Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/25 for details.
Options

Subaru Crew - Meet The Members

1212224262758

Comments

  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I think they'll tow up to about 2000lbs w/o a problem. Just a guess, but I've seen some foresters towing some big [non-permissible content removed] boats(well over 1000lbs) on trailers w/o brakes...

    -mike
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    My wife has pretty much decided on getting a new Forester...good idea. I'm thinking we might be able to save a bit w/a used one, but ....

    she wants cruise control & most used ones are w/o. I called Rayco this morning and they said "no one" aftermarket installs cruise any longer.

    Any suggestions? Leads? Thanks.

    Also: web address for QSubaru, please?

    Take care.
    Joe W.
  • davechendavechen Member Posts: 41
    I know this is an "OLD" topic, but I was away for a few days.
    Drew, I think "ignorant" is a bit of a harsh description for me forgetting to turn on my headlights on that Lumina that I rented =p
    I'm cruising along, it slowly gets dark, I casually note that the headlights (DRL) were on, and the dash lights were on, so I figured all of the lights were all on. Why would I think otherwise, unless I owned the car, or DRLs were on all cars by law, or the rental agency explained DRLs? Also, in my Volvo 740, at that time, I never touched the headlight switch --just left it ON all the time, since the lights would turn on/off with the ignition.
    People forget to turn off their blinkers all of the time, even having a blinking light and noise to tell them. The Lumina's DRL setup provided no indication except the headlight switch position, which is not in immediate view while driving.
    And no, there was no sensor that turned on the dash lights when it got dark out. They were linked to the DRLs, which turned on when the emergency brake was released.

    I guess I'm sounding too defensive=) My point really was that they could so easily have designed the DRLs not to fool some of the people some of the time into putting themselves into a dangerous position (no marker lights at night). It sounds, though, that they have fixed this issue.

    cburian, FWIW myself and my wife think the seats are pretty comfortable.
    DaveC.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    I apologise if I offended you, but I think you see my point. GM vehicles usually use high beams as the DRLs; did you notice if the tail lamps were on as well?

    FWIW, some vehicles (GM and Ford, I think), now have small idiot light which state "Daytime running lamps on", or "DRLs on". Some people may or may not like these indicators though.

    Drew
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I LIKE that idea! But that should come to no surprise to those who follow these boards.

    Bob
  • austriash1austriash1 Member Posts: 12
    For what it's worth, in the UK I've a friend who has a Forester which is rated to tow 2000kg, i.e., 4400 lbs. It has auto trans (boo) and a tranny cooler factory installed... No problem towing 2,000 lb glider + trailer according to him.

    (reluctantly getting into DRL issue): I live in an area with a lot of fog, and surprisingly many folks don't turn on their lights. I think mandatory DRLs are a great idea; granted, good drivers don't need them (lights on), but it protects us against those for whom natural selection hasn't kicked in (yet).
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    While we are on a light kick, and Patti is listening....

    What's the use of fog lights that you need to have the headlights engaged to use? The point of fog lights as I have read, is that they shoot the light lower than the fog or at least lower than the bumper so that you can see in the fog. With the DRLs on, or requiring headlights on at all, in order to use fogs defeats the purpose. DC allows the fogs on when you have the parking lights engaged, which I believe would be ideal. So if you must have DRLs either do the turn signal DRLs or if you turn your parking lights on, it turns off the DRLs, and as long as you have the parking lights on, you should be able to activate the Fog lamps. Or you should get rid of them completely (although I know that won't happen cause they are trendy...)

    -mike
  • davechendavechen Member Posts: 41
    Drew: Apology not necessary...we're all just stating our opinions. I see your point too.
    The tail lights were not on, only the headlights (didn't notice that it was the high beams) and dash lights. I went and looked because I was aghast after the 2nd time I forgot to turn the switch. This was a few years back...probably a '95 or '96 Lumina. I guess it is personal preference. I never forget to turn on the OB's headlights, and this is partially because I look at the gauges a lot, and when the outside light gets a little dim, I get 'triggered' to turn on the headlight switch. So I think that setup is fine...no need for a idiot light or anything.

