By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our
Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our
Visitor Agreement.
Comments
Either that or he's on an exceptionally long fishing trip.
Steve, Host
BTW, rugeti, there is no word yet on changes to the 2004 LC from the Toyota *oracle* lady. Will pass along when/if we hear of it.
2) Interest - interest rates are lower on new cars than on used.
3) Purchasing Frequency - You will have to buy another car quicker if you buy the '02 than if you buy the '04.
4) Resale value - The resale value will be higher when you go to sell on the '04 than on the '02. Because of this you should also not pay more than 80% for an '03 than you would for and '04 because it is truly worth that much less due to depreciation and resale value later on.
Calculate it all out and divide it across the total # of miles you would drive each. Remember that you will drive the '02 for less miles than you would the '04.
In answer to the question of the 2004... I have no answer yet. The 2004 spec. book has not been released. This means we are at least 2 months away from having them.
Just a year ago we were also looking at a Sequoia
vs. a Pilot. We really use the 3rd row seats and the Sequoias have way more room. I can get three car seats across the back. Also my bigger teenage kids have a lot of room back there. We love our Sequoia, we have an '03. It is a good family vehicle. We liked the Pilot too. It just isn't as roomy. If I were you I would get an '04.
Has anybody determined what the difference in gas mileage is between driving in 2WD v. 4WD? I haven't myself but I suspect it will be little to no difference as the Sequoia delivers all power to the rear wheels when in 4WD mode and transfers power to the front when needed correct?
Any insight on changes to the 2004 Land Cruiser?
I'm a fan of the Platinum plan, but only if reasonably priced.
By the way as stated you can buy from any dealer and you can do that anytime during the factory warranty (I.e. 35 months /35,000 miles from now). With all the computer controlled items, costs can add up real quick if there are problems. Did you know your '03 has NO throttle cable? It's just a position sensor! Did you know you don't need "hold" the key in the start position? Just tap it once and will crank for 20 seconds or when it starts whichever happens first. Toyota can also program the door locks through the computer (auto lock when you put in drive, auto lock when you hit 20 mph, or manual mode all your choice) as well as how long the lights stay on before turning off automatically and many other options. If they offered a 15 yr/200,000 option I would probably get that, my '93 Corolla just turned 170K (no problems knock on wood) but not as many computer controlled items either.
Extended warranties average a 70% profit for the retailer.
That means that the dealer (or insurance company) thinks that repairs on your Toyota aren't going to exceed the premium plus whatever interest it earns sitting in the account waiting for a claim.
Besides, Toyotas are reliable right? (mine sure was).
I prefer to keep my money and take my chances on repair costs. Besides, all that computer stuff is just like your PC; if it's going to fail, it'll probably fail in the first 24 hours.
ymmv, or maybe you think you sleep better with insurance. Here's a link with more. (Cheapskate Monthly)
Steve, Host
Here is a description of a typical conversation with a service writer on an AC problem:
"Well, if we're lucky, it will only be a switch. If that's all it is, you're looking at $140. If that doesn't do it, we have to go in and diagnose it. The diagnosis will run 4 hours of labor. Then, we should know if it is the compressor. If that isn't it, we'll start looking elsewhere. Unfortunately, we wont know until we actually put it back together and start using it."
Its a conversation like that, that makes many folks wish they had the extended warranty and that's only one system.
Warranties are just like insurance. You hope you never need to use it. If you ever do, you're sure glad you bought it. If you can afford to self insure, you're ahead of the game.
One final thought on this. It does depend on which warranty company you get and the price that is offered.
That's certainly true but, on average, you will pay more for the insurance than you would for the cost of repairs. Otherwise, the insurance companies wouldn't be in business.
tidester, host
As I said, if you can afford to self insure, do it.
For those who don't know the history:
cliffy1 Sep 19, 2001 11:54am
Steve, Host
Now - what was that conversation about extended warranties and insurance....
I also stand corrected - the tire pressure is 32psi, and I did adjust the pressure w/the new Toyo's to 32psi.
There have been no major problems. I ran into a family with same year but a Limited, said they were dissappointed when they first got it because of little problems, passenger seat collapsed, things not working correctly, a lot of little annoyances, but the dealer repaired everything under warranty and now they love it. They were at 75k and no other problems.
The way I look at it, an '04 will cost me about $800 more, assuming the prices do not increase. If there are some minor changes, it may be worth waiting for the new one as opposed to grabbing a year-end deal. What do you think?
