Subaru Crew - Meet The Members

1272830323358

Comments

  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    And from what I'm reading recently, they look more and more at fault.

    I like the 22psi recommended pressure. It's on the trim tags of millions of Explorers. No way 22psi is enough to support a 4000lb Explorer.

    -Colin
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    I just may be able to swing the fall trip. As for the VDC? Definite maybe??
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    OT, but you've got to feel for those Explorer owners -- You inflate your tires to "normal" settings and you increase your roll over potential in emergency maneuvers. You deflate them to Ford's "recommended" settings and you increase the chances of failure resulting in roll-overs. Lose-lose situation...
  • subearusubearu Member Posts: 3,613
    With QSubaru to get the accessories from, it just makes that much easier to order & install things for your Sube.

    I think this has been said before: those instructions aren't the greatest. They're basically pictures with little or no text.

    I'll probably be ordering the subwoofer, trailer hitch, and bike rack (for the hitch) in the near future. Maybe I should get a digital camera first so I can take pictures of the installs....

    -Brian
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Can anyone tell me what the proper breakin period is for the 00 Outback Wagon? The manual says to just watch the shifting, and the dealer said not to worry, just enjoy. The dealer also recommended 89 Octane, while the manual says 87. Any help would be appreciated.

    BTW I made it to Edmunds Live at Englishtown, NJ and drove the Esacpe and the Forester back-to-back. The Forester definitly rules over the Escape. The Escape had a wider turning radius, and little bit longer braking run also. It made me want to try the Outback on their course, but my wife quickly nixed that idea. 290 miles so far and it is NICE! Thanks for the help.
    Mark
  • jake696jake696 Member Posts: 111
    When is a Baru going to be available with a V-6??
  • bg18947bg18947 Member Posts: 184
    During break-in, the car will small awful as the new steel pipes are cured. Be ready. I thought it smelled pretty awful the first 1500 miles. You'll notice it when the engine is hot and you park your car in a garage. Whew!

    A lot of complaints about pulling to the right or being sensitive to the crown in the road. I thought my GT pulled to the right, but now I think the steering is just sensitive to any grades at all. I had my GT pulling to the left when I thought the road was pretty flat.

    Brakes will be softer than you will probably expect, but you'll get use to it. The sedan's trunk has to be slammed pretty tight to close. RE-92 tires are only average. I can't wait til wear mine out. I'll probably replace with Goodrich Comp-TA HR4.

    Other than these minor issues, I've got everything that I expected. No real disappointments except that my driver door suffered its first bad shopping cart dent. I don't even have 3000 miles on my GT yet and I get bashed by a shopping cart.

    Don't do any undercoating or rustproofing. If you read up on the body treatments during manufacturing, I think you would agree that it's pretty well protected.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Not any time soon, considering Subaru just completed development on a 3.0L flat six.

    Read the test article linked on Edmunds.com's homepage (right now at least).

    -Colin
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Why would Subaru need a V-6? What are advantages of V6 vs H6? What are advantages of I6 for that matter?
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    A v6 would require a higher hoodline but less width in the engine bay. There's really no problem with width as it is though... and a higher engine raises the vehicle's center of gravity, which is not good for handling.

    An inline six would be even worse than a v6, as it is long and tall.

    As far as debating the benefits of each type of architecture by itself... Eh, I'll pass.

    -Colin
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    FYI - I have heard of NO plans to create a V-6. If anything, I think some other manufacturers want our flat engines for their efficiency, lower center of gravity, and, on a simpler note, the higher degree of safety.

    Think about it. Would you want to have a V-6 coming into your engine compartment in a front end collision, or a flat-6 that drops down and under? This is just my opinion, but it is based on seeing a lot of accident testimonials from Subaru owners and commentary from rescue personnel.

    Just thought I'd share!
  • jerrys2jerrys2 Member Posts: 189
    For the first 500 miles don't drive at a constant speed for any length of time; keep it under 70. Change oil @ 1000-1500 miles. Only my opinion (and by no means am I an expert on the subject) but it has worked well for various new cars over the years as well as my two Subarus.