    Mike: The law in CA is that you must have the low beams on if you want to turn on the fog lights, and when high beams are on, no other lights (driving or fog) can be on. One purported argument for this is that your low-down fog or driving lights cannot be seen by approaching cars over even the slightest rise in the road. Not 100% sure of the details of that law, but I've driven thru blinding snowstorms and thule fog at Lake Tahoe in a car that I wired to let me turn on just the foglights and I agree with you --it worked much better than also having the glaring low beams on. Another law written by an ignorant lawmaker who has never driven in heavy fog or snow...

    DaveC
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I knew there were more reasons i had no desire to ever move to CA...

    Earthquakes
    Riots
    Mudslides
    Brush Fires
    and now
    Idiotic Fog/driving Light rules....


    ;)

    -mike
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    ...implants.
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Idiots driving in a (not "the") fog
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    When they first came out I was against DRLs. They struck me has being idiot lights and another case of government interference. However, over the last few years, I've changed my position. Austriash1 is right, DRLs help protect us from all the fools out there. I can't even begin to count the number of times I've seen someone driving in twilight conditions where it was almost impossible to see their car. And I just know that they're thinking: "golly, I can see to drive just fine". I also vote for reduced headlight DRLs only with a "DRL On" indicator. I see no real purpose for having the sidemarkers etc on all the time other than to increase the burnout rates of numerous light bulbs.

    -Frank P.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    30.5 mpg on a camping trip to the western NC mountains. 01 Forester 5-sp, two adults, lots of camping gear, normal driving and A/C on approx 60% of the time.

    -Frank P.
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    1) QSubaru: how do I reach them? I've tried a search of this topic & tried an address that was listed. No luck. Suggestions?

    2) Any info re: aftermarket installation of cruise control on Foresters?

    Take care.
    Joe W.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    can be accessed at qsubaru.homepage.com
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
  • dsackmandsackman Member Posts: 145
    paisan, abhidharma, originalbitman: Eat your hart out. It is great here in CA. Snow skiing in the morning, lying on the beach in the afternoon. Great economy, especially in the Bay Area. Lots of innovative thinking. Absolutely love it here, even if I am a "socialist" commie?
    Just a joke!
    Anyway, why does no one mention REAR fog lights. This is something available on many european cars. I have not yet seen this here in America. There are so many cases where water/snow spray completely covers a car and the regular rear lights are not sufficient to make the car visible.

    Daniel
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Both my MB vehicles have single rear driver's side foglamps. I believe BMWs, Audis and Volvos also have rear foglamps. Volvo uses two rear foglamps, which is not really a good idea since one can mistake them for the brake lights.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Joe W: you certainly can purchase and install cruise control after the purchase. I did. Give Darlene a call for the parts, though it was just about the only thing I did not install myself (a dealer did it).

    On insurance, quotes can vary wildly. I pay less for my Forester than my wife pays for her older 626, though hers is the V6. If you're a Costco member, check out the Executive Member program. You qualify for discounted insurance - we're saving $300 per year or so.

    tlima: congrats. Any photos to share?

    paisan: we are considering an SIA plant tour for the spring, depending on interest. Hop over to the Events topic.

    Towing: I think the H4 can pull a ton, and I agree about the brake requirement being a hassle. Why not offer a towing package, with rear disc brakes (for the L model), a tranny cooler, and the hitch? Maybe even bigger front brakes to eliminate that requirement.

    Frank: 30+mpg, with A/C? You got me!

    -juice
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Thought disc brakes were standard on all subies except for the imprezas and the legacy brighton (which is disco'ed in 2001)

    -mike
  • davechendavechen Member Posts: 41
    I agree! CA is great for the outdoor Subaru-type adventurer! Northern CA anyways. Weather is awesome (our custom is to play football on Thanksgiving day, rollerhockey on Christmas day, it has been a mild 70-90 for last few weeks, not a drop of rain all summer), beaches, skiing (over a dozen ski areas at Lake Tahoe), fishing (river, lake, or deep-sea), hiking, camping (53,000 camp sites available in hundreds of campgrounds!), backpacking (coastal & mountain), kayaking (whitewater or ocean), whitewater rafting, horseback riding, varied terrain (desert, plains, mountain, coastal), etc. plus there is huge cultural diversity and almost no unemployment (for now...).
    For Northern CA, I can partially refute:
    >earthquakes (nothing big in 11 years, cross my fingers)
    >Brush Fires (all the 8 westernmost states have major fires, actually, esp Montana)
    >idiotic Fog/driving Light rules (I don't think CA is the only state with this rule, but it is stupid)
    >driving in A fog (hmm I've seen crappy drivers just about everywhere in the world)

