Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options

I spotted an (insert obscure car name here) classic car today! (Archived)

19799809829849851306

Comments

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    I didn't really care for the composite headlight look of the Monte Carlo LS when it first came out, but it did grow on me in later years. And their interiors were pretty nice.

    Did the LS come with that nicer interior standard, or did you still have to pay extra for it? I'm looking at my old car book, and it looks like an '86 Monte Carlo with the 305 started at $10,631 for the sport coupe, and $10,841 for the LS with the 305. So if the LS had that interior standard, that seems like a serious bargain to me.

    My old car book doesn't break out V6/V8 cost for the T-bird that year. But, a V-6 Monte sport coupe started at $10,241, and $10,421 for the LS (Unless Consumer Guide got dyslexic with those numbers!) The '86 T-bird started at $11,020 for a V6 coupe. The more luxurious trim level, Elan, started at $12,554, again with a V6.

    The Cougar started at $11,421 for the GS coupe, $12,767 for the LS coupe. The XR-7 was $14,377, but came with a turbo 4 standard.

    But now if we're going with sportier models, the Monte had the SS, starting at only $12,466, and the Aerocoupe starting at $14,191. So the T-bird/Cougar definitely started at higher price points than the Monte Carlo.
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,938
    I would guess that the T-bird came with more standard features and in higher trim levels added things that were not available on the Monte.

    I'm pretty sure you couldn't get digital ATC, digi dash, tripminder, dual power seats, and air ride on the Monte.

    Those T-birds could be loaded up to near Lincoln levels at the time.

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    I could live without the T-Tops, but I'd have to have the pinstripe-whitewall tires that came with the F-41 suspension. I know I'm anal, but I didn't like the optional side molding that was right above the bright sill molding. I'd have to pull that off. :)

    Almost every one of those LS's with checkerboards I've ever seen is that gray color. There was one at the G-Body National in Cleveland last summer, offered for sale by a dealer in Canton. I can't recall the asking price. I think it had 58K miles. He told me he'd had several calls about it from southern CA but admitted he would kinda hate seeing it get 'molested', LOL.

    I actually put a deposit on an '85 SS once, before I changed my mind and ordered my Celebrity at a different dealer. I fought a bit but got my deposit back.

    Someone posted on the G-Body forum not a month ago, that Mexican SS's had those wheels and Grand Prix instrument panel. I was incredulous. I'm glad you'd heard it elsewhere as well!
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    andre, the LS had the same standard interior as the Sport Coupe did. That CL interior was optional at extra cost on both.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Those wheels stuck in my head from when I first saw them as a kid. I nicknamed them "80s wheels" a long time ago, and still think that when I see them. Always thought they were cool.

    Mexican market weirdness can be like Canadian market weirdness. Topaz body with a Tempo front end? And even on TRX wheels:

    image
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    edited March 2020
    Sure enough, if you google "Mexican Monte Carlo," a lot of Grand Prix dashboards pop up! Looks like they used the Grand Prix door panels and seats, too!

    Oh, one detail that just popped into my mind, about the '82 Malibu Classic wagon my grandparents had...I remember the woodgrain on the dash, between the HVAC ducts on the passenger side, had sort of a disturbing pattern. I recall that if you looked close enough, there was what appeared to be the faces of some kind of pig-monster looking things in the pattern! Kind of stirs up memories of that "Eye of the Beholder" episode of the Twilight Zone, of the alternate reality where Ellie May Clampett was considered horribly ugly, and these pig-monster people were considered the epitome of beauty!

    Speaking of '82 Malibus, that was the year they called them all "Malibu Classic", and they did seem to upgrade the standard interior, over what the base Malibu had been. If you wanted something a bit ritzier, they offered a "Custom" trim option. I don't think I've ever seen one in person, but it looks pretty nice...


    Here's the standard interior.


    For some reason, while I didn't like the interior of that Monte Carlo, earlier, the blue of the Malibu here doesn't bother me. Perhaps it's a trick of the light, or they did some kind of color correction in the print, but it seems like the dash, seat fabric, and vinyl on the door panels all blend together more closely, than on that Monte. Plus, I think there's just something about that ribbed pattern on the Monte's door panel that I don't find that tasteful, whereas the Malibu's is simpler.