Phantom Gray
Silver Sky
Natural White
Black
Salsa Red Pearl
Desert Sand
Blue Marlin
Imperial Jade
Expected arrival 2-3 weeks per money grabbing sales rep. Offering 2003 Limited loaded except no DVD for $39,300 plus TTL. Is this a fair price??
However it does not appear that Michelin carries that size in the M+S.
I believe the Land Cruiser uses 275/65/17. Does anybody know what brand they use?
Unrelated item. My 01 Limited has about 64K miles and transmission "blew". When dealer opened it up the magnet was full of metal and transmission was ruined, so they installed a new transmission.
Appeared to occur after using 4WD for a short time. Low noise appeared which became worse after a day or two especially when upshifting/downshifting around 25 - 40MPH and around 65 MPH. Finally, going uphill at about 60MPH there was a "sickening" crunch etc and only a rattling sound when in any gear including park.
Vehicle had been well maintained with no off road use and 4wd use from time to to time in snow and rain.
Has anybody experienced anything similar?
Did Toyota cover the cost of a new tranny?
Initially dealer said cost of tranny $ 7k cdn plus about $ 1.5 k cdn for installation. Later they said I would have to pay up to 20%.
When vehicle was ready they said no charge. I think the fact that I had all required service work done at the dealer since purchasing vehicle plus I had been at the dealer the week before asking about changes to 04 model may have helped.
They still do not know the cause.
http://www.toyota.com/about/news/product/2003/08/18-1-pricing.htm- l
Here you go...directly from Toyota....
"Thank you for contacting Toyota Motor Sales, U.S.A., Inc.
We appreciate your interest in the Sequioa and welcome the opportunity to address your inquiry.
We are currently working on a technical countermeasure to address a "drone" in the 2003 Sequoia drive train at speeds greater than 35mph. The sound has been found to be rooted in the differential.
Once that countermeasure has been put into place on the production line, a Technical Service Bulletin will be released to all of our servicing dealers. The Technical Service Bulletin will consist of repair instructions on how to correct the "drone" from the differential as well as a list of VIN (Vehicle Identification Number) ranges for those units affected.
We thank you for your enthusiasm about our products and hope that you will continue to consider Toyota for your driving needs.
If we can be of further assistance, please feel free to contact us.
National Customer Relations"
http://www.mitocorp.com/panasonic_dvd_vehicle_specificat.htm#navi
I've been planning on buying a 04 4Runner within the next couple of months.
However I have noticed the lack of head and leg room in the new model. I'm 6'1" tall and approx. 200lbs. I think I'm about average height for this area (maybe a little on the tall/big side) but shouldn't the redesigned 4Runner have more head and leg room?
In order for me to get comfortable I have to lower the seat all the way to the bottom and move the seat all the way back to it's farthest postion. This leaves me about 2 1/2" headroom and no adjustment room for my legs (but the seat is in the spot I current want).
While this does make it easier to remember the settings if they get changed I don't think I want a new vehicle that has no room for adjustments.
What happens during the winter when I have a large, heavy coat on? What about when I wear boots?
All of this has got me thinking about another choice for the replacement of my 1996 Blazer. I want to stay with Toyota for their quality and reliabilty. The only other choice (within my price range) is the Sequoia.
The problem I have is that I already decided against a Chevy Tahoe because it is too big and I want something that is fairly "nibble" in the handling and parking department (I back into parking spots 99% of the time).
I drove a Sequoia today for the first time and it drives alot better that a Tahoe but it isn't small by any means.
The Lexus GX470 has the added headroom I need but it is BUTT ugly and overpriced IMHO.
Can anyone here give me any info on how the Sequoia compares to the 4Runner for everyday driving, handling, and parking?
BTW, this would be my everyday vehicle.
Good luck and keep us posted.
http://www.lemonlawamerica.com/state_laws/california.htm
Go back one page on that link, and you'd find one applicable to your state.
There is a legalese statement from the lemon law statute that is pertinent to durangobuyer's case:
"Nonconformity" means a nonconformity which substantially impairs the use, value, or safety of the new motor vehicle to the buyer or lessee"
Whatever the length of *impaired usage of the vehicle* is may be determined by the arbitrator in the case before a judgement of if it qualifies for a lemon law. I dunno tho' cos I am not a lawyer.
Hope this helps