Subaru Crew - Meet The Members

1303133353658

Comments

  • jake696jake696 Member Posts: 111
    No, I meant V-6. "V" is still the best overall engine design...
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    What do you base your statement on? Facts please.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Be it V6, or I6, or VR6, or H6. All of them have their strengths and weaknesses. I6 engines have been known for their smoothness, but the overall height required makes it impractical for many vehicles.
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    is because it's a competitor to the Forester. I followed up Subaru's offerings since late 80's, and happily owned 3 Soobs (currently own and drive 2). I also had a misfortune to own Ford Escort, and since then I developed a big huge grudge for Ford's quality. I personally see Escape's recalls as another indication of quality problems at Ford Motor Co.

    When a special topic "Escape vs Forester" is established, I'll be posting comments there...
  • bg18947bg18947 Member Posts: 184
    I was watching a European auto race about 2 weeks ago on one of the national broadcast channels, and they went into a discussion on how race technologies will be applied to production cars. The technology they keyed in on was Audi's pushbutton gear changing (clutch-pedal-less) which allowed Audis to win more championships recently. The gear changes are lightning fast, and will eventually show up in the showroom in a few years. It should appeal to a broader market.

    I bought a 2000 GT Ltd with an auto so that my wife can drive it. Some people complain about the gated shifter as looking lame. I think what they have to realize is that the gated shifter is a safety feature so that you don't accidentally shift into the wrong gear for those of us who do shift autos (I being one of them). It isn't to look cool. Even the column shifter of my 2000 Odyssey minivan is gated to prevent popping it into the wrong gear. The gating is for function and not looks. Believe me, it doesn't sound good when you accidentally shift into R from one of the Ds. It will set you back at least $2000 when you show up at AAMCO. Fortunately, most automatic transmissions are electronically controlled to prevent some disasters. I've switched from 3rd into 1st in my 96 Blazer, but the electronics dropped me into 2nd for a brief second before it was safe enough to drop into 1st. Whew! I was going for 2nd for a downhill stretch. This won't happen with the gated shifter!
  • shndvnshndvn Member Posts: 22
    Thanks to everyone for their replies to my MPG
    post. There were some good points made. It's
    just frustrating when you do all this research
    and pay a lot of money and not get what you
    expected. Besides the lower mileage, I've had
    problems with steering wheel alignment and
    excessive wind noise from the driver's window
    (the dealer attempted to fix both but no luck
    yet), some "glue" on the panels and door handles
    wasn't applied very well, and my insurance costs
    have gone up a lot (I knew this beforehand and
    I have shopped around - I just don't understand
    why it's so high for a Forester in this area).

    The Forester is a good vehicle and it's great to
    have a forum such as this for support - I just
    wish the above issues hadn't surfaced so early
    after purchase to detract from my "new vehicle"
    enjoyment.

    I will try a couple weeks of driving a little
    slower and see how that changes the mileage.
    Eventually, I'll get over these things and
    enjoy all the advantages of AWD during the
    skiing season. Maybe I should change my name
    to Dave and get a couple dogs?

    Kate, I hope your MPG improves over time.

    Ken, did you see those Aztecs at the Mountain
    View Art&Wine Festival? I was there too and
    my girlfriend kept trying to get me to enter
    the contest they had going on (a trip somewhere)
    but I didn't want to get too close to those
    beastly vehicles! ;-)
  • shndvnshndvn Member Posts: 22
    One more thing... for those of you that went to
    EdmundsLive, how do they handle the registration
    times? That is, do they group all the people
    together with the same time range and swap the
    groups in and out during the day. Or do people
    just show up whenever and stay as long as they
    like?

    Thanks.
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    can be seen here, well at least for the BMW X5 and the Isuzu Trooper.

    The M-class (which has 2.5 mph bumpers) still beats the X5 overall, which only did well in the rear bumper test.
  • kenskens Member Posts: 5,869
    Shane,

    I sure did see those Aztecs in Mountain View. Never knew you could contort plastic so much...