  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    I had both '81 and '82 Monte Carlos new. The woodgrain was horrible IMHO! Shiny and bright and supposed to look 'burled' or something. Big red emblem with nameplate on the 'woodgrain' panel above the glovebox. I could see seeing a face in there.

    My '81 had no A/C. I found out one time that the big, long fake woodgrain trim panel just snapped in. I used to like to goof on people by saying "Hold this" while I was driving and handing it to the passenger.

    I way-preferred the shiny black panel used on the '81 Malibu Classic only.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    That Custom interior was what was also offered on the '82 Monte Carlo (mine had it in Jade) and what was later called the "CL" interior.

    The standard Malibu Classic interior is the same seat trim as the Monte Carlo, but the door panels were different.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    Yeah, I think for '83, when they just called the Malibu "Malibu"...no more "Classic", they renamed the "Custom" interior "CL".

    And I'm still convinced, to this day, that GM was planning on trying to pass off what ultimately became the Malibu as a second-wave of downsizing for the Caprice, similar to what Pontiac did with the Bonneville G. But then, for whatever reason, cooler heads prevailed? I wonder if, maybe they were expecting 1981 sales to tank, but when they didn't tank as badly as expected, Chevrolet was able to give the Caprice/Impala a reprieve, while Pontiac, for whatever reason, stayed committed to the Bonneville G?

    It must have been frustrating for Pontiac, though, as the '81 LeMans didn't really drop that much compared to '80, and I believe the Catalina/Bonneville sold at around the same rate as well. But then the '82 Bonneville G sold slightly less than the '81 LeMans had, and the 6000 got off to a really slow start the first couple years.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264
    fintail said:

    Biggest issue IIRC with early Lexus was fall-apart leather, and the finish on the steering wheel would sometimes perish.

    SC was a top of the line car back in the day, getting hard to find a nice original as many have fallen victim to the tuner crowd. I think Bill Gates had/has one, and could be spotted driving it locally.

    My buddy Steve who had money to burn at the time bought a blue over tan SC 400 the first year they were out. Bought it because the magazines were raving about it, he said. Drove it for a year then parked it in his garage, taking it out once a year for service and burn off the gas. Sold it to a collector a couple of years ago for $12-13K. It was a nice curiosity to me but I was never all that impressed despite its perfect condition. The 6-cylinder ones with a stick bring bigger money these days.



    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    I was always more impressed with those early LS400 sedans, than I was the SC's. The SC just seemed too plain. Not that the LS400 screamed "LOOK AT ME", but I thought they were tastefully done.

    As for premium Japanese coupes in those days, I did like the Acura Legend.

    Oh, for the "something you don't hear every day files"...I have Antenna TV playing in the background. On "Barney Miller", a woman comes into the station and says "I'm looking for the officer who found my DeSoto..." And they're arguing over whether it's pink, or "Coral", and how it was a very popular color that year. Naturally they're not going to show the car, but I'm going to guess, 1956? Wasn't coral extra popular around that timeframe? I think pink/coral was Mamie Eisenhower's favorite color, and that's why there were a lot of pink/coral colored cars around that time....not to mention, bathrooms!
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264


    One of the other old forums that was essentially an I Hate GM forum, someone told me how 'thrashy' the 2.2 was. He finally conceded he had not so much as sat in one, yet rode in one or drove one.

    I believe that guy is now writing reviews for Roadshow or Edmunds. You know, the guy that complains about GM hard plastics but mum’s the word on that subject when he’s reviewing a Honda or a Hyundai.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264

    It's road and tire noise now IMHO. It used to be even a Chevy was whisper-silent. My complaint mostly centers around the wife's new Equinox...big tires and open all the way to the back inside. My '17 Cruze is pretty quiet, but not as much as my daughter's previous-gen '15, which isn't as quiet as my '08 Cobalt was.

    The GM full-size downsized cars were totally silent in my memory. One advertising line that I believed was true was the '77 Caprice's brochure, "You'll find it hard to believe a moving automobile can be so quiet".

    I sincerely believe that in the ever-present dash to cut weight, sound deadening is a casualty.