    TOWING: I don't think tow ratings have much to do with engine size. My '86 Volvo 740 had a 114 hp 2.3 liter inline 4, weighted 4000 lbs, and was rated for 3500 lbs towing. I towed a 2800 lb trailer/boat (which incidentally had trailer brakes) many miles at a time, AC on, 60 mph over rolling hills, and the engine temp gauge didn't even budge! Had a tranny oil cooler just to be safe. It wasn't a joy to drive with that much weight, but it worked fine. So the OB should be a piece o' cake to tow 2000 lbs with 165 hp!

    Speaking of Volvo, yep, it had rear fog lights and that was sweet! They are basically completely separate, red lensed, 22 watt bulbs that had a focused reflector to aim the light at somebody driving directly behind you. Worked like a charm in heavy dark rain, snow, spray, tule fog, etc. Yep, it coulda had just one, but two is even more visible. Plus, the three brake lights were entirely separately illuminated.

    DaveC.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    The first time I ever drove a vehicle with them was in England. I drove a Rover 600 (basicly a Honda Accord with an Anglo-twist to it) and a Volvo V70 that both had rear fog lamps. There was a separate switch on the dash to activate them. If I'm not mistaken, I believe all cars in the UK have to have rear fog lamps by law.

    Bob
  • thors_hammerthors_hammer Member Posts: 32
    I know it's off topic (sorry) but one the things that exemplifies the attitude of California lawmaker is the fact that you can't smoke in bars. Most people don't go to bars for the healthy environment.....
    I like the anti-fog light law. It keeps the rednecks here from driving down the road with 1.21 gigawatts of foglight pointed right at your eyes.

    -Bryan
  • originalbitmanoriginalbitman Member Posts: 920
    Had another... first in weeks. Measured 3 points per side at 3 different flat surfaces. Happy to report all measurements within 1/4 inch. Phew! Still haven't bought a 6 foot level to check the pavement... will save that for after the road trip. Am I weird or what?

    Bit < Californian (qualify because I've been here over 20 years)
  • jwilson1jwilson1 Member Posts: 956
    for the address and responses ... good people.

    Take care.
    Joe W.
  • jerrys2jerrys2 Member Posts: 189
    Suggest you check your odometer...or your calculator.

    Jerry
  • royallenroyallen Member Posts: 227
    Towing capability seems to have two components, one is how long are you willing to take to get to highway speed and how much added demand and wear is placed on the drive-line, and second, how much more stopping distance will be required. If your trip ready vehicle weighs 4000# and you add 2000# of trailer weight, it will take 50% longer to get to speed and 50% more power to climb, etc. Probably no big deal and better than the average 18 wheeler. If the trailer has no brakes it will take 50% farther to stop. That may or may not be a problem... and since it is outside the manufacturers recommendation, SOA has protected themselves from legal risk. To go one step further, if the road is wet, and/or down hill not only will it be harder to stop but the risk of the trailer jackknifing is increased. The stopping issues have little to do with vehicle design beyond the benefit of antilock brakes that are capable of good stops from highway speed at the loaded operating weight. So if you drive with appropriate caution and avoid congested high speed roads, it could be safe to tow whatever you like. The risk of towing increased trailer weights without trailer brakes is related to the risk of needing to make a maximum effort stop.
  • cptpltcptplt Member Posts: 1,075
    I lived in Europe for 11 years, rear fog lights are great if used properly and I would love to see them on more US cars, but they are only great in conditions requiring them. If you have to follow some idiot at night who has left them on they are dazzling to the point of being dangerous. In the UK, it was illegal to have them on in clear weather conditions. With all the idiots in the US you can guarantee if they were widely available, every other car would keep them on and they would probably cause more accidents than they would prevent!
  • grahampetersgrahampeters Member Posts: 1,786
    They're great (like front fogs) if you can ensure that pillocks turn them off. The problem in the UK was that most drivers tended to leave them on, even after clearing fog, guaranteeing that following drivers were blinded. They really are only of benefit in really poor visibility. Once you can see 200m ahead all they are doing is blinding other drivers. Mercedes and VW have a neat switch that cancels them when the main beams go off. The self cancelling switch on the Subaru fogs would achieve similar effect.