    My '96 Outback called for 91 Octane which I used for the first 32k miles (over 3 years). After I planned to order a 2000 I changed to 87 and there was absolutely no difference in performance or otherwise over the next 8k miles

    To those of you concerned about the cost of gas ...suggest you try priceline, got my last 50 gallons for $1.42.

    Jerry
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    To revisit a topic I'm still agonizing over, anyone out there who has a brush guard/nudge bar who wants to offer an opinion on their utility (or lack thereof)? I'm fond of the looks of Subaru's own brush guard, but haven't been able to find much evidence for it actually providing much actual protection. I'm also interested in the Manik & WAAG wraparound grill guards (I think of them as "Range Rover"-type guards since that's the first vehicle I saw with that style), and it looks like they would provide some useful protection for my Forester, but I'm still unsure how much -- especially given that they're notably more expensive than Subaru's own. Finally, I wonder about the potential downsides of brush guards in general (cleaning hassles? more likely to accidentally tap things with that extra metal hanging out front? what would happen in a collision? etc.).
    So I'd be interested in hearing from anyone with ownership experience with these things.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I have an '00 trooper, and i installed a nudge bar from East Coast Bull Bars in Australia...

    First 90% of the ones installed in the US including the subaru one are for astetic purposes only and don't provide a wink of protection. The main problem is that they are mounted so close to the vehicle that if they get hit, and pushed even 1/2 an inch, they are going to damage your grille, bumper, hood, light assemblies (and on wrap around ones your fenders) I've spoken with several body shops and they don't reccomend any bars that aren't at least 1-2 inches off the bumper and are connected to the frame (instead of the body)

    Here is mine:
    http://www.iace.com/ia/trooper

    The place I got it from is:
    http://www.ecb.com.au/

    Juice saw the bar on my truck, these are quality bars and I like the non-gaudy look of the nudge bar (especially on a forester)

    -mike
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    V-6: I think the poster meant a 6 cylinder in general, a lot of newbies don't understand the Horizontally Opposed layout.

    Breakin: Just don't use cruise and no hard breaking til 1000 miles. I've broken in all my cars like that and had no problems

    Octane: run the lowest reccomended in the manual, until you hear knocking, then kick it up a notch until the knocking goes away. The OB should be fine on 87 (just don't get the 87 at like gaseteria or some other El Cheapo place) I'd stick to the major manufacturers personally (especially in our area)

    -mike
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    I remember someone said SOA changed terms, and now you can only use points towards service and accessories, not towards buying a new Soob. Do those cards carry an annual fee? Am I better off getting 1% cash back from my Discover, and putting ir into "car fund" for the future purchase?

    Suggestions, anyone?

    --Kate
  • iscottsiscotts Member Posts: 28
    I signed up with the 5% cashback on next new car plan. I've heard that it has changed to 3% cashback on Soob parts, service and cars, but I have yet to receive an amended contract.

    Discover cashback isn't 1% until you reach some threshold. The Soob card is always 3%, and though it is in coupons, if you need stuff (and we'll all need service one day) it may be a better deal. Drawbacks: cashback coupons are in $100 increments (no change given!) and expire in 4 years.

    Mastercard is taken in more places than Discover too.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Colin: Ford actually was recommending 26psi, not 22, but still. Firestone had stated 30psi. Now Ford is saying 26-30psi is OK, to cover their @$$.

    Patti: yes, please come! It's great to meet people in person, it always surprised me. For example, I expect you to have a little halo above your head... :o)

    Brian: getting a digital camera would be great. I'm sharing instructions for the Forester, but it would be nice to have someone doing that for the Outback (especially since they sell more).

    Mark: more details on Edmunds Live please! How'd the Escape do in the slalom? Where you able to push it hard? Did the tall sidewalls give in, or hang in there? What about off-road, and all of these compared to the Soob?

    Yes, I saw paisan's push bar and it was sweet. Pure and simple, good function, not at all gawdy. I figure it'll absorb some punishment before the bumper even comes into play. Also a good place to mount lights if you need those.

    -juice
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Does anyone know if there are H6 outbacks available for test-drive in the Bay Area dealerships? I am hesitant to call them and get tied up with salesman's pitch...