    A big part of that is the departure of body on frame construction in cars. Unibodies are inherently noisier and harder to make silent, especially for tire and road noise. My Cutlass is body on frame and has zero road noise despite only a jute pad under the carpet. Those ‘77 big cars also had those stick-on insulating pads with some sort of goop facing the noise source that really seemed to work.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    ab348, your comments reminded me of either C&D or MT goofing on the high corner rear lights of the 'dustbuster' GM minivans, while praising them on Volvo wagons. :)
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,328
    tjc78 said:

    Our Enclave is like a bank vault. 80 MPH and you can whisper to each other. It's really surprising to me considering its a giant box.

    well, it is a Buick. what's the point of buying one if you don't get that?

    Quiet was never something that registered on my radar. Considering I prefer to have the radio cranked and moonroof open, you really don't notice a little tire whine!

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,328
    I actually like the looks of that Monte. Could you get it with a 5 speed stick?

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Saw a goodie on my walk today, an Isuzu I-Mark Turbo sedan with some kind of "Lotus" badge, just like this:

    image

    Can't be more than a few remaining.
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    That would be a 92. They indeed cost around 45K (USD) then, about the same as the LS of the day. I remember the first one I saw, black with gold trim (because 1992) driven by the mother of a rich kid in school. Quite an exotic sight as the nearest dealer was probably 2 hours away with no traffic.

    The 6cyl manual is more or less a NA Supra with a different body, and can take insane tuning.
    ab348 said:



    My buddy Steve who had money to burn at the time bought a blue over tan SC 400 the first year they were out. Bought it because the magazines were raving about it, he said. Drove it for a year then parked it in his garage, taking it out once a year for service and burn off the gas. Sold it to a collector a couple of years ago for $12-13K. It was a nice curiosity to me but I was never all that impressed despite its perfect condition. The 6-cylinder ones with a stick bring bigger money these days.

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    RE.: Monte 5-speed--no such animal, ever, and I believe the last four-speed Monte was a '78. Possibly a '79 and '80, but not after that for sure.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • sdasda Member Posts: 7,570
    Olds offered the 5sp with the Omega and Cutlass 260 V8, and 260 V8 diesel. It had the dog leg shift pattern. I believe it was the same 5sp that I had in my 76 Sunbird with the Buick sourced 231 V6. If so, it had a tight shift gate and it was too easy to miss second and shift to fourth instead. It was a noisy transmission overall and not very durable. Another weak point was the clutch that typically had a noisy throw out bearing and needed replacement every 20-40k. The 5sp did allow for relaxed interstate driving and good mpg.

    2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    My friend who had the '87 Thunderbird Turbo Coupe was driving a '79 Zephyr Z-7 302 with 4-speed when I met him. He had ordered it and it took forever. He had premature clutch failure in his opinion and wondered if it was the same clutch as the four-cylinder cars. Who knows?

    I've had four low-buck Chevys with clutches--'97 Cavalier (129.6K miles), '02 Cavalier (112K), '08 Cobalt (106K I think; got rid of it because the paintwork done when my Stude rolled into it at six weeks of age for the Cobalt, was starting to fade and show wear), oh, and '90 Corsica (108K). All were bought new. No apparent clutch wear at all; trust me, I could still stall them out! When I bought the first or the second car, a woman told me her husband said "GM clutches last 25K miles", LOL.

    I never rode the clutch. I tried to teach my daughters to not ride the brakes too, although after a 15-minute try neither girl ever wanted to drive a stick ever again. Riding the brakes--it makes me crazy to see someone's brake lights on for like five consecutive minutes!
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    andre, re.: Pontiac's dropping of full-size cars after '81 until they made a hasty retreat later with the rebadged Caprice Classic--I'd say your hypothesis is spot-on. I bet they were grooming the Malibu to take over the Caprice/Impala spot, but sales never decreased that bad.

    I understand why, but when the "Parisienne" came out, I was like, "Come on!". I'd not known GM to move a product from one division to another like that. Sure, the FWD A-bodies looked similar, but a Parisienne WAS a Caprice! Even the instrument panel was the same! I guess though, really, that had been done with Ventura/Omega/Apollo--but I still think when the American Parisienne was introduced, there was extremely little difference from the Caprice Classic.

    When they added skirts and that wiiiiiddddddee rocker trim, it did revert in looks to '81 Bonneville I think.