    For some reason, the extent of desire to illuminate with front or rear fog lights seems to be inversely proportional to male hardware size.

    Cheers

    Graham
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    I saw a Volvo yesterday with a 100K "High mileage Club" Badge. Does anyone know if Subaru has a similar program (I know they were looking for the highest mileage Subaru in Drive magazine awhile ago).

    Frank
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I hate em cause they blind me when driving. 99% of the time they aren't needed, and it's the idiots in the audis and jags that leave em on. I usually just put my highbeams, fogs, and as many auxiliary lights on as possible to show them how annoying they are... or I just pass them...

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    paisan: the Forester L and I think Impreza L and Outback Sport have drum brakes. Subaru should make 4 wheel discs standard.

    Frank: 100k is nothing. ISR Subaru has a quarter-million mile club!

    Well, I spent a long weekend on the Forester, and have added nearly a dozen pages to my site. Look here for the new additions.

    I finally added the fender flares that were sitting in my shed, and I love them. The bonus was that they covered a door ding I had.

    This morning someone I work with saw my Forester and didn't recognize it, then asked "didn't you own a station wagon?"

    I also installed the interior air filtration system, which is about the easiest thing I've done. Just remove a cut out with a utility knife, screw it two brackets, slip the filter in, and then close the cover.

    It's so simple Subaru should just make it standard. I have asthma and allergies, so hopefully this will help.

    Hella xenons were next. Per Ken's advice, I ordered a set and installed them. Easy as pie and a noticeable improvement, but see for yourself. For $27 it's worth it.

    Then I did the 30k service, including oil change, PCV valve, fuel filter, fuel additive, radiator flush and fill, and air filter. I took photos and shared several tips for these.

    The horn swap was a bit humbling. You'll recall I mentioned there was not a significant difference in the note? Well, there was NONE, because I swapped the wrong horn! Can you say "placebo effect"?

    There are 2, one behind the grille for the alarm (I guess) and one behind the passenger side head light for the main horn.

    I certainly do notice a difference now! The "beep-beep" is now a deeper "honk-honk". Though still not the deepest I've heard, it's a significant improvement for $10 (Highway Blaster, from Pep Boys).

    Enthusiasts can also check out my custom made cold-air intake, thanks to Ramon's and Colin's tips. Better yet, it cost ZERO and I can notice a difference already.

    Whew. Sorry for the long post, hope you guys like the new pages.

    -juice

    PS All items were from QSubaru, except the Hella Xenons (Susquehana Motorsports) and the horn (Pep Boys)
  • hardenbrhardenbr Member Posts: 11
    Royallen,

    I agree with your comments, particularly those regarding companies setting limits to cover liability.

    I have been towing recreationally for about 15 years, with various vehicles and trailers. Caution, and SMOOTH actions are the rule, but some vehicles are just better at towing than others.

    Which brings me back to my original questions regarding real world towing experiance with Forester or OB. I appreciate all of the thoughtful responses, but I must conclude that folks don't tend to purchase Subarus as tow vehicles.

    On the other hand, given that my current needs are pretty mild (I used to tow my boat with a Toyota PU with 2.4 liter 4), I'm inclined to think the Forester would be up to the task. Maybe I will start a new trend. I'll keep y'all posted.

    BTW - I'm disappointed at the loss of the Brighton model. My wife just bought one, and it is an ideal family car for those on a budget, or just not interested in a $1-2K upcharge for "luxury" items like CD, roof rack, electric locks, 4wheel disk brakes. Oh well, the politics of big business.
  • FrankMcFrankMc Member Posts: 228
    Juice-
    Thanks for the link. I guess I always loved those "high mileage" badges that the European higher end cars would sport. Since I never saw any on Subaru's (or any Japanese brand car) for that matter I was just just curious if the Subaru club, or anyone had something like that. Maybe a decal for the window or something. (I understand that 100K is a modest goal for a Subaru but if you encourage everyone to try and hit 250K, how can you sell them new cars?)
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Yeah forgot about the OBS, thought all the foresters were disc but I guess not.