    Ken
  • texsubarutexsubaru Member Posts: 242
    As far as Texas drivers on auto vs. manual transmissions, it may well depend on where they're doing most of their driving. If you have one of those lengthy daily commutes in stop'n'go traffic around Houston or Dallas, then you might quite logically prefer an auto.
    But if you regularly do long-distance driving out in West or South Texas or the Panhandle, then, if you have a 5-speed, you can get it up into 5th and quite possibly not have to shift again for hours.
  • thecatthecat Member Posts: 535
    Shndvn,

    I know you've posted several times regarding your MPG and you may have already answered this, but.. have you checked your tire pressure. My 99-S auto has consistently gotten 26-28 mpg.

    Ed. Live lets you enter according to your reserved time .. but you can stay as long as you like. As the day goes on, the lines to drive cars get longer as you might expect. Go early. Juice & I got there at 9:00 and you could walk right up to any vehicle and drive away! Within 30 min's that was no longer the case. By noon, the lines were getting pretty long for the more interesting cars.
    -hutch
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    I think the point was that most of large pickups these days F-150s, Sierras, etc. (which stereotypes suggest Texans seem to drive alot of) are almost completely sold with automatic transmissions. Even most SUVs are auto. It's nearly impossible to find anything which starts weighing over 4000 pounds that has a standard transmission in it unless it's for a specific purpose.

    Personally on these boats, there wouldn't be much point in having a stick. It's not something I would stick on big Cadillacs, or those cars from the late 70s and 80s. What's the point?

    Stick is undoubtly still around for two reasons:

    1) for those people who actually drive a car that is performance oriented and can handle

    2) and for cars which are cheap, because it lowers the cost of manufacture and improves gas mileage (this being the prime reason why they are so popular in europe and elsewhere in the world)

    Sure glad my OB is a 5-speed. I'd fall asleep if it was an auto...
  • kyotzkyotz Member Posts: 10
    My wife and I picked up our new Outback yesterday in Scottsdale, AZ. The new baby is a 2001 5spd wintergreen who is already attracting looks from people. :) Especially from my neighbor who drives a V8 Tundra and bitches about the gas milage.

    The trip back to Tucson was a smooth and pleasant ride. Unfortunately I lost my temporary license plate somewhere along I-10 :) Oh well..... After some phone calls I got a new plate issued today.

    I am really happy with this car and I think as I get to know her I will be even more enamored!

    I am going away for the weekend and I'll post some updates about the trip and the ride....

    To steal a line from Graham: Cheers!

    Chris (Go Coyotes - Hockey season is back!!!!!)
  • amishraamishra Member Posts: 367
    Go Leafs! I'm still praying for snow :)
  • axterioaxterio Member Posts: 1
    (This is a post on behalf of the absent "Juice" whom we all miss so much.)

    I'm back from Rangoon. Had a great time .. got 401.27814 mpg average on the trip (thanks to the new Neutron Exploder 2000 which arrived from DSubaru just in time for the trip). Drove the Soob right through the local quicksand pits .. no problem. The bouyancy belt works exactly as designed. While I was in the "pits", I ran accross a few fellas from the local U.S. Army base that had gotten their Hummers stuck. Subaru to the rescue. (I should have the photos on the website by tomorrow). It seemed wimpy to pull them out one at a time .. so I chained them all together, like railroad cars, and pulled them all out together. The Soob barely broke a sweat. The recently installed .2874 inch teflon muffler bearings and knibler pins really do make a difference.

    The new larger tires may have played some part in the improved traction however they are now part of a new mystery. Upon return, I checked the rotation counter on each wheel and noticed that the right front tire had turned 128,421 revolution during the trip but the other three tires indicated a count of 128,420. I have no explanation for the variance.

    Well, it's good to be back. I've listened to enough Barney audio tapes to last a lifetime.

    - Jukes :)
  • c_hunterc_hunter Member Posts: 4,487
    Congratulations on the new ride!

    Craig
  • jresjres Member Posts: 69
    Jukes --

    The muffler bearings probably helped, the teflon coating allows the sound to roll right off, therefore reducing back pressure. Your probably getting an extra two or three hp because of that. Are you ordering any STD performance parts from Marlene at DSubaru soon? What's the URL again I seem to have misplaced it?
  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Hi Bobbie! I've lost your e-mail address. Did everything turn out okay? It looks resolved according to your case, but I haven't seen you here. Let me know if additional assistance is needed!
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    Chris (kyotz): Congrats and welcome! Don't forget to update your profile with the model and color, and something about yourself if you're so inclined. Please come back often.

    axterio: LOL! I enjoyed the reference to D/QSubaru, and pulling out all the Hummers, chained together.