    They never did introduce a coupe, like Caprice had.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    I've sometimes wondered, what was it about the Olds 260, that GM only saw fit to use the 5-speed with that engine? That combination was offered in the 1976 Pontiac LeMans, as well.

    As for the downsized Monte Carlo, I think you could get a 4-speed in 1978, but, but for '79 it was only offered in the 267 and 305-equipped Malibus. For '80, it was limited to the 305, and for '81, the 305 was standard-automatic (and only offered in wagons, police cars, and taxis). At least, according to the EPA.
  • stickguystickguy Member Posts: 53,328
    I tried to teach my daughter to drive a stick since I had my Accord when she got her permit. She actually did OK with parts of it, but just was not comfortable with it (and could not get some part of it I think). So she just did not want to continue trying. Probably should have kept at it. I think she would have gotten the hang eventually, or killed my car trying.

    2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264
    edited March 2020
    My now-deceased neighbor 2 doors up from me had a '78 Monte Carlo with 4-speed that he bought new. When I first moved here in '97 he used to stroll down to chat. He ordered it and bought it new, camel metallic with a white vinyl roof and white interior, along with rally wheels. He told me that he had the rear frame repaired after it rusted out as so many did. He was quite elderly even then but for my first 4 or 5 years here I used to see him and his wife driving in it. After he died around '05 she stayed in the house but sold the car after a few years. I have not seen it around since. She passed away at home just a couple of years ago. After that the house was listed for sale and it was interesting to see the pics of the inside of his garage. It was immaculate, well-organized and full of tools, reflecting his career as an aircraft mechanic, although their next-door neighbor who was helping to take care of her before she died cleaned out much of the good stuff in the days immediately after her death. No idea if that was planned or just opportunism on their part, though I suspect the latter.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264
    andre1969 said:

    I've sometimes wondered, what was it about the Olds 260, that GM only saw fit to use the 5-speed with that engine? That combination was offered in the 1976 Pontiac LeMans, as well.

    Well, the Olds 260 was not much more powerful than the standard V-6 and couldn't be hopped up much either. Given the weakness of the 5-speed that is probably all the power it could handle. The pedal setup and linkages are popular among modifiers if you can find a good one to work with these days.

    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264


    I understand why, but when the "Parisienne" came out, I was like, "Come on!". I'd not known GM to move a product from one division to another like that. Sure, the FWD A-bodies looked similar, but a Parisienne WAS a Caprice! Even the instrument panel was the same! I guess though, really, that had been done with Ventura/Omega/Apollo--but I still think when the American Parisienne was introduced, there was extremely little difference from the Caprice Classic.

    When they added skirts and that wiiiiiddddddee rocker trim, it did revert in looks to '81 Bonneville I think.

    They never did introduce a coupe, like Caprice had.

    IIRC when Pontiac dropped their full-size cars in the early '80s, the Caprice-based Parisienne was cobbled together quickly by GM Canada for this market, since up here Pontiac essentially had as big (or maybe even slightly bigger) a market share as Chevrolet, and their full-size models did well. The '82 Parisienne sold here was even more of a Chevy-clone than later models were. I did not recall this, but if you go to the brochures website and look in the Canada section, what was known in the US as the Bonneville Brougham was sold in Canada as the Parisienne since the downsizing in '77. But that was just a name change since the car was virtually identical to the US version. When GM decided to reintroduce a full-size to the Pontiac lineup in the US the Parisienne was already available. I totally agree about the instrument panel being the worst part of it - I suppose the tooling for the original Pontiac version was destroyed after the US dropped it. The modified front end styling was clearly based on the Chevy but didn't seem quite so obvious.

    The '82 Parisienne did have a coupe available here but it sold poorly and was dropped in '83. The Chevy DNA is quite visible in this shot.


    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    I'd mentioned that I follow a Facebook G-Body forum (as it's called; included all '78-87 RWD GM midsizes) and those guys covet the 4-speed cars. They are quite rare apparently, and I want to say I never saw one as a new car. I did see some V6 cars with the floor-mounted 3-speed manual.

    The one I wanted then, and wish I had now, is a black '78 Malibu Classic coupe, not Landau, column-shift automatic, PS, PB, gold pinstripe, Sport wheel covers, whitewalls, body side moldings, F41, 305 2-barrel, door edge guards, floor mats, tinted glass, cruise control, remote-control LH mirror, A/C, Special Instrumentation, 50/50 camel cloth front seats with dual center armrests, deluxe bumpers (strips), AM/FM radio with rear seat speaker; Custom Deluxe (color-keyed) seat belts.