    -mike
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Russell: the Legacy L is still a good value, though. The ABS is particularly well suited for a family car.

    Frank: good point. ISR is a tuner shop, not part of SoA.

    paisan: yep, mine are drums :(

    Hey, maybe I could retrofit some discs for my next project...nah, I need a break!

    -juice

    PS That remind me, the SCOA event on Saturday is also a parts swap, so who knows? Maybe I'll find a set of rear discs after all.
  • hardenbrhardenbr Member Posts: 11
    Juice,

    You prompted a question.

    The Brighton was advertised with single channel ABS, while all of the other models have 4 channel ABS. I assume this just means that on the Brighton all 4 brakes are modulated together, while on the others they are modulated independantly. In either case, all Subarus have ABS as standard equipment. Do you know whether I am correct on this? I haven't tested the ABS system on the Brighton yet. (FWIW - I commute in my S10 PU, and due to the way I drive the ABS gets a workout routinely. Hard on the brake into a bend, gravel on the inside of the corner, front inside tire loses traction, brake peddle starts pulsing while truck holds course. Love it!)
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Your horn swap story gave me a good laugh. Funny how people can rationalize things -- like "isn't it wierd how similar the new and old horns sound". I've practically gone down with the ship making sense out of my mistakes before I realize I did something wrong.

    When installing RAM in a computer recently, I took the old module out and then somehow managed to confuse it with the new one. Put the old module back in the computer, and the new module back into the static bag. Upon re-boot, I was a bit boggled by things and started down the long road of troubleshooting until I realized what I'd done. It was worth a good forehead smack . . . .

    Craig
  • tlimatlima Member Posts: 124
    I'll take some photos after I take delivery and add a few accessories. :( Vehicle is at port and expected to be at the dealership sometime this week.

    Yes, rear brakes are drums on the Forester L. Although I would rather have all disc, I have owned cars with rear-drums without problems. I believe stopping distance on Forester L is only 1 foot longer from 60mph compared to S.

    -tlima
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    That's a really "cool" project, and I enjoy looking through your web pages.

    On that "snorkus", was that bulbous gourd-looking thing on the bottom a large hollow chamber? Was it connected (open) to the snorkus pipe? Did there appear to be any butterfly valves inside the snorkus at all?

    I'm trying to rationalize the intent of the original serpentine duct design, and the only thing I can figure is that it was set up to reduce noise, unless there was some sort of valve in there to also control airflow.

    I'm curious how the engine will handle any additional airflow that you added with your new setup. Do you know if there is a computer controlled valve somewhere else in the air intake system? If so, that may keep the flow rate regulated no matter what you do upstream. Regardless, the reduction in airflow temperature should help more than anything else.

    Very cool! I'd like to hear more details about this project.

    Craig
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Title says it all. (that's why I assumed they were the only ones with drums but Juice straightened me on that)

    -mike
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Jerry- 30.5 mpg is confirmed and not that much higher than the 29.5 I got a couple of months ago on a road trip. Sorry if your's is significantly less. As the ole saying goes: your mileage may vary.

    Dave C- Not to trash CA but not having a "big" earthquake in 11 years is hardly a selling point (FYI: I was in Northern CA during the 89 World Series quake). In comparison, most other places in the country haven't had a significant quake in thousands of years.

    Juice- Nice photos and instructions. How bout an updated shot of your Forester in profile so we can see the full effect of the new wheels and fender flares? Re your horn...the Forester comes with two OE horns. One each HI and LOW tone which are used for both alarm and reg horn. I replaced mine with the conch type but was disappointed with the results. Yeah there's a diff, but not a major one. That's why I sprung for the Hella Super Tones. They are considerably louder but (IMHO) not significantly enough to justify the cost of horns plus pro install.

    -Frank P.
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Hi All! It's been a crazy couple of days. I've been reading your post and trying to get some specific answers (re: suspension differences). Between meetings, I'm trying to get information. I'll be on here tomorrow for a few hours so I hope to get caught up. I just didn't want you to think I disappeared.

    Looking forward to being with you all!
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    The Tribute/Escape topics on this forum are very quiet now, after all those recalls. Still, I cannot believe so many people jumped in and left a deposit for a car in 1st year of production and with so obvious serious teething problems. Some folks are ready to pay MSRP or above MSRP.