    ..Mike

  • subaru_teamsubaru_team Member Posts: 1,676
    Congratulations on your Subaru! I hope it brings you many happy, safe and trouble free miles!! Will you think less of me if I say GO FLYERS??
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Jukes- How much did the bouyancy belt cost? Did you get it from Marlene at DSubaru? How bout posting some installation pictures on your web site "Juiced-man.com"

    -Frank P.
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    good humor, jukes. Pulling out chained Hummers made me ROTFL.
  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    I've seen some raving reports (at CR-V thread) for $1.36/gal (octane 92 !) obtained at priceline.com. I tried it out. However, it seems that in my area I could not really get any savings. The price that priceline recommended was about average in my area.

    I bid $1.20 and then $1.50 for 50 gals of regular (87) gas (entered a LOT of gas stations to choose from), and both offers were rejected. Then priceline.com kicked me out, saying to come back no earlier than in 24h.

    Anyone has a better luck using priceline for gas in the SF Bay Area? Anyone can recommend a "best kept secret" station where price is consistently lower than average? Then of course it won't be a secret anymore ;-)
  • babaorileybabaoriley Member Posts: 74
    Jukes-For the first time I get to post LOL. I've grinned, chuckled and snickered, but I actually LOL during your post. Thanks!

    Chris-Nice choice of color (same as mine), although living in the SF Bay Area, I have an auto. Does your '01 have pockets on the back of the front seats?

    Kate-If you're ever in Petaluma, there's a Shell & Chevron right off the freeway @ North Petaluma Blvd that are usually $.10 cheaper per gallon. I think they are in a price war against each other.

    Brett
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I get 2% off mobil with my amex,and I figured out that it works out to about the same as I could get on 50gal at a specific gas station in the NYC area. besides I got through much more than 50gal in a month with my trooper @ 2500miles a month :)

    -mike
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    Hi Kate,

    Ok, I'm in DC, not SF, but I too was intrigued by this. Priceline has an excellent business model -- the consumer pays in advance for an undelivered product and priceline gets the float. Hat's off to capitalism!

    Like Drew, I also buy fuel at Costco (though for me Costco is 15 mins away, so an empty tank is an excuse to shop for massive quantities of stuff I probably don't need -- they've got me pegged). A few weeks ago, Costco's gas was $1.479/gallon (still is, actually), on a whim I tried $1.40/g at priceline.com and got it. I also entered a lot of stations, most nearby or along the routes that I or my wife usually drive. The 7 cent savings isn't that much, but the station (Sunoco) is 5 mins away, not the 15 to Costco. If one considers that fuel in Montgomery County, MD (higher fuel tax than VA or other MD counties) is $1.569 at nearby stations, a 17 cent difference is more interesting.

    I tried it primarily because I'm an early adopter and wanted to have the Big Brother experience -- oops, posting again in the wrong thread. I bought 10 gallons because I wasn't sure what octane blend Sunoco would proffer (turns out it's 87 so I'm ok). I thought my Civic was more empty than it was: I only squeezed in 8 gallons! (it holds a whopping 11.8)

    Regarding the "best kept secret", priceline.com listed two Sunoco stations as "Best Chance" so I included them; one of them was the only station that accepted my bid.

    Since priceline accepted my bid, I've been locked in and can't bid lower (maybe this is because I've got 2 gallons remaining in my account). I'll probably request a 2nd account for my wife and try to bid lower that way.

    Good luck!

    ..Mike

    ..Mike

  • kate5000kate5000 Member Posts: 1,271
    Originally, I signed up starting 1:30 pm. I wonder if I can come earlier than that, or do they restrict this?
  • lucien2lucien2 Member Posts: 2,984
    LOL!