    As for Discover card, I somehow manage to reach the 1% threshold ($ 3000) really fast ;-(. However, 3% or better 5% sound really sweet.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    (BTW, Darlene accepts those coupons for parts and accessories)

    I'll take a stab at the engine configurations, at least in general.

    V6s are most common. They're not too long or wide, and can be angled at 54, 60, or 90 degrees, perhaps even other variations. Most require balance shafts, however, and the exhaust usually has to be tuned to sound right. They can be mounted transversely, like my wife's 626 (which complicates the route of power delivery), or longitudinally, which is generally preferred.

    I6s are less common. BMW uses these, and soon the Chevy Blazer will. So does Lexus in the GS and IS 300. My '81 Mustang also had one of these. They're smooth and the exhaust sound is sweet, but they're very hard to package. They're long so they're mounted longitunidally, and require a long hood to accomodate the long block. They also tend to eat into front leg room, and reduce cabin space, hence the interior space in most models is compromised (the 3-series and IS300 are smallest-in-class).

    H6s are rare, only Porsche and Subaru makes them nowadays. They have perfect second order balance, but are generally noisy so engineers work a lot on that. They offer flexible packaging: Subaru uses a longitunal front mount, while Porsche has a mid-engine configuration.

    In Subaru's case, a short block with a longitudinaly mounted engine allows for straight drive shafts and less frictional loss in its power delivery. That's why they're more efficient than other AWDs with similar power.

    I had guessed 20/25, but C&D stated the preliminary EPA figures are 19/24. Still, Volvo XC gets only 17/22 and the VW 4Motion 17/24 both with 22 fewer horsepower.

    The block lies very, very low in the engine compartment, so the center of gravity is kept low. Also, as Patti stated, they'd slide under the passenger compartment in a front-end collision. Not surprisingly both the Legacy and Forester mastered the industry's toughest safety test - the IIHS offset front crash tests.

    -juice
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    kate500,

    There are absolutely ZERO H6s available for test drive in the Bay Area. I was just at Carlsen Subaru with my brother who is shopping for one. The only way you would get to drive one is to place an order with them now (they're charging 5.75% over invoice) and get first dibs when they arrive sometime in October. They're actually encouraging people to go that route since it gives them more H6s to sell.

    Ken
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    Check it out, here are photos of Kutt's and Marty's new Foresters.

    I expect to add a few pages myself, once I get back from the OBX. Digital camera is in hand, ready for the road trip and hopefully some sand blasting. :)

    -juice
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Juice,
    -The Escape had a little bit better acceleration in the straight away, compared to the Forester. Right off the start the Forester did jump a little faster, but then the Escape edged out.
    -The Subaru defintely did better in the slalom with the Escape rolling a little (someone else on the test track almost rolled with it!)
    -I am not sure what you meant by the "tall sidewalls give in, or hang in there?" I did not notice anything unusual regarding the sidewalls.
    -Off road the Escape handled more with a truck like feel, whereas the Forester had the nicest ride for the small SUV's. My wife with her bad back was more comfortable in the Forester over the Escape. (That is until I hit that last bump on the off road portion, whereupon she sat out the rest of the day.)
    -As regards the bigger trucks (Durango, Expedition, and Tahoe) the Tahoe had the nicest ride and handling.

    -I do have to admit that the only small SUV's I drove were the Forester and Escape, since they were the only 2 I was interested in.

    My apologies for the non-technical review. This was the first time I was ever able to do anything like this,and it was definitely worth it! I hope Edmunds makes it into an annual event, because I know I will positively go again.
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    That's about what I expected. You'll recall I wasn't able to drive one because the steering wheels were falling off (I love saying that).

    A little quicker off the line is no surpise, there's a 3.0l V6 with 200hp under the hood. The difference should be bigger if you ask me, since it won't match the mpg of the Forester.

    As far as the sidewalls go, I meant the tires were leaning over onto their sidewalls, like on the CR-V and XTerra I drove. Alas, you didn't try those.

    Yeah, I really liked Edmunds Live, too. Just two things I'd change: next time I'll plan on spending a full day there instead of half, and I'll wear a helmet if Hutch is driving!

    :o)

    -juice
  • ateixeiraateixeira Member Posts: 72,587
    I just read that the Outback won Intellichoice's award for best mid-size wagon over $20k.

