Edmunds dealer partner, Bayway Leasing, is now offering transparent lease deals via these forums. Click here to see May lease deals!
Options
Honda Civic: Problems & Solutions
This discussion has been closed.
Popular New Cars
Popular Used Sedans
Popular Used SUVs
Popular Used Pickup Trucks
Popular Used Hatchbacks
Popular Used Minivans
Popular Used Coupes
Popular Used Wagons
Comments
I replaced it with an '02 hatch Si. It's very different but every bit as lovable. The shifter position I like better; and the flat floor, HB space, and outside access to the rear I find much more convenient. As you probably know, the HB is torquier, smoother, heavier, and stiffer; so, it feels a bit less like a screaming 'sports car'. As a fun daily driver, I think the HB is a better car though I also think it has a bit less potential as a sports car than the coupe. The thing I like least about the HB is the black interior; everything shows.
Paying less for the HB than the coupe doesn't hurt, either. FWIW, I think the HB at MSRP is a major marketing flub which becomes a major bargain at street price.
I run the recommended pressures (32 front, 30 rear), and I'm pleased though my taste runs to road feel over smooth.
What color, BTW?
Is your car a sedan or coupe? Did you notice any scratches, chips, or damage to the rear window before it shattered?
Thanks to Ncampbell 2002 for info on service required light.
I kinda doubt a stick would improve your highway mileage much, unless it were geared taller. You're doing great as it is.
Suspension you like, tranny and hp less than optimum, the gal you like
vs.
Suspension you like, optimal tranny and hp, no gal that you like
You pays your money and makes your call, LOL. IMO, you done good.
(My gal leaves the driving to me, so I get it all [except the mpg, of course]. LOL)
If it's a choice right hp and tranny vs. right gal, only an idiot would do different.
Will
I checked the fuses, and they look fine. My lights were not left on to drain the battery. The dealer is closed today. Any ideas?
Sidenote, I'm not convinced that the Firestone issue previously was their fault purely. Ford was equally at fault for not specing the proper air pressure, and owners for not properly maintianing their tire, it was unfortunate no one really stepped up to the plate. I guess Ford is richer/stronger and they got less of a bad rap for their poor decision and partially poor design on their part.
http://www.caranddriver.com/article.asp?section_id=4&article_- - id=3604&page_number=1
Also
http://theserviceadvisor.com/octane.htm
It simply states you can't extract more power from a car requiring regular by using premium. It too bad the article is missing info as I remember the results of the V6 Accord showed slightly slower acceleration using premium over regular fuel. Premium is more of a placebo effect on the driver unless the car specfically requires it.
Car and driver tried to simulate the roll over "problem." They determined the problem was the driver. Even though Ford indicated lower pressure for the tires on the door jamb than Bridgestone/Firestone specified, an attentive driver would have been able to avoid roll over. Driving an SUV with your knees while talking on the cell phone and drinking coffee will make any vehicle flip in case of tire blow out. Chances are, that people who did have roll over never checked the air in their tires.
Yokohamas are good tires for the price (check out www.tirerack.com) I had Avid T4 on my CR-V, and while it was excellent for wet and dry, it was terrible in snow. The Avids were labeled as High performance all season tires. Once the Mischelins on the Si wear out, I will most definately get Yokohamas again, but only as spring/summer/fall tire and get a separate winter set.
By the way, buying tires on line is not as bad as people think it is. I had mine shipped to work, took them to Costco to have tires mounted for $10/tire with lifetime rotation and balancing. For $240 ($42/tireX4+$30 for shipping+$40 for installation) I had the tires shipped and mounted. A local shop that carries Yokohamas, wanted almost $90/tire plus $10 for installation for a total of $400. Most stores don't carry Yokohama tires for some reason.
I just follow the manual written by engineers who state additives add to the cost of running the vehicle as does premium fuel. Personally if I wanted more performance then the car offers I would not have bought a Honda Civic. I would have bought an Integra or anything else with more power using regular fuel and no additives. When I need more performance I just rev the engine higher as the EX model is okay.
Anyway I agree I have never tried it. You should state that its potentially a costly upgrade for minimal performance upgrade if any more of a perception thing. Sorry I'm an engineer/scientist.
Nick
Did you use a different gasoline brand lately? Here is my story:
My 2002 Civic EX is 45000 miles.I always use 76 gas . Another day, I filled my Civic with Shell. After a day, I heard whistling noise louder and louder every day. I suspected either the gas or the brake that caused the noise. So, I ordered on Internet the brake set. The next gas tank I filled it with 76. The noise is less and less. After the third gas tank with 76, the noise was gone. I still keep the brake for future use. I concluded that we should use only one gas brand for our car.
Thanks for the advice I would of never thought the whistling noise could come from using different gas brands. I will start using only one brand and tell you what happens. Thanks again.
It's a PLACEBO!!