    Had I been two or three years older at that time, and got the job I got, I probably would've ordered that car.

    I think the instrument panel was a bold decision at the time. I'd have to have had the Monte gauge cluster, but to have zero woodgrain inside, and no nameplate on the dash...I still like the dash. Of course, in later years the desire to add both became overwhelming, sigh.

    My ordered unit would've looked a good bit like this one. For some reason F41 on the mid-size cars never got the pinstripe whitewall I liked from the big Chevys, but it doesn't bother me on a midsize:

    https://www.curbsideclassic.com/automotive-histories/vintage-review-1978-chevrolet-malibu-classic-car-and-driver-goes-crazy-for-f41/
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    edited March 2020
    To be fair, the full-sized Pontiac, at we know it at least, was dropped in Canada as well for '82. The '82 full-sized Pontiacs were basically rebadged Impalas, just with a Pontiac grille insert, and taillights that got rid of the 3-taillight look, but still fit into the narrow Impala taillight opening. The "real" Pontiacs, with Pontiac sheetmetal, engines, and interiors, were gone. My guess is that with US production of them wrapping up, there wasn't enough demand in Canada to keep up all the Pontiac-unique components, so they started rebadging Chevies.

    And then, once Pontiac realized they jumped the gun on dumping full-sized cars, and looked to Canada for inspiration, they figured they might as well bring the Canadian name down, as well. "Bonneville" was now committed to the midsize, and if they tried to revert it back to the full-size, it would have been admitting they made a mistake. I think the Catalina was destined to die, anyway, as the market for lower-end big cars was drying up. The Impala nameplate itself went away for '86, being replaced by a base Caprice. It had the same grille, taillights, etc as a Caprice, but continued the old Impala interior. The only other prestige name in recent memory Pontiac had, I guess, was "Grand Ville", but at that point in time, it probably didn't have much nostalgia or brand equity going for it.

    One interesting variant that Canada got, was a Parisienne coupe. At least, in '82 they had one. They also held onto the LeMans nameplate, at least through '82, although it was identical to the '82 Bonneville-G, rather than the '81 LeMans.

    **Edit: AB348, we must be psychically linked, somehow :p

    Also, this might be a bit sacrilegious, but I actually like the Parisienne dash! I preferred the "real" Catalina/Bonneville dash, but one detail I liked about the Parisienne, is how they made the four round gauge faces. It made me think just a bit of a '64 Tempest/LeMans/GTO! In contrast, I remember the Chevy sort of going back and forth between a strip speedometer in a rectangle, flanked by a round gauge on either side, or four square gauge faces. I can't remember if one was an upgrade over the other, or maybe the 4 square gauges was an update that came in later years?
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    Just thinking about my old Cobalt. I searched for a 4-door base model with 5-speed but ABS. Almost unobtainium then. My local dealer found one in Indianapolis and went and got it. It was the mid-year "XFE" one, with some under-the-skin tricks for MPG. It had satellite radio, which I'm thinking was a mid-year thing then but not sure.

    I bought my daughter an '09, white with light gray interior, on eBay from guy from NJ which would take me a page to describe how the sale transaction went. He was the son of a well-to-do guy, and whose personality was every bad Jersey stereotype you ever heard. He would be angry at me for asking questions about the car during the auction. But I told myself I didn't need to like the seller to buy the car.

    My daughter was in an accident where a pickup pulled out in front of her, then left the scene. She did have a minor fracture in her wrist from the airbag, and we settled two years later with the other guy's insurance company. I got $100 more for her Cobalt than I bought it for four years earlier.

    She has said she liked it better than her current Cruze ('15). I'd agree, the Cobalt looked better IMHO. The standard wheelcovers in '09 and later had more, finer openings cut in them and looked a lot better than my '08 I think.

    To me, the ignition switch fiasco was so dumb...the way GM handled it. When I saw a TSB about it, mentioning the key feeling 'sticky' to get out of the switch--when I first noticed the very beginnings of that in mine, I had the switch replaced under warranty. My daughter's never had that feeling, later. When it became a recall, it was determined that some fairly-low-level employee didn't change the part no. of the revised switch, I believe it was. So when the recall happened, they couldn't tell for certain if the part replaced in mine from the TSB was the revised part, or not. I bet that never happens again.