    Also, Subaru Forester still holds Consumer Reports' top spot.

    True, they're subjective ratings, but it's nice to see them recognized and awarded.

    -juice
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    Because of all of your postings regarding my driving at Edmz Live, Patti has posted a challenge to race me. She believes you ! What now ?

    Well, anyway, since my car is an auto .. I was wondering ....

    - hutch
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    This board is so quiet now...
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Juice will be so disappointed in us when he returns! I think we need to start getting some good techie type questions here for him to come home to - just so he knows how much he was missed!!
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    So, Patti, have you had a chance to drive the H6 yet? When can we expect reviews to start popping up in major car magazines?
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    Has it been confirmed that the H6 will in fact be available in the rest of the Legacy line in 2002? I know at least 3 potential customers who will wait til 2002 to get a Legacy (GT or L) over a camary/maxima if they will in fact be getting an option of the H6. Help me sell your cars ;)

    -mike
  • guxxguxx Member Posts: 33
    Someone asked me the other day which type of engine was in my Forester, and I said it was different because it was horizontal, but she drove a Jeep Grand Cherokee, making a hoopla over the V6 or V8 it had, and I didn't know how to respond? How does the Forester's engine compare to the Jeep's engine? How to answer her? Thx
  • royallenroyallen Member Posts: 227
    guxx: You might have your answer in earlier posts #1530-1533. If not post your question again.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    If your friend has a '99, '00 or '01 Jeep Grand Cherokee, with the 4.7L V-8, she's got a good engine. It's state-of-the-art, as far as American engines are concerned. If she has the older 5.2L/5.9L V-8, or the 4.0L I-6, she's driving a dinosaur.

    Yes, the Subaru has a horizontally opposed H-4, often referred to as a "boxer" configuration. This is similar to what Porsches uses. Not bad company to be associated with.

    Bob
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    guxx,

    You have a horizontally opposed 4-cylinder engine in your Forester. It's also called a boxer engine (for the way the pistons move), an H4, B4 or flat-4. Basically, the engine layout is flat where the pistons all lie on the same plane; two on the right, two on the left.

    The boxer layout is good because it's compact and it keeps the center of gravity low on your vehicle. Also, because the piston movements oppose each other, the engine is naturally quiet.

    Ken
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    Odelay, 115 posts to catch up on in one forum alone...

    I think that V6 post was just someone trying to stir us up, without realizing the Soob 6 is available now.

    Juice is either on vacay, or actually had work to do. One or the other.

    I will miss y'all at the fall foliage meet, but will try to get some good pics of me at driving school that same day. Juice better have his HTML manual out that week...
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    For all the time I've spent on this forum, I don't think I've ever seen anybody comment on the Outback sedan. Does anyone care about this vehicle? How do the sales compare to, say, a Legacy GT?

    Patti, do you have any sales figures and/or sales projections/comments regarding this vehicle, and its place in the automotive landscape?

    Bob
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    I've only seen a couple on the road. I don't quite understand what the target market is for this car, honestly.
  • dsackmandsackman Member Posts: 145
    The same holds true for the Outback Sedan. I do not need or want a wagon, but I want the ability to go "anywhere" with the increased ground clearance in luxury. When will the Outback Sedan H6/VDC be available? I have my check ready.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I've been wondering why no manual transmission is available in the Outback Sedan (so long as we are on that topic) I don't drive stick but it's kinda weird to not see it as an option. Is it because of the low sales volume?

