Edmunds Members - Cars and Conversations

roadburner · October 26

As I've said before, If I had no choice but to drive a CUV I think that I would be reasonably content with a GLC 43 or -preferably- a GLC 63.

Michaell · October 26

laurasdada said:
The new KitchenAid DW was delivered Thursday, GE unceremoniously hauled away. The installer was focused, professional. He said he triple checked everything, should be no issues. Ran a light load the next day and miracle of miracles, it appeared to have washed the dishes! And it was almost completely dry inside.

Fingers crossed that the Covid GE fridge (compressor died after 5 months, fixed and fine since), range and nuclear oven continue to work for many more years.

Our new W/D for the basement laundry space are scheduled to be delivered between 8-10 tomorrow morning. If the daughter likes them enough, we may pull the trigger and order them as replacements for the main laundry room.

suydam · October 26

Let her look at a new Kia Sportage hybrid. Edmunds just did a comparo with it, the CR-V and the new 2026 RAV4 and it blew them out of the water.

I like our Kia Sportage PHEV. Our neighbor has the Hyundai Tucson PHEV which is also nice.
I do prefer the Chevy Blazer EV to both of them but it is a bigger vehicle. Depends on what size you are looking for. A compromise between a sedan and an SUV might be the Subaru Outback. Sits up higher but looks more like a station wagon.
And speaking of Costco, they often have coupons for certain auto brands. We got $1000 off the Blazer EV. They also have great deals on rental cars. It’s not just what’s in the warehouse. We also get our prescriptions filled there and eye exams and glasses too.

kyfdx · October 26

stickguy said:
nice pro tip there!

Also, optical department

oldfarmer50 · 1:21AM

ab348 said:
I’m surprised how tight the rear seat seems to be.

Let her look at a new Kia Sportage hybrid. Edmunds just did a comparo with it, the CR-V and the new 2026 RAV4 and it blew them out of the water.

We recently drove a GLC back from NJ. The guy in the back seat abandoned us to ride in the back seat of a Kia Forte. It was that cramped.

oldfarmer50 · 1:27AM

ab348 said:
Reliability is a used often as a slur towards H/K vehicles, and in the past I too would have subscribed to that feeling. But from what I gather they aren’t awful these days. The RAV is such a penalty box to drive and its interior is so cheap-feeling and noisy it seems like a worthwhile trade-off to me.

The engines are still iffy based on all the recalls (I have another one tomorrow) but they certainly load them up with tech. If I had known about all the problems Kia has with their engines I might have bought the Mitsubishi Outlander Sport I was considering despite the CVT.

stickguy · 3:24AM

Some of the engines are definitely a weak spot. But these days GM and even Toyota have been having massive issues with engine failures.

benjaminh · 4:05AM

snakeweasel said:
Since I am planning on retiring within 2 years She Who Must Be Obeyed and I decided that since all our vehicles are over 10 years old that it would be a good idea to get a new car before retirement. I would like a midsized sedan she wants an SUV which means we will get an SUV.

Anyway I had the great idea to go to CarMax so we can look at several makes at one location. Big mistake as my wife fell in love with this:

https://www.carmax.com/car/27949596

Anyway looks like a mid sized SUV is in our future. Any suggestions from the crew?

I like that Mercedes. But if you're planning to keep it for ten years odds are that you'll have expensive repairs in that time. Since she picked out a Mercedes it's maybe unlikely you could get her to test drive an Outback, but they are nice vehicles inside and out. It's easy to get $3k off of list on the last of the 2025s + 0.9% financing from Subaru. I've gotten the 10 year/100k 0 deductible Subaru bumper to bumper warranty for $2500 additional, and so no worries about repairs for a very long time.

venture · 7:34AM

The dryer guy came this morning. Replaced the belt. 15 minutes. $150. I was in the wrong profession.

Michaell · 8:03AM

venture said:
The dryer guy came this morning. Replaced the belt. 15 minutes. $150. I was in the wrong profession.

I know we generally only see the revenue side of the business, but as a small business owner, I'm sensitive to the costs, as well.

How much does he have invested in parts inventory? Maintenance and gas for the truck? Insurance? All these things to into the pricing of his time.

We're having a problem with our garbage disposal - or, more correctly, the outlet into which its plugged. Only one of the sockets work that's under the sink, and since the disposal is plugged into one and the dishwasher into the other, we can only use one at a time. It's a hassle, but not debilitating. Got a guy coming out tomorrow morning to look into it. Not sure what it will cost, but it will be worth it.

corvette · 8:12AM

@Michaell - I'm sure you've thought of this, but is one of the outlets switched?

Michaell · 8:54AM

corvette said:
@Michaell - I'm sure you've thought of this, but is one of the outlets switched?

Nope.

tjc78 · 9:45AM

@Michaell

Couple a things to check -

1 - Is there a GFCI reset under there (not on the outlet, but a separate unit)
2 - Double check the breaker it is on - turn it off and back on even if it doesn't look tripped (it may be a GFCI)
3 - If the outlets aren't switched, how do you turn your GD on/off? Air Switch?
4 - You just had a ton of work done in your basement... assuming they worked in the panel, there could have been a loose wire on the neutral bar or breaker and they disrupted it.

