you can contact me at bsmart10@hotmail.com if you like.
    Happy Trooping !!! ;->
Sign In or Register to comment.