    =mike
  • ridermaniaridermania Member Posts: 3
    this proves again that there is something weired and unexplainable in how subaru "brains" market their vehicles. the availability of different options on various their models don't make any sense. I understand they are trying to put emphasis on the most profitable model (i.e outback), but they don't seem to realize that are loosing potential customers when they limit the options. that applies to the color availability as well (even though it doesn't bother me). ugraded GT sedan (turbo or H6, cold weather package) could give audi/bmw and other run for their money.... I just hope subaru listens to their customers. also they will need to make sure their salespeople are "uptodate" and ready to face the tough audi/bmw sales personel
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    yup, totally agree. SOA would do well to take a quick glance at the ford Focus for proof. I was looking forward to that car, as it was highly acclaimed in Europe and was a good looking wagon.I was ready to buy when the rumor mill mentioned the 5 speed, which, quite frankly, I assumed would be available. I was REALLY hoping for the 5 door hatch, because it would give Golf customers another option. Well, no 5 door, which I expected, but no 5-speed wagon, either! Unbelievable. I was so disappointed; I had to spend a lot more money than I wanted in order to get a peppy wagon with a 5 speed- my '99 OB, which I bought on major closeout as the '00s rolled in. Not that I regret that decision :), but there is clearly a niche market for these cars equipped with 5-speeds. the Ford Focus Forum went bananas when the tranny was made official, and now it looks like Ford is going to do an about-face and offer a 5 speed. too late for this customer. Hope Soob, with its niche market and loyal buyer base, doesn't miss the lesson.

    How many 5-speed owners out there?

    I'm one.
  • mikef11mikef11 Member Posts: 74
    I, too, drive a manual. My wife also has no interest in driving an automatic.

    It is interesting to read the comments about lack of options in the cars. In Canada, if you want a manual Outback, you have to get the base Outback wagon. The Limited and the Sedan are auto only. I am not sure if I would have bought the Ltd if I could have bought it in manual guise, but I didn't even consider it. I believe the Legacy Gt is also auto only. The restricted options also rule out the H6 and most likely the SVX/OutBrat..

    Oh well, at least the Cold weather package is standard on all Canadian Outbacks :-)

    MikeF
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Cast my vote too. I think the 5-spd 2.5-H4 combo is just about perfect in the OB wagon.

    Craig
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    I spoke to one of Hertz's Virginia regional managers at a picnic today, and he had some very positive comments about Outbacks (they rent them out at the Richmond Airport). This guy said he has never had ANY problems with Outbacks, and has only taken them out of service for scheduled maintenance. I found this interesting, since rental cars generally take a beating (Hertz keeps cars until they have about 22,000 mi on the ODO) and often go in for minor fixes along the way. What I found most interesting was the fact that this guy chose an Outback as his "company car" last winter when we had some heavy snow and ice. Interesting because Hertz is part of Ford, and they also rent Ford SUVs, Volvos, and Mazdas (among many other makes).

    Craig
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    My brother decided to order the H6 OB VDC this weekend! He added a couple of goodies to it like the rear spoiler and dog gaurd. The total after taxes and fees came out to around $34K.

    It's supposed to come in sometime in October. Man, oh, man, I can't wait to drive it! :)

    Ken
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Talk about good fortune :-) The rear spoiler is definitely very nice. Will your brother start posting here now too?

    Drew
  • jresjres Member Posts: 69
    I've always drove a stick and I was very dissapointed that the GT sedan didn't come with a stick. I went with a GT Wagon and am very happy, but I would probably have had a hard time choosing if a 5 speed had been an option.

    John
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    I've got two. In fact, I wouldn't be driving a Soob today if it wasn't for the fact that I couldn't get a manual trans 2000 Cherokee (turned out for the better anyway!).

    Regarding SOA offering additional options: I understand Subaru's dilemma....every option offered increases the per-vehicle cost of production. SOA may be enjoying record sales but still only accounts for a small fraction of the total market.

    Regarding the Outback sedan: SOA doesn't sell very many. Probably because they are cross shopped against camcords, which are several thousand cheaper and come with a V-6 option.

    -Frank P.
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Hmmm - well, I prefer a 5-speed and my current test vehicle is a 5-speed GT Limited. I really like it! However, we seem to have a fairly low demand for 5-speed transmissions and that is why they do not make many. I think part of it is cost to the company. Back in the SVX days, there was a group of us pushing for a manual transmission coupled with that beautiful 6 cyl. We were encouraging considering it because we had heard from a lot (it seemed) of customer's that wanted it. Then, market studies were done and it turned out that a VERY small percentage of customer's like a manual transmission. In looking at the sales data, it still does not look like a lot of owners grab the manuals. Who can figure? My guess: People who really know there cars and get involved with sites like Edmunds, enjoy a 5-speed. The "average" driver seems to head toward the Auto.
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.