    I remember asking my local dealer Service Writer, if they were being inundated with that recall, and he looked stone-faced and opened a drawer with several inches of work orders in it, LOL.

    I never worried about my daughter's, as the switch felt fine, like new. The wearing was a gradual thing. It did get the recall of course, though. I did mention to my elderly friend who had been my hometown Stude-MB dealer, that his dealer would give him a loaner for as long as it took for parts to come in (he had an HHR). He didn't know that but thanked me profusely. He had a rental for two or three months I think. He saw it as a way to extend the life of his HHR.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    My last post has some serious 'topic drift' I know, LOL.

    It reminds me, obtusely--and this is off-topic too--that, recently, a car magazine had a long-term test of a recent Subaru model and they reported it had been back at the dealer's for something like one-third of the test schedule for various things. Certainly not the current general perception of Subie out there. I do not recall the model or even the magazine name, sadly. But I was pretty stunned to read that, based on all the general perception.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,419
    stickguy said:

    I tried to teach my daughter to drive a stick since I had my Accord when she got her permit. She actually did OK with parts of it, but just was not comfortable with it (and could not get some part of it I think). So she just did not want to continue trying. Probably should have kept at it. I think she would have gotten the hang eventually, or killed my car trying.

    My son got his learner's permit in February 2010, while I still had the 2-year Impreza lease. Lease was up in late July, so I tried and tried to get him to work on driving the stick, as I didn't have to worry about clutch wear.

    One day, he killed it 27 times in row, at a left turn only light, with traffic backing up farther and farther behind him. Begged me to drive. I wouldn't do it. Eventually, after a lot of tears and angst, we made it.

    I bought the BMW in late April, that year. He had an Acura that was a gift from my uncle. He gets his license in August, and starts expressing a deep interest in learning to drive the stick, again. On my new (to me) BMW. You know, the one I'm going to keep for six years.. :(

    Anyway, now he is a diehard stick driver. He is on his third one (Tacoma). And, evidently my BMW clutch survived... ;)

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • MichaellMichaell Moderator Posts: 262,066
    Kids and stick shifts.

    Step son was first. I honestly don't remember teaching him to drive stick - I think his best friend did.

    Next up was the step daughter. Wife wanted her to learn how to drive stick. In fact, we searched 3 Ford dealers to find the "perfect" Focus for her - like @uplanderguy, the wife wanted a stick shift with ABS. Found a 5 door version that fit the bill and bought it.

    Several attempts to teach her failed, miserably. My daughter is 5'7", but has larger than average feet. She could never get the hang of the foot placement between the three pedals, and we eventually gave up. I drove the Focus, and she drove my Saturn L300.

    Last, was my son, who was both the youngest of the three kids and didn't get his license until he was 18. When he graduated HS, I brought out to him my father-in-laws early 90's Subaru Legacy wagon. 140,000 miles, and it made the trip from CO to CA without a hiccup, and averaged 30MPG to boot. I taught him the basics in a school parking lot, and he managed to get the hang of it pretty quickly. He didn't keep the Subaru for long, and gifted it to a close friend of his, who totaled it not much later.

    Wife learned to drive stick a lot like @kyfdx taught his son. Her stepdad helped her buy an ex-rental Datsun 210 with a stick. When the transaction was complete, he flipped her the keys and said "see you at home". Wife had it all figured out quickly, and drove nothing but stick shifts until I met her.

    Me? Like my step son, a friend taught me how to drive stick in his 70's Chevy Luv. I still remember going up and down the street in front of my house, getting the hang of it. There are times where I'd like to have one more "fun" stick shift car to drive.

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and let us know! Post a pic of your new purchase or lease!


    MODERATOR

    2015 Subaru Outback 3.6R / 2024 Kia Sportage Hybrid SX Prestige

  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    Many people expect Subarus to need head gaskets as routine maintenance. They, like all cars, have their quirks.

    I think there's plenty of image behind the brand along with substance. Also, excellent touchy-feely marketing helps a lot.

    My last post has some serious 'topic drift' I know, LOL.