    I expect pictures of the A-Pillar mounted homemade snorkus for amphibious assault on the website right away!!
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    bg18947- Speaking of the functionality of gated shifters.....recently, my then 15 year-old niece, who was driving on a learner's permit, managed to put a Toyota Sienna into reverse while attempting to activate the left turn signal. This while driving down the road! Kudos to Toyota's design...cause while although the transmission made an awful racket, no obvious damage was done. Of course her mother (my sister), who was riding with her, proceeded to "gently" explain that this was not a good thing to do. Thereby further flustering the poor girl and causing her to sideswipe a mailbox. Well at least she can blame her driving ability on genetics since her mother is as dingy as they come. Oh...happy ending you ask? Depends on your point of view....suffice it to say that Atlanta now has one more 16 year-old licensed driver so drive here at your own risk!

    -Frank P.
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Paisan- Don't totally discount the real-world applicability of the IIHS's tests. A few years ago, my wife managed to back into a similar pole in a convenience store parking lot. (And yes it does seem like my extended family is involved in more than its share of automotive mishaps!)

    -Frank P.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    Frank, a friend in high school was working for the turnpike one summer and accidentally shifted an older Chevy 3500 dually into reverse at 50 MPH. (He was reaching for the visor!)

    It locked the rear tires but did nothing unusual after he shifted back into drive. Those GM TH400s are really tough. ;)

    -Colin
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    ROTFLOL....You guys have got to check this link out:

    http://cagle.slate.msn.com/news/suv/

    (posted by "Ladyblue" in the "I don't like SUVs" topic)

    _Frank P.
  • paisanpaisan Member Posts: 21,181
    I've found most of them stall the car and drop the tranny to neutral if you do that. (Whenever I rent a car I usually test this on my way back to the rental car company) I love getting damage waiver on rental cars.

    -mike
  • p0926p0926 Member Posts: 4,423
    Re #1712...yet another reason to not purchase a rental turn-in!

    -Frank P.
  • bat1161bat1161 Member Posts: 1,784
    Kate
    Edmunds says that you can arrive at any time during the day. The time slot you reserved is supposed to gurantee your driving. The rest of the time you are just waiting for an open slot. When I went it was late in the day, and nobody questioned the times at all. They have some interesting chat groups going during the day.
    Enjoy.
    Mark
  • miksmimiksmi Member Posts: 1,246
    "What I did on my summer vacation" on page 2 is priceless. Good choice on the link, my man.

    ..Mike

  • jake696jake696 Member Posts: 111
    It's a "Question of Balance" as the Moody Blues said...Be it 2 cyl (Bikes) 4,6,8...it's balance, logistics and utilization of the space/time continuum.
    (don't bogart that joint, pass it!)
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Just received my October 2000 copy of Consumer Reports - they reviewed small SUVs and wagons. Guess which small SUV came up on top? The Forester S, of course (!) and by a huge margin over the Honda CR-V EX. The CR-V barely reached the start of the "Very Good" section, while the Forester was in the "Excellent" section.

    C.R said that the CR-V was a "Clever all-wheel-drive SUV concept, but flawed execution", but that the Forester was "an all-wheel-drive SUV that's an excellent all-around performer".

    The only "low" that the Forester had was "spongy brake-pedal feel", but they did comment that the brakes worked well overall. I think that most of us know by now that this is caused by the two stage brake booster.

    The CR-V's lows includes "handling, noise, driving position, awkward rear gate".

    Drew
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    Most V-6 engines have to have balance shafts unless they run a 60 degree V. The boxer engine has perfect primary balance, regardless of the number of cylinders. Space utilization is also the same if not a bit better, as CG is lower on a Boxer. The reason most auto companies started with "V" configurations goes back to body on frame construction. They had to fit the engine between narrow frame rails. That is not an issue anymore, especially since most v-6 engines are transversly mounted today. There really is no "superior engine configuration", all have strengths and weaknesses.
  • locke2clocke2c Member Posts: 5,038
    By the way, if someone has reached the breaking point (har-har) on that spongy pedal, Rallispec sells the single stage booster for $320 and the master cylinder $100. (You need the master cylinder on any 99-up model.)

    If that wasn't enough, and I think it would be, you could add the stainless braided brake lines for another $115. You could also use them as a lower cost solution-- I have them and they do firm up the pedal a bit.

