Did you recently take on (or consider) a loan of 84 months or longer on a car purchase?
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
A reporter would like to speak with you about your experience; please reach out to PR@Edmunds.com by 7/22 for details.
Options
Comments
I believe that car is as-advertised. We’re talking about mid-sixties.
That entire auction was widely publicized and there were a lot of various ‘new’ Chevy cars and trucks with miles like this.
They did have that weird looking Tercel wagon, which I think came in AWD.
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and share!
Edmunds Moderator
Saw an older (‘00’s?) Accord today in town with a broken ball joint. When I see that, it’s invariably a Honda. Although, lots of poor college kids here driving beaters.
I think that looks a bit odd, but also the rear, the way the beltline kicks up at the thick D-pillar. The car looks kind of tail heavy. I think the '92 restyle added about 9-10 inches to the overall length, but wheelbase went up by less than a half inch, so the car had more overhang than in the past. I think the sedan handles it pretty well, but with the wagon it's more noticeable.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
Mine: 1995 318ti Club Sport-2020 C43-1996 Speed Triple Challenge Cup Replica
Wife's: 2021 Sahara 4xe
Son's: 2018 330i xDrive
And, yeah, the third generation's wagon was truly one of the worst (visual) efforts by any maker.
Saw an oddity in traffic today - 58 Buick 2 door HT, apparent restomod. Immaculate looking cosmetics. On old style wire wheels like on a period Mopar, but the rear end was sitting too high, like a 60s hot rod. Or maybe some kind of air suspension issue? I expected it to make noise when passing by, but it was almost silent.
You'd think with repairs to that fender, they would've handled that rub mark right on the feature line.
I remember some of the cars stored inside were covered with decades of grime, but after a good wash, looked much-better. I'm sure the car has been detailed and touched up.
I'm sure there's the usual FB 'experts' on the original listing going, "yeah, that's 100,010 miles", LOL.
I spotted tjos Cougar not too long ago. Thought it was interesting with the Cobra grill but so far my research indicates that it was owner added.
The dialogue in there was interesting. I remember looking at one a long time ago as a late model used car and I didnt like it becuase it felt like an old car to me, opposite of modern. Maybe because the one I drive was bench seat 6 cyl, but it felt like a 70s car to me, not in a good way. That was maybe partially because I never like the Ford ergonomics at that time.
Off-topic, but has anyone seen the new flick, “The Life Of Chuck”, based on a Stephen King “novella”? I have mixed feelings about it but it drew me in immediately. In a modern-day traffic scene, “Christine” is present.
No, just opened in theaters June 13. We were the only people in the theater on a Sunday afternoon. It was Twilight Zone-y.
Also saw a 60 Pontiac 2 door post, 70s style custom with a very sparkly metalflake paint job and mag wheels.
Very nice AMX. I like those.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
The interiors disappoint I think, in typical AMC fashion for me.
But the exterior, spot-on IMHO.
The only other AMC's I like a lot are the '74 and later Matador coupes. I know they're weird, but they were pretty different.
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.
This in a time capsule 1988 (that's a thing now, time flies) house:
In a 50s house:
And a mystery car - whatever it is, it looks gigantic and I see a wide whitewall peeking out in the back. Maybe a big Lincoln or Cadillac:
Oh, does anybody know, roughly, what the trunk of a 90-100 foot pine tree would weigh? We had a storm come through yesterday evening, and it gave me this treat...
I asked Alexa, and she said roughly 4000-5500 lb. I thought it would be heavier. Anyway, in my mind, I'm thinking it *might* work, since I'm not actually dragging the full weight of it, but rather pivoting it. Or, is this a potential "Hold mah beer and watch THIS!" moment?
Be careful cutting off the limbs, some may be under tension.
Yeah, you might get away with a longer cut, but I'd definitely try to limit the weight to about 2000# per section that you're trying to move. Since the truck itself is not on the best surface for good friction, and the log will have a whole lot of friction if you're trying to drag it sideways, a pulley attached to a tree would half the weight to assist the truck.
Maybe take some smaller pieces (firewood sized) and fill the back of the truck in order to give the truck better traction. Also consider using a kinetic rope if you have access to it to help give some torque multiplication to start it moving. Very doable!
And, on the tree again.... maybe just cut it up and put an ad out there that someone can have it for free in exchange for cleaning it up? That's good firewood, and people are always after firewood. At least... around here!
https://www.zillow.com/homedetails/2621-E-19th-Ave-Spokane-WA-99223/23530195_zpid/
I second the idea about putting up an ad for free wood - I know locally you'd get rid of it in no time.
2021 VW Arteon SEL 4-motion, 2018 VW Passat SE w/tech, 2016 Audi Q5 Premium Plus w/tech
and it can be in your garage under a cover.
2014 Malibu 2LT, 2015 Cruze 2LT,
Edmunds Price Checker
Edmunds Lease Calculator
Did you get a good deal? Be sure to come back and let us know! Post a pic of your new purchase or lease!
MODERATOR
2015 Subaru Outback 3.6R / 2024 Kia Sportage Hybrid SX Prestige
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
56K seems low for a Mark II. IMO a nearly perfectly styled vehicle.
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
That picture is epic! Old girl still moves too!
2025 Ram 1500 Laramie 4x4 / 2023 Mercedes EQE 350 4Matic
And, full disclosure, a friend of snapped the pic, not me...don't want y'all to think I was doing anything (too) stupid!
Did Pontiac call those wheels "Rally II"? That's what I seem to remember. Were they available in '67? I'm fuzzy on that. I seem to remember thinking '68 on the big cars, but not sure.
Regardless, they look great on the car.
My Catalina originally had the slotted hubcaps, like what the bottom drawing shows. They were for a 14" wheel. I remember my old '69 Bonneville having hubcaps that looked like what the white Ventura 4-door hardtop is sporting. It can be hard to tell from an illustration where they sometimes distort things, but I wonder if those are 15" rims? If you got disc brakes, you needed 15" rims, as the 14" wouldn't clear the caliper, so I wonder if the bottom is what you got standard, and the middle is what you got standard, if you ordered disc brakes?
I looked through the '67 brochure, and they didn't show any illustrations of the full-sized cars sporting a Rally II. They were all either hubcaps, or those 8-lug wheels. The Rally II WAS offered in the smaller bolt pattern though, as an option for the Firebird and midsized cars.
On a different subject, on FB someone posted a lime green '76 Vega Kammback that looked new in every respect. I still like the looks, and the reliability was WAY improved by that time. Someone posted under it, flatly, "Not a Kammback. Those were the panel trucks. This is a station wagon".
I replied, "Wrong. Kammback is the wagon. The panel was the 'Panel Express'. Easily verifiable by the brochures online".
His response: "Nope".
A few people 'liked' my comment.
I wished to reply to his "nope", "Dope", but I didn't.
Man, car stupidity on Facebook is rampant.
A big Pontiac wheel cover I always loved was the upscale '66 wheel cover with spinner. I know that would've been for drum brakes.
2017 Cadillac ATS Performance Premium 3.6
2020 Acura RDX tech SH-AWD, 2023 Maverick hybrid Lariat luxury package.