    It reminds me, obtusely--and this is off-topic too--that, recently, a car magazine had a long-term test of a recent Subaru model and they reported it had been back at the dealer's for something like one-third of the test schedule for various things. Certainly not the current general perception of Subie out there. I do not recall the model or even the magazine name, sadly. But I was pretty stunned to read that, based on all the general perception.

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    I really only look at the current car mags on the drug store newsstand. I was just there and couldn't find it. I don't like when people post stuff without any substantiation, so ignore that post of mine! LOL
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    andre, the round instruments were used when introduced on the '77 full-size Chevys. It wasn't until '85 they started using the square instruments. Here's the '84:

    http://www.oldcarbrochures.org/United States/Chevrolet/1984-Chevrolet/1984-Chevrolet-Caprice--Impala-Brochure/slides/1984_Chevrolet_Caprice_Classic__Impala-06-07.html

    As I've mentioned several times here, I always liked the gloss black panel above the glovebox, and the Parisienne got this. To my eyes, it's a break from test-tube woodgrain and hard, grained plastic.

    Speaking of glovebox--the ones in those cars were pretty useless. A pet peeve of my Dad's, and mine too, was when the owner's manual wouldn't fit in the glovebox.

    It's pretty amazing to me that Car and Driver had the '83 Caprice Classic on their "Ten Best Cars" list, in the seventh year of the iteration, and especially that it was a full-size domestic. I'll always like the '77-79 cars best of the run.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • tjc78tjc78 Member Posts: 16,938
    Wife learned to drive stick a lot like @kyfdx taught his son. Her stepdad helped her buy an ex-rental Datsun 210 with a stick. When the transaction was complete, he flipped her the keys and said "see you at home". Wife had it all figured out quickly, and drove nothing but stick shifts until I met her.

    My Grandfather did that with my Aunt. She wanted a stick shift as her first car. He bought her a Datsun (I don't remember which one) and once she got her license in his Cadillac she taught herself the manual.

    To this day, still drives one (Honda Fit)

    2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    Same Cosworth I posted earlier, sold for much-more money not long afterwards, apparently...$25.3K. I would love to own this car, a 2.0 liter, 16 valve, twin overhead cam, fuel injected, light car with near-perfect cornering, built 40+ years ago down the road from me. Wouldn't supercede my dream Studebaker list, but would come soon after.

    https://www.mecum.com/lots/FL0119-356520/1976-chevrolet-cosworth-vega/?fbclid=IwAR334wwtZ7NvnuPvimbZdFNstlmZjGd7ROYPk3u4K8V1eVMv8GntYlKOkX4

    Comments from Oct. '76 Road Test posted by the admin of the Facebook Vega and H-Body forum, which I find interesting. I'm sure they're cherry-picked, but still interesting. The sticker price I found startling to say the least, back then when I saw the single one our dealer got in.

    "Cosworth Vega is the only American car worthy of the lot. It is more than just some little super coupe...the one thing with the Cosworth that sets it apart from the others is the engine. Stock it has 110 horsepower but it should be good for at least 200 and still be streetable." "The results are in Figure 2. Read 'em and weep, all you foreign-is-better nuts, because right there at the top, and by a long way at that, is the Cosworth Vega. It had the fastest 0-60 time, the fastest quarter-mile time, and tied with the Saab for the shortest braking distance". "Cosworth: The least body roll complemented the power-provoked oversteer"

    Supposedly, the test pitted Alfa, Mazda, Lancia and Saab versus the Cosworth. The Facebook page doesn't list models, unfortunately.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • kyfdxkyfdx Moderator Posts: 265,419
    Read 'em and weep, all you foreign-is-better nuts,

    Where do they think Cosworth engines originate? :D

    Edmunds Price Checker
    Edmunds Lease Calculator
    Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!

    Edmunds Moderator

  • omarmanomarman Member Posts: 2,702
    Spacely Sprockets and Co[g]sworth Cogs? The Jetsons right?

    I only know this because Orbit City is on Indianola in Columbus. :)


    A time to embrace, and a time to refrain from embracing.
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    "Chevrolet developed the car's all-aluminum inline-four 122 cu in (1,999 cc) engine, and British company Cosworth Engineering designed the DOHC cylinder head." Engines were assembled in Tonawanda, NY and the car was assembled in rural Lordstown, Ohio.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852

    Spacely Sprockets and Co[g]sworth Cogs? The Jetsons right?