This is the device I'm talking about. It is a standalone GFCI button (we have this on our whirlpool tub)

tjc78 · 9:46AM

venture said:
The dryer guy came this morning. Replaced the belt. 15 minutes. $150. I was in the wrong profession.

Quite frankly... that's cheap. Not much money in any technician showing up for less than $100 service call and a 20-30% markup on parts.

andres3 · 10:01AM

snakeweasel said:

andres3 said:

The measure of exposure matters: some studies show crashes per mile may fall as speed increases (because you spend fewer miles/time on the road for a fixed trip), which is exactly what I'm talking about above.

However, I have to concede there's some data where crashes per hour (time-based) tend to rise with speed. This creates the apparent paradox you noted. See Pei et al. (2012) and related work.

I believe this suggests that the benefit of reducing hazards by reducing your time-exposure to "incidents" is limited to your ability to not lose focus and become fatigued. Of course, you don't have to last without fatigue as long if you get to your destination sooner!!!!
Trying to keep this short, I have gone over this and I believe that they are looking at this all wrong. They seem to be looking simply by exposure to risk and not in changes to risk due to speed differences. Below is from the link:

"The results indicate that average speed plays a significant role in crash risk, despite opposing correlations with respect to distance and time exposure; the correlation between speed and crash risk is positive when distance exposure is considered, but negative when time exposure is used."

This can create a paradox as if two drivers are going down a street and one is going further and faster both can be safer than the other one by less exposure due to distance and one by time.

This fully ignores the laws of physics that state that the amount of energy excerted by an object increases exponentially with it increase in speed. i.e. a car doing 40 MPH has 4 times the energy than one doing 20 MPH. With that increase in energy the vehicle becomes harder to control.

Physics is never ignored in the real world by reasonable people, unless they have their head in the sand. Good drivers don't lose control, so your exponential kinetic energy is multiplied by zero and therefore a zero factor. (noting the true value may not be absolute zero in a post above). There is no "harder" to control for good drivers. You are either in control or you are not in control. I know I can't turn as hard as suddenly at 100 MPH as at 10 MPH. That's a known readily apparent condition. So you don't lose control. The key is understanding and having experience with how your car handles near or at the limits for both of those speeds. Knowledge is power.

Yes, it takes longer to stop, it takes more distance traveled to react, but reaction time is not a heavy factor (or at least not as heavy as the common conventional wisdom thinks) - and that explains the real world data. Heavier factors could be a combination of the fact bad drivers and/or wild animals may not give you any time to react (another any number multiplied by zero equals zero equation). Or if they do give you time not sufficient time to avoid a wreck even if you were going slower than the speed limit. Making yourself harder to hit by making yourself less available to be hit clearly has weight towards reducing safety risks.

If fast things weren't harder to hit, there's no reason a major-league pitcher would throw 100 MPH fastballs.

Looking at the quantity of crashes in the real-world ignores nothing. It's a valid way to record and analyze real-world data rather than speculate with statistical models based on absurd assumptions and presumptions.

More crashes = bad.
Less crashes = good.

jmonroe1 · 10:11AM

Michaell said:

venture said:
The dryer guy came this morning. Replaced the belt. 15 minutes. $150. I was in the wrong profession.
I know we generally only see the revenue side of the business, but as a small business owner, I'm sensitive to the costs, as well.

How much does he have invested in parts inventory? Maintenance and gas for the truck? Insurance? All these things to into the pricing of his time.

We're having a problem with our garbage disposal - or, more correctly, the outlet into which it’s plugged. Only one of the sockets work that's under the sink, and since the disposal is plugged into one and the dishwasher into the other, we can only use one at a time. It's a hassle, but not debilitating. Got a guy coming out tomorrow morning to look into it. Not sure what it will cost, but it will be worth it.

————————————————
A disposal and dishwasher should not be on the same circuit. It’s highly unlikely that each half of the receptacle is on its own breaker but it is possible to do that and if it is done, I don’t think the code allows it.

The fix for you is a new circuit being installed with its own receptacle. Hold onto your wallet.

jmonroe

kyfdx · 10:28AM

I don't understand how you have a disposal without a switch?

andres3 · 10:31AM

stickguy said:
random thought on this. often times when people are driving faster on the highway it is because traffic is light. And if there aren't many other cars on the road, odds of an accident go down a lot. So as always, conditions matter.

Correct, but only for vehicle to vehicle collisions. Conditions exponentially x exponentially X EXPONENTIALLY matter though, cannot emphasize enough appropriate speed for conditions.

You can still be hit by a lighting bolt (reducing time exposure effective here), or by a landing airplane (higher speed might help you not get rear ended here), or some other "act of God" as they say. Animals are not a thing on Interstates near me, but that might be different in other areas without walled off limited access freeways and constant traffic.

Michaell · 11:34AM

Ok I had too many things going on this morning with my earlier response. Yes, the disposal is on a switch, mounted in the cabinet under the sink.

Yes, lots of electrical work has been done. The basement has its own breaker panel in the space under the stairs, and the outside box has a master 30amp breaker clearly labeled.

It seems as if one of the outlets under the sink no longer works. I’ll let you all know what I learn tomorrow after the guy comes out.

stickguy · 11:38AM

So there are 2 outlets under the sink? That makes sense. Though you can have an outlet that is half switched.

Edmunds Members - Cars and Conversations

Comments

Helpful Tools

Most popular vehicles

Your Privacy