    -Colin
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    I didn't know that 60 degree V6 engines required balance shafts. FWIW, my E320 and ML320 both have a 90 degree SOHC 3 valve/twin spark per cylinder V6 engine with balance shafts. MB designed the V6 engine with a 90 degree angle so that it would be modular with the 90 degree V8s.

    If you're interested in more, have a look here: Ward's 10 best engines awards.

    I wonder if Subaru's new H6 will be an award winner for 2001. The DCX V6 has been on the list since it made its debut in 1997.

    Drew
  • mikef11mikef11 Member Posts: 74
    Sorry people. It's the Sens' year.
    BTW, anybody want to trade for Yashin :-)

    MikeF
  • kyotzkyotz Member Posts: 10
    with or without Yashin! The Coyotes will win the Cup this year!!!!
  • tincup47tincup47 Member Posts: 1,508
    The 60 degree v6 does not need a balance shaft, that is the v angle required to have primary balance. On 4 and 8 cyl V engines 90 degree is required. I agree there are many well engineered engines in every configuration, the BMW inline sixes are excellent also, I was just questioning a blanket statement that v-6 was the best engine choice. I think your link to Ward's supports my point.
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    Need to get you a new name - something in the food family, like your brother.

    I'm not offering any suggestions!

    Bob
  • abhidharmaabhidharma Member Posts: 93
    ...with their ranking of the Forester as #1 in the small SUV class, do we also trust their ranking of the Outback Limited as #3 behind the Passat and the Ford Focus in the wagon class?

    Personally, I don't.

    CR knows how to test appliances, maybe even driving appliances, and their reliability information is useful, but they don't have a clue when it comes to assessing the driving experience, especially for vehicles aimed at enthusiasts.

    I think it's a slippery slope if we use CR's endorsements selectively.

    Just my $.02 (and Canadian cents at that)

    Randy
  • alingaling Member Posts: 598
    Yup, take it with a grain of salt, as always with all reviews. I didn't see the Focus wagon's rating at first (was too busy reading the CR-V and Forester review), but later was surprised that it ranked on top of the Outback Limited.

    My 2 cents Canadian too :-)
    Drew
  • armac13armac13 Member Posts: 1,129
    With 8-10 more Canadian $.02, we could build a nickel! :-) Saw a picture of Pontiac's latest concept car, the Pariah. Sorry, that should read the Piranha. Makes the Aztek look both mainstream and attractive. What are they putting in the water in the design centre?

    Ross
  • gtdrivergtdriver Member Posts: 67
    ...until they give a product you like a less-than-desired review. Just like Canadians probably talk about how their great teams in the hockey capital of the world are actually better than the Devils, who seem to have won the cup again.
    If you look at the review in the March issue that generated that 3rd place position for the Outback Limited in the Wagons department, you'll inderstand why. They found the car to be well conceived, but.... "normally competent handling can become tricky at the limit; acceleration is a bit poky [whatever that means]; fuel economy is unimpressive; and adding a few desirable options pushes the price quite high".
    I'm as big a Subaru fan as anyone else reading this board, but sometimes you have to concede to the truth. Everything I've read, heard and experienced points to those things being true, and maybe the Passat is a better wagon for those reasons, but I'd bet on the Subaru's reliability and costs to maintain over the first 100,000 miles or so. And comparing a $28,000 Subaru to an $18,000 Ford Focus is plain silly. I doubt that a potential buyer of either of these cars will have the other on his list of alternatives. Had CR used an "L" Wagon, at least the price and handling issues would have been far less significant.

    BTW, the revised Subaru credit card program has a maximum of $500/year compared to the current $700 per year (along with the change from 5% to 3%).
  • rshollandrsholland Member Posts: 19,788
    I agree with gtdriver. As much as I like Subarus, they're not perfect. And... sometimes the truth "does" hurt.

    Bob
This discussion has been closed.

Your Privacy

By accessing this website, you acknowledge that Edmunds and its third party business partners may use cookies, pixels, and similar technologies to collect information about you and your interactions with the website as described in our Privacy Statement, and you agree that your use of the website is subject to our Visitor Agreement.