    Although I predict that both these vehicles will be plagued with mechanical problems (based on my own bad Ford experience), I still think it's a very serious competition to Forester, and SOA should come up with a strong response ("Grand Forester") asap.
  • jerrys2jerrys2 Member Posts: 189
    Frank:

    That is great mileage. I did get a little better than 27 on a few occasions with my 2000 Outback Ltd.(AT) Generally it is in the 25-26 range.

    As an aside I have been useing Priceline.com for gas latest price was $1.44 for regular and $1.54 for premium (required on my supercharged Buick Riviera).

    Jerry
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I think once the kinks are ironed out, the Tribute / Escape will mainly eat into CR-V and RAV-4 sales, and probably not affect the Forester too much. In most comparisons, the Forester still fits into its own unique category. I'd hate to see Subaru "butch-up" the Forester to compete with the Tribute / Escape, because it would probably ruin the real concept of the vehicle. Whatever the case, I bet Subaru is watching the market very closely . . .

    Craig
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Outside of Baltimore there is a Subaru/Mazda dealer, and there are probably many more such pairing throughout the country. I'm sure many a SOA factory rep is going to be more than a little nervous when they see customers make direct comparisons between the two vehicles on the same dealer lot.

    While RAV4s and CRVs may take the brunt the sales loss caused by the Escape/Tribute, I really think at Subaru/Mazda (or Subaru/Ford - there's one in Frederick, MD) dealerships, the Forester is going to take a beating.

    I'd be really curious as to how Subaru is going to counter the Escape/Tribute, in terms of sales strategy.

    Bob
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I'm not that familiar with the Brighton; I didn't even know it had ABS!

    tlima: I imagine rear discs will help more than a foot, but of course there are many factors that affect overall braking distance. I think the Forester S holds C&D's crown for best brakes ever on an SUV.

    Thanks for the praise, it was a lot of work!

    The snorkus was totally hollow, and seems pretty pointless. Suck in hot air, store it, route it inefficiently, then deliver the hot air.

    You're right on target - it was designed to reduce noise. But at normal throttle positions, it makes no difference. At full throttle it does most definitely, but in that situation I LIKE to hear intake noise!

    The key on my intake is the mass airflow sensor, which is down stream of my mod, so that means the computer will compensate by adding more fuel if needed, hence added performance is possible, at least in theory.

    I'd say I can feel it, but the horn had me fooled too! Let's just say it "feels" faster. I have to run up that hill by my house, and compare speeds before/after.

    Frank: I disconnected one horn at a time. In mine, only the one behind the headlight works. Perhaps because mine is a '98? Even so, what's the 2nd horn for? The alarm on Ken's '98 Forester is behind the intake, so these are two separate horns, not from the alarm.

    Now I'm confused! But the horn "honks" a deeper, more satisfying tune so I should be happy.

    Bob: I have to disagree, and mainly because the opposite happened when the Grand Vitara V6 and XTerra V6 showed up - Forester sales are up!

    The Forester has only a 4-banger, but among those it's the most powerful, yet still manages to be the most efficient (22/27 for auto, as most are sold).

    The V6's tread into the teens in terms of mileage, and I think that'll cross it off some lists right there. 19/22 for the Escape V6, right?

    It's also mostly domestic, so the Tribute is more likely to be cross shopped. Realize most consumers are clueless about the joint venture.

    Fitzgerald sells Subaru and Isuzu (and Dodge) from the same room, and it still seems like the Outback/Forester get all the showroom traffic, despite the bargain priced Rodeos and Troopers sitting right next to them.

    My experience is hardly scientific, but still.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Yup, the snorkus-thingy is there simply to reduce intake noise. The 00+ models have it inside the engine compartment, however. I've read about turbo Forester owners in Japan noticing power increases after removing it. Makes sense - it increases airflow as well as drawing it from a cooler source -- perfect for turbos.

    I'll check out the horns on my Forester tonight...
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Hey Juice not to bust your nutz or anything but...

    If the Forester has the best braking of any "SUV" why do you guys insist that it isn't? Seems like you are try to compare apples to oranges again...


    -mike
This discussion has been closed.