    Good one! I loved the play on words from that show, and the Flintstones.

    Almost too many to quote: Dean Martian, Gina Lollajupiter, Stony Curtis, Rock Hudstone, etc.

    Omar, I apparently forgot that you were from Columbus. Daughter and son-in-law both teach at Hilliard.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • roadburnerroadburner Member Posts: 18,317
    A couple of friends in CCA had Cosworth Vegas. Apparently more than a few were converted to sidedraft Webers. Trashing the cat also produced a big gain. None of the cars it was pitted against in that article were all that great, with the exception of the SAAB 99. I can't think of a single 1976 car I would want to own. Now move up a couple of years and there was the Z28, 911 Turbo, and E24 6er to name a few. Those were outstanding cars.

    Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
    Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
    Son's: 2018 330i xDrive

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    kyfdx said:

    Read 'em and weep, all you foreign-is-better nuts,

    Where do they think Cosworth engines originate? :D

    Just curious, did the whole engine come from the UK, or just the head? According to Wikipedia, GM designed the engine, and Cosworth Engineering did the head. I wonder which part was more troublesome...the block or the head? :p
  • fintailfintail Member Posts: 58,408
    edited March 2020
    1976 is a tough year for cars. MB diesels were slow and gassers had troublesome emissions junk. Other Germans had similar issues. Japanese cars dissolved in harsh climates. British cars dissolved on contact with air. Domestics were mostly pre-downsized with emasculated big engines. Everything had big bumpers.
  • ab348ab348 Member Posts: 20,264

    I can't think of a single 1976 car I would want to own.

    I can, but for reasons very different than what yours would be. In '76 I was about to graduate from university and had no money of my own. The local Pontiac dealer used a large empty lot nearby for new-car storage, and I would often haunt that on weekends to satisfy my car curiosity. One day I saw a car there that hit me right between the eyes and I have never forgotten it. A '76 Firebird, Lime Green metallic with a green and yellow over the roof tape stripe, white bucket seat interior, console, rally wheels, 350. It just looked *so good* to my young eyes at that point in time. I wanted it so, so badly. If it reappeared today I might have to buy it. This pic is of a poor example but the only one I could find.




    2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6

  • andre1969andre1969 Member Posts: 26,022
    I'll confess that there's plenty of '76 model year cars I'd like to own, but then I do tend to go for the big'uns. And, I always had a thing for the '76-77 LeMans. But yeah, for the most part, performance sucked. I read somewhere that even with the 455, a '76 LeMans was only good for 0-60 in around 10 seconds. I remember an old MT or C&D test of the '77 police cars, and they tested a LeMans Enforcer with the 400, and 0-60 was something like 11.4 or 11.8 seconds...geeze, no wonder Buford T. Justice couldn't catch the Bandit!
  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    edited March 2020
    Actually, andre, I never have heard of problems with a Cosworth Vega engine.

    There are quite a few '76 cars I could like to own, as well. Still, IMHO, an era of (some) automobiles as 'art' over function. And sometimes...that's OK.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
  • sdasda Member Posts: 7,570
    I think the 73-74s were the worst performance, drivability, gas mileage wise. That improved pretty much year by year, and when fuel injection became the norm, things really improved. I remember our 73 Grand Am 400 2bbl would often cough, stumble and stall when started from cold. Letting it run for a couple of minutes helped but no guarantee that it would run well until fully warmed up. My 76 Sunbird V6 was cold natured, too. Come to think of so was my 82 Skylark V6. None had fuel injection.

    2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech

  • uplanderguyuplanderguy Member Posts: 16,852
    Our '73 Nova six was terrible when cold. Our '74 Impala 350 2-barrel was much, much better. The general wisdom is that driveability (at least on GM cars) improved quite a bit in '75 with the catalytic converter, unleaded fuel, and electronic ignition. My Dad deliberately bought a late '74 because he didn't want to fuss with unleaded fuel, LOL.
    2024 Chevrolet Corvette Stingray 2LT; 2019 Chevrolet Equinox LT; 2015 Chevrolet Cruze LS
This discussion has been closed.